1
|
van Velzen M, de Graaf-Waar HI, Ubert T, van der Willigen RF, Muilwijk L, Schmitt MA, Scheper MC, van Meeteren NLU. 21st century (clinical) decision support in nursing and allied healthcare. Developing a learning health system: a reasoned design of a theoretical framework. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2023; 23:279. [PMID: 38053104 PMCID: PMC10699040 DOI: 10.1186/s12911-023-02372-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2023] [Accepted: 11/09/2023] [Indexed: 12/07/2023] Open
Abstract
In this paper, we present a framework for developing a Learning Health System (LHS) to provide means to a computerized clinical decision support system for allied healthcare and/or nursing professionals. LHSs are well suited to transform healthcare systems in a mission-oriented approach, and is being adopted by an increasing number of countries. Our theoretical framework provides a blueprint for organizing such a transformation with help of evidence based state of the art methodologies and techniques to eventually optimize personalized health and healthcare. Learning via health information technologies using LHS enables users to learn both individually and collectively, and independent of their location. These developments demand healthcare innovations beyond a disease focused orientation since clinical decision making in allied healthcare and nursing is mainly based on aspects of individuals' functioning, wellbeing and (dis)abilities. Developing LHSs depends heavily on intertwined social and technological innovation, and research and development. Crucial factors may be the transformation of the Internet of Things into the Internet of FAIR data & services. However, Electronic Health Record (EHR) data is in up to 80% unstructured including free text narratives and stored in various inaccessible data warehouses. Enabling the use of data as a driver for learning is challenged by interoperability and reusability.To address technical needs, key enabling technologies are suitable to convert relevant health data into machine actionable data and to develop algorithms for computerized decision support. To enable data conversions, existing classification and terminology systems serve as definition providers for natural language processing through (un)supervised learning.To facilitate clinical reasoning and personalized healthcare using LHSs, the development of personomics and functionomics are useful in allied healthcare and nursing. Developing these omics will be determined via text and data mining. This will focus on the relationships between social, psychological, cultural, behavioral and economic determinants, and human functioning.Furthermore, multiparty collaboration is crucial to develop LHSs, and man-machine interaction studies are required to develop a functional design and prototype. During development, validation and maintenance of the LHS continuous attention for challenges like data-drift, ethical, technical and practical implementation difficulties is required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark van Velzen
- Data Supported Healthcare: Data-Science unit, Research Center Innovations in care, Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
- Department of Anesthesiology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Helen I de Graaf-Waar
- Data Supported Healthcare: Data-Science unit, Research Center Innovations in care, Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Anesthesiology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Tanja Ubert
- Institute for Communication, media and information Technology, Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Robert F van der Willigen
- Institute for Communication, media and information Technology, Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Lotte Muilwijk
- Data Supported Healthcare: Data-Science unit, Research Center Innovations in care, Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
- Institute for Communication, media and information Technology, Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Maarten A Schmitt
- Data Supported Healthcare: Data-Science unit, Research Center Innovations in care, Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Mark C Scheper
- Data Supported Healthcare: Data-Science unit, Research Center Innovations in care, Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Anesthesiology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
- Allied Health professions, faculty of medicine and science, Macquarrie University, Sydney, Australia
| | - Nico L U van Meeteren
- Department of Anesthesiology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
- Top Sector Life Sciences and Health (Health~Holland), The Hague, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Easterling D, Perry AC, Woodside R, Patel T, Gesell SB. Clarifying the concept of a learning health system for healthcare delivery organizations: Implications from a qualitative analysis of the scientific literature. Learn Health Syst 2022; 6:e10287. [PMID: 35434353 PMCID: PMC9006535 DOI: 10.1002/lrh2.10287] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2021] [Revised: 07/01/2021] [Accepted: 07/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
The "learning health system" (LHS) concept has been defined in broad terms, which makes it challenging for health system leaders to determine exactly what is required to transform their organization into an LHS. This study provides a conceptual map of the LHS landscape by identifying the activities, principles, tools, and conditions that LHS researchers have associated with the concept. Through a multi-step screening process, two researchers identified 79 publications from PubMed (published before January 2020) that contained information relevant to the question, "What work is required of a healthcare organization that is operating as an LHS?" Those publications were coded as to whether or not they referenced each of 94 LHS elements in the taxonomy developed by the study team. This taxonomy, named the Learning Health Systems Consolidated Framework (LHS-CF), organizes the elements into five "bodies of work" (organizational learning, translation of evidence into practice, building knowledge, analyzing clinical data, and engaging stakeholders) and four "enabling conditions" (workforce skilled for LHS work, data systems and informatics technology in place, organization invests resources in LHS work, and supportive organizational culture). We report the frequency that each of the 94 elements was referenced across the 79 publications. The four most referenced elements were: "organization builds knowledge or evidence," "quality improvement practices are standard practice," "patients and family members are actively engaged," and "organizational culture emphasizes and supports learning." By dissecting the LHS construct into its component elements, the LHS-CF taxonomy can serve as a useful tool for LHS researchers and practitioners in defining the aspects of LHS they are addressing. By assessing how often each element is referenced in the literature, the study provides guidance to health system leaders as to how their organization needs to evolve in order to become an LHS - while also recognizing that each organization should emphasize elements that are most aligned with their mission and goals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Douglas Easterling
- Department of Social Sciences and Health PolicyWake Forest School of MedicineWinston‐SalemNorth CarolinaUSA
| | - Anna C. Perry
- Wake Forest Clinical and Translational Science Institute, Wake Forest School of MedicineWinston‐SalemNorth CarolinaUSA
| | - Rachel Woodside
- Wake Forest Clinical and Translational Science Institute, Wake Forest School of MedicineWinston‐SalemNorth CarolinaUSA
| | - Tanha Patel
- North Carolina Translational and Clinical Sciences InstituteUniversity of North Carolina School of MedicineChapel HillNorth CarolinaUSA
| | - Sabina B. Gesell
- Department of Social Sciences and Health PolicyWake Forest School of MedicineWinston‐SalemNorth CarolinaUSA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gladding PA, Patrick A, Manley P, Mash L, Shepherd P, Murphy R, Vilas-Boas S, Schlegel TT. Personalized hypertension management in practice. Per Med 2015; 12:297-311. [DOI: 10.2217/pme.14.83] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
The revolution occurring in genomic and personalized medicine is likely to have a significant impact on the management of hypertension. However, from the perspective of translating new knowledge into clinical practice, progress has been slow. This review article summarizes recent advances in hypertension-related diagnostics while also offering new perspective on hypertension management for the future. Such new perspectives will likely require a paradigm shift toward more integrated and holistic approaches for better prevention and treatment of hypertension in both individuals and the population as a whole.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick A Gladding
- Theranostics Laboratory, North Shore Hospital, Shakespeare Rd, Auckland, New Zealand
| | | | - Paul Manley
- MacMurray Hypertension Clinic Ltd, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Laura Mash
- MacMurray Hypertension Clinic Ltd, Auckland, New Zealand
| | | | - Rinki Murphy
- Department of Medicine, University of Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Silas Vilas-Boas
- Centre for Microbial Innovation, University of Auckland, New Zealand
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hirsch BR, Zafar SY. Comparative effectiveness research: moving medical oncology forward. Semin Radiat Oncol 2014; 24:49-53. [PMID: 24314342 DOI: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2013.08.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
Comparative effectiveness research (CER) is critically needed in medical oncology to improve the care being delivered to oncology patients. As medical oncologists are forced to rely on insufficient data as a part of daily treatment decision making, and as the cancer treatment landscape evolves quickly relative to other areas of medicine, CER is particularly pressing in our field. Continued reliance on randomized clinical trials is a part of the solution, but it cannot be the sole answer. As new and richer data sources become available addressing quality of life, resource utilization, and other critical elements, the implementation of CER will advance. Its true power will lie in linkages to "learning health systems" and real-time application to the day-to-day practice of medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bradford R Hirsch
- Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC; Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC.
| | | |
Collapse
|