1
|
Patil AS, Levasseur B, Gupta M. Neuromodulation and Habituation: A Literature Review and Conceptional Analysis of Sustaining Therapeutic Efficacy and Mitigating Habituation. Biomedicines 2024; 12:930. [PMID: 38790891 PMCID: PMC11118194 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines12050930] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2024] [Revised: 04/14/2024] [Accepted: 04/18/2024] [Indexed: 05/26/2024] Open
Abstract
Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is a therapeutic modality for the treatment of various chronic pain conditions that has rapidly evolved over the past 50 years. Unfortunately, over time, patients implanted with SCS undergo a habituation phenomenon leading to decreased pain relief. Consequently, the discovery of new stimulation waveforms and SCS applications has been shown to prolong efficacy and reduce explantation rates. This article explores various SCS waveforms, their applications, and proposes a graded approach to habituation mitigation. We suspect the neural habituation phenomenon parallels that seen in pharmacology. Consequently, we urge further exploration of the early introduction of these stimulation strategies to abate spinal cord stimulation habituation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anand S. Patil
- St. Luke’s Rehabilitation Medical Center, Spokane, WA 99202, USA
| | | | - Mayank Gupta
- Neuroscience Research Center, LLC, Overland Park, KS 66215, USA
- Kansas Pain Management, Overland Park, KS 66210, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Yeung AM, Huang J, Nguyen KT, Xu NY, Hughes LT, Agrawal BK, Ejskjaer N, Klonoff DC. Painful Diabetic Neuropathy: The Need for New Approaches. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2024; 18:159-167. [PMID: 36305521 PMCID: PMC10899841 DOI: 10.1177/19322968221132252] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Painful diabetic neuropathy is a common vexing problem for people with diabetes and a costly problem for society. The pathophysiology is not well understood, and no safe and effective mechanistically-based treatment has been identified. Poor glycemic control is a risk factor for painful diabetic neuropathy. Excessive intraneuronal glucose in people with diabetes can be shunted away from physiological glycolysis into multiple pathological pathways associated with neuropathy and pain. The first three treatments that are traditionally offered consist of risk factor reduction, lifestyle modifications, and pharmacological therapy, which includes only three drugs that are approved for this indication by the United States Food and Drug Administration. All of these traditional treatments are often inadequate for relieving neuropathic pain, and thus, new approaches are needed. Modern devices based on neuromodulation technology, which act directly on the nervous system, have been recently cleared by the United States Food and Drug Administration for painful diabetic neuropathy and offer promise as next-in-line therapy when traditional therapies fail.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Nicole Y. Xu
- Diabetes Technology Society, Burlingame, CA, USA
| | - Lorenzo T. Hughes
- Balance Health, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Mills-Peninsula Medical Center, Burlingame, CA, USA
| | | | - Niels Ejskjaer
- Steno Diabetes Center North Denmark and Department of Endocrinology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - David C. Klonoff
- Diabetes Technology Society, Burlingame, CA, USA
- Diabetes Research Institute, Mills-Peninsula Medical Center, San Mateo, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Yeung AM, Huang J, Nguyen KT, Xu NY, Hughes LT, Agrawal BK, Ejskjaer N, Klonoff DC. Spinal Cord Stimulation for Painful Diabetic Neuropathy. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2024; 18:168-192. [PMID: 36384312 PMCID: PMC10899837 DOI: 10.1177/19322968221133795] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) technology has been recently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for painful diabetic neuropathy (PDN). The treatment involves surgical implantation of electrodes and a power source that delivers electrical current to the spinal cord. This treatment decreases the perception of pain in many chronic pain conditions, such as PDN. The number of patients with PDN treated with SCS and the amount of data describing their outcomes is expected to increase given four factors: (1) the large number of patients with this diagnosis, (2) the poor results that have been obtained for pain relief with pharmacotherapy and noninvasive non-pharmacotherapy, (3) the results to date with investigational SCS technology, and (4) the recent FDA approval of systems that deliver this treatment. Whereas traditional SCS replaces pain with paresthesias, a new form of SCS, called high-frequency 10-kHz SCS, first used for pain in 2015, can relieve PDN pain without causing paresthesias, although not all patients experience pain relief by SCS. This article describes (1) an overview of SCS technology, (2) the use of SCS for diseases other than diabetes, (3) the use of SCS for PDN, (4) a comparison of high-frequency 10-kHz and traditional SCS for PDN, (5) other SCS technology for PDN, (6) deployment of SCS systems, (7) barriers to the use of SCS for PDN, (8) risks of SCS technology, (9) current recommendations for using SCS for PDN, and (10) future developments in SCS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Nicole Y. Xu
- Diabetes Technology Society, Burlingame, CA, USA
| | - Lorenzo T. Hughes
- Balance Health, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Mills-Peninsula Medical Center, Burlingame, CA, USA
| | | | - Niels Ejskjaer
- Steno Diabetes Center North Denmark and Department of Endocrinology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - David C. Klonoff
- Diabetes Technology Society, Burlingame, CA, USA
- Diabetes Research Institute, Mills-Peninsula Medical Center, San Mateo, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Caussade T, Paduro E, Courdurier M, Cerpa E, Grill WM, Medina LE. Towards a more accurate quasi-static approximation of the electric potential for neurostimulation with kilohertz-frequency sources . J Neural Eng 2023; 20:10.1088/1741-2552/ad1612. [PMID: 38100821 PMCID: PMC10822676 DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/ad1612] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2023] [Accepted: 12/15/2023] [Indexed: 12/17/2023]
Abstract
Objective.Our goal was to determine the conditions for which a more precise calculation of the electric potential than the quasi-static approximation may be needed in models of electrical neurostimulation, particularly for signals with kilohertz-frequency components.Approach.We conducted a comprehensive quantitative study of the differences in nerve fiber activation and conduction block when using the quasi-static and Helmholtz approximations for the electric potential in a model of electrical neurostimulation.Main results.We first show that the potentials generated by sources of unbalanced pulses exhibit different transients as compared to those of charge-balanced pulses, and this is disregarded by the quasi-static assumption. Secondly, relative errors for current-distance curves were below 3%, while for strength-duration curves these ranged between 1%-17%, but could be improved to less than 3% across the range of pulse duration by providing a corrected quasi-static conductivity. Third, we extended our analysis to trains of pulses and reported a 'congruence area' below 700 Hz, where the fidelity of fiber responses is maximal for supra-threshold stimulation. Further examination of waveforms and polarities revealed similar fidelities in the congruence area, but significant differences were observed beyond this area. However, the spike-train distance revealed differences in activation patterns when comparing the response generated by each model. Finally, in simulations of conduction-block, we found that block thresholds exhibited errors above 20% for repetition rates above 10 kHz. Yet, employing a corrected value of the conductivity improved the agreement between models, with errors no greater than 8%.Significance.Our results emphasize that the quasi-static approximation cannot be naively extended to electrical stimulation with high-frequency components, and notable differences can be observed in activation patterns. As well, we introduce a methodology to obtain more precise model responses using the quasi-static approach, retaining its simplicity, which can be a valuable resource in computational neuroengineering.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Caussade
- Instituto de Ingeniería Matemática y Computacional, Facultad de Matemáticas, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago Chile
| | - Esteban Paduro
- Instituto de Ingeniería Matemática y Computacional, Facultad de Matemáticas, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago Chile
| | - Matías Courdurier
- Departamento de Matemática, Facultad de Matemáticas, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - Eduardo Cerpa
- Instituto de Ingeniería Matemática y Computacional, Facultad de Matemáticas, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago Chile
| | - Warren M. Grill
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Department of Neurobiology, Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Leonel E. Medina
- Departamento de Ingeniería Informática, Universidad de Santiago de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Provenzano DA, Park N, Edgar D, Bovinet C, Tate J. High-frequency (10 kHz) spinal cord stimulation (SCS) as a salvage therapy for failed traditional SCS: A narrative review of the available evidence. Pain Pract 2023; 23:301-312. [PMID: 36409060 DOI: 10.1111/papr.13184] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2021] [Revised: 10/12/2022] [Accepted: 10/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Traditional spinal cord stimulation (t-SCS) has been used to treat chronic pain for over 50 years. However, up to 30% of patients undergo explant, with the main indication being loss of efficacy (LoE), and few alternative treatment options exist for these patients. Strategies to mitigate LoE commonly include conversion to another type of SCS (termed 'salvage' or 'rescue'). This review summarizes the existing literature concerning the efficacy and safety of 10 kHz SCS as a salvage therapy. METHODS We searched PubMed, the Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, and other sources between January 2009 and April 2021. Records were retained if the authors reported clinical outcomes with a minimum of ≥ 3 months of follow-up in patients implanted with a Senza® 10 kHz SCS system in an effort to treat t-SCS LoE. RESULTS Ten articles were eligible for inclusion, reporting 3 prospective studies and 7 retrospective reviews. In the single study that salvaged patients without a repeat trial prior to surgery, 81% of patients were responders (≥ 50% pain relief from baseline), with mean pain relief of 60%. Among repeat-trial studies, the responder rate ranged from 46% to 80%, and mean pain relief from 47% to 68%. No unanticipated therapy-related safety issues were reported among the included articles. CONCLUSION Preliminary data suggest that chronic back and/or leg pain patients with t-SCS LoE can experience improved and durable pain relief after conversion to 10 kHz SCS. However, additional research is needed to define predictors of success and establish whether salvage without a repeat trial is a viable conversion method.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Chris Bovinet
- The Spine Center of SE Georgia, Brunswick, Georgia, USA
| | - Jordan Tate
- Southern Pain and Spine, Jasper, Georgia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Shen Z, Beckel J, de Groat WC, Tai C. Effect of high-frequency membrane potential alternation between depolarization and hyperpolarization on dorsal root ganglion neurons of rats. Physiol Rep 2023; 11:e15582. [PMID: 36695759 PMCID: PMC9875814 DOI: 10.14814/phy2.15582] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2022] [Accepted: 01/04/2023] [Indexed: 06/17/2023] Open
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to determine how sensory neurons respond to high-frequency membrane potential alternation between depolarization and hyperpolarization. Membrane currents were recorded from dissociated dorsal root ganglion (DRG) neurons of adult rats using the whole cell patch clamp technique in voltage clamp mode. Stepwise depolarization of the membrane was applied first to determine the threshold membrane potential for inducing an action potential (AP) current. Then, membrane potential alternation between depolarization (to +20 mV) and hyperpolarization (to -110 mV) was applied to the neuron for 10 s at different frequencies (10 Hz to 1 kHz). The tested DRG neurons had APs of either a long duration (>10 ms) or a short duration (<10 ms). Membrane potential alternation at ≥500 Hz completely disrupted the AP generation, disabled the ion channel gating function, and produced membrane current alternating symmetrically across zero. Replacing extracellular sodium with potassium increased the amplitude of the membrane current response and caused the membrane current to be larger during hyperpolarization than during depolarization. These results support the hypothesis that high-frequency biphasic stimulation blocks axonal conduction by driving the potassium channel open constantly. Understanding neural membrane response to high-frequency membrane potential alternation is important to reveal the possible mechanisms underlying axonal conduction block induced by high-frequency biphasic stimulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhijun Shen
- Department of UrologyUniversity of PittsburghPittsburghPennsylvaniaUSA
| | - Jonathan Beckel
- Department of Pharmacology and Chemical BiologyUniversity of PittsburghPittsburghPennsylvaniaUSA
| | - William C. de Groat
- Department of Pharmacology and Chemical BiologyUniversity of PittsburghPittsburghPennsylvaniaUSA
| | - Changfeng Tai
- Department of UrologyUniversity of PittsburghPittsburghPennsylvaniaUSA
- Department of Pharmacology and Chemical BiologyUniversity of PittsburghPittsburghPennsylvaniaUSA
- Department of BioengineeringUniversity of PittsburghPittsburghPennsylvaniaUSA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Martinez S, Veirano F, Constandinou TG, Silveira F. Trends in volumetric-energy efficiency of implantable neurostimulators: a review from a circuits and systems perspective. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMS 2022; PP:2-20. [PMID: 37015536 DOI: 10.1109/tbcas.2022.3228895] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/19/2023]
Abstract
This paper presents a comprehensive review of state-of-the-art, commercially available neurostimulators. We analyse key design parameters and performance metrics of 45 implantable medical devices across six neural target categories: deep brain, vagus nerve, spinal cord, phrenic nerve, sacral nerve and hypoglossal nerve. We then benchmark these alongside modern cardiac pacemaker devices that represent a more established market. This work studies trends in device size, electrode number, battery technology (i.e., primary and secondary use and chemistry), power consumption and longevity. This information is analysed to show the course of design decisions adopted by industry and identifying opportunity for further innovation. We identify fundamental limits in power consumption, longevity and size as well as the interdependencies and trade-offs. We propose a figure of merit to quantify volumetric efficiency within specific therapeutic targets, battery technologies/capacities, charging capabilities and electrode count. Finally, we compare commercially available implantable medical devices with recently developed systems in the research community. We envisage this analysis to aid circuit and system designers in system optimisation and identifying innovation opportunities, particularly those related to low power circuit design techniques.
Collapse
|
8
|
Hagedorn JM, Pittelkow TP, Bendel MA, Moeschler SM, Orhurhu V, Sanchez-Sotelo J. The painful shoulder arthroplasty: appropriate work-up and review of interventional pain treatments. JSES REVIEWS, REPORTS, AND TECHNIQUES 2022; 2:269-276. [PMID: 37588877 PMCID: PMC10426573 DOI: 10.1016/j.xrrt.2022.04.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/18/2023]
Abstract
Shoulder arthroplasty is a successful surgical procedure for several conditions when patients become refractory to conservative management modalities. Unfortunately, some patients experience persistent chronic pain after shoulder arthroplasty. These individuals should undergo a comprehensive evaluation by an orthopedic surgeon to determine whether structural pathology is responsible for the pain and to decide whether reoperation is indicated. At times, a surgical solution does not exist. In these circumstances, a thorough and specific plan for the management of persistent chronic pain should be developed and instituted. In this article, we review common reasons for persistent pain after shoulder arthroplasty and outline the evaluation of the painful shoulder arthroplasty. We then provide a thorough review of interventional pain management strategies. Finally, we hypothesize developments in our field that might provide better outcomes in the future for patients suffering with chronic intractable pain after shoulder arthroplasty.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan M. Hagedorn
- Corresponding author: Jonathan M. Hagedorn, MD, Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Division of Pain Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
| | - Thomas P. Pittelkow
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Division of Pain Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Markus A. Bendel
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Division of Pain Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Susan M. Moeschler
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Division of Pain Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Vwaire Orhurhu
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Division of Pain Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Joaquin Sanchez-Sotelo
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Division of Pain Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Strand N, J M, Tieppo Francio V, M M, Turkiewicz M, El Helou A, M M, S C, N S, J P, C W. Advances in Pain Medicine: a Review of New Technologies. Curr Pain Headache Rep 2022; 26:605-616. [PMID: 35904729 PMCID: PMC9334973 DOI: 10.1007/s11916-022-01062-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Purpose of Review This narrative review highlights the interventional musculoskeletal techniques that have evolved in recent years. Recent Findings The recent progress in pain medicine technologies presented here represents the ideal treatment of the pain patient which is to provide personalized care. Advances in pain physiology research and pain management technologies support each other concurrently. Summary As new technologies give rise to new perspectives and understanding of pain, new research inspires the development of new technologies
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalie Strand
- Department of Anesthesiology, Division of Pain Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA. .,NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL, USA. .,University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
| | - Maloney J
- Department of Anesthesiology, Division of Pain Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Vinicius Tieppo Francio
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, The University of Kansas Medical Center (KUMC), 3901 Rainbow Blvd. MS1046, Kansas City, KS, 66160, USA
| | - Murphy M
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, The University of Kansas Medical Center (KUMC), 3901 Rainbow Blvd. MS1046, Kansas City, KS, 66160, USA
| | | | - Antonios El Helou
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Moncton Hospital, Moncton, NB, Canada
| | - Maita M
- Department of Anesthesiology, Division of Pain Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Covington S
- Department of Anesthesiology, Division of Pain Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Singh N
- OrthoAlabama Spine and Sports, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Peck J
- Performing Arts Medicine Department, Shenandoah University, Winchester, VA, USA
| | - Wie C
- Department of Anesthesiology, Division of Pain Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Hagedorn JM, Parmele JB, Wolff JS, Bendel MA, D'Souza RS. The Prevalence of Elevated Impedances and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Ineligibility Following Implantation of 10 kHz Spinal Cord Stimulation Devices: A Retrospective Review. Neuromodulation 2022; 25:719-723. [PMID: 35803678 DOI: 10.1111/ner.13471] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2021] [Revised: 04/26/2021] [Accepted: 05/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is increasingly utilized in the treatment of multiple chronic pain conditions. However, patients will continue to experience other medical issues and the potential for future magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) needs must not be overlooked. SCS devices have device-specific MRI conditional labeling and if impedances are elevated the patient may not be able to obtain an MRI. With 10 kHz SCS devices specifically, an impedance value above 10,000 ohms (Ω) is MRI ineligible. The primary objective of this article was to report the incidence of elevated impedances with a multilumen lead design per electrode, per lead, and to describe the total number of MRI ineligible patients due to elevated impedances using 10 kHz SCS cutoff values. The secondary objective was to determine whether certain patient demographics or surgery characteristics put patients at increased risk of elevated impedances. MATERIALS AND METHODS We performed a retrospective review of 327 patients who were implanted with a 10 kHz SCS device between January 2015 and November 2020. Regression models were fitted to determine associations between MRI ineligibility status with clinical characteristics including age, sex, BMI, lead location, implantable pulse generator (IPG) location, and time since implant. RESULTS We found elevated impedances with subsequent MRI ineligibility in 13 patients (4.0%). Regression analysis did not identify any associations with MRI ineligibility and patient risk factors including age, sex, body mass index, lead location, IPG location, and follow-up time since implant. CONCLUSION We found the prevalence of elevated impedances above 10,000 Ω to be 4% of implanted patients. This information is important for patients and physicians alike and should be considered when device selection is occurring in the pre-operative visits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan M Hagedorn
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Division of Pain Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
| | | | | | - Markus A Bendel
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Division of Pain Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Ryan S D'Souza
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Division of Pain Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
|
12
|
D'Souza RS, Olatoye OO, Butler CS, Barman RA, Ashmore ZM, Hagedorn JM. Adverse Events Associated With 10-kHz Dorsal Column Spinal Cord Stimulation: A 5-Year Analysis of the Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) Database. Clin J Pain 2022; 38:320-327. [PMID: 35132023 DOI: 10.1097/ajp.0000000000001026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2021] [Accepted: 12/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND High-frequency (10-kHz) spinal cord stimulation (SCS) continues to be an emerging therapy in chronic pain management. The same complications that plagued earlier SCS systems may affect newer stimulation technologies, although there is limited data on the type of complications and surgical management of these complications. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to systematically examine real-world complications associated with 10-kHz SCS reported on the Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database. MATERIALS AND METHODS The MAUDE database was queried for entries reported between January 1, 2016 and December 31, 2020. Entries were classified into procedural complications, device-related complications, patient complaints, surgically managed complications, serious adverse events, and/or other complications. Primary outcomes included type and frequency of complications, and surgical management of complications. RESULTS A total of 1651 entries were analyzed. Most entries were categorized as procedural complications (72.6%), followed by serious adverse events (10.5%), device-related complications (10.5%), and patient complaints (9.9%). Most complications were managed surgically with explant (50.9%) rather than revision (5.0%) or incision/drainage (6.6%). Of procedural complications, the most common entries included non-neuraxial infection (52.9%), new neurological symptoms (14.7%), and dural puncture (9.5%). Of device-related complications, the most common entries included lead damage (41.6%), erosion (18.5%), and difficult insertion (11.5%). CONCLUSION This retrospective 5-year analysis of complications from10-kHz SCS provides a real-world assessment of safety data unique for this stimulation modality. This analysis may help inform future clinical decisions, lead to device enhancement and optimization, and improve mitigation of risks to provide safe and efficacious use of 10-kHz SCS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan S D'Souza
- Division of Pain Medicine Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine
| | - Oludare O Olatoye
- Division of Pain Medicine Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine
| | - Casey S Butler
- Division of Pain Medicine Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine
| | - Ross A Barman
- Departments of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine
| | - Zachary M Ashmore
- Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Mayo Clinic Hospital, Rochester, MN
| | - Jonathan M Hagedorn
- Division of Pain Medicine Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Gupta M, Ray M, Ladesich N, Gupta A. Health-Care Utilization and Outcomes with 10 kHz Spinal Cord Stimulation for Chronic Refractory Pain. J Pain Res 2021; 14:3675-3683. [PMID: 34880672 PMCID: PMC8648088 DOI: 10.2147/jpr.s306126] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2021] [Accepted: 08/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Chronic pain is a common condition associated with decreased quality of life and increased health-care costs. Opioid analgesics are routinely used to treat chronic pain despite limited evidence of long-term efficacy. Spinal cord stimulation at a frequency of 10 kilohertz (10kHz-SCS) has been shown to be effective for treating chronic pain. Objective This study was conducted to evaluate the effects of 10kHz-SCS on patients’ pain intensity, volume of pain interventions, and opioid intake in a real-world setting. Study Design This study was a retrospective review of patient data. Setting The study was conducted at a single, community-based clinic. Methods Outcomes including pain relief, quality of life, opioid intake, and rate of health-care usage were evaluated using data from patients who were implanted with a 10kHz-SCS device to treat chronic pain. These outcomes were then compared for the pre- and post-implant periods. Results A total of 47 patients with a mean follow-up duration of 15.6 ± 6.2 months were included in this analysis. Mean pain relief was 73 ± 22% and 89% were responders at the final follow-up visit. The rate of medical interventions fell from 3.48±3.05 per year before starting 10kHz-SCS to 0.49±1.16 per year afterward (P < 0.001). Of 30 patients with available opioid consumption data, 89% maintained or decreased their intake after implant. Conclusion Retrospective data from a single center, with minimal exclusion criteria shows clinically significant pain relief with 10kHz-SCS, accompanied by significant indirect benefits including stable or reduced opioid use and reduced interventional procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mayank Gupta
- Neuroscience Research Center, LLC, Overland Park, KS, USA
| | - Mahoua Ray
- Neuroscience Research Center, LLC, Overland Park, KS, USA
| | | | - Akshat Gupta
- Neuroscience Research Center, LLC, Overland Park, KS, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Malinowski MN, Chopra PR, Tieppo Francio V, Budwany R, Deer TR. A narrative review and future considerations of spinal cord stimulation, dorsal root ganglion stimulation and peripheral nerve stimulation. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2021; 34:774-780. [PMID: 34608057 DOI: 10.1097/aco.0000000000001072] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW In recent years, neuromodulation has experienced a renaissance. Novel waveforms and anatomic targets show potential improvements in therapy that may signify substantial benefits. New innovations in peripheral nerve stimulation and dorsal root ganglion stimulation have shown prospective evidence and sustainability of results. Sub-perception physiologic bursting, high-frequency stimulation and feedback loop mechanisms provide significant benefits over traditional tonic spinal cords stimulation (SCS) in peer reviewed investigations. We reviewed the themes associated with novel technology in the context of historical stalwart publications. RECENT FINDINGS New innovations have led to better nerve targeting, improvements in disease-based treatment, and opioid alternatives for those in chronic pain. In addition, new neural targets from both structural and cellular perspectives have changed the field of Neurostimulation. SUMMARY For many years, tonic SCS was representative of neuromodulation, but as this review examines, the progression of the field in the past decade has reshaped patient options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark N Malinowski
- OhioHealth Grant Medical Center, Ohio University Heritage COM, Columbus, Ohio
| | | | - Vinicius Tieppo Francio
- The University of Kansas Medical Center, Department of Rehabilitative Medicine, Kansas City, Kansas
| | - Ryan Budwany
- Center for Integrative Pain Management, West Virginia University School of Medicine, Morgantown
| | - Timothy Ray Deer
- The Spine and Nerve Center of The Virginias
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, WVU School of Medicine
- American Society of Pain and Neuroscience, Charleston, West Virginia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Hagedorn JM, Romero J, Thuc Ha C, Bendel MA, D'Souza RS. Paresthesia-Based Versus High-Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation: A Retrospective, Real-World, Single-Center Comparison. Neuromodulation 2021; 25:710-718. [PMID: 34272921 DOI: 10.1111/ner.13497] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2021] [Revised: 06/22/2021] [Accepted: 06/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has become a common treatment modality for chronic pain of various etiologies. Over the past two decades, significant technological evolution has occurred in the SCS space, and this includes high-frequency (10 kHz) stimulation. Level I evidence exists reporting superiority of 10 kHz SCS over traditional SCS, however, conflicting reports have been published. The primary objective was to report site-collected real-world patient reported percentage improvement in pain scale (PR-PIPS) with traditional SCS and 10 kHz SCS from a single, academic medical center. MATERIALS AND METHODS This study was a single-center retrospective review to determine PR-PIPS of traditional SCS and 10 kHz SCS in those patients implanted for at least 12 months. Data were collected by two independent physicians not involved with the implant surgery to minimize bias in the data collection process. PR-PIPS and other clinical variables were abstracted either via chart review or via phone call for patients who were at least 12 months post-implant at the last clinical follow-up. RESULTS A total of 163 implanted patients (traditional stimulation n = 85; high-frequency stimulation n = 78) were identified. Twenty-two explants (traditional stimulation n = 10; high-frequency stimulation n = 12) were performed (13.5%). Seventy-five total remaining SCS implants utilizing traditional stimulation and 66 total remaining SCS implants utilizing high-frequency stimulation were included. There was no difference in PR-PIPS between traditional stimulation (50.6% ± 30.1%) and high-frequency stimulation (47.6% ± 31.5%) in the adjusted linear regression model in a variety of implant indications (p = 0.399). There was no difference in frequency of patient categorization into various thresholds of percentage pain relief based on type of stimulation. The most common reasons for explant were loss of efficacy (50.0%) and infection (40.0%) in the traditional cohort, and loss of efficacy (58.3%) in the high-frequency cohort. CONCLUSIONS This study adds further evidence to the published literature that successful long-term results can be achieved with SCS. Our retrospective analysis did not find a statistically significant difference in PR-PIPS between traditional stimulation and high-frequency stimulation in a variety of indications over an average follow-up of nearly two years. Notably, there were statistically significant differences in treatment indications and primary sites of pain between the two patient cohorts, and this should be considered when interpreting the results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan M Hagedorn
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Division of Pain Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Joshua Romero
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Division of Pain Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Chris Thuc Ha
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Division of Pain Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Markus A Bendel
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Division of Pain Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Ryan S D'Souza
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Division of Pain Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Hagedorn JM, Misercola B, Comer A, Tari-Blake J, Hoffmann CM, Mehta P, Deer TR. The Team Approach to Spinal Cord and Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation: A Guide for the Advanced Practice Provider. Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes 2021; 5:663-669. [PMID: 34195557 PMCID: PMC8240163 DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2021.05.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan M Hagedorn
- Division of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | | - Ashley Comer
- The Spine and Nerve Center of the Virginias, Charleston, WV
| | | | - Chelsey M Hoffmann
- Division of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | | - Timothy R Deer
- The Spine and Nerve Center of the Virginias, Charleston, WV
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Hagedorn JM, Deer TR, Canzanello NC, Covington SM, Schroeder DR, Bendel MA, Moeschler SM, Hooten WM. Differences in calculated percentage improvement versus patient-reported percentage improvement in pain scores: a review of spinal cord stimulation trials. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2021; 46:293-297. [PMID: 33479116 DOI: 10.1136/rapm-2020-102238] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2020] [Revised: 12/16/2020] [Accepted: 01/04/2021] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Spinal cord stimulation is frequently used for the treatment of intractable chronic pain conditions. Trialing of the spinal cord stimulator device is recommended to assess the patient's response to neurostimulation before permanent implantation. The trial response is often assessed by Numeric Rating Scale changes and patient-reported percentage pain improvement. Using number rating scale changes between prespinal and postspinal cord stimulation trial, a calculated percentage pain improvement can be obtained. The aim of this study was to assess the difference between calculated and patient-reported percentage improvement in pain scale during spinal cord stimulation trials. METHODS This study was a retrospective single center review of all spinal cord stimulation trials from January 1 2017 to July 1 2019. A total of 174 patients were included. The paired t-test was used to compare numeric pain scores obtained prestimulation versus poststimulation. The mean difference between methods (patient-reported minus calculated) was compared with zero using the 1-sample t-test. Lin's concordance correlation coefficient was computed with a 95% CI, calculated using Fisher z-transformation; and a bootstrapping approach was used to compare the concordance correlation coefficient between groups. In all cases, two-tailed tests were used with p<0.05 considered statistically significant. RESULTS Based on prestimulation and poststimulation numeric rating scale scores, the mean±SD calculated percentage improvement in pain scale was 54±28. The mean±SD patient-reported percentage improvement in pain scale was 59±25. The overall 95% limits of agreement for the two methods are -30% to +41%. The overall concordance correlation coefficient was 0.76 (95% CI 0.69 to 0.81). CONCLUSION Although the two methods are highly correlated, there is substantial lack of agreement between patient-reported and calculated percentage improvement in pain scale, suggesting that these measures should not be used interchangeably for spinal cord stimulator trial outcome assessment. This emphasizes the need for improved metrics to better measure patient response to neuromodulation therapies. Additionally, patient-reported percentage improvement in pain was found to be higher than calculated percentage improvement in pain, potentially highlighting the multidimensional experience of pain and the unpredictability of solely using Numeric Rating Scale scores to assess patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan M Hagedorn
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Division of Pain Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Timothy R Deer
- Spine and Nerve Center of the Virginias, West Virginia University - Health Sciences Campus, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA
| | - Nicholas C Canzanello
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Stephen M Covington
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Darrell R Schroeder
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Division of Pain Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Markus A Bendel
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Division of Pain Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Susan M Moeschler
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Division of Pain Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - W Michael Hooten
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Division of Pain Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Hagedorn JM, Lam CM, D'Souza RS, Sayed D, Bendel MA, Ha CT, Romero J, Hall M, Freeman E, Richardson BF, Hoelzer BC. Explantation of 10 kHz Spinal Cord Stimulation Devices: A Retrospective Review of 744 Patients Followed for at Least 12 Months. Neuromodulation 2021; 24:499-506. [PMID: 33469972 DOI: 10.1111/ner.13359] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2020] [Revised: 12/21/2020] [Accepted: 12/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES High-frequency 10 kHz spinal cord stimulation (10 kHz-SCS) has achieved analgesia superior to traditional SCS in a number of studies. However, there is concern regarding long-term outcomes of 10 kHz-SCS. Prior work has suggested that explant rates are higher with 10 kHz-SCS. Our primary objective was to determine the explant rate of 10 kHz-SCS in a large patient cohort from multiple centers followed for at least 12 months after implant surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS We performed a retrospective chart review of all patients who received a 10 kHz-SCS implant before July 1, 2019. We abstracted patient demographics, implant date, primary site of pain, implant indication, explant date, and reason for explant. A total of 744 patients were included in the study analysis. RESULTS Average age of the overall cohort was 65.53 years and 407 (54.7%) were women. Average follow-up for all patients was 793 days. There were a total of 76 explants (10.2%). The most common reason for explant was loss of efficacy, which accounted for 39 explants (51.3% of total explants, 5.2% of overall cohort). Female sex and radiculopathy as the SCS indication were associated with statistically significant decreased risk of 10 kHz-SCS explant. CONCLUSIONS We found 10 kHz-SCS explant rates to be similar to prior reported explant rates for traditional SCS devices. Patient-related factors including female sex and radiculopathy as the primary SCS indication may be protective factors against explantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Dawood Sayed
- University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | | | | | | | - Morgan Hall
- Southwest Spine & Pain Center, Provo, UT, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Hagedorn JM, Pittelkow TP, Hunt CL, D'Souza RS, Lamer TJ. Current Perspectives on Spinal Cord Stimulation for the Treatment of Cancer Pain. J Pain Res 2020; 13:3295-3305. [PMID: 33324090 PMCID: PMC7732175 DOI: 10.2147/jpr.s263857] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2020] [Accepted: 11/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Cancer and cancer treatment-related chronic pain affect a significant number of patients. The etiology of this pain is diverse and may include nociceptive and/or neuropathic characteristics. Treatment is often multifactorial and may require advanced interventional techniques, such as spinal cord stimulation (SCS). This narrative review provides a thorough overview of cancer-related pain mechanisms and the use of SCS for cancer-related pain. Additionally, a review of the precautions that should be considered when caring for this patient population is provided with recommendations for safe care when utilizing these techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan M Hagedorn
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Division of Pain Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Thomas P Pittelkow
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Division of Pain Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Christine L Hunt
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Division of Pain Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Ryan S D'Souza
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Division of Pain Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Tim J Lamer
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Division of Pain Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|