Treatment of knee osteoarthritic pain with platelet-rich plasma: a systematic review of clinical studies

There Is Wide Variation in Platelet-rich Plasma Injection Pricing: A United States Nationwide Study of Top Orthopaedic Hospitals

BACKGROUND

Demand for platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections for osteoarthritis has dramatically increased in recent years despite conflicting evidence regarding its efficacy and highly variable pricing in the top orthopaedic centers in the United States, because PRP is typically not covered by insurance. A previous study investigating the mean price of PRP injections obtained information only from centers advertising online the availability of PRP injections. Thus, there is a need for further clarification of the overall availability and variability in cost of PRP injections in the orthopaedic community as well as an analysis of relevant regional demographic and hospital characteristics that could be associated with PRP pricing.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

Our study purposes were to (1) report the availability and price variation of knee PRP injections at top-ranked United States orthopaedic centers, (2) characterize the availability of pricing information for a PRP injection over the telephone, (3) determine whether hospital characteristics (Orthopaedic Score [ U . S. News & World Report measure of hospital orthopaedic department performance], size, teaching status, and rural-urban status) were associated with PRP injection availability and pricing, and (4) characterize the price variation, if it exists, of PRP injections in three metropolitan areas and individual institutions.

METHODS

In this prospective study, a scripted telephone call to publicly listed clinic telephone numbers was used to determine the availability and price estimate (amount to be paid by the patient) of a PRP injection for knee osteoarthritis from the top 25 hospitals from each United States Census region selected from the U.S. News & World Report ranking of best hospitals for orthopaedics. Univariable analyses examined factors associated with PRP injection availability and willingness to disclose pricing, differences across regions, and the association between hospital characteristics (Orthopaedic Score, size, teaching status, and rural-urban status) and pricing. The Orthopaedic Score is a score assigned to each hospital by U . S. News & World Report as a measure of hospital performance based partly on patient outcomes, with higher scores indicating better outcomes.

RESULTS

Overall, 87% (87 of 100) of respondents stated they offered PRP injections. Pricing ranged from USD 350 to USD 2815 (median USD 800) per injection, with the highest prices in the Northeast. The largest price range was in the Midwest, where more than two-thirds of PRP injections given at hospitals that disclosed pricing cost USD 500 to USD 1000. Of the hospitals that offered PRP injections, 68% (59 of 87) were willing to disclose price information over the telephone. PRP injection pricing was inversely correlated with hospital Orthopaedic Score (-3% price change [95% CI -5% to -1%]; p = 0.01) and not associated with any of the other hospital characteristics that were studied, such as patient population median income and total hospital expenses. An intracity analysis revealed wide variations in PRP pricing in all metropolitan areas that were analyzed, ranging from a minimum of USD 300 within 10 miles of metropolitan area B to a maximum of USD 1269 within 20 miles of metropolitan area C.

CONCLUSION

We found that although PRP injections are widely available, pricing continues to be a substantial financial burden on patients, with large price variability among institutions. We also found that if patients are willing to shop around in a metropolitan area, there is potential to save a meaningful amount of money.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

As public interest in biologics in orthopaedic surgery increases, knowledge of its pricing should be clarified to consumers. The debated efficacy of PRP injections, combined with our findings that it is an expensive out-of-pocket procedure, suggests that PRP has limited cost-effectiveness, with variable, discrete pricing. As such, the price of PRP injections should be clearly disclosed to patients so they can make informed healthcare decisions.

Intra-articular injection of platelet-rich plasma in patients with hemophilia and painful knee joint cartilage degeneration

INTRODUCTION

Knee arthropathy causes pain to people with hemophilia (PWH). One of the current controversies is whether injections of intra-articular platelet-rich plasma (PRP) are effective in relieving the knee pain of PWH.

AREAS COVERED

A narrative literature review was conducted on the efficacy of PRP injections in the knees of PWH.

EXPERT OPINION

Intra-articular PRP knee injections are widely used in patients with knee osteoarthritis to relieve pain and delay total knee arthroplasty. Although numerous publications have supported the use of PRP in knee osteoarthritis, there is still major controversy regarding its true usefulness, given that a number of studies with a high degree of evidence have failed to show the efficacy of PRP. With respect to painful hemophilic arthropathy, the use of PRP injections is even more controversial, as there are only four publications on the subject supporting the use of PRP in hemophilia, all of them with a low degree of evidence. A publication with grade 1 evidence recommended against the use of PRP in hemophilic arthropathy because its efficacy has not been demonstrated. My opinion is that intra-articular PRP injections should not be used in hemophilia until there is more evidence of its benefits.

Comparison of the Effect of MFAT and MFAT + PRP on Treatment of Hip Osteoarthritis: An Observational, Intention-to-Treat Study at One Year

Hip osteoarthritis (OA) is a major contributor to reduced quality of life and concomitant disability associated with lost working life months. Intra-articular injection of various biological materials has shown promise in alleviating symptoms and potentially slowing down the degenerative process. Here, we compared the effects of treatment of a cohort of 147 patients suffering from grade 1–4 hip OA; with either micro-fragmented adipose tissue (MFAT), or a combination of MFAT with platelet-rich plasma (PRP). We found significant improvements in both the visual analogue score for pain (VAS) and Oxford hip score (OHS) that were similar for both treatments with over 60% having an improvement in the VAS score of 20 points or more. These results suggest a positive role for intra-articular injection of MFAT + PRP as a treatment for hip osteoarthritis which may be important particularly in low body mass index (BMI) patients where the difficulty in obtaining sufficient MFAT for treatment could be offset by using this combination of biologicals.

Intra-Articular Platelet-Rich Plasma Injections in Knee Osteoarthritis: A Review of Their Current Molecular Mechanisms of Action and Their Degree of Efficacy

Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is estimated to affect more than 10% of the population, with a lifetime risk of 45%. Contemporary guidelines advise control of body weight, therapeutic physical exercise, drug treatment (oral non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, paracetamol, opioids), and mechanical aids (walking aids, braces, orthoses). Nevertheless, these treatments typically have only short-term benefits. Intra-articular corticosteroids are typically advised, but only for short-term pain alleviation, given that their benefits last only a few weeks. The efficacy of hyaluronic acid is controversial. When the aforesaid options fail, total knee arthroplasty is generally recommended as an efficacious treatment. However, it is costly and can involve medical and postoperative complications. Therefore, determining alternate safe and effective treatments for knee OA is paramount. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has lately been investigated for the treatment of knee OA. This article reviews recent knowledge concerning PRP’s molecular mechanisms of action. The effectiveness of intra-articular PRP injections in the knee joint remains controversial, although most recent publications show pain alleviation in the short term. Orthopedic surgeons treating people with knee OA are becoming increasingly interested in PRP, despite indecisive clinical data and basic science information. Further studies comparing PRP with placebo are required.

Efficacy of Intra-Articular Injection of Platelet-Rich Plasma Combined with Mesenchymal Stem Cells in the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

This study systematically evaluated the effect of intra-articular injection of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) on knee osteoarthritis (KOA).

METHODS

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of PRP combined with MSC in the treatment of KOA were collected from PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Wiley online library, CNKI, and Wanfang databases from inception to July 30, 2022. Two researchers read and screened the literature to extract the data, respectively. After conducting a risk-of-bias assessment of included data, RevMan 5.3 software was used for meta-analysis. The Cochrane Handbook risk-of-bias assessment tool was used to evaluate the included literature.

RESULTS

A total of 9 papers with 480 KOA patients were included in this study. Significant differences in terms of visual analogue scale (VAS) score (MD = -1.10, 95% CI -1.91 to -0.29), P = 0.008) and knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS) (MD = 4.56, 95% CI 0.54-8.58, P = 0.050) were noted between the 2 groups. Subgroup analysis found that MD = 1.66 in KOOS-pain-1 group (95% CI (0.10, 3.22), P = 0.040), which is significant. The MD for KOOS total score and IKDC scores between the two groups was MD = 6.31 (95% CI 2.73-9.88, P = 0.0005) and MD = 3.05 (95% CI -7.09-13.20, P = 0.56), respectively.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study provide a theoretical basis for the clinical treatment of KOA with PRP combined with MSC.

Two or four injections of platelet-rich plasma for osteoarthritic knee did not change synovial biomarkers but similarly improved clinical outcomes

We compared two and four intra-articular injections of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) in terms of changes of synovial cytokines and clinical outcomes. One hundred twenty-five patients having knee osteoarthritis (OA) underwent PRP injections at a 6-week interval. Before each PRP injection, synovial fluid aspiration was collected for investigation. Patients were divided into two or four intra-articular PRP injections (group A and B, respectively). Changes in synovial biomarkers were compared with the baseline levels of both groups, and clinical outcomes were evaluated until one year. Ninety-four patients who had completed synovial fluid collection were included for final evaluation, 51 in group A and 43 in group B. There were no differences in mean age, gender, body mass index (BMI), and radiographic OA grading. The average platelet count and white blood cell count in PRP were 430,000/µL and 200/ µL, respectively. There were no changes of synovial inflammatory cytokines (IL-1β, IL-6, IA-17A, and TNF-alpha), anti-inflammatory cytokines (IL-4, IL-10, IL-13, and IL-1RA), and growth factors (TGF-B1, VEGF, PDGF-AA, and PDGF-BB) between baseline levels and six weeks in group A, and 18 weeks in group B. Both groups had significantly improved clinical outcomes from six weeks including visual analog scale (VAS), patient-reported outcome measures [PROMs; Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) Index and Short Form-12 (SF-12)], with a significant delayed improvement of performance-based measures [PBMs; time up and go (TUG), 5-time sit to stand test (5 × SST), and 3-min walk test (3-min WT)]. In conclusion, two- or four-PRP intra-articular injection at a 6-week interval for knee OA demonstrated no changes of synovial cytokines and growth factors but similarly improved clinical outcomes from 6 weeks until 1 year.