Spinal cord stimulation use in patients with failed back surgery syndrome

Transgrade Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation as a Salvage Technique for Three Different Anatomical Barriers: A Case Series

BACKGROUND

Dorsal root ganglion stimulation (DRGS) is an effective treatment for complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) and post-surgical neuropathic pain. However, some patients have surgical and anatomical conditions that are contraindications to traditional DRGS technique. A novel transgrade approach to DRGS placement has been described and demonstrated effective for post spine surgery patients. We present three patients, each with a different reason in which DRGS would not be accessible via the traditional anterograde approach, who all had successful DRGS transgrade placement.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The case series includes three patients with either CRPS or post-surgical neuropathic pain who had an anatomical or post-surgical condition that historically would have rendered DRGS contraindicated. Two patients had previously failed dorsal column stimulation. All three patients had successful placement with the transgrade approach-entry into the contralateral epidural space at the level of the targeted foramen from a cephalad angle. Each patient gave their verbal and written consent to be included in the case series.

RESULTS

Following treatment with a transgrade approach, all three patients had significant pain relief and improvement in function without complication.

CONCLUSION

Barriers to anterograde foraminal access including previous implantation, previous instrumentation, and epidural adhesions may prevent DRGS placement in certain indicated patients. This can be especially challenging in patients who have failed other neuromodulation options like dorsal column stimulation. Our case series demonstrated that the transgrade technique can be successfully used in these cases to increase access to DRGS.

The Effectiveness of an Intensive Interdisciplinary Pain Rehabilitation Program in the Treatment of Post-Laminectomy Syndrome in Patients Who Have Failed Spinal Cord Stimulation

Introduction

Post-laminectomy syndrome (PLS) patients who have previously undergone spinal cord stimulation and failed to have significant improvement create a unique challenge for ongoing pain management. We hypothesize that, following successful completion of intensive, interdisciplinary pain rehabilitation (IPR), this patient population can achieve a significant reduction in pain, improvement in mood, functional levels, and self-efficacy.

Materials and methods

A retrospective chart review was conducted comparing the following for patients prior to enrollment in the IPR program and upon completion: numeric rating scale (NRS) pain scores; functional status via the six-minute walk test; mood via the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D), Multidimensional Pain Inventory (MPI) Life control scores and MPI Interference, and the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS); and self-efficacy via the Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ).

Results

Forty-three patients met inclusion criteria, with 17 males and 26 females and a mean age of 64 years. Patients demonstrated a statistically significant increase in six-minute walk test distance of 104 m, a decrease in average NRS pain score of 1.4 points, an increase in average MPI life control by 8.3 points, a decrease average MPI interference by 5.3 points, an increase in average Short Form-36 by 6.5 points, an increase in average PCS by 4.4 points, and an increase in average PSEQ score of 18.1. Their average mood via CES-D improved by 4.2 points.

Conclusions

Intensive, interdisciplinary pain rehabilitation provides an effective therapeutic modality for patients with post-laminectomy syndrome who have failed spinal cord stimulation by decreasing pain levels and by increasing functional status and self-efficacy.