1
|
Savage S, Flores-Saviaga C, Rodney R, Savage L, Schull J, Mankoff J. The Global Care Ecosystems of 3D Printed Assistive Devices. ACM TRANSACTIONS ON ACCESSIBLE COMPUTING 2022. [DOI: 10.1145/3537676] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
The popularity of 3D printed assistive technology has led to the emergence of new ecosystems of care, where multiple stakeholders (makers, clinicians, and recipients with disabilities) work toward creating new upper limb prosthetic devices. However, despite the increasing growth, we currently know little about the differences between these care ecosystems. Medical regulations and the prevailing culture have greatly impacted how ecosystems are structured and stakeholders work together, including whether clinicians and makers collaborate. To better understand these care ecosystems, we interviewed a range of stakeholders from multiple countries, including Brazil, Chile, Costa Rica, France, India, Mexico, and the U.S. Our broad analysis allowed us to uncover different working examples of how multiple stakeholders collaborate within these care ecosystems and the main challenges they face. Through our study, we were able to uncover that the ecosystems with multi-stakeholder collaborations exist (something prior work had not seen), and these ecosystems showed increased success and impact. We also identified some of the key follow-up practices to reduce device abandonment. Of particular importance are to have ecosystems put in place follow up practices that integrate formal agreements and compensations for participation (which do not need to be just monetary). We identified that these features helped to ensure multi-stakeholder involvement and ecosystem sustainability. We finished the paper with socio-technical recommendations to create vibrant care ecosystems that include multiple stakeholders in the production of 3D printed assistive devices.
Collapse
|
2
|
Yamada S, Bartunek J, Behfar A, Terzic A. Mass Customized Outlook for Regenerative Heart Failure Care. Int J Mol Sci 2021; 22:11394. [PMID: 34768825 PMCID: PMC8583673 DOI: 10.3390/ijms222111394] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2021] [Revised: 10/01/2021] [Accepted: 10/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Heart failure pathobiology is permissive to reparative intent. Regenerative therapies exemplify an emerging disruptive innovation aimed at achieving structural and functional organ restitution. However, mixed outcomes, complexity in use, and unsustainable cost have curtailed broader adoption, mandating the development of novel cardio-regenerative approaches. Lineage guidance offers a standardized path to customize stem cell fitness for therapy. A case in point is the molecular induction of the cardiopoiesis program in adult stem cells to yield cardiopoietic cell derivatives designed for heart failure treatment. Tested in early and advanced clinical trials in patients with ischemic heart failure, clinical grade cardiopoietic cells were safe and revealed therapeutic improvement within a window of treatment intensity and pre-treatment disease severity. With the prospect of mass customization, cardiopoietic guidance has been streamlined from the demanding, recombinant protein cocktail-based to a protein-free, messenger RNA-based single gene protocol to engineer affordable cardiac repair competent cells. Clinical trial biobanked stem cells enabled a systems biology deconvolution of the cardiopoietic cell secretome linked to therapeutic benefit, exposing a paracrine mode of action. Collectively, this new knowledge informs next generation regenerative therapeutics manufactured as engineered cellular or secretome mimicking cell-free platforms. Launching biotherapeutics tailored for optimal outcome and offered at mass production cost would contribute to advancing equitable regenerative care that addresses population health needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Satsuki Yamada
- Center for Regenerative Medicine, Marriott Family Comprehensive Cardiac Regenerative Medicine, Marriott Heart Disease Research Program, Van Cleve Cardiac Regenerative Medicine Program, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA; (S.Y.); (A.B.)
- Division of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Jozef Bartunek
- Cardiovascular Center, OLV Hospital, 9300 Aalst, Belgium
| | - Atta Behfar
- Center for Regenerative Medicine, Marriott Family Comprehensive Cardiac Regenerative Medicine, Marriott Heart Disease Research Program, Van Cleve Cardiac Regenerative Medicine Program, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA; (S.Y.); (A.B.)
- Department of Physiology and Biomedical Engineering, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Andre Terzic
- Center for Regenerative Medicine, Marriott Family Comprehensive Cardiac Regenerative Medicine, Marriott Heart Disease Research Program, Van Cleve Cardiac Regenerative Medicine Program, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA; (S.Y.); (A.B.)
- Department of Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Department of Clinical Genomics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kim DS, Lee G, Cho H, Bae S. Regenerative Medicine in South Korea: Bridging the Gap Between Authorization and Reimbursement. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2021; 9:737504. [PMID: 34527662 PMCID: PMC8435711 DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.737504] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2021] [Accepted: 08/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Regenerative medicine (RM) has considerable potential to address the needs of aging-related and uncurable diseases. However, its incorporation into reimbursement of health insurance benefits poses many challenges, including uncertain evidence and insufficient investment. This paper examines the wide gap between manufacturers, regulatory bodies, and health technology bodies regarding reimbursements for RMs focused cell therapy products. In this mixed-methods study, we first analyzed the sales of RMs approved in South Korea. In addition to exploring beliefs related to the market value of RMs, in-depth interviews were conducted with 24 experts (17 from bio-industries, two from the regulatory body, three from a health technology assessment (HTA) body, and two from the Pharmaceutical Benefit Coverage Assessment Committee [PBCAC]). Lastly, we surveyed PBCAC members about the market value of RMs. In total, 15 of the 20 developed cell therapy products are on the market in South Korea, and amounted to 0.24% of total pharmaceutical expenditures in 2018. We identified a wide gap between stakeholders and regulators regarding the market value and pricing of RMs. The interviewees from the pharmaceutical manufacturer association raised the issue of rising manufacturing costs and proposed a specific pricing policy for RMs. To bridge the gap between approval and reimbursement, stakeholders demand an alternative framework of value-based pricing. Conditional health insurance reimbursement may be an alternative to the traditional process in order to generate evidence of the effects of RMs using “risk-based” or “outcome-based” approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dong-Sook Kim
- Department of Research, Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service, Chuncheon, South Korea
| | - Geunwoo Lee
- Department of Research, Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service, Chuncheon, South Korea
| | - Hyungyung Cho
- College of Pharmacy, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, South Korea
| | - SeungJin Bae
- College of Pharmacy, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Coppens DG, Gardarsdottir H, Bruin MLD, Meij P, Gm Leufkens H, Hoekman J. Regulating advanced therapy medicinal products through the Hospital Exemption: an analysis of regulatory approaches in nine EU countries. Regen Med 2020; 15:2015-2028. [PMID: 33151792 DOI: 10.2217/rme-2020-0008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim: To study regulatory approaches for the implementation and utilization of the Hospital Exemption (HE) in nine EU countries. Materials & methods: Using public regulatory documentation and interviews with authorities we characterized the national implementation process of the HE, including national implementation characteristics and two outcomes: national licensing provisions and the amount of license holders. Results: National licensing provisions vary substantially among selected countries as a result of different regulatory considerations that relate to unmet medical needs, benefit/risk balance, and innovation. The amount of license holders per country is moderate (0-11). Conclusion: The HE facilitates HE utilization in clinical practice in some countries, yet safeguarding of public health and incentivizing commercial development is challenging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Delphi Gm Coppens
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology & Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Helga Gardarsdottir
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology & Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Division Laboratories, Pharmacy & Biomedical Genetics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Marie L De Bruin
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology & Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Copenhagen Centre for Regulatory Science, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Pauline Meij
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy & Toxicology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Hubert Gm Leufkens
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology & Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Jarno Hoekman
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology & Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Innovation Studies Group, Faculty of Geosciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Lindenberg MA, Retèl VP, van den Berg JH, Geukes Foppen MH, Haanen JB, van Harten WH. Treatment With Tumor-infiltrating Lymphocytes in Advanced Melanoma: Evaluation of Early Clinical Implementation of an Advanced Therapy Medicinal Product. J Immunother 2019; 41:413-425. [PMID: 30300260 PMCID: PMC6200372 DOI: 10.1097/cji.0000000000000245] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2018] [Accepted: 08/06/2018] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL)-therapy in advanced melanoma is an advanced therapy medicinal product (ATMP) which, despite promising results, has not been implemented widely. In a European setting, TIL-therapy has been in use since 2011 and is currently being evaluated in a randomized controlled trial. As clinical implementation of ATMPs is challenging, this study aims to evaluate early application of TIL-therapy, through the application of a constructive technology assessment (CTA). First the literature on ATMP barriers and facilitators in clinical translation was summarized. Subsequently, application of TIL-therapy was evaluated through semistructured interviews with 26 stakeholders according to 6 CTA domains: clinical, economic, patient-related, organizational, technical, and future. In addition, treatment costs were estimated. A number of barriers to clinical translation were identified in the literature, including: inadequate financial support, lack of regulatory knowledge, risks in using live tissues, and the complex path to market approval. Innovative reimbursement procedures could particularly facilitate translation. The CTA survey of TIL-therapy acknowledged these barriers, and revealed the following facilitators: the expected effectiveness resulting in institutional support for an internal pilot, the results of which led to the inclusion of TIL-therapy in a national coverage with evidence development program, the availability of an in-house pharmacist, quality assurance expertise and a TIL-skilled technician. Institutional and national implementation of TIL-therapy remains complex. The promising clinical effectiveness is expected to facilitate the adoption of TIL-therapy, especially when validated through a randomized controlled trial. Innovative and conditional reimbursement procedures, together with the organization of knowledge transfer, could support and improve clinical translation of TIL and ATMPs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melanie A. Lindenberg
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology
- Department of Health Technology and Services research, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Valesca P. Retèl
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology
- Department of Health Technology and Services research, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | | | - Marnix H. Geukes Foppen
- Division of Molecular Oncology and Immunology
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute—Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam
| | - John B. Haanen
- Division of Molecular Oncology and Immunology
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute—Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam
| | - Wim H. van Harten
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology
- Department of Health Technology and Services research, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Quinn C, Young C, Thomas J, Trusheim M. Estimating the Clinical Pipeline of Cell and Gene Therapies and Their Potential Economic Impact on the US Healthcare System. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2019; 22:621-626. [PMID: 31198178 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2019.03.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2018] [Revised: 02/05/2019] [Accepted: 03/28/2019] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To estimate, at the indication level, durable gene and cellular therapy new product launches in the United States through 2030, and the number of treated patients. METHODS A statistical analysis of clinical trials pipeline data and disease incidence and prevalence was conducted to estimate the impact of new cell and gene therapies. We used Citeline's® Pharmaprojects® database to estimate the rates and timing of new product launches, on the basis of the phase of development, duration in phase, and probability of progression. Disease incidence and prevalence data were combined with estimates of market adoption to project the size of reimbursed patient populations. RESULTS We project that about 350 000 patients will have been treated with 30 to 60 products by 2030. About half the launches are expected to be in B-cell (CD-19) lymphomas and leukemias. CONCLUSIONS Cell and gene therapies promise durable clinical benefit from a single treatment course. High upfront reimbursement for these products means that the total costs could exceed what the healthcare system can manage. This creates a need for precision financing solutions and new reimbursement models that can ensure appropriate patient access to needed treatments, increase affordability for payers, and sustain private investment in innovation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Casey Quinn
- Center for Biomedical Innovation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
| | - Colin Young
- Center for Biomedical Innovation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jonathan Thomas
- Center for Biomedical Innovation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Mark Trusheim
- Center for Biomedical Innovation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Nagpal A, Milte R, Kim SW, Hillier S, Hamilton-Bruce MA, Ratcliffe J, Koblar SA. Economic Evaluation of Stem Cell Therapies in Neurological Diseases: A Systematic Review. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2019; 22:254-262. [PMID: 30711072 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2018.07.878] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2018] [Revised: 07/13/2018] [Accepted: 07/27/2018] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To examine economic evaluation studies of stem cell therapies (SCTs) in neurological disorders and to provide an overview of the quality of the economic evidence available on this topic. METHODS The review examined studies that performed an economic evaluation of the use of stem cells in adult patients with neurological diseases and that were published in English during the period 2007 to 2017. Data analyzed and reported included study population, disease indication, main analytical approaches for the economic analysis and perspective, key assumptions made or tested in sensitivity analyses, cost outcomes, estimates of incremental cost effectiveness, and approaches to quantifying decision uncertainty. RESULTS A total of three studies reporting on the findings of the economic evaluation of the use of SCT in stroke, Parkinson disease, and secondary progressive multiple sclerosis, respectively, were identified. All three studies conducted a cost-utility analysis using decision-analytic models and reported an incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-years gained (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio) versus standard care. These studies reported meaningful cost savings in stroke, Parkinson disease, and secondary progressive multiple sclerosis in the base-case scenarios. CONCLUSIONS Despite significant progress in clinical research in the use of SCT in neurological diseases, economic evaluation of these therapies is still at a nascent stage. Given the early stage of research inputs (clinical and cost outcomes data) into the models per se, further research is urgently needed to enable meaningful assessment of the cost effectiveness of these advanced therapies and to ensure sustainable access for population groups most likely to benefit in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anjali Nagpal
- Adelaide Medical School, Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Adelaide, SAHMRI, South Australia, Australia.
| | - Rachel Milte
- Institute for Choice, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Susan W Kim
- Heart Health Theme, SAHMRI, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Susan Hillier
- Sansom Institute for Health Research, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Monica A Hamilton-Bruce
- Adelaide Medical School, Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Adelaide, SAHMRI, South Australia, Australia; The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woodville South, South Australia, Australia; CALHN, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Julie Ratcliffe
- Institute for Choice, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Simon A Koblar
- Adelaide Medical School, Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Adelaide, SAHMRI, South Australia, Australia; The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woodville South, South Australia, Australia; CALHN, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Evolution of Business Models in Regenerative Medicine: Effects of a Disruptive Innovation on the Innovation Ecosystem. Clin Ther 2018; 40:1084-1094. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2018.06.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2018] [Revised: 06/01/2018] [Accepted: 06/04/2018] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
|
9
|
Stark JF. Perspectives on human regeneration. PALGRAVE COMMUNICATIONS 2018; 4:66. [PMID: 29910957 PMCID: PMC6003594 DOI: 10.1057/s41599-018-0118-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2017] [Accepted: 04/18/2018] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
Regeneration is a concept that has fascinated humans for centuries. Whether we have been trying to bring things back to life, extract additional resources from the world, or remodel our living spaces-domestic and urban-it is often presented as an unproblematic force for good. But what exactly does it mean to regenerate a body, mind or space? This paper, which introduces a collection of contributions on the theme of human regeneration, explores the limits and possibilities of regeneration as a conceptual tool for understanding the biological realm. What does it mean to be regenerated? How can a scholarly focus on this concept enrich our histories of bodies, ageing, disability and science, technology and medicine? As a secondary goal, I identify two distinct aspects of regeneration-'hard' and 'soft' regeneration-which concern the medical and social elements of regeneration respectively. By recognising that everything from cosmetics and fictions to prosthetics and organs grown in vitro display a combination of 'hard' and 'soft' elements, we are better placed to understand that the biological and social must be considered in consort for us to fully appreciate the meanings and practices that underpin multiple forms of human regeneration.
Collapse
|
10
|
Nishigaki F, Ezoe S, Kitajima H, Hata K. Human resource development contributes to the creation of outstanding regenerative medicine products. Regen Ther 2017; 7:17-23. [PMID: 30271848 PMCID: PMC6134916 DOI: 10.1016/j.reth.2017.06.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2017] [Accepted: 06/07/2017] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Regenerative medicine is currently the focus of global attention. Countries all around the world are actively working to create new regenerative treatment modalities through pioneering research and novel technologies. This is wonderful news for patients who could not be treated with existing medical options. New venture businesses and companies are being established in regenerative medicine and their rapid industrialization is anticipated. However, to ensure high-quality products, human resources qualified in research and development and the manufacturing of these products are essential. The Forum for Innovative Regenerative Medicine (FIRM) conducted a questionnaire of its industry members to examine the training and hiring of people in research and development, product creation, manufacturing, and more. Regenerative medicine is a brand new field; thus, many different businesses will need to cooperate together. People with a broad range of technical skills, abilities, and knowledge will be in demand, with various levels of expertise, from basic to advanced.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fusako Nishigaki
- Regenerative Medicine Labs., Drug Discovery Research, Astellas Pharma Inc., 21 Miyukigaoka, Tsukuba-shi, Ibaraki 305-8585, Japan
- Forum for Innovative Regenerative Medicine (FIRM), 2-3-11 Nihonbashi-Honcho, Chuo-ku, Tokyo 103-0023, Japan
| | - Sachikon Ezoe
- Department of Medical Innovation, Osaka University Hospital, 2-1, Yamada-Oka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan
| | - Hideki Kitajima
- Department of Medical Innovation, Osaka University Hospital, 2-1, Yamada-Oka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan
| | - Kenichiro Hata
- Forum for Innovative Regenerative Medicine (FIRM), 2-3-11 Nihonbashi-Honcho, Chuo-ku, Tokyo 103-0023, Japan
- Japan Tissue Engineering Co., Ltd. (J-TEC), Japan
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Abstract
Many countries have identified regenerative medicine as a strategic priority, and have thus launched a range of initiatives to facilitate innovation in the field. This perspective paper argues that several initiatives involve resource distributions that could impinge on widely accepted egalitarian notions of fairness and justice that underpin current healthcare systems. Specifically, this paper focuses on five initiatives, and argues that these initiatives reflect a largely unacknowledged utilitarian perspective on distributive justice. The intention of this paper is not to argue against these initiatives, but rather to stimulate an open discussion on what qualifies as a just and fair system of resource distribution, so that the regenerative medicine field can responsibly deliver on its clinical potential.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John Gardner
- Department of Sociology, School of Social Sciences, Monash University, W414 Menzies Building, 20 Chancellors Walk, Clayton, Melbourne, 3800, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Webster A. Regenerative medicine and responsible research and innovation: proposals for a responsible acceleration to the clinic. Regen Med 2017; 12:853-864. [DOI: 10.2217/rme-2017-0028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
This paper asks how regenerative medicine can be examined through the ‘responsible research and innovation’ (RRI) approach which has been developed over the past decade. It describes the drivers to the development of RRI, and then argues for the need to understand innovation itself through drawing on social science analysis rooted in science and technology studies. The paper then identifies a number of highly specific challenges faced by the regenerative medicine field and the implications these have for value creation. It offers a number of examples of how a combined RRI/science and technology studies perspective can identify priority areas for policy and concludes by arguing for a ‘responsible acceleration’, more likely to foster readiness at a time when much of the policy domain is pushing for ever-rapid access to cell therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew Webster
- Department of Sociology, SATSU, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Gardner J, Webster A. Accelerating Innovation in the Creation of Biovalue: The Cell and Gene Therapy Catapult. SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY & HUMAN VALUES 2017; 42:925-946. [PMID: 28845068 PMCID: PMC5546419 DOI: 10.1177/0162243917702720] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/13/2023]
Abstract
The field of regenerative medicine (RM) has considerable therapeutic promise that is proving difficult to realize. As a result, governments have supported the establishment of intermediary agencies to "accelerate" innovation. This article examines in detail one such agency, the United Kingdom's Cell and Gene Therapy Catapult (CGTC). We describe CGTC's role as an accelerator agency and its value narrative, which combines both "health and wealth." Drawing on the notion of sociotechnical imaginaries, we unpack the tensions within this narrative and its instantiation as the CGTC cell therapy infrastructure is built and engages with other agencies, some of which have different priorities and roles to play within the RM field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John Gardner
- School of Social Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- John Gardner, School of Social Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Melbourne, Victoria 3800, Australia.
| | - Andrew Webster
- Science and Technology Studies Unit, Department of Sociology, University of York, Heslington, York, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Rosemann A, Bortz G, Vasen F, Sleeboom-Faulkner M. Global regulatory developments for clinical stem cell research: diversification and challenges to collaborations. Regen Med 2016; 11:647-57. [DOI: 10.2217/rme-2016-0072] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
In this article, we explore regulatory developments in stem cell medicine in seven jurisdictions: Japan, China, India, Argentina, Brazil, the USA and the EU. We will show that the research methods, ethical standards and approval procedures for the market use of clinical stem cell interventions are undergoing an important process of global diversification. We will discuss the implications of this process for international harmonization and the conduct of multicountry clinical research collaborations. It will become clear that the increasing heterogeneity of research standards and regulations in the stem cell field presents a significant challenge to international clinical trial partnerships, especially with countries that diverge from the regulatory models that have been developed in the USA and the EU.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Achim Rosemann
- Centre for Education Studies, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK
- Centre for Bionetworking, School of Global Studies, University of Sussex, Brighton, BN1 9SJ, UK
| | - Gabriela Bortz
- Institute of Science & Technology Studies, National University of Quilmes (IESCT-UNQ), Roque S. Peña 352, (1876) Bernal, Buenos Aires, Argentina
- National Council of Scientific & Technical Research (CONICET), Godoy Cruz 2290, C1425FQB Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Federico Vasen
- Institute of Science & Technology Studies, National University of Quilmes (IESCT-UNQ), Roque S. Peña 352, (1876) Bernal, Buenos Aires, Argentina
- Institute of Social Research, National Autonomous University of Mexico, Circuito Mario de la Cueva s/n, Ciudad Universitaria, Coyoacán, 04510 Ciudad de México, México
| | - Margaret Sleeboom-Faulkner
- Centre for Bionetworking, School of Global Studies, University of Sussex, Brighton, BN1 9SJ, UK
- Department of Anthropology, University of Sussex, Arts C 206, Brighton, BN1 9SJ, UK
| |
Collapse
|