Monocytes recruitment blocking synergizes with mesenchymal stem cell transplantation for treating myocardial infarction

Mesenchymal stromal cells for improvement of cardiac function following acute myocardial infarction: a matter of timing

Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is the leading cause of cardiovascular death and remains the most common cause of heart failure. Reopening of the occluded artery, i.e., reperfusion, is the only way to save the myocardium. However, the expected benefits of reducing infarct size are disappointing due to the reperfusion paradox, which also induces specific cell death. These ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) lesions can account for up to 50% of final infarct size, a major determinant for both mortality and the risk of heart failure (morbidity). In this review, we provide a detailed description of the cell death and inflammation mechanisms as features of I/R injury and cardioprotective strategies such as ischemic postconditioning as well as their underlying mechanisms. Due to their biological properties, the use of mesenchymal stromal/stem cells (MSCs) has been considered a potential therapeutic approach in AMI. Despite promising results and evidence of safety in preclinical studies using MSCs, the effects reported in clinical trials are not conclusive and even inconsistent. These discrepancies were attributed to many parameters such as donor age, in vitro culture, and storage time as well as injection time window after AMI, which alter MSC therapeutic properties. In the context of AMI, future directions will be to generate MSCs with enhanced properties to limit cell death in myocardial tissue and thereby reduce infarct size and improve the healing phase to increase postinfarct myocardial performance.

Monocytes presenting a pro-inflammatory profile persist in patients submitted to a long-term pharmacological treatment after acute myocardial infarction

Introduction: Although it is broadly known that monocyte recruitment is involved in atherosclerosis development and that, in accordance with the microenvironment, these cells can be modulated into three well-known subpopulations: Classical (CD14++CD16-), intermediate (CD14++CD16+), and non-classical (CD14+CD16++), the effects of treatment with different pharmacological strategies (based on lipid-lowering and antiplatelets) after acute myocardial infarction upon the monocytes modulation and the role of the chemokine receptors CCR2, CCR5 and CX3CR1 in this context, are poorly understood. Methods: In this study, patients [n = 148, both men (n = 105, 71%) and women (n = 43, 29%)] submitted to treatment with a 2×2 factorial design, in which they received rosuvastatin 20 mg or simvastatin 40 mg plus ezetimibe 10 mg, as well as ticagrelor 90 mg or clopidogrel 75 mg were enrolled. Monocyte subsets were analyzed by flow cytometry at baseline (BL), and after one (1-M) and 6 months (6-M) of treatment. Results: Firstly, our results showed that, regardless of the treatment received, higher percentages of classical monocytes and lower of non-classical monocytes were found at the 6-M time point than BL values, whilst the percentage of intermediate monocytes was higher in all time points assessed than the other subsets. There were reductions in the CCR2 expression by non-classical and intermediate monocytes, without differences for the classical subtype. Concerning the CCR5 expression, there were reductions in the three monocyte subtypes, whereas the CX3CR1 expression increased both in intermediate and classical monocytes, without differences for non-classical monocytes. In relation to the treatment received, a higher percentage of intermediate monocytes at the 6-M time point than the values BL was observed in the group treated with simvastatin + ezetimibe + clopidogrel. No significant differences were found concerning non-classical, intermediate, and classical monocytes, for CCR2, CCR5, and CX3CR1 in the four treatment arms. Conclusion: Taken together, our results demonstrated that even under lipid-lowering and antiplatelet therapy for 6 months, the inflammatory phenotype of monocytes still persisted in the patients enrolled in this study.

Identification of GLS as a cuproptosis-related diagnosis gene in acute myocardial infarction

Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) has the characteristics of sudden onset, rapid progression, poor prognosis, and so on. Therefore, it is urgent to identify diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers for it. Cuproptosis is a new form of mitochondrial respiratory-dependent cell death. However, studies are limited on the clinical significance of cuproptosis-related genes (CRGs) in AMI. In this study, we systematically assessed the genetic alterations of CRGs in AMI by bioinformatics approach. The results showed that six CRGs (LIAS, LIPT1, DLAT, PDHB, MTF1, and GLS) were markedly differentially expressed between stable coronary heart disease (stable_CAD) and AMI. Correlation analysis indicated that CRGs were closely correlated with N6-methyladenosine (m6A)-related genes through R language "corrplot" package, especially GLS was positively correlated with FMR1 and MTF1 was negatively correlated with HNRNPA2B1. Immune landscape analysis results revealed that CRGs were closely related to various immune cells, especially GLS was positively correlated with T cells CD4 memory resting and negatively correlated with monocytes. Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated that the group with high DLAT expression had a better prognosis. The area under curve (AUC) certified that GLS had good diagnostic value, in the training set (AUC = 0.87) and verification set (ACU = 0.99). Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) suggested that GLS was associated with immune- and hypoxia-related pathways. In addition, Gene Ontology (GO) analysis, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) analysis, competing endogenous RNA (ceRNA) analysis, transcription factor (TF), and compound prediction were performed to reveal the regulatory mechanism of CRGs in AMI. Overall, our study can provide additional information for understanding the role of CRGs in AMI, which may provide new insights into the identification of therapeutic targets for AMI.

Targeting monocytes/macrophages in fibrosis and cancer diseases: Therapeutic approaches

Over almost 140 years since their identification, the knowledge about macrophages has unbelievably evolved. The 'big eaters' from being thought of as simple phagocytic cells have been recognized as master regulators in immunity, homeostasis, healing/repair and organ development. Long considered to originate exclusively from bone marrow-derived circulating monocytes, macrophages have been also demonstrated to be the first immune cells colonizing tissues in the developing embryo and persisting in adult life by self-renewal, as long-lived tissue resident macrophages. Therefore, heterogeneous populations of macrophages with different ontogeny and functions co-exist in tissues. Macrophages act as sentinels of homeostasis and are intrinsically programmed to lead the wound healing and repair processes that occur after injury. However, in certain pathological circumstances macrophages get dysfunctional, and impaired or aberrant macrophage activities become key features of diseases. For instance, in both fibrosis and cancer, that have been defined 'wounds that do not heal', dysfunctional monocyte-derived macrophages overall play a key detrimental role. On the other hand, due to their plasticity these cells can be 're-educated' and exert anti-fibrotic and anti-cancer functions. Therefore macrophages represent an important therapeutic target in both fibrosis and cancer diseases. The current review will illustrate new insights into the role of monocytes/macrophages in these devastating diseases and summarize new therapeutic strategies and applications of macrophage-targeted drug development in their clinical setting.

Strategies to Overcome the Barrier of Ischemic Microenvironment in Cell Therapy of Cardiovascular Disease

The transplantation of various immune cell types are promising approaches for the treatment of ischemic cardiovascular disease including myocardial infarction (MI) and peripheral arterial disease (PAD). Major limitation of these so-called Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products (ATMPs) is the ischemic microenvironment affecting cell homeostasis and limiting the demanded effect of the transplanted cell products. Accordingly, different clinical and experimental strategies have been evolved to overcome these obstacles. Here, we give a short review of the different experimental and clinical strategies to solve these issues due to ischemic cardiovascular disease.