Anti-influenza therapy: the emerging challenge of resistance

Opportunistic Infections Post-Lung Transplantation: Viral, Fungal, and Mycobacterial

Opportunistic infections are a leading cause of lung transplant recipient morbidity and mortality. Risk factors for infection include continuous exposure of the lung allograft to the external environment, high levels of immunosuppression, impaired mucociliary clearance and decreased cough reflex, and impact of the native lung microbiome in single lung transplant recipients. Infection risk is mitigated through careful pretransplant screening of recipients and donors, implementation of antimicrobial prophylaxis strategies, and routine surveillance posttransplant. This review describes common viral, fungal, and mycobacterial infectious after lung transplant and provides recommendations on prevention and treatment.

Opportunistic Infections Post-Lung Transplantation: Viral, Fungal, and Mycobacterial

Opportunistic infections are a leading cause of lung transplant recipient morbidity and mortality. Risk factors for infection include continuous exposure of the lung allograft to the external environment, high levels of immunosuppression, impaired mucociliary clearance and decreased cough reflex, and impact of the native lung microbiome in single lung transplant recipients. Infection risk is mitigated through careful pretransplant screening of recipients and donors, implementation of antimicrobial prophylaxis strategies, and routine surveillance posttransplant. This review describes common viral, fungal, and mycobacterial infectious after lung transplant and provides recommendations on prevention and treatment.

A Therapeutically Active Minibody Exhibits an Antiviral Activity in Oseltamivir-Resistant Influenza-Infected Mice via Direct Hydrolysis of Viral RNAs

Emerging Oseltamivir-resistant influenza strains pose a critical public health threat due to antigenic shifts and drifts. We report an innovative strategy for controlling influenza A infections by use of a novel minibody of the 3D8 single chain variable fragment (scFv) showing intrinsic viral RNA hydrolyzing activity, cell penetration activity, and epidermal cell penetration ability. In this study, we examined 3D8 scFv’s antiviral activity in vitro on three different H1N1 influenza strains, one Oseltamivir-resistant (A/Korea/2785/2009pdm) strain, and two Oseltamivir-sensitive (A/PuertoRico/8/1934 and A/X-31) strains. Interestingly, the 3D8 scFv directly digested viral RNAs in the ribonucleoprotein complex. scFv’s reduction of influenza viral RNA including viral genomic RNA, complementary RNA, and messenger RNA during influenza A infection cycles indicated that this minibody targets all types of viral RNAs during the early, intermediate, and late stages of the virus’s life cycle. Moreover, we further addressed the antiviral effects of 3D8 scFv to investigate in vivo clinical outcomes of influenza-infected mice. Using both prophylactic and therapeutic treatments of intranasal administered 3D8 scFv, we found that Oseltamivir-resistant H1N1-infected mice showed 90% (prophylactic effects) and 40% (therapeutic effects) increased survival rates, respectively, compared to the control group. The pathological signs of influenza A in the lung tissues, and quantitative analyses of the virus proliferations supported the antiviral activity of the 3D8 single chain variable fragment. Taken together, these results demonstrate that 3D8 scFv has antiviral therapeutic potentials against a wide range of influenza A viruses via the direct viral RNA hydrolyzing activity.

Respiratory Viruses: Influenza, RSV, and Adenovirus in Kidney Transplantation

Although advances in immunosuppression and antimicrobial prophylaxis have led to improved patient and graft survival, respiratory viruses continue to be a common cause of morbidity and mortality in immunocompromised populations. We describe the clinical manifestations, diagnosis and treatment options for influenza, respiratory syncytial virus and adenovirus infection in the kidney transplant population.

High resolution melting analysis as a tool to detect molecular markers of antiviral resistance in influenza A viruses

A real-time PCR followed by high resolution melting analysis (HRMA) was developed, for rapid detection of antiviral resistance markers in influenza A viruses, of both H1N1 and H3N2 subtypes. The targets of these assays were the nucleotide substitution G806A (S31N mutation) in the M gene as marker of resistance to adamatanes in influenza viruses A(H3N2), the substitution A356T (E119V mutation) in the N2 gene of influenza viruses A(H3N2) and the substitution C823T (H274Y mutation) in the N1 gene of the pandemic A(H1N1) 2009 virus as markers of oseltamivir resistance. First, the designed primers and the overall protocol of the HRMA were validated using already characterized viral isolates either containing or lacking changes at the tested codons. Then, HRMA was used to search for the marker of oseltamivir resistance in 75 clinical samples, H1N1 2009 positives, analyzed previously by pyrosequencing and Sanger sequencing, and of both adamantane-derivatives and oseltamivir resistance in 57 H3N2 positive clinical samples. The results of HRMA of the H1N1 2009 isolates were in agreement with those obtained by sequencing. As regards the H3N2 isolates, HRMA revealed a widespread resistance to adamantanes with 89.5% nucleotide substitution G806A, while 3% were resistant to oseltamivir (A356T change). HRMA, applied to the detection of markers of resistance to antiviral drugs against influenza A viruses, confirmed to be a procedure flexible, low cost and time-saving, suitable for application to epidemiological surveys and in clinical settings for diagnostic purposes.

Efficacy and safety of oral oseltamivir for influenza prophylaxis in transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Haematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) and solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients are at high risk for severe influenza and its complications, and may not be adequately protected by vaccination.

METHODS

Liver, kidney, or liver-kidney transplant or allogeneic HSCT recipients aged ≥1 year were randomized to oseltamivir (75 mg once daily for those ≥13 years or weight-based dosing for children 1-12 years) or placebo for 12 weeks during periods of local influenza circulation. Patients were assessed for influenza infection via daily diary, every-other-week culture and PCR, and baseline and end-of-treatment serology.

RESULTS

A total of 477 subjects were enrolled (239 oseltamivir and 238 placebo); most were adults (96%) and SOT recipients (81%). In the intent-to-treat population, the frequency of laboratory-confirmed clinical influenza (culture positive and/or >4-fold increase in haemagglutinin antibody inhibition [primary end point]) was similar in the oseltamivir and placebo groups (2.1% [5/237] and 2.9% [7/238]). Incidence of laboratory-confirmed influenza was significantly reduced in the oseltamivir group versus placebo when determined by reverse transcriptase-PCR (1.7% [4/237] versus 8.4% [20/238]; 95% CI 2.8, 11.1) or viral culture (<1% [1/237] versus 3.8% [9/238]; 95% CI 0.7, 6.6), giving protective efficacies of 79.9 and 88.8%, respectively. Serious adverse events (oseltamivir 8% and placebo 10%) and adverse events (oseltamivir 55% and placebo 58%) were reported in both arms with a similar frequency. One illness due to oseltamivir-resistant A/H1N1 virus was detected in each group.

CONCLUSIONS

Oseltamivir prophylaxis is generally well-tolerated and may reduce culture- or PCR-confirmed influenza incidence in transplant recipients.

Antivirals and resistance: influenza virus

Influenza causes annual epidemics of respiratory viral infections are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Influenza vaccines have been shown to reduce the risk of infection and mitigate against some of the virus' sequellae. Likewise, two classes of antivirals, the adamantanes (amantadine and rimantadine) and the neuraminidase inhibitors (laninamivir, oseltamivir, peramivir, and zanamivir) are currently approved for the prevention and treatment of influenza; several other classes of antivirals and immune modulators are also currently under investigation. One of the greatest challenges to our armamentarium of antivirals is the emergence of resistant mutants. In this paper, we will review the currently approved and investigational antiviral agents and the mechanisms of resistance that impact their activity.

Influenza, including the novel H1N1, in organ transplant patients

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This article will review the epidemiology, diagnosis, prevention and management of influenza in solid organ transplant recipients.

RECENT FINDINGS

A number of recent studies have documented that influenza vaccination is both well tolerated and generally effective in producing an immunologic response in most solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients. Antiviral use is associated with improved clinical outcomes, but prolonged shedding may require a longer course of therapy than what is currently approved by the FDA. Antiviral resistance emerges rarely in transplant patients and should be considered in all patients with an inadequate clinical and/or virologic response.

SUMMARY

Influenza is associated with significant morbidity and mortality, particularly in lung transplant recipients. Molecular diagnostics are preferred over other diagnostic modalities, if available. Influenza vaccination is well tolerated and provides protective benefit in most SOT recipients; in those with contraindications to vaccination or in whom responses are predicted to be poor, antivirals may be considered. Antiviral therapy is associated with improved outcomes in transplant patients and treatment should be continued until clinically and virologic response have been documented. Resistance, particularly with patients infected with the pandemic influenza A/H1N1, should be considered and treated with an antiviral with predicted activity.