Adhesions during and after Surgical Procedures, their Prevention and Impact on Women'S Health

Surgery vs. hormone-based treatment for pain control in deep infiltrating endometriosis: a retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the outcome of surgical or hormone-based pharmacological treatment for deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE) in patients with pain symptoms.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study of 122 women with DIE of the bowel was conducted: 61 women underwent surgical treatment due to poor pain control and 61 received hormone-based treatment alone for at least six months. Chronic pelvic pain, dysmenorrhea, deep dyspareunia, dyschezia and dysuria were evaluated by a visual analog scale (VAS) to measure pain on a scale from 0 to 10. Dyspareunia was further evaluated using the Deep Dyspareunia Scale (scores of 0-3).

RESULTS

Surgery (n = 61 women) was performed at a mean of 3.3 ± 1.6 years previously, while hormone-based treatment alone (n = 61 women) was used for a mean of 3.0 ± 1.41 years. After surgery, women without a desire to procreate received hormone-based treatment. Before treatment, the most intense endometriosis-related pain in the surgical treatment group and hormone-based treatment group alone were chronic pelvic pain (VAS = 9.48 ± 1.49; 8.57 ± 2.22), dysmenorrhea (VAS = 9.61 ± 1.45; 9.02 ± 1.35) and deep dyspareunia (VAS = 8.04 ± 2.82; 7.47 ± 3.21, respectively), all with mean pain scores of around 8 (0-10) in both groups. Both treatments were effective at reducing all symptoms (p < .001). The surgical treatment proved to be more effective and more enduring at improving chronic pelvic pain (p < .001), dyschezia (p = .003) and deep dyspareunia (p < .001). Regarding deep dyspareunia, using the deep dyspareunia scale, ∼70% of surgically treated women scored 0 or 1 (absent or mild deep dyspareunia) after treatment, compared to scores 2 or 3 (intense dyspareunia) in about 70% of the group using hormone-based treatment (p < .001).

CONCLUSION

Both types of treatment, surgical and pharmacological, effectively improved pain symptoms associated with DIE. However, improvement in chronic pelvic pain, dyschezia and deep dyspareunia was greater and longer-lasting after surgery.

Ovariopexy-Before and after Endometriosis Surgery

Endometriosis surgery is often very challenging. Key to complete resection of endometriosis is access to the retroperitoneum. Endometriosis can involve the ureter and uterine vessels, and ovary on the lateral pelvic wall makes retroperitoneal access difficult. Primary and post-surgical adhesions prevalence in endometriosis is very high. Ovariopexy, transposition of ovaries temporarily, is done for better surgical access and to reduce postoperative adhesions. We concluded that although limited evidence, ovariopexy is an excellent tool to aid endometriosis surgery and prevent postoperative adhesions. It is cost effective, simple and complication rate almost nil. More robust trials are required to substantiate evidence for its impact on preventing postoperative adhesions and its effect on fertility. In this review, we describe our technique of ovariopexy supplemented with a video, with the aim to put light on this useful and important technique, which is beneficial both for surgeons and patients.

Complications of Laparoscopy in Connection with Entry Techniques

The anatomy of the human being has not changed. However, technical developments in operating materials and methods call for improvements in surgical procedures as well as the management of complications. A fundamental distinction between any operating method and laparoscopy is that, in the latter, the initial entry is usually performed in blind fashion. Blind entry may result in vessel or organ damage, especially in patients who have undergone previous surgery. One of the difficulties associated with the entry is that the damage may not be identified immediately and then necessitate major abdominal repair. Furthermore, the improvement of surgical instruments and techniques enables the surgeon to perform even major operations by the laparoscopic approach. This is associated with renewed learning curves and a high rate of complications due to vascular, bowel, uterine, or bladder damage. The improvement of surgical techniques must be accompanied by advancements in the management of complications. The aim of this review is to address the risks of laparoscopy as well as their correct and professional management. (J GYNECOL SURG 33:81)

Impact of medical and surgical treatment of endometriosis on the cure of endometriosis and pain

This endometriosis study evaluates three different treatment strategies (hormonal medication, surgical, or combined treatment) and discusses the influence of endometriosis on the cure of this disease and pain relief. Four hundred and fifty patients with genital endometriosis, aged 18-44 years, were randomly distributed to three treatment groups at the first laparoscopy. They were reevaluated at a second-look laparoscopy (D 426/10), one to two months after the three-month hormonal therapy for groups 1 and 3 and five to six months later for group 2 (surgical treatment alone). Outcome data focussed on the recurrence of symptoms and pain. The three treatment options independent of the initial endoscopic endometriosis classification (EEC) stage including deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE) achieved an overall cure rate of 50% or higher. The highest cure rate of 60% was achieved by the combined treatment, 55% by the exclusively hormonal therapy, and 50% by the exclusively surgical treatment. An overall pregnancy rate between 55% and 65% was achieved with no significant difference in relation to the therapeutical option.

Combined surgical and hormone therapy for endometriosis is the most effective treatment: prospective, randomized, controlled trial

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To evaluate 3 therapy strategies: hormone therapy, surgery, and combined treatment.

DESIGN

Prospective, randomized, controlled study (Canadian Task Force classification I).

SETTING

University-based teaching hospital.

PATIENTS

Four hundred fifty patients with genital endometriosis, aged 18 to 44 years, before first laparoscopy.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 treatment groups: hormone therapy, surgery, or combined treatment. Patients were reevaluated at second-look laparoscopy, at 2 to 2 months after 3-month hormone therapy in groups 1 and 3 and at 5 to 6 months in group 2 (surgical treatment alone). Outcome data were focussed on the endometriosis stage, recurrence of symptoms, and pregnancy rate.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

All treatment options, independent of the initial Endoscopic Endometriosis Classification stage, achieved an overall cure rate of ≥50%. A cure rate of 60% was achieved with the combined treatment, 55% with exclusively hormone therapy, and 50% with exclusively surgical treatment. Recurrence of symptoms was lowest in patients who received combined treatment. Significant benefit was achieved for dysmenorrhea and dyspareunia. An overall pregnancy rate of 55% to 65% was achieved, with no significant difference between the therapeutic options.

CONCLUSION

In the quest to find the most effective treatment of genital endometriosis, this clinical randomized study shows the lowest incidence of recurrence with combined surgical and medical treatment and improved pregnancy rate in any medically treated patients with or without surgery. The highest cure rate (Endoscopic Endometriosis Classification stage 0) for endometriosis was also achieved in the combined treatment group.