[Evaluation of mouse brain-derived, inactivated Japanese encephalitis vaccine]

Resumption of active recommendation of the human papillomavirus vaccine in Japan and future challenges for the National Immunization Program

Japan's immunization program resumed proactively recommending the use of the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine nationwide in April 2022, after suspending this recommendation in June 2013. The promotion of catch-up vaccinations is an urgent issue to reduce the increase in cervical cancer and other cancers caused by low vaccination rates. In addition, the National Immunization Program still has issues to be considered, such as the adoption of the 9-valent vaccine, establishment of an appropriate number of vaccinations according to age, and routine immunization of males. There is a history of eliminating the use of the measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine and the mouse brain-derived, purified inactivated Japanese encephalitis vaccine, as well as suspending the HPV vaccine recommendation in Japan. These decisions have led to the current preventable infectious disease burden. In order to make the right policy decisions based on science-based assessments, it is necessary to establish a safety assessment platform to evaluate the causal relationship between vaccines and adverse events following immunization. Information technology, which has been promoted with the coronavirus disease 2019 vaccine in the current pandemic, may assist in providing more detailed vaccine safety evaluations for other vaccines.

Vaccines for preventing Japanese encephalitis

BACKGROUND

Vaccination is recognized as the only practical measure for preventing Japanese encephalitis. Production shortage, costs, and issues of licensure impair vaccination programmes in many affected countries. Concerns over vaccine effectiveness and safety also have a negative impact on acceptance and uptake.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate vaccines for preventing Japanese encephalitis in terms of effectiveness, adverse events, and immunogenicity.

SEARCH STRATEGY

In March 2007, we searched the Cochrane Infectious Diseases Group Specialized Register, CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library 2007, Issue 1), MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILACS, BIOSIS, and reference lists. We also attempted to contact corresponding authors and vaccine companies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), including cluster-RCTs, comparing Japanese encephalitis vaccines with placebo (inert agent or unrelated vaccine), no intervention, or alternative Japanese encephalitis vaccine.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Authors independently extracted data and assessed methodological quality. Dichotomous data were compared with relative risks and a 95% confidence interval (CI), and converted into percentage vaccine efficacy.

MAIN RESULTS

Eight RCTs involving 358,750 participants were included. These trials investigated two available and three pre-licensure vaccines. Two RCTs assessing efficacy of the commercially available inactivated Nakayama vaccine were identified. A two-dose schedule of the licensed vaccine provided significant protection of 95% (95% CI 10% to 100%) for one year only, while two doses of an unpurified precursor vaccine protected children by 81% (95% CI 45% to 94%) in year one and by 59% (95% CI 2% to 83%) in year two. Serious adverse events were not observed. Mild and moderate episodes of injection site soreness, fever, headache, and nausea were reported in less than 6% of children receiving inactivated vaccine compared to 0.6% of unvaccinated controls. One cluster-RCT compared the live-attenuated SA14-14-2 vaccine (widely used in China) with no intervention measuring adverse events. Fever was reported in 2.7% of vaccinees compared to 3.1% of controls, while 0.1% of both groups suffered diarrhoea or seizures. Four small pre-licensure RCTs assessing a genetically engineered vaccine and two cell culture-derived inactivated vaccines revealed high immunogenicity and relative safety.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Only one of the three currently used vaccines has been assessed for efficacy in a RCT. Other RCTs have assessed their safety, however, and they appear to cause only occasional mild or moderate adverse events. Further trials of effectiveness and safety are needed for the currently used vaccines, especially concerning dose levels and schedules. Trials investigating several new vaccines are planned or in progress.