Trauma care in the tropics: addressing gaps in treating injury in rural and remote Australia

Epidemiology and outcomes of brain trauma in rural and urban populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To identify and describe differences in demographics, injury characteristics, and outcomes between rural and urban patients suffering brain injury.

DATA SOURCES

CINAHL, Emcare, MEDLINE, and Scopus.

REVIEW METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing epidemiology and outcomes of rural and urban brain trauma was conducted in accordance with PRISMA and MOOSE guidelines.

RESULTS

36 studies with ~ 2.5-million patients were included. Incidence of brain injury was higher in males, regardless of location. Rates of transport-related brain injuries, particularly involving motorized vehicles other than cars, were significantly higher in rural populations (OR:3.63, 95% CI[1.58,8.35], p = 0.002), whereas urban residents had more fall-induced brain trauma (OR:0.73, 95% CI[0.66,0.81], p < 0.00001). Rural patients were 28% more likely to suffer severe injury, indicated by Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS)≤8 (OR:1.28, 95% CI[1.04,1.58], p = 0.02). There was no difference in mortality (OR:1.09, 95% CI[0.73,1.61], p = 0.067), however, urban patients were twice as likely to be discharged with a good outcome (OR:0.52, 95% CI[0.41,0.67], p < 0.00001).

CONCLUSIONS

Rurality is associated with greater severity and poorer outcomes of traumatic brain injury. Transport accidents disproportionally affect those traveling on rural roads. Future research recommendations include addition of prehospital data, adequate follow-up, standardized measures, and sub-group analyses of high-risk groups, e.g. Indigenous populations.

Why are bleeding trauma patients still dying? Towards a systems hypothesis of trauma

Over the years, many explanations have been put forward to explain early and late deaths following hemorrhagic trauma. Most include single-event, sequential contributions from sympathetic hyperactivity, endotheliopathy, trauma-induced coagulopathy (TIC), hyperinflammation, immune dysfunction, ATP deficit and multiple organ failure (MOF). We view early and late deaths as a systems failure, not as a series of manifestations that occur over time. The traditional approach appears to be a by-product of last century’s highly reductionist, single-nodal thinking, which also extends to patient management, drug treatment and drug design. Current practices appear to focus more on alleviating symptoms rather than addressing the underlying problem. In this review, we discuss the importance of the system, and focus on the brain’s “privilege” status to control secondary injury processes. Loss of status from blood brain barrier damage may be responsible for poor outcomes. We present a unified Systems Hypothesis Of Trauma (SHOT) which involves: 1) CNS-cardiovascular coupling, 2) Endothelial-glycocalyx health, and 3) Mitochondrial integrity. If central control of cardiovascular coupling is maintained, we hypothesize that the endothelium will be protected, mitochondrial energetics will be maintained, and immune dysregulation, inflammation, TIC and MOF will be minimized. Another overlooked contributor to early and late deaths following hemorrhagic trauma is from the trauma of emergent surgery itself. This adds further stress to central control of secondary injury processes. New point-of-care drug therapies are required to switch the body’s genomic and proteomic programs from an injury phenotype to a survival phenotype. Currently, no drug therapy exists that targets the whole system following major trauma.