Effects of submucosally administered platelet-rich plasma on the rate of tooth movement

Roles of B-cell lymphoma 6 in orthodontic tooth movement of rat molars

INTRODUCTION

B-cell lymphoma 6 (Bcl6) inhibits osteoclast differentiation in vitro; however, its role in orthodontic tooth movement (OTM) remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the role of Bcl6 in OTM of rat molars.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

OTM was performed on the maxillary first molars of male rats using nickel-titanium coil springs (25 gf) for 14 days with or without local injection of FX1 (50 mg/kg), a Bcl6 inhibitor (n = 10 per group). Micro-computed tomography (CT) images were used to analyse OTM distance and bone morphometric parameters. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) determined Bcl6 expression and tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase staining (TRAP) staining assessed osteoclast differentiation. TRAP staining, and reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction determined the effect of FX1 (1 μM) on in vitro rat osteoclast differentiation. The effect of FX1 on cell proliferation and Smad4 expression in periodontal ligament (PDL) cells was determined.

RESULTS

Administration of FX1 significantly increased OTM distance and decreased the bone/tissue volume compared with vehicle treatment. IHC staining showed that the vehicle-OTM group had higher expression of Bcl6 than the FX1-OTM group. The number of osteoclasts on the compression side was significantly higher in the FX1-OTM group than that in the vehicle-OTM group. FX1 enhanced osteoclast differentiation and expression of Nfatc1, Dc-stamp, and Ctsk mRNA in osteoclasts in vitro. FX1 significantly promotes PDL cell proliferation in vivo and in vitro.

LIMITATIONS

We evaluated only 14 days of OTM.

CONCLUSIONS

Bcl6 may play an important role in OTM via modulation of osteoclast differentiation and PDL cell proliferation.

Evaluating the efficacy of platelet-rich plasma on orthodontic tooth movement rate: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The main objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP) on acceleration of the orthodontic tooth movement and assess the evidence based on the available literature.

METHODS

The trial was registered and reported according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Electronic databases including PubMed, Cochrane, Scopus, Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Google Scholar were searched for randomized controlled studies of PRP on the rate of tooth movement. The search was restricted to articles published in English between January 2000 to 31 December 2023. The search was completed by two reviewers independently and the risk of bias was evaluated using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool (RoB 2.0) and meta-analysis was performed. Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) was done to determine the certainty of evidence.

RESULTS

Thirteen studies were included in the systematic review and 10 were included in the quantitative analysis. A random-effects model for meta-analysis of seven studies evaluating the rate of canine retraction revealed a statistically significant increase in the rate of orthodontic tooth movement of 0.38 mm/month in 1 month (121 patients; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.27-0.49; I2 = 35%; P < 0.001) which decreased to 0.09mm/month in the fourth month (80 patients; 95% CI 0.02-0.17; I2 = 0%; P < 0.02). Three studies that considered en masse retraction revealed a mean difference of 0.36mm over 3 months (40 patients; 95% CI -0.23 to 0.94; I2 = 74%; P < 0.23).

CONCLUSIONS

The study suggests that PRP application can accelerate tooth movement, but its effects decreased over 4 months. The results should be interpreted cautiously due to the study's inherent limitations.

An Evaluation of the Rate and Type of Orthodontic Tooth Movement When Injecting Platelet-Rich Plasma During Mini-Implant-Based Segmented en-Masse Retraction of Upper Anterior Teeth

INTRODUCTION

The study aimed to determine the influence of palatal injection of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) on the rate and type of orthodontic tooth movement (OTM) during the en-masse retraction of upper anterior teeth.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two-arm parallel-group trial, in which 30 class II division 1 adult patients (7 males and 23 females) aged 16 to 27 years were recruited. The sample was randomly divided into two groups: the experimental group, in which PRP was injected in the palatal mucosa of the maxillary six anterior teeth immediately before starting the en-masse retraction of upper anterior teeth, whereas in the control group, traditional treatment was employed. Following the first premolar extraction, space closure was accomplished using frictionless mechanics for the en-masse retraction of upper anterior teeth. In both groups, a rigid segmented arch made of stainless steel with a diameter of 0.021 x 0.025 inch and an 8-mm power arm was used for the upper anterior teeth, and mini-implants were inserted between the upper second premolar and first molar at 8 mm apical from the archwire line. NiTi coil springs were used for retraction. Measurements were recorded at the onset of space closure (T0) and every 40 days till the middle of the en-masse retraction of upper anterior teeth (T1).

RESULTS

Thirty patients completed the trial, and no patients were lost to follow-up in both groups. The OTM rate in the PRP group was similar to that of the control group (P = 0.596). The upper anterior teeth in the two groups were retracted mostly by controlled tipping and partially by translation. Statistically insignificant differences were observed between the two groups regarding the rest of the cephalometric variables. No serious harms were observed in either group.

CONCLUSIONS

PRP was ineffective in accelerating the OTM rate during the en-masse retraction of upper anterior teeth and it did not affect the type of tooth movement.

Platelet-rich plasma's (PRP) impacts on accelerated canine movement

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the impact of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) on canine movement acceleration.

METHODS

Randomized clinical trial split-mouth study with a double-blind design and controlled group on 31 orthodontic patients, which had been indicated bilateral maxillary first premolar extraction. Each patient recorded clinical features, analyzed lateral cephalometric film, and evaluated the acceleration on dental models at every specific interval.

RESULT

The cumulative distance to the distal canines was larger for the PRP injection group than for the control group at three time points (4 weeks, 8 weeks, and 12 weeks), all of which were statistically significant. The PRP injection group's canine distal width increased from the first 4 weeks (ΔT1) to the highest in the middle 4 weeks (ΔT2 = 1.78 ± 0.11 mm/month), and then it gradually decreased in the last 4 weeks (ΔT3). The speed of the PRP-injected canine was faster than the control group by 1.51 times.

CONCLUSION

PRP can accelerate the speed of canine movement in orthodontics and can be applied for severe cases, for example, impacted tooth retraction, molar protraction or retraction, and other cases.

Methods of measuring distal canine movement and rotation- A review

This article provides an overview of the various methods for measuring distal canine movement and rotation during retraction. Various databases, including PubMed Central, Science Direct, Wiley Online Library, the Cochrane Library, Textbooks, Google Scholar, and Research Gate, and a manual search up until September 2022, were used to search for various methods of measuring distal canine movement and rotation during retraction. After excluding the duplicate articles, the papers explaining these techniques were included. Four significant techniques were identified. The digital method with 3D superimposition is the safest, most accurate, and most accessible of the methods reviewed.

Effect of leukocyte-platelet-rich fibrin (L-PRF) on the rate of orthodontic tooth movement and expression of various biomarkers in gingival crevicular fluid

OBJECTIVES

To assess the outcome of leukocyte-platelet-rich fibrin (L-PRF) on the rate of maxillary canine retraction and its correlation with the levels of Receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B ligand (RANKL), osteoprotegerin (OPG), and RANKL:OPG in the gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) during comprehensive orthodontic treatment.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Eighteen females who required all 1st premolars extraction for the correction of their class I bimaxillary protrusion malocclusions were included. The L-PRF plugs were placed in the experimental side 1st premolar extraction sockets. Canine retraction was performed by sliding mechanics. Canine retraction was assessed from the maxillary study models prepared just before the extraction (T₀) and then at 1 week (T₁), 2 weeks (T₂), 4 weeks (T₃), and 8 weeks (T₄) after the 1st premolar extraction and placement of L-PRF plugs. The concentrations of RANKL and OPG in the GCF were evaluated at T₀, T₁, T₂, T₃, and T₄.

RESULTS

In experimental sides, the amount of canine retraction was statistically more during the T₀-T₁, T₁-T₂, and T₂-T₃ periods. The mean concentration of RANKL at T₁, T₂, and T₃ was significantly more in the experimental sides. The mean concentration of OPG was significantly less in the experimental sides at T₂, T₃, and T₄. The RANKL:OPG was significantly more in the experimental sides at T₁, T₂, T₃, and T₄. No significant correlation was found between amount of canine retraction and concentration of RANKL and OPG and RANKL to OPG ratio in GCF.

CONCLUSIONS

The L-PRF accelerated the rate of maxillary canine retraction by 0.28 mm over an 8-week period. The L-PRF favored the local osteoclastogenesis by enhancing the RANKL and suppressing the OPG concentrations. There was no significant correlation between the rate of maxillary canine retraction and expression of RANKL, OPG, and RANKL:OPG in GCF.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The Clinical Trials Registry of India (Reg. No. CTRI/2020/10/028390, Date-13.10.2020).

The effect of submucosal injection of platelet-rich fibrin vs. platelet-rich plasma on orthodontic tooth movement in rabbits; 28 days follow-up

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare between the effects of submucosal injection of platelet rich fibrin (i-PRF) versus platelet rich plasma (PRP) on orthodontic tooth movement (OTM) in a rabbit model over a 28-day follow-up period.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixty-three rabbits were assigned into 3 equal groups. Group I animals were subjected to the OTM without any treatments and considered as the control. Whereas groups II and III were handled as group I and instead i-PRF and PRP were injected submucosally in the buccal vestibular mucosa next to the mandibular 1st premolar, respectively. The distance of OTM was consecutively measured clinically after 7, 14 and 28 days. Seven rabbits from each group were euthanized after 7, 14 and 28 days for histological evaluation. Two-way ANOVA followed by LSD post-hoc statistical tests were used for comparison.

RESULTS

After 28 days, the mean tooth movements were 4.36±0.04mm in the control group, 6.30±0.06mm in the group receiving PRP and, 6.85±0.09mm in the group receiving i-PRF. Statistical analysis for the values of teeth movements revealed highly significant differences between different groups (P=0.001) and between different time periods (P=0.001). Histological analysis showed that submucosal injection of PRP and i-PRF yielded significant differences in periodontal ligament width in compression and tension sides between different groups (P=0.001) and between different time periods (P=0.001).

CONCLUSION

Submucosal injection of either PRP or i-PRF is a minimally invasive and safe approach for accelerating OTM. In this rabbit model, the effect of i-PRF is significantly more pronounced than the effect of PRP.

Effectiveness of platelet-rich concentrates on the rate of orthodontic tooth movement: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Autologous platelet-rich concentrates (PRCs) are recently used as a local biological substance in orthodontics to accelerate the rate of tooth movement.

OBJECTIVES

This systematic review aimed to evaluate the effects of PRCs on the rate of orthodontic tooth movement (OTM).

SEARCH METHODS

Unrestricted search of five electronic databases supplemented by the manual and gray literature search were undertaken in March 2022.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the effect of PRCs on the rate of OTM with their side effect were included in this systematic review.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data items were extracted by two authors using a pre-piloted extraction form. Similar outcomes within a comparable time frame were synthesized in a meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Fourteen studies were deemed eligible for inclusion and seven RCTs were pooled in a meta-analysis. Canine retraction rate was higher in the side of PRCs injection than the control side by 0.28 mm/month (95% CI: 0.16-0.40, I2 = 95.6 per cent, P < 0.001, 345 patients) in the first 4 months after PRCs injection. There was no statistically significant difference between the PRCs side and the control side regarding molar anchorage loss (MAL) (MD = 0.03 mm, 95% CI: -0.18 to 0.24, I2 = 46.3 per cent, P = 0.78, 44 patients), canine rotation (MD = -0.19o, 95% CI: -1.95 to 1.57, I2 = 45.4 per cent, P = 0.96, 48 patients), or en-masse retraction. Likewise, there was no difference between both groups in terms of the duration of de-crowding. The mandibular canine retraction was statistically higher on the PRCs side than on the control side by 0.17 mm/month (P < 0.001, one trial). Regarding root resorption, there was no statistically significant difference between the experimental and control sides within the follow-up time. Mild pain scores were reported by the patients in the first 24 hours after injections.

CONCLUSIONS

Low-level evidence indicates that the effect of PRCs on OTM is minor and clinically insignificant. The findings should be interpreted with caution due to the inherent limitations in the included RCTs.

REGISTRATION

PROSPERO (CRD42022300026).

The effect of platelet-rich concentrates on orthodontic tooth movement: A review of randomized controlled trials

Objectives

Platelet-rich concentrates, namely platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and platelet-rich fibrin (PRF), have recently shown potential roles in accelerating orthodontic tooth movement (OTM) and reducing treatment duration. Our study aims to systematically evaluate the effect of platelet-rich concentrates on OTM.

Materials and methods

An electronic search of 11 databases, followed by a hand search of reference lists of eligible studies and related reviews, was conducted up to January 2022. Randomized controlled trials investigating OTM of patients with platelet-rich concentrates were included. Risk of bias was assessed by version 2 of Cochrane tool (RoB 2) for assessing risk of bias in randomized trials.

Results

Among 715 records initially identified, 9 studies were included, of which 3 used PRP and the other 6 applied PRF. 7 studies supported a positive relationship between platelet-rich concentrates and OTM, but the other 2 studies reported a null and a negative effect of PRF, respectively. The overall qualities of evidence were moderate to high.

Conclusions

Platelet-rich concentrates as PRP and PRF seem to be effective in accelerating OTM at early stages, while their long-term efficacy remains controversial. Repeated application of platelet concentrates may increase the accelerated stability of OTM.

Effect of platelet-rich plasma on the rate of orthodontic tooth movement

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) on the rate of orthodontic tooth movement (OTM) during en-masse anterior retraction.

METHODS

Twenty adult patients with Angles Class I bimaxillary protrusion or crowding requiring first premolar extraction for routine orthodontic treatment were divided into control and experimental groups. The control group did not receive PRP, whereas the experimental group received PRP in the alveolar mucosa of the maxillary 6 anterior teeth just before starting en-masse retraction. Measurements were recorded on digital models made from scanned plaster casts at the beginning of space closure and the end of 3 months. The overall rate of OTM between both groups was compared. The amount of anchorage loss and type of anterior retraction on lateral cephalogram was also compared between the groups.

RESULTS

The overall rate of OTM was minimally increased but not statistically significant in the experimental vs control group (P = 0.838). Anterior retraction parameters in both groups showed incisors moving primarily by controlled tipping and partly by translation. An intergroup comparison of all cephalometric parameters for anchorage loss and anterior retraction showed statistically insignificant differences between both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

PRP is ineffective in accelerating the rate of OTM during en-masse anterior retraction.