Evaluation of the miniplate-anchored Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device in skeletal Class II growing subjects: A randomized controlled trial

Impact of initial lip competence on the outcome of class II functional appliances therapy

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this prospective clinical study was to evaluate the impact of initial lip position on class II functional appliance therapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In total, 34 class II division 1 patients (23 females, 19 males; mean age 12.4 ± 0.9 years) that met the inclusion criteria (> ½ class II molar relationship, overjet > 6 mm, ANB > 4°, neutral or horizontal growth pattern, cervical vertebral maturation stage (CVMS) II - III, mean wear-time > 10 h/day) were consecutively divided into two groups (lip incompetence (LI); lip competence (LC)). All patients were treated with the Sander bite jumping appliance (BJA). Wear time was microelectronically measured. Lateral cephalograms were taken at the beginning (T0) and after 1 year of treatment (T1). An untreated class II group served as a control (CG). Inter-group comparisons were determined with Mann-Whitney U tests for independent samples.

RESULTS

Significant skeletal treatment effects were found in both treated groups when compared to the CG with significantly more pronounced mandibular skeletal effects in the LI than in the LC group (mandibular base length p < 0.001, composite mandibular base length p < 0.001, condylar head growth p = 0.002, co-pg p < 0.00, go-pg p = 0.003, reduction of the ANB angle p = 0.009, and Wits appraisal p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The more pronounced mandibular effects in the LI group were composed of the functional orthopedic effect plus harmonization of the lip competence.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Functional harmonization of lip incompetence with BJA enhances mandibular growth stimulation. Lip incompetence seems to impede mandibular growth and its harmonization seems to be a preventive approach.

[Early orthodontic/orthopedic treatment in patients with class II sagittal anomalies. A review]

Introduction

Class II sagittal anomalies have a prevalence of between 18-32% of the population. To resolve this type of malocclusion, various therapies have been proposed, some of which involve functional orthodontic or orthopedic appliances. However, it is still a matter of discussion whether the treatments should be started at an early age in patients, or if there are adverse effects that could harm structures of the stomatognathic system.

Objective

To analyze the results obtained from early treatment in patients with Class II sagittal malocclusion through a literature review.

Materials and methods

An advanced search with terms and connectors was carried out in the Medline via Pubmed and Science Direct databases. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied for the definitive selection.

Results

Through this search, a total of 5909 articles were collected, of which 23 were considered to meet the criteria established in this review work.

Conclusions

There are orthodontic/orthopedic devices aimed at solving the characteristics of class II sagittal malocclusions, but before planning early treatment it is essential to provide an accurate diagnosis to evaluate the specific type of appliance that is required.

Effects of skeletal anchorage on mandibular rotation with fixed functional appliance therapy in class II malocclusion patients – A systematic review and meta-analysis

Objectives:

The study aimed to systematically investigate the effect of skeletal anchorage on mandibular rotation during FFA therapy during Class II correction in adolescents.

Material and Methods:

The review protocol was registered under the PROSPERO database (CRD42021256690). Electronic searches of databases and screening were performed up to May 2022. Only randomized clinical trials (RCT) and non-randomized controlled trials (non-RCT) were included in the study. Revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for RCTs (RoB 2) and risk of bias in non-randomized studies-of interventions tool for non-RCT were used for studies. Meta-analysis was performed and a forest plot was obtained. The primary outcome was mandibular rotation. Other outcomes assessed were angles SNA, SNB, ANB, mandibular incisor proclination, and failure rates of mini-screws and mini plates.

Results:

Twelve studies (eight RCTs and four non-RCTs) were included fulfilling inclusion criteria. Evidence showed a low-to-moderate risk of bias for different domains. Meta-analysis for mandibular rotation revealed a greater increase in mandibular plane angle in patients who received FFA with skeletal anchorage as compared to patients who did not receive skeletal anchorage.

Conclusion:

With or without skeletal anchorage, mandibular rotational changes during FFA therapy are similar. FFA when combined with skeletal anchorage causes more skeletal changes in sagittal parameters than conventional FFA used alone. FFA with skeletal anchorage reduces lower incisor proclination.

Skeletal and dentoalveolar effects of class II malocclusion treatment using bi-maxillary skeletal anchorage: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

The goal of this systematic review was to assess the available evidence regarding the skeletal and dentoalveolar effects of bi-maxillary skeletal anchorage devices (BMSADs) used in treating growing class II malocclusion patients.

METHODS

A comprehensive search was conducted on PubMed, Scopus, Science Direct, Web of Science, Cochrane, and LILACS up to November 2021, which was augmented by a manual search. The studies included were clinical trials (RCTs) and/or follow-up observational studies (retrospective and prospective). The outcomes of interest were the skeletal, dentoalveolar, and occlusal treatment-induced changes obtained from pre- and post-cephalometric measurements. The risks of bias of the included studies were assessed using an assessment tool from previous publications.

RESULTS

Out of 742 screened articles, only 4 were eligible and thus included in the qualitative synthesis. They showed a moderate overall risk of bias. The results are presented as mean changes in both the study and control groups. All studies reported retrusion of the maxillary base and advancement of the mandible (meaning reduced ANB angle). Three of the included studies reported an increase in the vertical jaw relation, which was contrary to what the fourth study reported. Three studies reported an increase in the maxillary incisors' inclination or position, while one study reported their retroclination. Proclination of the mandibular incisors happened in two studies, whereas the other two studies reported retroclination. The overjet was reduced in all included studies.

CONCLUSION

Apart from the protrusive effects on the mandible, retrusive effects on the maxilla, and the consequent reduction of the overjet, BMSADs results in inconsistent skeletal and dentoalveolar effects. However, the current evidence is limited due to the variability in the biomechanics of the intermaxillary components, type of anchorage, and comparable groups in the included studies. Further RCTs with more standardized methodologies are highly encouraged.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

BMSADs (using miniscrews or miniplates on both jaws) induces more skeletal than dentoalveolar effects. However, this must be practiced with caution, based on the benefit to risk (surgical insertion) ratio, and the limited evidence available in hand so far. Registration The protocol for this systematic review was registered at the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO, No.: CRD42020199601).

A Scoping Review about the Characteristics and Success-Failure Rates of Temporary Anchorage Devices in Orthodontics

This study synthesized the scientific evidence concerning the main characteristics of the Temporary Anchorage Devices (TADs) used in orthodontics and reported the success-failure rates during treatment. For that means, this scoping review collected articles from previous research. A complementary search was carried out in the databases PubMed-MEDLINE, Scopus, LILACS, and EMBASE, focusing on original studies published from 2010 to 2020. We analyzed the main characteristics of the publications. As a result, 103 articles were included. Most of the research was conducted among different groups, who needed TADs principally in the maxilla and an interradicular location between the second premolar and first molar. AbsoAnchor, Dentos Inc., Daegu, Korea, was the most used brand of TADs. The most common characteristics of the devices and biomechanics were a diameter and length of 1.6 mm and 8 mm, a self-drilled system, a closed technique for placement, immediate loading, and forces that ranged between 40 and 800 g. Of the studies, 47.6% showed success rates ≥90%. In conclusion, high success rates were found for TADs, and differences were found according to sociodemographic and clinical variables. The studies showed variability in methodological design, and scientific publications were concentrated in certain countries. We recommend further scientific research on TADs using more standardized designs.

ADDING TEMPORARY ANCHORAGE DEVICES (TADs) TO THE FORSUS™ CLASS II CORRECTION SYSTEM MAY NOT ENHANCE THE SAGITTAL SKELETAL EFFECTS BUT MAY CONTROL THE INCLINATION OF THE MANDIBULAR INCISORS

ARTICLE TITLE AND BIBLIOGRAPHIC INFORMATION

A comparison of the effects of Forsus appliances with and without temporary anchorage devices for skeletal Class II malocclusion. Liu L, Zhan Q, Zhou J, Kuang Q, Yan X, Zhang X, Shan Y, Lai W, Long H. Angle Orthod. 2020 Dec 30. doi:10.2319/051120-421.1. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 33378419.

SOURCE OF FUNDING

National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 82,071,147, 81,571,004, and 81,500,884).

TYPE OF STUDY/DESIGN

Systematic review with meta-analysis.

Class ii treatment effects with fixed functional appliances: jasper jumper vs. forsus fatigue resistant device

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare cephalometric changes of Class II malocclusion patients treated with Jasper Jumper and Forsus, associated with fixed appliances.

METHODS

The sample consisted of 62 individuals divided into 3 groups: group 1 included 22 subjects with a mean initial age of 12.39 years, treated with Jasper Jumper associated with fixed appliances for a mean period of 2.43 years; group 2 included 19 subjects with a mean initial age of 12.43 years, treated with Forsus associated with fixed appliances for a mean period of 3.54 years; and group 3 included 22 Class II malocclusion untreated subjects at a mean age of 12.14 years, followed for a mean period of 1.78 years. Intergroup comparison was performed with one-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey test.

RESULTS

Both treated groups had similar dentoskeletal changes: restrictive effect on the maxilla; clockwise rotation of the occlusal plane; mild increase in lower anterior facial height; limitation on the vertical development of the maxillary molars; labial tipping and intrusion of the mandibular incisors; extrusion of mandibular molars; improvements of the maxillomandibular relationship, overjet, overbite, molar relationship; and retrusion of the upper lip. The mandibular incisors exhibited greater protrusion in group 1 compared to the other groups. In addition, group 2 presented mild protrusion of the lower lip, and groups 1 and 3 showed mild retrusion.

CONCLUSION

The Jasper Jumper and Forsus appliances were effective and showed similar changes in the treatment of Class II malocclusion.

Effects of fixed functional appliances with temporary anchorage devices on Class II malocclusion: A systematic review and meta‑analysis

BACKGROUND

The use of fixed functional appliances (FFAs) in conjunction with temporary anchorage devices (TADs) has been proposed to enhance skeletal changes and reduce proclination of the lower incisors.

OBJECTIVES

To systematically investigate the skeletal and dentoalveolar effects of FFAs with TADs on Class II malocclusion in adolescents.

METHODS

Electronic searches of databases and manual searches of references were performed up to August 30, 2020. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and clinical controlled trials (CCTs) focusing on adolescent patients treated with FFAs combining TADs were included. The modified Cochrane risk-of-bias tool (R.O.B 2.0) and ROBINS-I (Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies-of Interventions) Tool were used to assess the risk of bias in RCTs and CCTs, respectively. Meta-analyses of SNA, SNB, ANB, Co-Gn, SN-MP, the lower and upper incisor inclination changes were performed. Subgroup analyses and sensitivity analyses were conducted based on TAD types, FFA types, record types and types of study designs.

RESULTS

Ten studies were included with a sample size of 281. Meta-analyses revealed significant differences in the changes in SNB (mean difference [MD] 0.67; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.04-1.29), ANB (MD -1.22, 95% CI -2.04 to -0.39), Co-Gn (MD 1.57; 95% CI 0.22-2.92), inclination of the lower incisors (MD -5.64, 95% CI -7.78 to -3.50)] and inclination of the upper incisors (MD -1.91; 95% CI -3.69 to -0.13). TAD types and FFA types seem to affect the treatment outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with FFAs alone, FFAs with TADs exhibit superior skeletal effects and reduce the inclination of the lower incisors in the short term; however, the evidence showed moderate to high risk of bias. Registration number CRD42020177611.

A comparison of the effects of Forsus appliances with and without temporary anchorage devices for skeletal Class II malocclusion

OBJECTIVES

To compare the effects of Forsus appliances with and without temporary anchorage devices (TADs) for patients with skeletal Class II malocclusion.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Through a predefined search strategy, electronic searching was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CENTRAL, ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, and SIGLE with no language restrictions. Eligible study selection, data extraction, and evaluation of risk of bias (Cochrane Collaboration tool) were conducted by two authors independently and in duplicate. Any disagreement was solved by discussion or judged by a third reviewer. Statistical pooling, sensitivity analysis, subgroup analysis, and assessment of small-study effects were conducted by using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis and Stata 12.0. Heterogeneity was analyzed for different types of study designs, TADs, and radiographic examinations.

RESULTS

Electronic search yielded a total of 256 studies after removing duplicates. Among them, six studies were finally included. All articles were of high quality. The pooled mean differences were -0.27 (95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.59, 0.05) for SNA, 0.58 (95% CI: -0.07, 1.23) for SNB, -0.86 (95% CI: -1.74, -0.03) for ANB, 1.63 (95% CI: 0.46, 2.80) for Co-Po, 0.75 (95% CI: 0.28, 1.23) for SN-MP, -7.56 (95% CI: -11.37, -3.76) for L1-MP, 0.47 (95% CI: -0.98, 1.91) for overjet, 0.39 (95% CI: -0.57, 1.35) for overbite, -1.84 (95% CI: -5.15, 1.47) for SN-OP, and 4.97 (95% CI: -1.22, 11.17) for nasolabial angle.

CONCLUSIONS

TADs (especially miniplates) were able to eliminate dental adverse effects of Forsus appliances for correction of skeletal Class II malocclusion.

Pharyngeal airway and hyoid bone position changes of skeletal anchored Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device and activator appliances

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effects of miniplate anchored Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device (MAF) and activator treatments in the pharyngeal airway dimensions and hyoid bone position.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-eight patients with mandibular retrusion who were treated with either MAF or activator were selected retrospectively and compared with an untreated control group. The data of 114 lateral cephalograms, comprising those taken before treatment (T1) and at the end of functional treatment (T2), were evaluated with regard to their linear, angular, and area measurements.

RESULTS

The mandibular length increased and the hyoid bone moved forward with both treatments (P < 0.05). The horizontal change in the hyoid bone position with MAF treatment was correlated with changes in the point B and ANB angle. Increases of 1.8 mm, 1.4 mm, and 1.8 mm in the pharyngeal airway dimensions were obtained at the levels of the second, third, and fourth cervical vertebra, respectively, with the MAF treatment. On the other hand, an increase of 1.9 mm was found at the level of the fourth cervical vertebra with the activator treatment. The greatest vertical movement in the Menton and the highest increase in the oropharyngeal area were observed in the MAF group (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Both the MAF and activator treatments caused favorable maxillomandibular changes; however, the MAF treatment provided a greater increase in the oropharyngeal area according to both the increase in mandibular length and the change in the vertical position of the mandible.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Functional appliances were found to be useful in increasing the pharyngeal airway dimensions in the short-term. The skeletal anchored fixed functional appliance caused a greater increase in the oropharyngeal airway area that may be beneficial for Class II patients who carry a risk of having respiratory problems.

Evaluation of the splint-supported Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device in skeletal Class II growing subjects

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the use of the Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device (FFRD), supported with bimaxillary splints, in treatment of skeletal Class II malocclusion.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data from 46 skeletal Class II females who received either conventional Forsus alone (FFRD group) (15 patients, 12.54 ± 0.90 years), FFRD and bimaxillary splints (splint-FFRD group) (15 patients, 12.29 ± 0.82 years), or were untreated controls (16 subjects, 12.1 ± 0.9 years) were retrieved from previous clinical trials. FFRD was inserted onto the mandibular archwire in the FFRD group after leveling and alignment with multibracket appliances. In the splint-FFRD group, Forsus was inserted between fixed maxillary and mandibular splints. Treatment continued until reaching an edge-to-edge incisor relationship.

RESULTS

Both treatment groups failed to induce significant mandibular skeletal effects compared to the normal growth exhibited by untreated controls. The splint-FFRD group showed significant reduction of SNA (-0.88° ± 0.51°) and ANB (-1.36° ± 0.87°). The mandibular incisors showed significant proclination in the FFRD (9.17° ± 2.42°) and splint-FFRD groups (7.06° ± 3.34°).

CONCLUSIONS

The newly proposed splint-supported FFRD was equally effective as the conventional FFRD in treatment of Class II malocclusion with dento-alveolar changes and additional maxillary restricting effect. It has an additional advantage of immediate initiation of the Class II correction.

Skeletally anchored forsus fatigue resistant device for correction of Class II malocclusions-A systematic review and meta-analysis

The use of skeletal anchorage with fixed functional appliances (FFA) has been proposed by various authors to produce skeletal changes and reduce lower incisor proclination. To compare the skeletal and dentoalveolar effects of Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device (FFRD) with or without skeletal anchorage (miniplates and mini-implants). The electronic database PubMed, Cochrane Library, Medline, Embase and Google Scholar along with a manual search of orthodontic journals till the year 2019. Only randomized control trials (RCTs) were included in the systematic review. One controlled clinical trial (CCT) which involved FFRD was included in the review since it was a continuation of an RCT which was expanded to a CCT. Skeletal and dentoalveolar outcome data were extracted to collect study characteristics. After evaluating risk of bias, the standardized mean differences (SMDs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Three RCTs and one prospective CCT were evaluated. The analysis included data from 116 Class II subjects [(58) treated with FFA along with skeletal anchorage and (58) treated with FFA]. There were no significant difference between the two groups with respect to mandibular length changes (P value = .10) and SNB angle changes (P value = .22). With respect to lower incisor inclination however, there was a significant difference between the two groups (P value = .005) signifying better results with respect to skeletal anchorage. The studies reviewed provide insufficient evidence to form a conclusion regarding the effects of the use of skeletal anchorage with FFRD. The available weak evidence suggests that the use of skeletal anchorage with FFRD has no superior skeletal effects but is able to reduce proclination of the lower incisors. Control of lower incisor proclination remains the most significant advantage of skeletal reinforcement, and miniplate-anchored FFRD showed more promising results in preventing lower incisor proclination than miniscrew-anchored FFRD.

Treatment efficiency of activator and skeletal anchored Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device appliances

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the study was to investigate the treatment efficiency of miniplate anchored Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device (MAF) as compared with the activator appliance.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Mandibular retrognathia was treated with two methods, the MAF group (8 girls, 11 boys, mean age 13.03 ± 0.69 years) and the activator group (7 girls, 12 boys, mean age 12.68 ± 0.73 years). An untreated control group (9 girls, 10 boys, mean age 12.95 ± 0.73 years) was constructed to eliminate growth-related changes through the American Association of Orthodontists Foundation Legacy Collection. Data of 114 lateral cephalograms were analyzed.

RESULTS

The inhibition of the maxillary growth was greater in the MAF group, whereas forward displacement of the mandible was higher in the activator group (P < 0.05). Sagittal maxillomandibular relation was improved similarly in both treatment groups (P < 0.05). Mandibular length was increased in both treatment groups with the highest increase in the activator group (P < 0.05). Retroclination of the incisors was observed in the MAF group (P < 0.05). The upper lip was retruded in the MAF group and lower lip was protruded in the activator group (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The activator created greater mandibular changes, whereas the MAF provides somewhat smaller mandibular changes due to the restriction caused by retroclined maxillary incisors.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Although both MAF and activator treatments caused favorable maxillomandibular changes, new treatment alternatives that reduce dentoalveolar side effects and eliminate patient cooperation are still required to achieve skeletal correction in class II malocclusion treatment in growing patients.