"What's the Point?": Understanding Why People With Type 2 Diabetes Decline Structured Education

Lower education and immigrant background are associated with lower participation in a diabetes education program - Insights from adult patients in the Outcomes & Multi-morbidity In Type 2 diabetes cohort (OMIT)

OBJECTIVES

Diabetes educational programmes should be offered to patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). We assessed the proportion of diabetes educational program participation among adults with T2DM, and its associations with place of residence in Norway, education, and immigrant background.

METHODS

We identified 28,128 diagnosed with T2DM (2008-2019) in the Outcomes & Multi-morbidity In Type 2 diabetes cohort. To examine associations between sociodemographic factors and participation in diabetes start courses (yes/no), we computed adjusted risk ratios (95% CI) using log-binomial regression.

RESULTS

Overall, 18% participated on the diabetes start course, but partaking differed by Norwegian counties (range:12-34%). Individuals with an immigrant background were 29% less likely to participate (RR 0.71, CI 0.65-0.79). Similarly, those with a lower educational level were 23% less likely to participate (RR 0.77, CI 0.72-0.83) than those with the highest education. The association between education and start course participation was not significant in the subgroup of immigrant individuals (RR 0.88 CI 0.70-1.12).

CONCLUSIONS

We found that diabetes start course participation was overall low, especially in individuals with low education and immigrant background.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

More efforts are needed to promote diabetes start courses in patients with T2DM.

Participants' and Health Care Providers' Insights Regarding a Web-Based and Mobile-Delivered Healthy Eating Program for Disadvantaged People With Type 2 Diabetes: Descriptive Qualitative Study

BACKGROUND

Healthy eating is a key element of type 2 diabetes (T2D) self-management. Digital interventions offer new avenues to reach broad audiences to promote healthy eating behaviors. However, acceptance of these interventions by socioeconomically disadvantaged people (eg, those with lower levels of education and income or from ethnic minority groups) has not yet been fully evaluated.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate the acceptability and usability of EatSmart, a 12-week web-based and mobile-delivered healthy eating behavior change support program, from the perspective of intervention participants living with T2D and health care providers (HCPs) involved in diabetes care.

METHODS

This study used a qualitative descriptive design. Overall, 60 disadvantaged adults with T2D, as determined by receipt of either a HealthCare Card or a pension or benefit as the main source of income, were recruited. Data from participants regarding their experiences with and perceptions of the program and longer-term maintenance of any behavior or attitudinal changes were collected through a web-based self-report survey with open-ended questions administered 12 weeks after baseline (54/60, 90%) and semistructured telephone interviews administered 36 weeks after baseline (16/60, 27%). Supplementary semistructured interviews with 6 HCPs involved in diabetes care (endocrinologists, accredited practicing dietitians, and diabetes nurse educators) were also conducted 36 weeks after baseline. These interviews aimed to understand HCPs' views on successful and unsuccessful elements of EatSmart as a technology-delivered intervention; any concerns or barriers regarding the use of these types of interventions; and feedback from their interactions with patients on the intervention's content, impact, or observed benefits. All data from the surveys and interviews were pooled and thematically analyzed.

RESULTS

In total, 5 key themes emerged from the data: program impact on food-related behaviors and routines, satisfaction with the program, reasons for low engagement and suggestions for future programs, benefits and challenges of digital interventions, and cultural considerations. Results showed that EatSmart was acceptable to participants and contributed positively to improving food-related behaviors. Most participants (27/43, 63%) mentioned that they enjoyed their experience with EatSmart and expressed high satisfaction with its content and delivery. The educational and motivational content was considered the most useful part of the program. Benefits discussed by intervention participants included gaining health knowledge and skills, positive changes in their food purchasing and cooking, and eating greater quantities and varieties of fruits and vegetables. HCPs also described the intervention as beneficial and persuasive for the target audience and had specific suggestions for future tailoring of such programs.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings suggested that this digitally delivered intervention with supportive educational modules and SMS text messages was generally appealing for both participants and HCPs. This intervention medium shows promise and could feasibly be rolled out on a broader scale to augment usual diabetes care.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID)

RR2-10.2196/19488.

Patient outcomes of a clinician curriculum on how to deliver a diabetes diagnosis

AIMS

To investigate the effects of a curriculum that teaches medical decision making and interpersonal communication in the context of prediabetes (preDM) and type 2 diabetes (T2DM).

METHODS

This evaluation was an active-controlled trial of 56 patients, including patients who received their diagnosis from intervention-trained clinicians or a control group. Patients attended a research appointment for informed consent and collection of baseline measures. Over the following six months, both groups were mailed surveys and informational handouts monthly. Upon conclusion, we recorded the most recent A1c from the patient's record.

RESULTS

An analysis of covariance test revealed patients who received a T2DM diagnosis from an intervention-trained clinician reported higher reassurance from the diagnosing clinician and had a higher perception of threat. Although not statistically significant, patients with T2DM in the intervention group had a lower A1c at follow up and patients in the intervention group reported less poor eating and a higher degree of diet decision making.

CONCLUSIONS

The curriculum itself does not influence glycemic control, but our results demonstrate the positive impact on patients of the curriculum to teach critical skills to clinicians delivering a diabetes diagnosis.

A qualitative study exploring the barriers to attending structured education programmes among adults with type 2 diabetes

BACKGROUND

Diabetes self-management education, a universally recommended component of diabetes care, aims to support self-management in people with type 2 diabetes. However, attendance is low (approx. 10%). Previous research investigating the reasons for low attendance have not yet linked findings to theory, making it difficult to translate findings into practice. This study explores why some adults with type 2 diabetes do not attend diabetes self-management education and considers how services can be adapted accordingly, using Andersen's Behavioural Model of Health Service Utilisation as a framework.

METHODS

A cross-sectional semi-structured qualitative interview study was carried out. Semi-structured interviews were conducted by telephone with 14 adults with type 2 diabetes who had verbally declined their invitation to attend diabetes self-management education in Bath and North East Somerset, UK, within the last 2 years. Data were analysed using inductive thematic analysis before mapping the themes onto the factors of Andersen's Behavioural Model.

RESULTS

Two main themes were identified: 'perceived need' and 'practical barriers'. The former theme explored participants' tendency to decline diabetes education when they perceived they did not need the programme. This perception tended to arise from participants' high self-efficacy to manage their type 2 diabetes, the low priority they attributed to their condition and limited knowledge about the programme. The latter theme, 'practical barriers', explored the notion that some participants wanted to attend but were unable to due to other commitments and/or transportation issues in getting to the venue.

CONCLUSIONS

All sub-themes resonated with one or more factors of Andersen's Behavioural Model indicating that the model may help to elucidate attendance barriers and ways to improve services. To fully understand low attendance to diabetes education, the complex and individualised reasons for non-attendance must be recognised and a person-centred approach should be taken to understand people's experience, needs and capabilities.

A novel information sharing framework for people living with type-2 diabetes in the context of a group education program

Purpose

Online health communities (OHCs) offer opportunities for people with type-2 diabetes to share information and experiences for self improvement. This study is to introduce a novel framework for identifying the potential of online diabetes communities’ practices and outcomes in empowering people living with diabetes.

Method

: Using a qualitative tradition, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 15 members of these communities, attempting to answer research question: how an online framework for diabetes community can be outlined for empowering patients in their self-management in the context of DGEP. We also analysed 2312 threads shared in the three popular type-2 diabetes Reddit communities (r/diabetes, r/diabetes_t2, and r/type2diabetes) comprising more than 60,000 members.?

Results

Using thematic analysis, the study identifies three salient themes: (a) Leverage digital health technologies to ubiquitous access, share and integrate resources, (b) Community encouragement in self-care and self-monitoring, and (c) Improve mental well-being by experiencing commonality. Statistically, on average 87% of the participants contended that they would benefit the OHC framework for keeping them interconnected to the program. Furthermore, expert interviews with the healthcare team have been carried out for evaluating the usability and efficiency of the framework.

Conclusions

The proposed information-sharing framework promotes patients’ self-management of diabetes, revealing that patient participation in diabetes OHC leads to empowering self-management of their diabetes and in turns shedding some light on how healthcare organizations can improve patients’ information behaviour through OHC provisions. This qualitative study suggested that the proposed novel framework is perceived as a useful platform to empower diabetic patients in their self-management, extending value of physical group activities.