Risk of Type 2 Diabetes Among Lesbian, Bisexual, and Heterosexual Women: Findings From the Nurses' Health Study II

Cross-Sectional Evaluation of State-Level Protections, Medical Debt, and Deferred Care Among Sexual and Gender Minority People

BACKGROUND

Millions of Americans have medical debt and/or defer care due to cost. Few studies have examined the association of such health-related financial problems with sexual orientation or gender identity, and whether state-level policies protecting sexual and gender minority (SGM) people affect disparities in such problems.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the relationships between SGM status, state-level SGM protections, and health-related financial problems.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional analysis.

PARTICIPANTS

Nationally-representative sample of U.S. adults in the 2021 National Financial Capability Study.

MAIN MEASURES

Prevalence of medical debt and/or deferred care; adjusted odds ratios (aORs) by SGM status and residence in a state with fewer SGM protections.

KEY RESULTS

Of 25,170 survey respondents, 3.7% were gay/bisexual men, 4.3% lesbian/bisexual women, and 0.6% transgender people. Among lesbian/bisexual women, 39.4% had medical debt, the highest proportion of any group. Accounting for sociodemographic and personal-financial factors, women and all lesbian/gay/bisexual persons (vs. straight men) more often experienced medical debt (aOR [95% CI]: straight women 1.28 [1.16, 1.41], gay/bisexual men 1.55 [1.23, 1.94], lesbian/bisexual women 1.80 [1.50, 2.10]) or deferred care (e.g., 1.80 [1.51, 2.16] for lesbian/bisexual women). Transgender people vs. cisgender men were more likely to defer care (aOR = 2.58 [1.54, 4.30]). Living in a state with fewer SGM protections was associated with higher rates of health-related financial problems for most groups, especially cisgender women and lesbian/bisexual women.

CONCLUSIONS

Lesbian/gay/bisexual, female, and transgender adults experience more health-related financial problems, especially in states lacking SGM protections, underlining the importance of universal, comprehensive insurance coverage (including for services unique to SGM people), ending bans on gender-affirming care, and closing the male-female pay gap.

Natural menopause timing and menopause symptoms among lesbian, bisexual, and heterosexual women in the Nurses' Health Study II

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to examine sexual orientation differences in natural menopause timing and symptoms between lesbian and bisexual women compared with heterosexual women.

METHODS

We used longitudinal questionnaire data (1989-2015) from 92,314 women (858 lesbian, 375 bisexual) in the Nurses' Health Study II cohort. Women were 24-44 yr old at baseline and biennially reported their menopause status, including reasons for cessation of menstrual periods. In 2009 and 2013, women reported on their experience of hot flashes and night sweats. Covariates included age, age at menarche, body mass index, smoking, and parity. Sexual orientation was reported in 1995 and 2009.

RESULTS

Age-adjusted Cox models and logistic regression models suggest that there were no statistically significant differences in menopause timing between lesbian or bisexual women when compared with heterosexual women. When examining menopause symptoms, lesbian women consistently had a statistically significantly (P < 0.05) higher odds of experiencing hot flashes or night sweats (odds ratio range: 1.17 to 1.72) and moderate/severe symptoms (OR range: 1.26 to 1.77) than heterosexual women, even after adjusting for covariates such as smoking and obesity. There were no statistically significant differences in menopause symptoms between bisexual and heterosexual women.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest no meaningful difference in menopause timing between sexual minority and heterosexual women. Additionally, menopause symptoms were more likely among lesbian women and warrants additional study.

Development and Preliminary Validation of the Social Distance toward Bisexual Persons Scale

This article details the development and preliminary validation of the Social Distance toward Bisexual Persons Scale (SDBPS). This secondary data research employed an instrumental design, based on a quantitative, non-experimental, cross-sectional study conducted with Hispanics in Puerto Rico. The scale's development involved multiple stages. The team developed a pool of 22 items with two dimensions measuring social distance towards bisexual individuals that were generated from research literature. Seven experts reviewed the initial items, leading to the validation of the 10-item SDBPS. A diverse sample of 373 participants took part in the validation. As a result, the SDBPS demonstrated good psychometric properties, revealing variations in social distance by sex and sexual orientation. Convergent and divergent validity were confirmed. The SDBPS is a valuable tool for assessing social distance towards bisexual individuals, especially within Hispanic populations, and contributes to understanding the complexity of stigma. Further research should focus on cross-validation and assessing the scale's temporal reliability.

Cognitive Impairment in Sexual and Gender Minority Groups: A Scoping Review of the Literature

Purpose: The purpose of this review was to synthesize evidence on differences in cognitive impairment by sexual orientation/gender identity (SOGI) status. Methods: A scoping review of the literature was conducted. Five databases (PubMed/Medline, Cumulated Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Web of Science, PsycInfo, and Embase) were searched for primary articles comparing incidence or prevalence of cognitive impairment among sexual and gender minority (SGM) groups versus non-SGM groups. Two reviewers independently screened articles and conducted risk-of-bias assessment on eligible articles. Results: Fifteen primary studies were eligible. Most studies (n = 13) were cross-sectional, with moderate to critical risk of bias. Among eight studies examining self-reported cognitive impairment, seven reported a higher prevalence among some SGM groups versus non-SGM groups. Among seven studies using objective measures of cognitive impairment, three examined prevalence of clinician-documented diagnosis of dementia, of which two reported a higher prevalence specifically among transgender versus cisgender individuals. Among the other four studies examining objective measures, two reported poorer cognitive performance or memory, one reported better performance, and another reported no difference. Comparisons across studies were challenging due to inconsistencies in how SOGI and cognitive impairment were operationalized, and the factors used for statistical adjustment; some studies adjusted for putative intermediary factors that potentially explain differences in cognitive impairment. Conclusions: Whereas most published studies identified a positive relationship between SOGI status and self-reported cognitive impairment, evidence is mixed with regard to objective cognitive performance. Well-designed longitudinal, observational studies are needed, using objective measures of cognitive function, with careful consideration of confounding versus intermediary risk factors.

Double Stigma in Portuguese Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Older Adults: A Study of Health Status

The double stigma-sexual stigma and ageism-can affect the health status of lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) older adults, but little is known about this topic in Portugal and internationally. The aim of this study was to assess the health status and the prevalence of chronic diseases of Portuguese LGB older adults, as well as to assess the relationship between double stigma and health status. A sample of 280 Portuguese LGB older adults completed a chronic disease questionnaire, the Homosexuality-Related Stigma Scale, the Ambivalent Ageism Scale, and the SF-12 Short Form Health Survey. A structural equation model was performed using the double stigma variables as independent variables and health status as outcome. The mental health status of Portuguese LGB older adults was lower when compared to people from studies from more than 10 countries. Higher sexual self-stigma, sexual enacted stigma related to health care, and benevolent ageism significantly explained the worse general health status. The double stigma significantly affects the health status of these older adults in a profile of internalization of sexual stigma and benevolent age discrimination, and not necessarily by a hostile/aggressive profile. More research is needed on the double stigma.

Prevalence of Self-Reported Kidney Disease in Older Adults by Sexual Orientation: Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Analysis (2014-2019)

SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT

Studies discusses CKD disparities by age, race and ethnicity, and socioeconomics. However, despite well-documented disparities in CKD risk factors in LGBT+ adults, limited literature addresses CKD prevalence in this population. This analysis uses Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (2014-2019) data to compare self-reported kidney disease prevalence in LGBT+ older adults (older than 50 years) with their heterosexual peers. Our findings indicate that LGBT+ older adults have higher rates of self-reported kidney disease and a higher incidence of CKD risks including smoking, activity limitations, adverse health outcomes, and limited access to health care, housing, and employment. These results support increasing access to screening for CKD risk factors, providing culturally responsive health care, and addressing societal drivers of vulnerability in older LGBT+ adults.

BACKGROUND

Existing research documents disparities in CKD by age, race and ethnicity, and access to health care. However, research on CKD in lesbian, gay, bisexual, and trans (LGBT+) older adults, despite their higher rates of diabetes, heart disease, smoking, and alcohol use, is limited.

METHODS

Pooled data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (2014-2019) for 22,114 LGBT+ adults and 748,963 heterosexuals aged 50 and older were used to estimate the prevalence of self-reported kidney disease. Logistic regressions were used to compare older adults by sexual orientation.

RESULTS

Older LGBT+ men (adjusted odds ratio=1.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.09-1.54) were more likely than their heterosexual counterparts to report kidney disease, after controlling for sociodemographic factors, health behaviors, access to health care, and self-reported coronary heart disease, HIV, and diabetes; LGBT+ men and women also reported higher incidences of known risk factors for CKD. For example, both LGBT+ men (odds ratio [OR]=1.39; [95% CI], 1.26-1.54) and LGBT+ women (OR=1.39; [95% CI], 1.25-1.55) were more likely to be smokers and have a higher incidence of activity limitations, adverse health outcomes, and limited access to health care, housing, and employment.

CONCLUSION

These results support increasing access to screenings for CKD risk factors, providing preventative education and culturally responsive and affirming care, and addressing other societal drivers of vulnerability in older LGBT+ adults. The findings also support the value of interventions that address the interaction between CKD risk factors and the social marginalization that older LGBT+ adults experience.

Differences in Dietary Quality by Sexual Orientation and Sex in the United States: NHANES 2011-2016

BACKGROUND

There are persistent disparities in weight- and diet-related diseases by sexual orientation. Lesbian and bisexual females have a higher risk of obesity and cardiovascular disease compared with heterosexual females. Gay and bisexual males have a higher risk of diabetes and cardiovascular disease compared with heterosexual males. However, it remains unknown how sexual orientation groups differ in their dietary quality.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to determine whether dietary quality differs by sexual orientation and sex among US adults.

DESIGN

This was a cross-sectional study of 24-hour dietary recall data from a nationally representative sample of adults aged 20 through 65 years participating in the 2011-2016 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.

PARTICIPANTS/SETTING

Study participants were adults (n = 8,851) with complete information on dietary intake, sexual orientation, and sex.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The main outcome measures were daily energy intake from 20 specific food and beverage groups and Healthy Eating Index-2015 (HEI-2015) scores for sexual orientation groups (heterosexual vs gay/lesbian/bisexual).

STATISTICAL ANALYSES PERFORMED

Ordinary least squares regressions were used to calculate adjusted means for each food and beverage group and HEI-2015, stratified by sex and controlling for covariates (eg, age and race/ethnicity) and survey cycles (2011-2012, 2013-2014, and 2015-2016).

RESULTS

Among males, red and processed meat/poultry/seafood (P = .01) and sandwiches (P = .02) were smaller contributors to energy intake for gay/bisexual males compared with heterosexual males. Among females, cereals (P =.04) and mixed dishes (P = .02) were smaller contributors to energy intake for lesbian/bisexual females compared with heterosexual females. Gay/bisexual males had significantly higher total HEI-2015 scores than heterosexual males (mean ± standard deviation 53.40 ± 1.36 vs 49.29 ± 0.32, difference = 4.14; P = .004). Lesbian/bisexual females did not differ in total or component HEI-2015 scores from heterosexual females.

CONCLUSIONS

Although gay/lesbian/bisexual groups were similar for a variety of dietary outcomes compared with heterosexual groups, gay and bisexual men displayed healthier dietary quality for processed meat (by consuming smaller amounts) and overall dietary quality (according to HEI-2015) compared with heterosexual males.

Sexual orientation-related disparities in health conditions that elevate COVID-19 severity

PURPOSE

The Veterans Health Administration (VA) is the largest single integrated healthcare system in the US and is likely the largest healthcare provider for people with minoritized sexual orientations (e.g., gay, lesbian, bisexual). The purpose of this study was to use electronic health record (EHR) data to replicate self-reported survey findings from the general US population and assess whether sexual orientation is associated with diagnosed physical health conditions that may elevate risk of COVID-19 severity among veterans who utilize the VA.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of VA EHR data from January 10, 1999-January 07, 2019 analyzed in 2021. Veterans with minoritized sexual orientations were included if they had documentation of a minoritized sexual orientation within clinical notes identified via natural language processing. Veterans without minoritized sexual orientation documentation comprised the comparison group. Adjusted prevalence and prevalence ratios (aPR) were calculated overall and by race/ethnicity while accounting for differences in distributions of sex assigned at birth, age, calendar year of first VA visit, volumes of healthcare utilization, and VA priority group.

RESULTS

Data from 108,401 veterans with minoritized sexual orientation and 6,511,698 controls were analyzed. After adjustment, veterans with minoritized sexual orientations had a statistically significant elevated prevalence of 10 of the 11 conditions. Amongst the highest disparities observed were COPD (aPR:1.24 [95% confidence interval:1.23-1.26]), asthma (1.22 [1.20-1.24]), and stroke (1.26 [1.24-1.28]).

CONCLUSIONS

Findings largely corroborated patterns among the general US population. Further research is needed to determine if these disparities translate to poorer COVID-19 outcomes for individuals with minoritized sexual orientation.

Revictimization Is Associated With Higher Cardiometabolic Risk in Sexual Minority Women

OBJECTIVES

Although there is evidence that interpersonal trauma is associated with cardiometabolic risk in women, previous studies have not assessed the potential role of revictimization (victimization in both childhood and adulthood) among sexual minority women.

METHODS

We used data from the Chicago Health and Life Experiences of Women study to examine the associations of revictimization (including physical, sexual, and any revictimization) with self-reported psychosocial factors, health behaviors, and cardiometabolic risk factors (e.g., obesity, hypertension, and diabetes). We tested multiple logistic regression models, adjusted for covariates, to estimate odds ratios of the associations between revictimization and cardiometabolic risk.

RESULTS

The sample included 615 sexual minority women with a mean age of 40.0 years; 38.7% White. Eighty-three (13.5%) and 101 (16.4%) participants reported experiencing sexual revictimization and physical revictimization, respectively. Each form of revictimization was associated with higher odds of reporting lifetime depression and recent binge eating, but lower odds of having high social support. Physical revictimization was associated with higher odds of obesity (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 2.38; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.38-4.10) and hypertension (AOR, 3.31; 95% CI, 1.70-6.46). Similarly, participants who reported any revictimization were more likely to have obesity (AOR, 2.36; 95% CI, 1.42-3.92) and hypertension (AOR, 2.60; 95% CI, 1.31-5.26). No form of revictimization was associated with a higher odds of diabetes.

CONCLUSIONS

The higher odds of obesity and hypertension observed among sexual minority women who reported revictimization reinforce the need for early interventions to reduce cardiometabolic risk in this vulnerable population.

Sexual Orientation and Functional Limitations: Cross-sectional Analyses From the Adult Psychiatric Morbidity Survey

OBJECTIVE

To assess the association between sexual orientation and functional limitations in a large representative sample of the English population.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional.

SETTING

Data were from the 2007 Adult Psychiatric Morbidity Survey.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 7403 adults aged 16-95 years (51.4% female; mean age, 46.3±18.6y) were included in the present study.

INTERVENTIONS

Not applicable.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Sexual orientation was assessed using 2 items adapted from the Kinsey scale and was dichotomized into heterosexual and sexual minority orientation. Functional limitations were assessed using 7 activities of daily living (ADL) and instrumental activities of daily living (IADL). Functional limitations were defined as at least 1 difficulty in 1 of 7 ADL and IADL. Adjusted logistic regression analyses were conducted to investigate the association between sexual orientation (independent variable) and functional limitations (dependent variable).

RESULTS

The level of sexual minority orientation and prevalence of functional limitations in the sample was 7.1% and 32.9%, respectively. After adjusting for several potential confounders, sexual minority orientation was positively and significantly associated with functional limitations (odds ratio, 1.51; 95% confidence interval, 1.18-1.95; reference group: heterosexual orientation).

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the findings of this study, interventions aiming to prevent against and/or manage/reduce functional limitations in sexual minorities are needed. More research is also warranted to better understand mediators (eg, obesity, cognitive complaints, psychiatric disorders) involved in the sexual orientation-functional limitation relationship.

Assessing and Addressing Cardiovascular Health in LGBTQ Adults: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association

There is mounting evidence that lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer or questioning (LGBTQ) adults experience disparities across several cardiovascular risk factors compared with their cisgender heterosexual peers. These disparities are posited to be driven primarily by exposure to psychosocial stressors across the life span. This American Heart Association scientific statement reviews the extant literature on the cardiovascular health of LGBTQ adults. Informed by the minority stress and social ecological models, the objectives of this statement were (1) to present a conceptual model to elucidate potential mechanisms underlying cardiovascular health disparities in LGBTQ adults, (2) to identify research gaps, and (3) to provide suggestions for improving cardiovascular research and care of LGBTQ people. Despite the identified methodological limitations, there is evidence that LGBTQ adults (particularly lesbian, bisexual, and transgender women) experience disparities across several cardiovascular health metrics. These disparities vary by race, sex, sexual orientation, and gender identity. Future research in this area should incorporate longitudinal designs, elucidate physiological mechanisms, assess social and clinical determinants of cardiovascular health, and identify potential targets for behavioral interventions. There is a need to develop and test interventions that address multilevel stressors that affect the cardiovascular health of LGBTQ adults. Content on LGBTQ health should be integrated into health professions curricula and continuing education for practicing clinicians. Advancing the cardiovascular health of LGBTQ adults requires a multifaceted approach that includes stakeholders from multiple sectors to integrate best practices into health promotion and cardiovascular care of this population.

Estimating the Health Status of Privately Insured Gender Minority Children and Adults

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to characterize the health status of privately insured gender minority individuals. Methods: We created a diagnosis-based algorithm to identify gender minority children and adults in the 2009-2015 IBM^® MarketScan^® Commercial Database. We compared the age-adjusted health status among individuals with and without gender minority-related diagnosis codes. Results: The percentage of the privately insured population with gender minority-related diagnosis codes increased from 0.004% in 2009 to 0.026% in 2015. Age-adjusted analyses demonstrated that individuals with gender minority-related diagnosis codes were more likely to have diagnoses for mental health disorders (odds ratio [OR] = 8.5; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 8.1-9.0), substance use disorders (OR = 3.4; 95% CI = 2.9-3.9), and diabetes (OR = 1.4; 95% CI = 1.2-1.6), driven by high prevalence of these conditions among individuals younger than 18 years. Conclusions: Our findings highlight a markedly greater prevalence of mental health and substance use disorder diagnoses among privately insured gender minority individuals. These results establish a reference point for evaluating the impact of federal- and state-level policies that ban health insurance discrimination based on gender identity on the health and health care use of gender minority individuals.

Sexual Orientation and Diabetes During the Transition to Adulthood

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to examine how sexual orientation in adolescence and young adulthood was linked to diabetes risk. Methods: Data were drawn from the 1994-2008 National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health. The baseline sample included 4330 girls and 3510 boys ages 12-18. Guided by the life course approach, we considered both the timing and continuity of sexual orientation-broadly defined by sexual identity, sexual attraction, sexual contact, and romantic/sexual relationships-by differentiating respondents into four categories: sexual minority in both adolescence and adulthood, sexual minority in adulthood only, sexual minority in adolescence only, and heterosexual in both adolescence and young adulthood. Diabetes was identified using A1c and glucose biomarkers and self-reports of diabetes diagnosis or medication use. Results: Results from logistic regression models indicated that in comparison with their continuously heterosexual counterparts, respondents reporting sexual minority status in adulthood only or continuously in both adolescence and adulthood had higher diabetes risk in adulthood. However, respondents reporting sexual minority status in adolescence only were not different in diabetes risk in adulthood. The association between diabetes risk and continuous sexual minority status was stronger among women than among men. Conclusions: Sexual minority health disparities emerge early in the life course during adolescence and young adulthood. These findings highlight the importance of designing and implementing policies and public programs to alleviate minority stress early in life to reduce health disparities.

Examining Sleep Duration and Sleep Health Among Sexual Minority and Heterosexual Adults: Findings From NHANES (2005-2014)

Objectives: This study proposed to examine sexual identity differences in sleep duration and sleep health (use of sleep medications or sedatives, trouble sleeping, and diagnosis of sleeping disorders) among American adults. Methods: Data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2005-2014) were used. Sex-stratified multiple logistic regression models were used to compare sleep duration and sleep health between sexual minority (gay/lesbian, bisexual, not-sure) and heterosexual participants, adjusted for predetermined covariates. Heterosexual participants were the reference group. Results: The analytic sample included 16,332 participants. No differences in sleep duration or sleep health were detected when gay and bisexual men were compared to heterosexual men. Not-sure men had significantly higher rates of adequate sleep duration than heterosexual men (aOR 2.35 [1.16-4.79]. Compared to heterosexual women, bisexual women reported higher rates of short sleep duration (aOR 1.29 [95% CI = 1.01-1.65]). Bisexual women were also more likely than heterosexual women to use sleep medication or sedatives (aOR 1.85 [95% CI = 1.19-2.88]), to have ever told a health professional they had trouble sleeping (aOR 1.64 [95% CI = 1.15-2.34), and to have been told by a health professional they had a sleeping disorder (aOR 2.38 [95% CI = 1.50-3.80). Lesbian and not-sure women exhibited no differences in sleep duration or sleep health compared to heterosexual women. Conclusions: Findings suggest there is a need to promote sleep health and further investigate sleeping disorders among bisexual women. Additional research should incorporate objective measures of sleep health and examine whether sleep health is associated with chronic disease in sexual minorities.