Durable Effects of iGlarLixi Up to 52 Weeks in Type 2 Diabetes: The LixiLan-G Extension Study

The Wedding Bells Sound Really Good! iGlarLixi Fixed-Ratio Combination in the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes: A Narrative Review

iGlarLixi is a fixed-ratio combination of insulin glargine 100 U/mL and lixisenatide used in the treatment of type 2 diabetes. iGlarLixi has proven clinical benefits in terms of glycemia, weight control, and safety, defined by the risk of hypoglycemia. It simultaneously targets many pathophysiologic abnormalities which are at the root of type 2 diabetes and thus presents a complementary mode of action. Finally, it may also address diabetes treatment burden, and, by decreasing the complexity of treatment, it may improve patient adherence and persistence and fight against clinical inertia. This article reviews the results of major randomized controlled trials in people with type 2 diabetes that compared iGlarLixi to other therapeutic regimens, representing different intensification strategies, such as basal supported oral therapy, oral antidiabetic drugs, and a combination of the latter with glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists. Moreover, as a supplement to randomized trials, data from real-world evidence have also been included.

Effectiveness and Safety of iGlarLixi in People with Type 2 Diabetes in Adriatic Region Countries: ENSURE-ADR, a Real-World Study

INTRODUCTION

The efficacy of iGlarLixi, a fixed-ratio combination of basal insulin glargine 100 units/mL (iGlar) and the short-acting GLP-1 RA lixisenatide (Lixi), was established in people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) who were advancing therapy from oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs) and basal insulin (BI). This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of iGlarLixi using real-world data from people with T2D in the Adriatic region countries.

METHODS

This was a non-interventional, retrospective, multicenter, cohort study with the collection of pre-existing data at iGlarLixi initiation and after 6 months of treatment in real-world clinical and ambulatory settings. The primary outcome was the change in glycated hemoglobin (HbA_1c) at 6 months after iGlarLixi initiation. Key secondary outcomes included the proportion of people achieving HbA_1c < 7.0%, the effect of iGlarLixi on fasting plasma glucose (FPG), body weight and body mass index (BMI).

RESULTS

In this study, 262 participants (130 in Bosnia and Herzegovina, 72 in Croatia and 60 in Slovenia) initiated treatment with iGlarLixi. The participants had a mean ± SD age of 66.2 ± 7.9 years and the majority were women (58.0%). The mean baseline HbA_1c was 8.9 ± 1.7% and the mean body weight was 94.3 ± 18.0 kg. After 6 months of treatment, the reduction in the mean HbA_1c was statistically significant (1.11 ± 1.61%, 95% confidence internal [CI] 0.92, 1.31; p < 0.001), and the proportion of participants who achieved HbA_1c < 7.0% had significantly increased from baseline (8.0-26.0%, p < 0.001). The change in mean FPG (mmol/L) levels was significant (2.7 ± 4.4 [95% CI 2.1, 3.2; p < 0.001]). The mean ± SD body weight and BMI were significantly reduced by 2.9 ± 4.3 kg (95% CI 2.3, 3.4; p < 0.001) and 1.3 ± 4.4 kg/m² (95% CI 0.7, 1.8; p < 0.001), respectively. Two serious hypoglycemia episodes and one adverse gastrointestinal effect (nausea) were registered.

CONCLUSIONS

This real-world study demonstrated the effectiveness of iGlarLixi for improving glycemic control and decreasing body weight in people with T2D who need to advance therapy from OADs or insulin.

Fixed-ratio Combinations (basal Insulin Plus GLP-1RA) In Type 2 Diabetes. an Analytical Review Of Pivotal Clinical Trials

In type 2 diabetes, therapeutic failure to the oral anti diabetics is frequent, the use of schemes with basal insulin or with multiple doses of insulin (basal insulin and short-acting insulins) are a widely accepted way to intensify therapy. The use of GLP-1 receptor agonists is another intensification strategy. The fixedratio combinations with molecules such as insulin degludec + liraglutide, and insulin glargine + lixisenatide have proven useful in intensifying treatment of individuals with type 2 diabetes. The purpose of this review was to evaluate and analyze the results of pivotal studies with both fixed-ratio combinations in individuals with type 2 diabetes, finding that, they are capable of achieving better glycemic control when compared with each of its components separately (with a lower risk of hypoglycemia vs basal insulin and lower risk of gastrointestinal adverse effects vs GLP-1 receptor agonists) in various clinical scenarios, especially in individuals who do not achieve control with oral antidiabetics or who do not achieve control with basal insulin (associated with oral antidiabetics) or in those under management with GLP-1RA plus oral antidiabetics.

Effectiveness of IGlarLixi, a Fixed-Ratio Combination of Insulin Glargine 100 U/mL and Lixisenatide, in People with Type 2 Diabetes

INTRODUCTION

The latest Position Statement of the American Diabetes Association/European Association for the Study of Diabetes proposes the use of a fixed-ratio combination (FRC) of a long-acting basal insulin and a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist as part of treatment intensification. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of the insulin glargine + lixisenatide (iGlarLixi) FRC on glycaemic control and hypoglycaemia in real-life settings.

METHODS

This non-interventional, 26-week study included participants aged 18-80 years with suboptimally controlled type 2 diabetes (T2D) using oral antidiabetics (OADs) ± basal insulin therapy. The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of participants who achieved at least a 1% decrease in glycated haemoblobin (HbA1c) level from baseline to week 26.

RESULTS

Of the 441 participants eligible for entry into the study, 353 were included in the efficacy analyses. These individuals were switched from OADs without (282 [79.9%]) or with (71 [20.1%]) insulin-based treatment. A reduction in HbA1c of at least 1.0% (primary endpoint) was achieved by 215 subjects (60.9%). All glycaemic variables (mean ± standard deviation) improved significantly during follow-up (HbA1c, from 8.9 ± 1.31 to 7.4 ± 0.97%; fasting blood glucose, from 9.0 ± 2.18 to 6.9 ± 1.23 mmol/L; postprandial blood glucose, from 11.3 ± 2.33 to 8.5 ± 1.46 mmol/L; p < 0.001 for all). Body weight also decreased during follow-up, from 90.5 ± 18.03 to 88.2 ± 17.75 kg (p < 0.001). Overall, 41 participants (9.3% of the safety population) self-reported 101 non-severe hypoglycaemic episodes (incidence rate 0.498 events/person-year). There were no severe hypoglycaemic episodes reported. Gastrointestinal adverse events were reported by five participants (1.1% of the safety population). The vast majority (96.6%) of the study population continued iGlarLixi treatment after the final visit.

CONCLUSION

The results of this non-interventional study confirmed the efficacy results of the randomized controlled trial programme of the iGlarLixi FRC in a real-life setting. iGlarLixi significantly improved glycaemic control in association with a low frequency of hypoglycaemia and gastrointestinal adverse events in a heterogeneous population of participants with T2D suboptimally controlled with OADs ± basal insulin.

The current schemes of insulin therapy: Pro and contra

Insulin regimens have been evolving for a century. The schemes used for type 1 (T1D) and type 2 (T2D) diabetes differ due to differences in pathophysiology but share important features. Insulin is required for both types of diabetes when other means of controlling glucose are insufficient. For T1D this requires multiple daily injections or continuous subcutaneous infusion assisted by CGM, whereas in early T2D basal insulin together with oral agents or GLP-1RA is usually effective. In both cases current schemes typically maintain HbA1c levels between 7 and 8%, a range that limits but does not eliminate the long-term complications of diabetes, but do not restore glycemic control to a fully protective level. Inability to control postprandial hyperglycemia without problematic weight gain and hypoglycemia is a leading obstacle in both T1D and long-duration T2D. A greater share of prandial dosing decisions will have to be provided by smart electronic systems. Further changes in the structure or formulation of insulin are of uncertain potential, but schemes including delivery of amylin, GLP-1, and glucagon show promise. More reliable access to insulins, delivery devices, and capable medical advisors will be needed to optimize replacement of this essential hormone.