Cardiovascular Autonomic Neuropathy Is Associated With Increased Glucose Variability in People With Type 1 Diabetes

A Narrative Review: Relationship Between Glycemic Variability and Emerging Complications of Diabetes Mellitus

A growing body of evidence emphasizes the role of glycemic variability (GV) in the development of conventional diabetes-related complications. Furthermore, advancements in diabetes management and increased life expectancy have led to the emergence of new complications, such as cancer, liver disease, fractures, infections, and cognitive dysfunction. GV is considered to exacerbate oxidative stress and inflammation, acting as a major mechanism underlying these complications. However, few reviews have synthesized the association between GV and these emerging complications or examined their underlying mechanisms. Hence, this narrative review provides a comprehensive discussion of the burden, risks, and mechanisms of GV in these complications, offering further evidence supporting GV as a potential therapeutic target for diabetes management.

Possible Glycemic Effects of Vagus Nerve Stimulation Evaluated by Continuous Glucose Monitoring in People with Diabetes and Autonomic Neuropathy: A Randomized, Sham-Controlled Trial

Objective: Autonomic neuropathy is associated with dysglycemia that is difficult to control. We investigated if transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (tVNS) could improve glycemic levels. Methods: We randomized 145 individuals with type 1 diabetes (T1D) (n = 70) or type 2 diabetes (T2D) (n = 75) and diabetic autonomic neuropathy (DAN) to self-administered treatment with active cervical tVNS (n = 68) or sham (n = 77) for 1 week (4 daily stimulations) and 8 weeks (2 daily stimulations), separated by a wash-out period of at least 2 weeks. Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) indices were measured for 104 participants starting 5 days prior to intervention periods, during the 1-week period, and at end of the 8-week period. Primary outcomes were between-group differences in changes in coefficient of variation (CV) and in time in range (TIR 3.9-10 mmol/L). Secondary outcomes were other metrics of CGM and HbA1c. Results: For the 1-week period, median [interquartile range] changes of CV from baseline to follow-up were -1.1 [-4.3;2.0] % in active and -1.5 [-4.4;2.5] % in sham, with no significance between groups (P = 0.54). For TIR, the corresponding changes were 2.4 [-2.1;7.4] % in active and 5.1 [-2.6;8.8] in sham group (P = 0.84). For the 8-week treatment period, changes in CV and TIR between groups were also nonsignificant. However, in the subgroup analysis, persons with T1D receiving active tVNS for 8 weeks had a significant reduction in CV compared with the T1D group receiving sham stimulation (estimated treatment effect: -11.6 [95% confidence interval -20.2;-2.0] %, P = 0.009). None of the changes in secondary outcomes between treatment groups were significantly different. Conclusions: Overall, no significant changes were observed in CGM metrics between treatment arms, while individuals with T1D and DAN decreased their CV after 8 weeks of tVNS treatment.

The clinical importance of measuring glycaemic variability: Utilising new metrics to optimise glycaemic control

With the widespread use of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM), glycaemic variability (GV) is a glucose metric that has been gaining increasing attention. However, unlike other glucose metrics that are easily defined and have clear targets, GV has a large number of different measures given the complexity involved in assessment. While variabilities in HbA1c, fasting and postprandial glucose have been incorporated under the GV banner, short-term variability in glucose, within day and between days, is more in keeping with the correct definition of GV. This review is focused on short-term GV, as assessed by CGM data, although studies calculating GV from capillary glucose testing are also mentioned as appropriate. The different measures of GV are addressed, and their potential role in microvascular and macrovascular complications, as well as patient-related outcomes, discussed. It should be noted that the independent role of GV in vascular pathology is not always clear, given the inconsistent findings in different populations and the close association between GV and hypoglycaemia, itself an established risk factor for adverse outcomes. Therefore, this review attempts, where possible, to disentangle the contribution of GV to diabetes complications from other glycaemic parameters, particularly hypoglycaemia. Evidence to date strongly suggests an independent role for GV in vascular pathology but future large-scale outcome studies are required to fully understand the exact contribution of this metric to vascular complications. This can be followed by setting appropriate GV measures and targets in different diabetes subgroups, in order to optimise glycaemic management and limit the risk of complications.

Do Metrics of Temporal Glycemic Variability Reveal Abnormal Glucose Rates of Change in Type 1 Diabetes?

BACKGROUND

We aimed to identify the normal range of glucose rates of change (RoC) observed in health and assess whether existing metrics of temporal glycemic variability (GV-timing), such as mean absolute glucose change (MAG) and continuous overlapping net glycemic action (CONGA), are predictive of abnormally rapid RoC in type 1 diabetes (T1D).

METHODS

We identified the normal range of RoC over one-hour intervals from continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) data of healthy individuals. Rapidly rising glucose was defined as RoC values above percentiles 99% (level 1, L1) or 99.9% (level 2, L2), and rapidly falling glucose as below 1% (L1) or 0.1% (L2). The percentage of time these thresholds are exceeded in a given individual is referred to as time in fluctuation (TIF). In a separate CGM dataset of 736 T1D individuals, we calculated TIF-L1 and TIF-L2, and compared them against corresponding values of MAG and CONGA.

RESULTS

The extremum percentiles of RoC observed in health are 0.1%: -80 mg/dL/h, 1%: -50 mg/dL, 99%: +56 mg/dL/h, and 99.9%: +89 mg/dL/h. The T1D individuals spend significantly more TIF at rates exceeding these thresholds (TIF-L1: median, 16.7% [interquartile range, 12.7-21.5], TIF-L2: 5.0% [3.1-7.8]) than healthy individuals (TIF-L1: 1.4% [0.6-2.8], TIF-L2: 0.0% [0.0-0.2]). Both MAG and CONGA are highly correlated with TIF-L1 and TIF-L2 (r > .95 in each pairwise comparison).

CONCLUSIONS

Individuals with T1D spend significant time with glucose RoC exceeding those observed in health. Existing GV-timing metrics are strongly correlated with time with abnormal RoC. Incorporation of a GV-timing metric in clinical practice is recommended.

Association of Continuous Glucose Monitoring-Derived Glycemia Risk Index With Cardiovascular Autonomic Neuropathy in Patients With Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus: A Cross-sectional Study

BACKGROUND

The glycemia risk index (GRI) is a new composite continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) metric for weighted hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia. We evaluated the association between the GRI and cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy (CAN) and compared the effects of the GRI and conventional CGM metrics on CAN.

METHODS

For this cross-sectional study, three-month CGM data were retrospectively analyzed before autonomic function tests were performed in 165 patients with type 1 diabetes. CAN was defined as at least two abnormal results of parasympathetic tests according to an age-specific reference.

RESULTS

The overall prevalence of CAN was 17.1%. Patients with CAN had significantly higher GRI scores, target above range (TAR), coefficient of variation (CV), and standard deviation (SD) but significantly lower time in range (TIR) than those without CAN. The prevalence of CAN increased across higher GRI zones (P for trend <.001). A multivariate logistic regression analysis, adjusted for covariates such as HbA1c, demonstrated that the odds ratio (OR) of CAN was 9.05 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.21-36.96, P = .002) per 1-SD increase in the GRI. TIR and CV were also significantly associated with CAN in the multivariate model. The area under the curve of GRI for the prediction of CAN (0.85, 95% CI: 0.76-0.94) was superior to that of TIR (0.80, 95% CI: 0.71-0.89, P for comparison = .046) or CV (0.71, 95% CI: 0.57-0.84, P for comparison = .049).

CONCLUSIONS

The GRI is significantly associated with CAN in patients with type 1 diabetes and may be a better CGM metric than TIR for predicting CAN.

Research progress on the association between glycemic variability index derived from CGM and cardiovascular disease complications

Currently, glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) has been widely used to assess the glycemic control of patients with diabetes. However, HbA1c has certain limitations in describing both short-term and long-term glycemic control. To more accurately evaluate the glycemic control of diabetes patients, the continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) technology has emerged. CGM technology can provide robust data on short-term glycemic control and introduce new monitoring parameters such as time in range, time above range, and time below range as indicators of glycemic fluctuation. These indicators are used to describe the changes in glycemic control after interventions in clinical research or treatment modifications in diabetes patient care. Recent studies both domestically and internationally have shown that these indicators are not only associated with microvascular complications of diabetes mellitus but also closely related to cardiovascular disease complications and prognosis. Therefore, this article aims to comprehensively review the association between CGM-based glycemic parameters and cardiovascular disease complications by analyzing a large number of domestic and international literature. The purpose is to provide scientific evidence and guidance for the standardized application of these indicators in clinical practice, in order to better evaluate the glycemic control of diabetes patients and prevent the occurrence of cardiovascular disease complications. This research will contribute to improving the quality of life for diabetes patients and provide important references for clinical decision-making.

Serum Cytokines and Growth Factors in Subjects with Type 1 Diabetes: Associations with Time in Ranges and Glucose Variability

The detrimental effect of hyperglycemia and glucose variability (GV) on target organs in diabetes can be implemented through a wide network of regulatory peptides. In this study, we assessed a broad panel of serum cytokines and growth factors in subjects with type 1 diabetes (T1D) and estimated associations between concentrations of these molecules with time in ranges (TIRs) and GV. One hundred and thirty subjects with T1D and twenty-seven individuals with normal glucose tolerance (control) were included. Serum levels of 44 cytokines and growth factors were measured using a multiplex bead array assay. TIRs and GV parameters were derived from continuous glucose monitoring. Subjects with T1D compared to control demonstrated an increase in concentrations of IL-1β, IL-1Ra, IL-2Rα, IL-3, IL-6, IL-7, IL-12 p40, IL-16, IL-17A, LIF, M-CSF, IFN-α2, IFN-γ, MCP-1, MCP-3, and TNF-α. Patients with TIR ≤ 70% had higher levels of IL-1α, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-12 p70, IL-16, LIF, M-CSF, MCP-1, MCP-3, RANTES, TNF-α, TNF-β, and b-NGF, and lower levels of IL-1α, IL-4, IL-10, GM-CSF, and MIF than those with TIR > 70%. Serum IL-1β, IL-10, IL-12 p70, MCP-1, MCP-3, RANTES, SCF, and TNF-α correlated with TIR and time above range. IL-1β, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12 p70, MCP-1, RANTES, MIF, and SDF-1α were related to at least one amplitude-dependent GV metric. In logistic regression models, IL-1β, IL-4, IL-10, IL-12 p70, GM-CSF, HGF, MCP-3, and TNF-α were associated with TIR ≤ 70%, and MIF and PDGF-BB demonstrated associations with coefficient of variation values ≥ 36%. These results provide further insight into the pathophysiological effects of hyperglycemia and GV in people with diabetes.

Telemonitoring With a Connected Glucose Meter Improves Glycemia Among People With Insulin-Treated Type 2 Diabetes

BACKGROUND

Delayed initiation and inadequate titration remain critical challenges to optimizing insulin therapy in type 2 diabetes (T2D). We aimed to study whether hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) can be lowered in people with insulin-treated T2D using telemonitoring.

METHODS

This single-center study recruited adults with greater than or equal to six months of diabetes, greater than or equal to three months of insulin therapy, HbA1c ≥8.5% and ≤12.5%, and body mass index (BMI) ≤40 kg/m2. All participants received a connected glucose meter and the accompanying smartphone application. Participants sent weekly blood glucose (BG) diary to their primary endocrinologist via email. Adjustments in insulin doses were communicated to the participants. HbA1c, proportion of BG readings in range (70-180 mg/dL, PIR), below range (<70 mg/dL, PBR) and above range (>180 mg/dL, PAR), and glycemic variability as the coefficient of variation (% CV) were measured at baseline, week 12, and week 24 and compared using repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) or Friedman's ANOVA.

RESULTS

We recruited 40 people (55% women). Mean age was 57.9 years, BMI 27.8 kg/m2, and baseline HbA1c 9.8% (83.7 mmol/mol). Mean HbA1c improved by 1.7%, % CV reduced from 32.9% to 30.7%, PIR increased from 58.8% to 67.1% (all P <.01) by week 24, without any change in PBR. This was achieved with a 0.04 U/kg/d median increase in total daily dose of insulin and 0.9 kg weight gain over 24 weeks.

CONCLUSION

Telemonitoring and titration of insulin using a connected glucose meter resulted in significant improvements in glycemia, characterized by a reduction in HbA1c, increase in PIR, and reduction in glycemic variability without any increase in hypoglycemia.