Education for patients with established NIDDM. Disparities between patients who do and do not attend

Self-management in African American Women With Diabetes

Purpose

This study describes demographic and medical characteristics, self-efficacy, locus of control, self-managementd defined by functional status, hemoglobin HbA1c outcomes, and the relationships among these variables based on age group differences (25-44 years, 45-64 years, and 65-84 years) in African American women with type 2 diabetes.

Methods

Subjects (n = 75) in community medical practices were interviewed to complete a demographic and medical form, the Diabetes Self-efficacy Outcomes Expectancy Questionnaire (DSEQ), the Diabetes Locus of Control Scale, and the Medical Outcomes–Short Form 36 (SF-36). A venous blood sample was taken following the interview. Data were analyzed for the total sample and separately for age groups.

Results

Scores on the self efficacy (DSEQ) and the locus of control (LOC) were above average for all 3 groups. Significant correlations were found among subscales of the LOC, SF-36, and HbA1c. HbA1c scores were abnormally high across groups. Significant group differences were found in duration of diabetes and number of medications used.

Conclusions

Despite high levels of internal locus of control and self-efficacy and scores indicating good mental, physical, emotional, and social health, self-management amongthe women was inadequate, as indicated by abnormally high HbA1c levels.

WITHDRAWN: Group based diabetes self-management education compared to routine treatment, waiting list control or no intervention for people with type 2 diabetes mellitus

The review authors of this review update are unable to continue with their work. The Cochrane Metabolic and Endocrine Disorders Review Group is seeking very experienced new authors to perform an update on this complex intervention review.

At June 2015, this review has been withdrawn. This review is out of date although it is correct as the date of publication. The latest version is available in the 'Other versions' tab on the Cochrane Library, and may still be useful to readers.

The editorial group responsible for this previously published document have withdrawn it from publication.

Group based training for self-management strategies in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus

BACKGROUND

It has been recognised that adoption of self-management skills by the person with diabetes is necessary in order to manage their diabetes. However, the most effective method for delivering education and teaching self-management skills is unclear.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of group-based, patient-centred training on clinical, lifestyle and psychosocial outcomes in people with type 2 diabetes.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Studies were obtained from computerised searches of multiple electronic bibliographic databases, supplemented by hand searches of reference lists of articles, conference proceedings and consultation with experts in the field. Date of last search was February 2003.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled and controlled clinical trials which evaluated group-based education programmes for adults with type 2 diabetes compared with routine treatment, waiting list control or no intervention. Studies were only included if the length of follow-up was six months or more and the intervention was at least one session with the minimum of six participants.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed study quality. A meta-analysis was performed if there were enough homogeneous studies reporting an outcome at either four to six months, 12-14 months, or two years, otherwise the studies were summarised in a descriptive manner.

MAIN RESULTS

Fourteen publications describing 11 studies were included involving 1532 participants. The results of the meta-analyses in favour of group-based diabetes education programmes were reduced glycated haemoglobin at four to six months (1.4%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.8 to 1.9; P < 0.00001), at 12-14 months (0.8%; 95% CI 0.7 to 1.0; P < 0.00001) and two years (1.0%; 95% CI 0.5 to 1.4; P < 0.00001); reduced fasting blood glucose levels at 12 months (1.2 mmol/L; 95% CI 0.7 to 1.6; P < 0.00001); reduced body weight at 12-14 months (1.6 Kg; 95% CI 0.3 to 3.0; P = 0.02); improved diabetes knowledge at 12-14 months (SMD 1.0; 95% CI 0.7 to 1.2; P < 0.00001) and reduced systolic blood pressure at four to six months (5 mmHg: 95% CI 1 to 10; P = 0.01). There was also a reduced need for diabetes medication (odds ratio 11.8, 95% CI 5.2 to 26.9; P < 0.00001; RD = 0.2; NNT = 5). Therefore, for every five patients attending a group-based education programme we could expect one patient to reduce diabetes medication.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Group-based training for self-management strategies in people with type 2 diabetes is effective by improving fasting blood glucose levels, glycated haemoglobin and diabetes knowledge and reducing systolic blood pressure levels, body weight and the requirement for diabetes medication.

A comparison of learning activity packages and classroom instruction for diet management of patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus

Forty patients were randomly assigned to receive either the individualized learning activity packages or classroom instruction. Effectiveness was evaluated on the basis of fasting plasma glucose, glycosylated hemoglobin, percent of ideal body weight, and knowledge and behavior scores. No significant differences were found between the groups at entry or at the 2-month follow-up. At the 5-month follow-up, the group that received the learning activity packages scored significantly higher on knowledge assessment, significantly increased their behavior score, and decreased their percent of ideal body weight. Patients who received classroom instruction increased their behavior score and exhibited significantly decreased glycosylated hemoglobin levels. Behavior and blood glucose levels were significantly correlated. Although the learning activity packages proved effective in increasing knowledge, no significant improvement was observed in blood glucose levels.