Optimizing Therapeutic Outcomes With Oral Semaglutide: A Patient-Centered Approach

Aspiration risk and strategic approach for patients receiving GLP-1 receptor agonists undergoing elective surgery

Perioperative management of patients receiving a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1 RA) remains challenging for the anesthesiologist. Despite the approval of GLP-1 RAs 2 decades ago, the recent reports of aspiration and postoperative pulmonary complications drew attention to this group of medications and resulted in multiple societal guidelines that would provide recommendations for anesthesiologists and proceduralists on the appropriate perioperative management of GLP-1 RAs. However, despite these guidelines and proposed options, there was a lack of adequate evidence to support holding versus continuing the medication, as well as data related to the role of gastric ultrasound in that decision-making process. The release of multiple societal guidelines and studies evaluating the impact of GLP-1 RAs on perioperative outcomes resulted in more controversy and uncertainty for the clinician anesthesiologist to follow. The ultimate goal for perioperative management of these medications is to evaluate an individual patient's risk of aspiration, rather than assuming the risk is low when holding the medication appropriately or high if not holding it. Furthermore, it is unclear whether holding these types of medicines or unnecessary postponing of surgery may result in adverse outcomes. In this narrative review, we present a summary of the existing literature on the topic with a focus on the risk of aspiration and a recommendation for perioperative management to include the utilization of gastric ultrasound for surgery patients based on their risks.

The Effect of Oral Semaglutide on Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review

Background/Objectives: There has been a prominent rise in the use of GLP-1 RAs recently, particularly semaglutide, for the treatment of T2DM with or without obesity. Subcutaneous injections of semaglutide have demonstrated beneficial effects on cardiovascular risk factors. However, several factors hinder the use of subcutaneous administration. Therefore, the oral route is preferred; yet, it remains unclear whether oral semaglutide provides cardiovascular protection comparable to its subcutaneous counterpart. Methods: A systematic review in line with the PRISMA guidelines was performed based on eight databases (Scopus, Proquest, Science Direct, PubMed, Google Scholar, EBSCOHost, Clinical Key, and The Cochrane Library) to identify clinical studies that assessed the effects of oral semaglutide on cardiovascular risk factors, especially blood pressure and lipid or cholesterol profile in T2DM patients. Inclusion criteria included studies that used oral semaglutide on top of a mainstay treatment for T2DM compared to the placebo control group, assessed cardiovascular risk factors, and were conducted prospectively or in an RCT design. Case reports, ongoing studies with incomplete results, reviews, animal studies, and retrospective studies were excluded. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale and Jadad scale were used to assess the risk of bias in the included studies. Data extracted from the selected studies included patient characteristics, study design, research methodology, intervention regimen, and cardiovascular risk factors: SBP, DBP, TC, HDL, LDL, and TG. Data were presented in a table format to compare and synthesize the results of each study. Results: Five clinical studies were selected (two were randomized trials and three were observational, prospective studies). All five studies reported a consistent trend in the reduction in SBP (ranging from -2.60 to -12.74 mmHg) after oral semaglutide treatment. However, its effect on DBP was found to be less consistent. Lipid profile results show the most consistent trend in total cholesterol reduction (-8.80 to -22.19 mg/dL). Four studies reported a favorable reduction in LDL cholesterol (-7.6 to -18.0 mg/dL) and triglycerides (-11.00 to -40.13 mg/dL). HDL cholesterol shows the least consistent findings where three studies reported an increasing trend, yet this was not statistically significant; one study reported a mild increase in HDL (+0.90 ± 0.12; p < 0.0001); and one study reported a slight reduction in HDL (55.6 ± 2.5 to 51.6 ± 2.2; p < 0.05). Conclusions: Once-daily oral semaglutide is a promising add-on therapy for the treatment of T2DM with or without obesity in reducing cardiovascular risk factors, potentially lowering cardiovascular-related mortality. Thus, once-daily oral semaglutide may offer cardiovascular benefits comparable to the subcutaneous form, with the advantage of improved adherence.

Incretin-based therapies for the management of cardiometabolic disease in the clinic: Past, present, and future

Among newer classes of drugs for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) are incretin-based agents that lower both blood sugar levels and promote weight loss. They do so by activating pancreatic GLP-1 receptors (GLP-1R) to promote glucose-dependent insulin release and inhibit glucagon secretion. They also act on receptors in the brain and gastrointestinal tract to suppress appetite, slow gastric emptying, and delay glucose absorption. Phase 3 clinical trials have shown that GLP-1 RAs improve cardiovascular outcomes in the setting of T2DM or overweight/obesity in people who have, or are at high risk of having atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. This is largely driven by reductions in ischemic events, although emerging evidence also supports benefits in other cardiovascular conditions, such as heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. The success of GLP-1 RAs has also seen the evolution of other incretin therapies. Tirzepatide has emerged as a dual glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP)/GLP-1 RA, with more striking effects on glycemic control and weight reduction than those achieved by isolated GLP-1R agonism alone. This consists of lowering glycated hemoglobin levels by more than 2% and weight loss exceeding 15% from baseline. Here, we review the pharmacological properties of GLP-1 RAs and tirzepatide and discuss their clinical effectiveness for T2DM and overweight/obesity, including their ability to reduce adverse cardiovascular outcomes. We also delve into the mechanistic basis for these cardioprotective effects and consider the next steps in implementing existing and future incretin-based therapies for the broader management of cardiometabolic disease.

The Dawn of a New Pharmaceutical Epoch: Can AI and Robotics Reshape Drug Formulation?

Over the last four decades, pharmaceutical companies' expenditures on research and development have increased 51-fold. During this same time, clinical success rates for new drugs have remained unchanged at about 10 percent, predominantly due to lack of efficacy and/or safety concerns. This persistent problem underscores the need to innovate across the entire drug development process, particularly in drug formulation, which is often deprioritized and under-resourced.

The impact of electronic cigarette use on periodontitis and periodontal outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Periodontitis, a prevalent inflammatory disease affecting tooth-supporting structures, leads to significant oral health and systemic complications if untreated. While traditional smoking is a well-known risk factor for periodontitis, the impact of electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) on periodontal health remains unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to synthesize existing evidence on the effects of e-cigarette use on periodontitis and other periodontal outcomes.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted across PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science from their inception up to June 15 2024. Eligible studies included those assessing the impact of e-cigarette use on periodontal outcomes such as bleeding on probing (BOP), plaque index, probing depth, clinical attachment loss, and marginal bone loss. Data were extracted and analyzed using random-effect models to calculate pooled mean differences. R statistical software was used to perform meta-analyses.

RESULTS

Twelve studies were included in the meta-analysis. E-cigarette users showed a significantly lower mean BOP score compared to non-users (pooled mean difference: -14.233; 95% CI: -20.424 to -8.043; I² = 99%). For other periodontal outcomes, the findings were as follows: Plaque Index (MD: -0.160; 95% CI: -0.680 to 0.360; I² = 95%), Clinical Attachment Loss (MD: 0.120; 95% CI: -0.045 to 0.285; I² = 90%), Probing Depth (MD: 0.056; 95% CI: -0.070 to 0.182; I² = 85%), and Marginal Bone Loss (MD: -0.052; 95% CI: -0.168 to 0.064; I² = 88%).

CONCLUSION

Present studies have not identified a significant link between e-cigarette use and adverse effects on periodontal health, but the available research is limited. Further longitudinal research is necessary to evaluate the long-term effects of e-cigarette use on periodontal health and to clarify any associated risks.

Enhanced Oral Efficacy of Semaglutide via an Ionic Nanocomplex with Organometallic Phyllosilicate in Type 2 Diabetic Rats

This study aimed to develop an effective oral formulation of semaglutide, a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, using an organometallic phyllosilicate-based colonic delivery system. The core nanocomplex (AMP-Sema) of 3-aminopropyl-functionalized magnesium phyllosilicate (AMP) and semaglutide was prepared via electrostatic interactions. Subsequently, AMP-Sema was coated with a polymer showing pH-dependent solubility (Eudragit® S100) for preferential colonic delivery. The surface-coated nanoparticles (EAMP-Sema) showed a narrow size distribution, and the encapsulated semaglutide maintained its conformational stability. The pH-dependent drug release property of EAMP-Sema yielded around 20% and 62% drug release at pH 1.2 and 7.4, respectively. The nanoparticles exhibited significantly decreased size and surface charge at pH 7.4, which indicated the pH-dependent dissolution of the coating layer. Furthermore, EAMP-Sema effectively improved the membrane permeability and metabolic stability of semaglutide in the gastrointestinal tract. It protected the encapsulated drugs from proteolysis in simulated intestinal fluids and increased drug transport by 2.5-fold in Caco-2 cells. Consequently, orally administered EAMP-Sema (equivalent to 8 mg/kg of semaglutide) showed significant therapeutic benefits, yielding effective glycemic control and weight loss in high-fat diet/streptozotocin (40 mg/kg)-induced type 2 diabetic rats. These results demonstrate that EAMP-Sema could improve the efficacy of orally administered semaglutide by enhancing the GI stability and cellular uptake of protein drugs.

An Assessment of Semaglutide Safety Based on Real World Data: From Popularity to Spontaneous Reporting in EudraVigilance Database

Some glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs), first used in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), have been approved for the treatment of obesity in patients with or without T2DM (liraglutide-LIR, semaglutide-SEM, and tirzepatide-TIR). Social media had an important influence on the off-label use of GLP-1 RAs for obesity, especially for SEM. We analyzed the Google queries related to SEM to assess people's interest in this drug. We also investigated the occurrence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) by searching the EudraVigilance database (EV) for Individual Case Safety Reports (ICSRs) that reported SEM as the suspected drug and performed a descriptive and a disproportionality analysis. The data obtained for SEM were compared to other GLP-1 RAs. SEM had the highest proportions of searches on Google associated with the term "weight loss" and presented the lowest number of severe ADRs, but it also had the highest number of ICSRs reported in EV. Even though no unexpected safety issues have been reported for it until now, SEM has a hi3gh tendency for overdose reports. The most frequent off-label use was reported for SEM and TIR. In order to lower the risks of ADRs, the off-label use should be reduced and carefully monitored.

Bridging the gap in cardiovascular care in diabetic patients: are cardioprotective antihyperglycemic agents underutilized?

INTRODUCTION

Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and heart failure (HF) are two major complications of type 2 diabetes (T2DM). Cardiovascular protection is a key objective, yet not fully reached in clinical practice.

AREAS COVERED

Both glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) have proven their efficacy in reducing major cardiovascular events in high-risk patients with T2DM and SGLT2is in reducing hospitalization for HF in placebo-controlled randomized trials. However, real-life studies worldwide revealed that only a minority of patients with T2DM receive either a GLP-1RA or an SGLT2i and surprisingly even less patients with established ASCVD or HF are treated with these cardioprotective antihyperglycemic agents.

EXPERT OPINION

Bridging the gap between evidence-based cardiovascular protection with GLP-1RAs and SGLT2is and their underuse in daily clinical practice in patients with T2DM at high risk is crucial from a public health viewpoint. However, the task appears hazardous and the goal not attained considering the current failure. Education of specialists/primary care physicians and patients is critical. Multifaceted and coordinated interventions involving all actors (physicians, patients and broadly health-care system) must be implemented to stimulate the adoption of these cardioprotective antihyperglycemic medications as part of routine cardiovascular care among patients with T2DM.

Patient-physician alliance and patient's sense of self-efficacy are negatively associated with resistance to treatment among patients with type 2 diabetes

AIMS

Resistance to treatment is prevalent among patients diagnosed with chronic conditions, including type 2 diabetes (T2DM). The current study aimed to examine the relationship between patient characteristics, patient-physician relationship, and resistance to treatment in T2DM.

METHODS

A sample of 120 T2DM patients were recruited by means of non-randomized sampling and through a public post on Facebook. Participants were asked to fill-in several questionnaires online: Rotter's Locus of Control questionnaire (short version); the General Self-efficacy (GSE) questionnaire; the Working Alliance Inventory - Short Revised (WAI-SR) - evaluating patient-physician relationship; and, finally, the Resistance to Treatment Questionnaire (RTQ) - which meant to capture the intensity of resistance to treatment and served as the dependent variable in this study.

RESULTS

Interestingly, better patient-physician relationship and higher sense of self-efficacy among patients were found to negatively associate with patient's resistance to treatment (r = -.53, p < .001, and, r = -.26, p < .01, respectively). Patient-physician relationship explained 22% of the variance of resistance to treatment, and self-efficacy explained 6% of the variance.

CONCLUSIONS

Stronger patient-doctor relationship and higher sense of self-efficacy are shown to robustly associate with lower resistance to treatment among patients with T2DM. Current findings may instructor educate physicians as to the importance of the alliance with these chronic patients.

Patient Centricity Driving Formulation Innovation: Improvements in Patient Care Facilitated by Novel Therapeutics and Drug Delivery Technologies

Innovative formulation technologies can play a crucial role in transforming a novel molecule to a medicine that significantly enhances patients' lives. Improved mechanistic understanding of diseases has inspired researchers to expand the druggable space using new therapeutic modalities such as interfering RNA, protein degraders, and novel formats of monoclonal antibodies. Sophisticated formulation strategies are needed to deliver the drugs to their sites of action and to achieve patient centricity, exemplified by messenger RNA vaccines and oral peptides. Moreover, access to medical information via digital platforms has resulted in better-informed patient groups that are requesting consideration of their needs during drug development. This request is consistent with health authority efforts to upgrade their regulations to advance age-appropriate product development for patients. This review describes formulation innovations contributingto improvements in patient care: convenience of administration, preferred route of administration, reducing dosing burden, and achieving targeted delivery of new modalities.

Precision therapy for three Chinese families with maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY12)

Maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY) is rare monogenic diabetes. However, MODY is often undiagnosed or misdiagnosed. In this study, we aimed to investigate the pathogenic gene for diabetes and provide precise treatment for diabetes patients in three families. Three families with suspected MODY were enrolled and screened for germline mutations using Whole exome sequencing (WES). Candidate pathogenic variants were validated in other family members and non-related healthy controls. Three heterozygous missense mutations in the ABCC8 gene (NM_001287174), c.1555 C>T (p.R519C), c.3706 A>G (p.I1236V), and c.2885 C>T (p.S962L) were found in families A, B, and C, respectively. All mutation sites cosegregated with diabetes, were predicted to be harmful by bioinformatics and were not found in non-related healthy controls. Two probands (onset ages, 8 and 12 years) were sensitive to glimepiride. However, an insufficient dose (2 mg/day) led to ketoacidosis. When the dosage of glimepiride was increased to 4 mg/day, blood sugar remained under control. A dose of 4 mg glimepiride daily also effectively controlled blood sugar in an adult patient 25-year-old. In addition, all patients were sensitive to liraglutide, which could control blood sugar better. These data suggest that ABCC8 was the pathogenic gene in three families with diabetes. Glimepiride (2 mg/day) was not effective in controlling blood sugar in children with ABCC8 mutations, however, 4 mg/daily glimepiride was effective in both adults and children. Moreover, liraglutide was effective in controlling blood sugar in both adults and children with ABCC8 mutations.