Unexpected Hair Regrowth in a Patient with Longstanding Alopecia Universalis During Treatment of Recalcitrant Dermatomyositis with the Janus Kinase Inhibitor Ruxolitinib

Examining the Safety Profile of Janus Kinase (JAK) Inhibitors in the Management of Immune-Mediated Diseases: A Comprehensive Review

Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors have heralded a paradigm shift in the management of immune-mediated diseases. While their efficacy is well-established, the safety concerns associated with these agents, particularly regarding thromboembolic events (TE), remain a focus of extensive research and clinical scrutiny. This comprehensive literature review embarks on an exploration of the multifaceted landscape of JAK inhibitors, providing insights into their safety profiles across diverse immune-mediated diseases. The introduction highlights the transformative influence of JAK inhibitors in the treatment of immune-mediated diseases. Historically, the therapeutic arsenal for these conditions included corticosteroids, disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), and biologics. The advent of JAK inhibitors has revolutionized this landscape, although concerns about their safety persist. This review strives to comprehensively evaluate their safety, amalgamating knowledge from multiple studies and trials. The subsequent sections delve into the safety of specific JAK inhibitors in the context of rheumatoid arthritis, inflammatory bowel diseases, and dermatologic conditions and their associations with venous thromboembolism. The evolving understanding of TE risk, particularly the intricate relationship between these agents and immune-mediated diseases, is meticulously unravelled. The concluding remarks underscore the dynamic nature of TE risk assessment with regard to immune-mediated diseases involving JAK inhibitors. It underscores that risk assessment is multifactorial, influenced not only by the choice of JAK inhibitor but also by the nuances of the underlying immune-mediated disease and the unique patient characteristics. This review offers a holistic perspective on TE risks associated with JAK inhibitors and contributes to the ongoing dialogue regarding their safety in the realm of immune-mediated diseases.

Use of Janus kinase inhibitors in dermatomyositis: a systematic literature review

Dermatomyositis (DM) is an idiopathic inflammatory myopathy that commonly manifests with proximal muscle weakness and is associated with extramuscular pathology, including characteristic skin lesions such as Gottron's papules and heliotrope rash, as well as lung, gastrointestinal, joint, and cardiac involvement. Systemic corticosteroids are a cornerstone of therapy, and more recently intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG; OCTAGAM®) has been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of adults with DM. Both steroids and IVIG represent nonspecific anti-inflammatory therapy, and more targeted approaches are lacking. Transcriptomics has identified upregulation of interferon (IFN)-regulated genes as key features of both adult DM and juvenile DM (JDM). Accordingly, blocking IFN signalling through inhibition of the Janus kinase (JAK) pathway represents a potential treatment option for DM. Placebo-controlled trial data assessing the use of JAK inhibitors for the treatment of DM are limited; as such, a systematic literature review was undertaken to assess the evidence of JAK inhibitors in the treatment of patients with DM. Terms related to DM and JAK inhibitors were searched using PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and Dimensions to identify peer-reviewed publications reporting patients with DM who were treated with a JAK inhibitor. Baseline demographics, clinical characteristics, and treatment outcome data were extracted. A total of 48 publications reporting 145 unique patients (adult DM, n=84; JDM, n=61) were identified. Among cases of adult DM, 61 of 84 (73%) had refractory skin disease at baseline, and all (61 of 61) reported improvement in cutaneous symptoms. Of patients with adult DM, 16 of 84 (19%) had refractory muscle disease at baseline, and all (16 of 16) reported improvement in muscle symptoms. In patients with adult DM complicated by interstitial lung disease (ILD; n=33), 31 (94%) patients improved with JAK inhibitor treatment. Among cases of JDM with refractory skin disease at baseline (60 of 61), most patients (57 of 60; 95%) showed improvements in skin symptoms after JAK inhibitor treatment. Of patients with JDM with refractory muscle disease at baseline (36 of 61), most (30 of 36; 83%) reported improvement in muscle symptoms. Four patients with JDM and ILD experienced improvement in lung disease activity following treatment with a JAK inhibitor. Among both DM and JDM cases, all patients (17 with DM and 16 with JDM) who had elevated serum IFN and/or IFN-stimulated gene expression at baseline showed reduction in IFN or IFN gene expression. Although the conclusions that can be drawn from this analysis are limited because of the differences in assessments used across publications, overall treatment of patients with DM or JDM with a JAK inhibitor was associated with significant improvement of a wide range of DM manifestations, including skin lesions, muscle weakness, and ILD. Our systematic literature review suggests that JAK inhibitors may be a viable treatment option for DM/JDM, and randomised controlled trials are necessary to confirm these findings.

The role of bDMARDs in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies: A systematic literature review

Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM) are a group of different conditions typically affecting striate muscle, lung, joints, skin and gastrointestinal tract. Treatment typically relies on glucocorticoids and synthetic immunosuppressants, but the occurrence of refractory, difficult to treat, manifestations, may require more aggressive treatment, borrowed from other autoimmune diseases, including biologic disease modifying drugs (bDMARDs). In this regard, we conducted a systemic literature review in order to depict the current evidence about the use of bDMARDs in IIM. A total of 78 papers, published during the last 21 years, were retrieved. The majority of patients was treated with TNF-α inhibitors, whose effectiveness was assessed particularly in recalcitrant striate muscle, skin and joints involvement. Rituximab, whose evidence is supported by a large number of real-life studies and trials, seems to be an excellent option in case of ILD and anti-synthetase syndrome, while Tocilizumab, despite not meeting primary and secondary endpoints in a recently published clinical trial, proved its effectiveness in rapidly progressing ILD. Similarly, Abatacept, studied in a phase IIb clinical trial with conflicting evidence, was reported to be effective in some case reports of refractory dermatomyositis. Less data exist for anti-IL1 and anti-IL23 agents, which were employed particularly for inclusion body myositis and severe skin disease, respectively. This study provides an organ-focused assessment of bDMARDs in IIM, which display encouraging results in the treatment of refractory subsets of disease.

Past, Present, and Future in Dermatomyositis Therapeutics

Purpose of review

This review highlights current and emerging pharmacologic therapies for the treatment of dermatomyositis (DM). Current clinical evidence, in addition to recently published and ongoing clinical trials for various drugs in development, are summarized in this review.

Recent findings

There has been significant progress in the research and development of potential treatments in DM. The FDA recently approved Octagam® 10% Immune Globulin Intravenous (IVIg) for the treatment of DM. Several drug targets are being explored as viable therapeutic options in phase 2 and phase 3 clinical trials; at the forefront of these are JAK inhibitors (tofacitinib and baricitinib) and T-cell co-stimulation blockers (i.e. abatacept). In addition, clinical trials are currently under way for therapeutics targeting novel molecular pathways, including immunoproteasome inhibitors, anti-B cell therapy, anti-interferon drugs, complement inhibitors, and phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitors.

Summary

With the large number of clinical trials, multiple novel therapeutics in development, and improved classification and outcome measures, the treatment landscape for DM will continue to rapidly evolve in the coming years as more options become available.

Update on dermatomyositis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review summarizes and comments on current knowledge in dermatomyositis.

RECENT FINDINGS

The 2018 European Neuromuscular Centre classification of dermatomyositis has been challenging by the discovery of clinicopathological features associated with dermatomyositis-specific antibody (DMSA) that were not incorporated in the original criteria. These features include but may not be limited to the presence of perifascicular necrosis in anti-Mi-2 dermatomyositis; presence of diffuse nonperifascicular sarcoplasmic myxovirus resistance protein A expression in anti-MDA5 dermatomyositis; and dermatomyositis sine dermatitis in anti-NXP-2 dermatomyositis. Variations and subclassifications within the same DMSA subtypes are observed: anti-MDA5 dermatomyositis is clinically subcategorized into good, intermediate, and poor prognostic subgroups; concurrent anti-CCAR1 and anti-TIF1-γ positivity identify anti-TIF1-γ-positive patient with a lower risk for cancer-associated myositis. Owing to distinct IFN1-signaling pathway activation in dermatomyositis, JAK-STAT inhibitor - the pathway-targeted therapy, have been studied with promising results in refractory dermatomyositis and some new-onset dermatomyositis. In addition, the potential serum biomarkers for IFN1 pathway activation are being investigated for their performance in monitoring the disease activity and the efficacy of the treatment.

SUMMARY

DMSA, evidence of prominent IFN1 pathway activation, and risk/severity-associated biomarkers would likely play major roles in future dermatomyositis classification, disease monitoring, and treatment decision.

Refractory alopecia universalis associated with dermatomyositis successfully treated with tofacitinib

Dermatomyositis (DM) and alopecia areata are two diseases characterised by aberrant interferon signalling. While patchy alopecia of the scalp is a known feature of DM, alopecia universalis, which involves hair loss over the entire body, has rarely been reported in conjunction with DM. Herein, we report the case of a 30-year-old female with DM who developed refractory cutaneous disease and alopecia universalis that were successfully treated with tofacitinib. This could suggest that concomitant severe alopecia and refractory cutaneous DM may reflect a strong baseline interferon gene signature that may predict responsiveness to janus kinase inhibitors.

Targeted Therapies in Autoimmune Skin Diseases

Unlike the established anti-inflammatory drugs with a broad range, new-targeted therapeutic approaches have emerged in the management of autoimmune skin diseases to increase efficacy and decrease adverse reactions on the basis of an improved molecular understanding of pathogenesis. Most inflammatory dermatoses are driven by misled immune responses physiologically directed at exogenous pathogens, that is, type 1 immunity against viral pathogens, type 2 immunity against parasites, and type 3 immunity against fungi and bacteria. Pathogenic hallmarks of these major immune reaction patterns are characterized within this article, and a comprehensive overview of current clinical trials evaluating targeted therapeutics for respective dermatoses is outlined.

A Comprehensive Literature Review of JAK Inhibitors in Treatment of Alopecia Areata

Alopecia areata (AA) is a chronic, immune-mediated form of nonscarring alopecia that is multifactorial and results in localized patches. It is often described as a self-limiting condition that results in the spontaneous regrowth of hair in most cases. However, this regrowth may take several months or years to occur in some patients, leading to the development of psychoemotional trauma in those that are affected. Although several therapies for AA have been developed and tested, there is no specific treatment that has been approved, leading to the availability of many off-label conventional treatment options, with very limited responses. More recently, with the advancement of pre-clinical and genetic studies, a greater understanding of the pathomechanisms involved in the development of AA has been uncovered. This has resulted in the introduction of targeted therapies that use small molecules to block specific pathways involved in AA pathophysiology. As such, the use of janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors for treatment of AA has emerged. JAK inhibitors block the T-cell mediated inflammatory response thought to be the driving factor behind AA pathogenesis, by inhibiting the janus kinase (JAK) signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) signaling pathway, leading to a reversal of hair loss in AA patients. Thus, in an effort to demonstrate the efficacy of JAK inhibitors in the treatment of AA, several studies have been published within recent years. However, the question remains, “Are JAK inhibitors effective and safe in the management of Alopecia Areata?”. This review aims to provide a comprehensive report on the role, efficacy, and outcomes of using JAK inhibitors in the treatment of AA. To competently answer the research question highlighted, the most recent, quality articles published over a 10–15-year period were sourced using PubMed, NCBI, Research gate, Medline, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, EMBASE and Google scholar. The literature search was primarily focused on randomized controlled trials (RCTs); however, in the absence of such, only the most recently published case reports, case series, clinical trials and open-label studies published to date were included.

JAK-inhibitors for dermatomyositis: A concise literature review

Refractory dermatomyositis (DM) is defined as cases that do not show improvement after initial treatment with two different immunosuppressives combined with corticosteroids with or without intravenous immunoglobulins. In recent years, few studies have reported a positive response to the use of Janus kinase inhibitors (JAK-inhibitors) for the treatment of refractory DM. A systematic literature review was performed for articles studying the use of JAK-inhibitors for the treatment of refractory DM. We identified 38 females and 15 males treated with JAK-inhibitors without serious side effects. Tofacitinib was the most frequently used JAK-inhibitor followed by ruxolitinib. Significant improvement in CDASI score, muscle strength, body weight, and skin lesions were reported in most of the studies. The duration of follow-up ranged from 1 to 15 months without relapse. Therefore, the use of JAK-inhibitors looks promising in the treatment of refractory DM and further high volume research may be required to validate the current concept. As only case reports and series were identified without direct comparison for review, there is a potential risk of bias. Despite these limitations, we believe that the result of this analysis allows a better understanding of treatment options for refractory DM and will help generate a hypothesis that can be further tested.

The relationship between JAK2(V617F) mutation and dermatomyositis-a case report and literature review

The JAK family (JAK1, JAK2, JAK3, and TYK2) have recently emerged as a potential therapeutic management in controlling severe and refractory dermatomyositis. Meanwhile, the progress in the discovery of JAK blockers is significant, with an increasing number of selective JAK inhibitors reported and some are in or prepare for clinical trials. However, the importance of each JAK in dermatomyositis is unclear, which is critical for a comprehensive understanding of dermatomyositis and significant for forming mechanism-based strategy. Here, we presented a case with clinically amyopathic dermatomyositis and essential thrombocytosis with a somatic constitutive active mutation of JAK2(V617F). The coexistence of these two uncommon diseases attracted us to investigate their underlying relationship. To this end, we characterized the clinical course and laboratory findings of this patient. Particularly, we correlated JAK2(V617F) mutation burden in affected peripheral blood subset with clinical activity score of dermatomyositis. Based on our observation, we concluded that these two diseases are independent disorders, and JAK2(V617F) mutation burden is irrelevant to the severity of dermatomyositis. Finally, we reviewed the literature and summarized them with a thorough discussion.