A Case of Pork-cat Syndrome That Developed as Food-dependent Exercise-induced Anaphylaxis

The Feline and the Swine: A Peculiar Case in an Allergy Clinic

Cross-reactivity between mammalian proteins, such as that in Pork Cat Syndrome, remains a topic of great interest. This syndrome, characterized by an immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated response to porcine albumin triggered by sensitization through cat epithelium, has been sparsely documented. We discuss a 41-year-old female who developed a pruritic rash within 30 minutes of consuming pork. Notably, she exhibited elevated serum IgE levels with specific reactions to cat dander, dog dander, and pork. A skin prick test for pork was positive. The patient was treated conservatively with allergen avoidance, vitamin D supplementation, fexofenadine, and doxycycline for systemic reactions, and topical corticosteroids for localized skin reactions, yielding a resolution of symptoms. This case underscores the significance of recognizing rare cross-reactivities in allergy and immunology and the manifestations of Pork Cat Syndrome, necessitating a comprehensive patient history and awareness for improved diagnosis and management.

Hidden and Rare Food Allergens in Pediatric Age

In food allergy management, the avoidance of the allergen that caused the reaction plays a fundamental role. Nevertheless, that can be thwarted in case of accidental exposure to a rare or hidden allergen, causing the adoption of a monotonous diet and a consequent reduction in the quality of life of the patient and their family. The identification of a rare and hidden allergen is an important diagnostic challenge, taking into account that a significant proportion of all food reactions is in reality due to them. The aim of the present review is to provide the pediatric allergist an overview of the possible sources of rare and hidden food allergens, taking into consideration the routes of exposure to these potential allergens with the main examples published in the scientific literature and the distinction between types of direct or cross-contamination. The identification of the allergen responsible for the reaction and the provision of a dietary advice customized for the specific individual’s dietary habits is essential to improve quality of life of the familiar nucleus and to reduce the risk of further allergic reactions.

Cohort study of subclinical sensitization against galactose‐α‐1,3‐galactose in Japan: Prevalence and regional variations

Sensitization to galactose-α-1,3-galactose (α-Gal) leads to the development of α-Gal syndrome, which includes red meat allergy and cetuximab-induced anaphylaxis. Since tick bites represent the main cause of α-Gal sensitization, it was speculated that sensitization to α-Gal occurs throughout Japan. However, few cohort studies have investigated α-Gal sensitization in Japan. Therefore, we aimed to elucidate the subclinical sensitization rate to α-Gal in Japan. Sera were obtained from 300 participants without food or cetuximab allergy at Shimane University Hospital (Shimane prefecture), Tokyo Medical and Dental University Hospital (Tokyo metropolis), and Tohoku University Hospital (Miyagi prefecture). ImmunoCAP-bovine thyroglobulin (BTG), ImmunoCAP-beef, and IgE immunoblotting with cetuximab were performed to detect α-Gal-specific IgE. Clinical information was collected from participants using a questionnaire. The overall positivity rate of ImmunoCAP-BTG was 4.0% without significant inter-institute differences, whereas that for ImmunoCAP-beef was 9.7% with a significant inter-institute difference. Tokyo Medical and Dental University Hospital (19.0%) had the highest positivity rate. The positivity rate based on cetuximab IgE immunoblotting was 2.7%, without any significant inter-institute differences. The overall positivity rate for both ImmunoCAP-BTG and cetuximab immunoblotting was 2.0%, with a significant inter-institute difference; 5.0% of Shimane University Hospital was the highest. Two cases showed sensitization against the non-α-Gal epitope of cetuximab. The overall positivity rate for both ImmunoCAP-beef and cetuximab immunoblotting was 1.3%, without significant inter-institute differences. Male sex was associated with positive beef-specific IgE. The prevalence of subclinical sensitization to α-Gal is estimated at 2.0%-4.0% in Japan and may be higher in rural areas, supporting an association between tick bites and α-Gal sensitization. In contrast, the prevalence of subclinical sensitization to beef is 9.7% in Japan and is highest in Tokyo Metropolis, suggesting the presence of another IgE-binding epitope apart from α-Gal and another sensitization route in the sensitization to beef IgE.

Food-Dependent Exercise-Induced Wheals, Angioedema, and Anaphylaxis: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Food-dependent exercise-induced wheals, angioedema, and anaphylaxis remain insufficiently characterized.

OBJECTIVE

We systematically reviewed the literature on clinical manifestations, laboratory investigations, culprit foods, triggering exercise, comorbidities, and treatment outcomes.

METHODS

Using predefined search terms and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) recommendations, we searched 3 electronic databases to identify relevant literature published before July 2021.

RESULTS

Of 722 patients (median age 25 years; 55.4% male) from 231 studies (43 cohort studies, 15 cases series, and 173 case reports), 79.6% and 3.7% had anaphylaxis with and without wheals and/or angioedema, respectively. The remaining 16.6% had wheals and/or angioedema without anaphylaxis. The duration from eating to exercising and from exercising to symptom onset ranged from 5 minutes to 6 hours (median 1 hour) and from 5 minutes to 5 hours (median 30 minutes), respectively, and virtually all patients exercised within 4 hours after eating and developed symptoms within 1 hour after exercising. Wheat was the most common culprit food. Running was the most common trigger exercise. Most patients were atopic, and 1 in 3 had a history of urticaria. Aspirin and wheat-based products were the most frequent augmenting factors. On-demand antihistamines, corticosteroids, and epinephrine were commonly used and reported to be effective. Patients who stopped eating culprit foods before exercise no longer developed food-dependent exercise-induced allergic reactions.

CONCLUSIONS

Food-dependent exercise-induced allergic reactions are heterogeneous in their clinical manifestations, triggers, and response to treatment. Patients benefit from avoidance of culprit foods before exercise, which highlights the need for allergological diagnostic workup and guidance.