1
|
Swayne OB, Gorgoraptis N, Leff A, Ajina S. Exploring the use of dopaminergic medication to treat hemispatial inattention during in-patient post-stroke neurorehabilitation. J Neuropsychol 2022; 16:518-536. [PMID: 35384324 DOI: 10.1111/jnp.12276] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2021] [Revised: 03/08/2022] [Accepted: 03/16/2022] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Hemispatial inattention (HSI), a lateralised impairment of spatial processing, is a common consequence of stroke. It is a poor prognostic indicator for functional recovery and interferes with the progress during in-patient neurorehabilitation. Dopaminergic medication has shown promise in improving HSI in the chronic post-stroke period but is untested in more acute settings, e.g. during in-patient neurorehabilitation. We audited the use of dopaminergic medication in ten sequential patients with post-stroke HSI, on an open-label exploratory basis. Patients' response to medication was assessed individually, using a three-week Off-On-Off protocol. We employed a mixture of bedside and functional measures, and made a multidisciplinary judgement of efficacy in individual patients. In six out of 10 patients, there was a convincing improvement of HSI while on medication, which reversed when it was paused. There was a mean 57% relative increase in target detection in the star cancellation test on the most affected side (on vs. off medication). In the six responders, medication was therefore continued throughout their admission without adverse effects. The star cancellation test was sensitive to HSI in most patients but in two cases failed to detect changes that were picked up by a functional assessment (Kessler Functional Neglect Assessment Protocol). We found this multidisciplinary approach to be feasible in an in-patient neurorehabilitation setting. We suggest further research to explore the efficacy of dopaminergic medication in improving neurorehabilitation outcomes for patients with post-stroke HSI. We suggest that more detailed N-of-1 assessments of treatment response, with internal blinding, may be a productive approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Orlando B Swayne
- National Hospital for Neurology & Neurosurgery, London, UK.,Department of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, UK
| | - Nikos Gorgoraptis
- Department of Neurology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.,Regional Neurorehabilitation Unit, Homerton University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,Preventive Neurology Unit, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, UK
| | - Alex Leff
- Department of Brain Repair and Rehabilitation, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, UK
| | - Sara Ajina
- National Hospital for Neurology & Neurosurgery, London, UK.,Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, FMRIB, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Di Gregorio F, La Porta F, Lullini G, Casanova E, Petrone V, Simoncini L, Ferrucci E, Piperno R. Efficacy of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Combined With Visual Scanning Treatment on Cognitive-Behavioral Symptoms of Unilateral Spatial Neglect in Patients With Traumatic Brain Injury: Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial. Front Neurol 2021; 12:702649. [PMID: 34335455 PMCID: PMC8317998 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2021.702649] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2021] [Accepted: 06/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Left hemispatial neglect (LHSN) is a frequent and disabling condition affecting patients who suffered from traumatic brain injury (TBI). LHSN is a neuropsychological syndrome characterized clinically by difficulties in attending, responding, and consciously representing the right side of space. Despite its frequency, scientific evidence on effective treatments for this condition in TBI patients is still low. According to existing literature, we hypothesize that in TBI, LHSN is caused by an imbalance in inter-hemispheric activity due to hyperactivity of the left hemisphere, as observed in LHSN after right strokes. Thus, by inhibiting this left hyperactivity, repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) would have a rebalancing effect, reducing LHSN symptoms in TBI patients. We plan to test this hypothesis within a single-blind, randomized SHAM controlled trial in which TBI patients will receive inhibitory i-rTMS followed by cognitive treatment for 15 days. Neurophysiological and clinical measures will be collected before, afterward, and in the follow-up. This study will give the first empirical evidence about the efficacy of a novel approach to treating LHSN in TBI patients. Clinical Trial Registration:https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04573413?cond=Neglect%2C+Hemispatial&cntry=IT&city=Bologna&draw=2&rank=2, identifier: NCT04573413.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Di Gregorio
- Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale, UO di Medicina Riabilitativa e Neuroriabilitazione, Bologna, Italy
| | - Fabio La Porta
- IRCCS, Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, UO di Medicina Riabilitativa e Neuroriabilitazione, Bologna, Italy
| | - Giada Lullini
- IRCCS, Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, UO di Medicina Riabilitativa e Neuroriabilitazione, Bologna, Italy
| | - Emanuela Casanova
- IRCCS, Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, UO di Medicina Riabilitativa e Neuroriabilitazione, Bologna, Italy
| | - Valeria Petrone
- IRCCS, Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, UO di Medicina Riabilitativa e Neuroriabilitazione, Bologna, Italy
| | - Loredana Simoncini
- Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale, UO di Medicina Riabilitativa e Neuroriabilitazione, Bologna, Italy
| | - Enrico Ferrucci
- Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale, UO di Medicina Riabilitativa e Neuroriabilitazione, Bologna, Italy
| | - Roberto Piperno
- IRCCS, Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, UO di Medicina Riabilitativa e Neuroriabilitazione, Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Potvin-Desrochers A, Paquette C. Potential Non-invasive Brain Stimulation Targets to Alleviate Freezing of Gait in Parkinson's Disease. Neuroscience 2021; 468:366-376. [PMID: 34102265 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2021.05.037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2021] [Revised: 05/14/2021] [Accepted: 05/31/2021] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Freezing of gait (FOG) is a common motor symptom in Parkinson's disease (PD). Although FOG reduces quality of life, affects mobility and increases the risk of falls, there are little to no effective treatments to alleviate FOG. Non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) has recently yielded attention as a potential treatment to reduce FOG symptoms however, stimulation parameters and protocols remain inconsistent and require further research. Specifically, targets for stimulation require careful review. Thus, with current neuroimaging and neuro-electrophysiological evidence, we consider potential cortical targets thought to be involved in the pathophysiology of FOG according to the Interference model, and within reach of NIBS. We note that the primary motor cortex, the supplementary motor area and the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex have already drawn attention as NIBS targets for FOG, but based on neuroimaging evidence the premotor cortex, the medial prefrontal cortex, the cerebellum, and more particularly, the posterior parietal cortex should be considered as potential regions for stimulation. We also discuss different methodological considerations, such as stimulation type, medication state, and hemisphere to target, and future perspectives for NIBS protocols in FOG.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra Potvin-Desrochers
- Department of Kinesiology and Physical Education, Currie Gymnasium, 475 Pine Avenue West, McGill University, Montréal, Québec H2W 1S4, Canada; Integrated Program in Neuroscience, Montreal Neurological Institute, 3801 University Street, McGill University, Montréal, Québec H3A 2B4, Canada; Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation (Jewish Rehabilitation Hospital Research Site and CISSS Laval), 3205 Place Alton-Goldbloom, Laval, Québec H7V 1R2, Canada
| | - Caroline Paquette
- Department of Kinesiology and Physical Education, Currie Gymnasium, 475 Pine Avenue West, McGill University, Montréal, Québec H2W 1S4, Canada; Integrated Program in Neuroscience, Montreal Neurological Institute, 3801 University Street, McGill University, Montréal, Québec H3A 2B4, Canada; Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation (Jewish Rehabilitation Hospital Research Site and CISSS Laval), 3205 Place Alton-Goldbloom, Laval, Québec H7V 1R2, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Di Gregorio F, La Porta F, Casanova E, Magni E, Bonora R, Ercolino MG, Petrone V, Leo MR, Piperno R. Efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with visual scanning treatment on cognitive and behavioral symptoms of left hemispatial neglect in right hemispheric stroke patients: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 2021; 22:24. [PMID: 33407787 PMCID: PMC7789759 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-020-04943-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2020] [Accepted: 12/01/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Left hemispatial neglect (LHN) is a neuropsychological syndrome often associated with right hemispheric stroke. Patients with LHN have difficulties in attending, responding, and consciously representing the right side of space. Various rehabilitation protocols have been proposed to reduce clinical symptoms related to LHN, using cognitive treatments, or on non-invasive brain stimulation. However, evidence of their benefit is still lacking; in particular, only a few studies focused on the efficacy of combining different approaches in the same patient. METHODS In the present study, we present the SMART ATLAS trial (Stimolazione MAgnetica Ripetitiva Transcranica nell'ATtenzione LAteralizzata dopo Stroke), a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial with pre-test (baseline), post-test, and 12 weeks follow-up assessments based on a novel rehabilitation protocol based on the combination of brain stimulation and standard cognitive treatment. In particular, we will compare the efficacy of inhibitory repetitive-transcranial magnetic stimulation (r-TMS), applied over the left intact parietal cortex of LHN patients, followed by visual scanning treatment, in comparison with a placebo stimulation (SHAM control) followed by the same visual scanning treatment, on visuospatial symptoms and neurophysiological parameters of LHN in a population of stroke patients. DISCUSSION Our trial results may provide scientific evidence of a new, relatively low-cost rehabilitation protocol for the treatment of LHN. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04080999 . Registered on September 2019.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Di Gregorio
- Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale, UOC di Medicina Riabilitativa e Neuroriabilitazione, Bologna, Italy
| | - Fabio La Porta
- IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, UO di Medicina Riabilitativa e Neuroriabilitazione, Casa dei Risvegli Luca de Nigris, Via Giulio Gaist, 6, 40139, Bologna, Italy.
| | - Emanuela Casanova
- IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, UO di Medicina Riabilitativa e Neuroriabilitazione, Casa dei Risvegli Luca de Nigris, Via Giulio Gaist, 6, 40139, Bologna, Italy
| | - Elisabetta Magni
- IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, UO di Medicina Riabilitativa e Neuroriabilitazione, Casa dei Risvegli Luca de Nigris, Via Giulio Gaist, 6, 40139, Bologna, Italy
| | - Roberta Bonora
- IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, UO di Medicina Riabilitativa e Neuroriabilitazione, Casa dei Risvegli Luca de Nigris, Via Giulio Gaist, 6, 40139, Bologna, Italy
| | - Maria Grazia Ercolino
- IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, UO di Medicina Riabilitativa e Neuroriabilitazione, Casa dei Risvegli Luca de Nigris, Via Giulio Gaist, 6, 40139, Bologna, Italy
| | - Valeria Petrone
- IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, UO di Medicina Riabilitativa e Neuroriabilitazione, Casa dei Risvegli Luca de Nigris, Via Giulio Gaist, 6, 40139, Bologna, Italy
| | | | - Roberto Piperno
- IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, UO di Medicina Riabilitativa e Neuroriabilitazione, Casa dei Risvegli Luca de Nigris, Via Giulio Gaist, 6, 40139, Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Draaisma LR, Wessel MJ, Hummel FC. Neurotechnologies as tools for cognitive rehabilitation in stroke patients. Expert Rev Neurother 2020; 20:1249-1261. [DOI: 10.1080/14737175.2020.1820324] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Laurijn R. Draaisma
- Defitech Chair of Clinical Neuroengineering, Center for Neuroprosthetics (CNP) and Brain Mind Institute (BMI), Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (EPFL), Geneva, Switzerland
- Defitech Chair of Clinical Neuroengineering, Clinique Romande de Réadaptation, Center for Neuroprosthetics (CNP) and Brain Mind Institute (BMI, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (EPFL Valais), Sion, Switzerland
| | - Maximilian J. Wessel
- Defitech Chair of Clinical Neuroengineering, Center for Neuroprosthetics (CNP) and Brain Mind Institute (BMI), Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (EPFL), Geneva, Switzerland
- Defitech Chair of Clinical Neuroengineering, Clinique Romande de Réadaptation, Center for Neuroprosthetics (CNP) and Brain Mind Institute (BMI, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (EPFL Valais), Sion, Switzerland
| | - Friedhelm C. Hummel
- Defitech Chair of Clinical Neuroengineering, Center for Neuroprosthetics (CNP) and Brain Mind Institute (BMI), Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (EPFL), Geneva, Switzerland
- Defitech Chair of Clinical Neuroengineering, Clinique Romande de Réadaptation, Center for Neuroprosthetics (CNP) and Brain Mind Institute (BMI, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (EPFL Valais), Sion, Switzerland
- Clinical Neuroscience, University of Geneva Medical School, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Iwański S, Leśniak M, Polanowska K, Bembenek J, Czepiel W, Seniów J. Neuronavigated 1 Hz rTMS of the left angular gyrus combined with visuospatial therapy in post-stroke neglect. NeuroRehabilitation 2020; 46:83-93. [PMID: 32039875 DOI: 10.3233/nre-192951] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Visuospatial neglect (VSN) may be caused by an inter-hemispheric imbalance of neural activity after brain injury. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) allows rebalancing restoration to a certain degree, relieving neglect symptoms. OBJECTIVE This study investigates the therapeutic effect of 1 Hz rTMS applied over the left angular gyrus combined with visual scanning training in patients with left VSN in the subacute stroke phase. METHODS Twenty-eight patients with VSN were randomly assigned to either experimental (fifteen sessions of rTMS consisted of 1800 magnetic pulses delivered to the left angular gyrus with a neuronavigation control), or control group (fifteen sessions of sham stimulation), followed by visual scanning training. VSN severity was assessed both before and after treatment with a 3-month follow up employing the Behavioural Inattention Test and functional measures. RESULTS No statistically significant differences were detected in outcome measures between the rTMS and sham groups after completion of 3-week therapy and at 3-month follow up. The magnitude of stimulation effects was not associated either with lesion volume, its location, or baseline motor threshold. CONCLUSIONS Our study did not confirm efficacy of 1 Hz rTMS over the angular gyrus as an adjuvant method to visual scanning training in patients with VSN in the subacute stroke.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Szczepan Iwański
- 2nd Department of Neurology, Institute of Psychiatry and Neurology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Marcin Leśniak
- Institute of Psychology, University of Wroclaw, Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Katarzyna Polanowska
- 2nd Department of Neurology, Institute of Psychiatry and Neurology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Jan Bembenek
- Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Institute of Psychiatry and Neurology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Wojciech Czepiel
- Vascular Laboratory, Institute of Psychiatry and Neurology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Joanna Seniów
- 2nd Department of Neurology, Institute of Psychiatry and Neurology, Warsaw, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Noninvasive brain stimulation can modulate neural processing within the motor cortex and thereby might be beneficial in the rehabilitation of hemispatial neglect after stroke. METHODS We review the pertinent literature regarding the use of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and transcranial magnetic stimulation in order to facilitate recovery of hemispatial neglect after stroke. RESULTS Twenty controlled trials (including 443 stroke patients) matched our inclusion criteria. Methodology and results of each study are presented in a comparative approach. Current data seem to indicate a better efficiency of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, compared to tDCS to ameliorate hemispatial neglect after stroke. CONCLUSIONS Noninvasive brain stimulation has the potential to facilitate recovery of hemispatial neglect after stroke, but until today, there are not enough data to claim its routine use.
Collapse
|
8
|
Gammeri R, Iacono C, Ricci R, Salatino A. Unilateral Spatial Neglect After Stroke: Current Insights. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat 2020; 16:131-152. [PMID: 32021206 PMCID: PMC6959493 DOI: 10.2147/ndt.s171461] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2019] [Accepted: 12/24/2019] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Unilateral spatial neglect (USN) is a disorder of contralesional space awareness which often follows unilateral brain lesion. Since USN impairs awareness of contralesional space/body and often of concomitant motor disorders, its presence represents a negative prognostic factor of functional recovery. Thus, the disorder needs to be carefully diagnosed and treated. Here, we attempted to present a clear and concise picture of current insights in the comprehension and rehabilitation of USN. METHODS We first provided an updated overview of USN clinical and neuroanatomical features and then highlighted recent progresses in the diagnosis and rehabilitation of the disease. In relation to USN rehabilitation, we conducted a MEDLINE literature research on three of the most promising interventions for USN rehabilitation: prismatic adaptation (PA), non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS), and virtual reality (VR). The identified studies were classified according to the strength of their methods. RESULTS The last years have witnessed a relative decrement of interest in the study of neuropsychological disorders of spatial awareness in USN, but a relative increase in the study of potential interventions for its rehabilitation. Although optimal protocols still need to be defined, high-quality studies have demonstrated the efficacy of PA, TMS and tDCS interventions for the treatment of USN. In addition, preliminary investigations are suggesting the potentials of GVS and VR approaches for USN rehabilitation. CONCLUSION Advancing neuropsychological and neuroscience tools to investigate USN pathophysiology is a necessary step to identify effective rehabilitation treatments and to foster our understanding of neurofunctional bases of spatial cognition in the healthy brain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberto Gammeri
- Department of Psychology, SAMBA (SpAtial, Motor and Bodily Awareness) Research Group, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Claudio Iacono
- Department of Psychology, SAMBA (SpAtial, Motor and Bodily Awareness) Research Group, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Raffaella Ricci
- Department of Psychology, SAMBA (SpAtial, Motor and Bodily Awareness) Research Group, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
- Neuroscience Institute of Turin (NIT), University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Adriana Salatino
- Department of Psychology, SAMBA (SpAtial, Motor and Bodily Awareness) Research Group, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Zebhauser PT, Vernet M, Unterburger E, Brem AK. Visuospatial Neglect - a Theory-Informed Overview of Current and Emerging Strategies and a Systematic Review on the Therapeutic Use of Non-invasive Brain Stimulation. Neuropsychol Rev 2019; 29:397-420. [PMID: 31748841 PMCID: PMC6892765 DOI: 10.1007/s11065-019-09417-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2018] [Accepted: 09/27/2019] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
Visuospatial neglect constitutes a supramodal cognitive deficit characterized by reduction or loss of spatial awareness for the contralesional space. It occurs in over 40% of right- and 20% of left-brain-lesioned stroke patients with lesions located mostly in parietal, frontal and subcortical brain areas. Visuospatial neglect is a multifaceted syndrome - symptoms can be divided into sensory, motor and representational neglect - and therefore requires an individually adapted diagnostic and therapeutic approach. Several models try to explain the origins of visuospatial neglect, of which the "interhemispheric rivalry model" is strongly supported by animal and human research. This model proposes that allocation of spatial attention is balanced by transcallosal inhibition and both hemispheres compete to direct attention to the contralateral hemi-space. Accordingly, a brain lesion causes an interhemispheric imbalance, which may be re-installed by activation of lesioned, or deactivation of unlesioned (over-activated) brain areas through noninvasive brain stimulation. Research in larger patient samples is needed to confirm whether noninvasive brain stimulation can improve long-term outcomes and whether these also affect activities of daily living and discharge destination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Theo Zebhauser
- Department of Neuropsychology, Max-Planck Institute of Psychiatry, Kraepelinstrasse 2-10, 80804, Munich, Germany.,Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Klinikum Rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität, Munich, Germany
| | - Marine Vernet
- Section on Neurocircuitry, Laboratory of Brain and Cognition, NIMH/NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Evelyn Unterburger
- Division of Neuropsychology, Universitätsklinik Zürich USZ, Frauenklinikstrasse 26, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Anna-Katharine Brem
- Department of Neuropsychology, Max-Planck Institute of Psychiatry, Kraepelinstrasse 2-10, 80804, Munich, Germany. .,Berenson-Allen Center for Noninvasive Brain Stimulation, Department of Neurology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Lucente G, Valls-Sole J, Murillo N, Rothwell J, Coll J, Davalos A, Kumru H. Noninvasive Brain Stimulation and Noninvasive Peripheral Stimulation for Neglect Syndrome Following Acquired Brain Injury. Neuromodulation 2019; 23:312-323. [PMID: 31725939 DOI: 10.1111/ner.13062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2019] [Revised: 07/10/2019] [Accepted: 09/10/2019] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Hemispatial neglect is a frequent condition usually following nondominant hemispheric brain injury. It strongly affects rehabilitation strategies and everyday life activities. It is associated with behavioral and cognitive disability with a strong impact on patient's life. METHODS We reviewed the published literature on the use of noninvasive brain stimulation, including repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), and of noninvasive peripheral muscle stimulation, as therapeutic strategies for rehabilitation of neglect after acquired brain injury, such as in stroke or in traumatic injuries. The studies were grouped as controlled or uncontrolled studies in each stimulation techniques. RESULTS Thirty-four studies were identified and 16 on rTMS, 10 on tDCS, and 8 on vibration. All studies were conducted in adult patients who suffered a stroke, except for one that was conducted in a patient suffering traumatic acquired brain injury and another that was conducted in a patient with brain tumor. In spite of significant variability in treatment protocols, patients' features and assessment of neglect, improvement was reported in almost all studies with no side-effects. CONCLUSIONS Noninvasive brain stimulation and neuromuscular vibration are promising therapeutic neuromodulatory approaches for neglect. Further randomized-controlled studies are needed to corroborate their effectiveness as separate and combined techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppe Lucente
- Department of Neuroscience, Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain.,Grup de Recerca en Malalties Neuromusculars i Neuropediatriques, Department of Neurosciences, Institut d'Investigació en Ciències de la Salut Germans Trias i Pujol, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Badalona, Spain.,Medicine Department, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, 08193, Bellaterra (Cerdanyola del Vallès), Spain.,Fundació Institut d'Investigació en Ciències de la Salut Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain
| | - Josep Valls-Sole
- EMG Department, Hospital Clinic, Carrer de Villarroel, 170, 08036 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Narda Murillo
- Medicine Department, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, 08193, Bellaterra (Cerdanyola del Vallès), Spain.,Fundació Institut d'Investigació en Ciències de la Salut Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain.,Fundación Institut Guttmann, Institut Universitari de Neurorehabilitació adscrit a la UAB, 08916, Badalona, Spain
| | - John Rothwell
- Sobell Department of Motor Neuroscience and Movement Disorders, Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, University College London, London, UK
| | - Jaume Coll
- Department of Neuroscience, Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain.,Grup de Recerca en Malalties Neuromusculars i Neuropediatriques, Department of Neurosciences, Institut d'Investigació en Ciències de la Salut Germans Trias i Pujol, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Badalona, Spain.,Medicine Department, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, 08193, Bellaterra (Cerdanyola del Vallès), Spain.,Fundació Institut d'Investigació en Ciències de la Salut Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain
| | - Antoni Davalos
- Department of Neuroscience, Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain.,Medicine Department, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, 08193, Bellaterra (Cerdanyola del Vallès), Spain.,Fundació Institut d'Investigació en Ciències de la Salut Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain
| | - Hatice Kumru
- Medicine Department, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, 08193, Bellaterra (Cerdanyola del Vallès), Spain.,Fundación Institut Guttmann, Institut Universitari de Neurorehabilitació adscrit a la UAB, 08916, Badalona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Vatanparasti S, Kazemnejad A, Yoonessi A, Oveisgharan S. The Effect of Continuous Theta-Burst Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Combined with Prism Adaptation on the Neglect Recovery in Stroke Patients. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2019; 28:104296. [PMID: 31395425 DOI: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2019.07.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2019] [Revised: 07/01/2019] [Accepted: 07/13/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study was designed to investigate the effect of prism adaptation (PA) combined with continuous theta-burst transcranial magnetic stimulation (cTBS) on the neglect recovery of stroke patients with unilateral neglect. METHODS A total of 14 stroke patients with unilateral neglect were randomly assigned to 2 groups including an intervention group undergone PA combined with cTBS over the left intact parietal cortex and a control group. PA combined with sham cTBS was perfomed for 2 weeks in 10 daily sessions. Before and after the intervention, patients were evaluated for visuospatial neglect measured using the Star Cancellation Test (SCT), Line Bisection Task (LBT), Figure Copying Test, and Clock Drawing Task. Neurological function was evaluated using the Modified Rankin Scale (MRS). RESULTS Both groups (PA alone and PA+ cTBS) showed improvement in their neglected symptoms (measured by SCT, LBT, Figure Copying Test, and Clock Drawing Task), and in their disability in the neurological function (measured by MRS) (P< .05). CONCLUSIONS The results of the present study showed that, transcranial magnetic stimulation did not increase the effect of PA on neglect symptoms in stroke patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shole Vatanparasti
- Department of Cognitive Science, Institute for Cognitive Science Studies, Tehran, Iran.
| | - Anoshirvan Kazemnejad
- Department of Biostatistics, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
| | - Ali Yoonessi
- Neuroscience Department, School of Advanced Technologies in Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Shahram Oveisgharan
- Department of Neurology, Rush Alzheimer's Disease Center, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
van Lieshout ECC, van Hooijdonk RF, Dijkhuizen RM, Visser-Meily JMA, Nijboer TCW. The Effect of Noninvasive Brain Stimulation on Poststroke Cognitive Function: A Systematic Review. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2019; 33:355-374. [DOI: 10.1177/1545968319834900] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Introduction. Cognitive impairment after stroke has been associated with lower quality of life and independence in the long run, stressing the need for methods that target impairment for cognitive rehabilitation. The use of noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) on recovery of language functions is well documented, yet the effects of NIBS on other cognitive domains remain largely unknown. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review that evaluates the effects of different stimulation techniques on domain-specific (long-term) cognitive recovery after stroke. Methods. Three databases (PubMed, EMBASE, and PsycINFO) were searched for articles (in English) on the effects of NIBS on cognitive domains, published up to January 2018. Results. A total of 40 articles were included: randomized controlled trials (n = 21), studies with a crossover design (n = 9), case studies (n = 6), and studies with a mixed design (n = 4). Most studies tested effects on neglect (n = 25). The majority of the studies revealed treatment effects on at least 1 time point poststroke, in at least 1 cognitive domain. Studies varied highly on the factors time poststroke, number of treatment sessions, and stimulation protocols. Outcome measures were generally limited to a few cognitive tests. Conclusion. Our review suggests that NIBS is able to alleviate neglect after stroke. However, the results are still inconclusive and preliminary for the effect of NIBS on other cognitive domains. A standardized core set of outcome measures of cognition, also at the level of daily life activities and participation, and international agreement on treatment protocols, could lead to better evaluation of the efficacy of NIBS and comparisons between studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eline C. C. van Lieshout
- Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- University Medical Center Utrecht
- De Hoogstraat Rehabilitation Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Roel F. van Hooijdonk
- University Medical Center Utrecht
- De Hoogstraat Rehabilitation Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Tanja C. W. Nijboer
- Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- University Medical Center Utrecht
- De Hoogstraat Rehabilitation Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Lee SA, Kim MK. Effect of Low Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Depression and Cognition of Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Med Sci Monit 2018; 24:8789-8794. [PMID: 30513530 PMCID: PMC6289027 DOI: 10.12659/msm.911385] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study was conducted to investigate the effects of low frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex on depression and cognition in patients with traumatic brain injury. MATERIAL AND METHODS To accomplish this, 13 patients who were diagnosed with traumatic brain injury were divided into an experimental group (n=7) and a control group (n=6). The experimental group received rTMS during a 30-minute session 5 days per week for 2 weeks; the control group received sham rTMS. The patients were then evaluated for depression using the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) and for cognitive function using the Trail Making Test (TMT) and the Stroop Color Word Test (SCWT). RESULTS A significant decrease in MADRS, TMT, and SCWT was observed after the intervention in the experimental group (P<0.01), and there was a significant difference in the change value of MADRS, TMT, and SCWT compared to the control group (P<0.01). Moreover, the effect size for gains in the experimental group and control group was very strong for MADRS, TMT, and SCWT (effect size=1.44, 1.49, and 1.24 respectively). CONCLUSIONS The results of this study suggest that application of low frequency rTMS to the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex of patients with traumatic brain injury has a positive effect on depression and cognition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Si A Lee
- Department of Physical Therapy, Graduate School, Daegu University, Jillyang, Gyeongsan, Gyeongbuk, South Korea
| | - Myoung-Kwon Kim
- Department of Physical Therapy, College of Rehabilitation Sciences, Daegu University, Jillyang, Gyeongsan, Gyeongbuk, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
León Ruiz M, Rodríguez Sarasa M, Sanjuán Rodríguez L, Benito-León J, García-Albea Ristol E, Arce Arce S. Evidencias actuales sobre la estimulación magnética transcraneal y su utilidad potencial en la neurorrehabilitación postictus: Ampliando horizontes en el tratamiento de la enfermedad cerebrovascular. Neurologia 2018; 33:459-472. [DOI: 10.1016/j.nrl.2016.03.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2015] [Revised: 03/07/2016] [Accepted: 03/08/2016] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
|
15
|
León Ruiz M, Rodríguez Sarasa M, Sanjuán Rodríguez L, Benito-León J, García-Albea Ristol E, Arce Arce S. Current evidence on transcranial magnetic stimulation and its potential usefulness in post-stroke neurorehabilitation: Opening new doors to the treatment of cerebrovascular disease. NEUROLOGÍA (ENGLISH EDITION) 2018. [DOI: 10.1016/j.nrleng.2016.03.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
|
16
|
Sebastianelli L, Versace V, Martignago S, Brigo F, Trinka E, Saltuari L, Nardone R. Low-frequency rTMS of the unaffected hemisphere in stroke patients: A systematic review. Acta Neurol Scand 2017; 136:585-605. [PMID: 28464421 DOI: 10.1111/ane.12773] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/04/2017] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
The aim of this review was to summarize the evidence for the effectiveness of low-frequency (LF) repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) over the unaffected hemisphere in promoting functional recovery after stroke. We performed a systematic search of the studies using LF-rTMS over the contralesional hemisphere in stroke patients and reviewed the 67 identified articles. The studies have been gathered together according to the time interval that had elapsed between the stroke onset and the beginning of the rTMS treatment. Inhibitory rTMS of the contralesional hemisphere can induce beneficial effects on stroke patients with motor impairment, spasticity, aphasia, hemispatial neglect and dysphagia, but the therapeutic clinical significance is unclear. We observed considerable heterogeneity across studies in the stimulation protocols. The use of different patient populations, regardless of lesion site and stroke aetiology, different stimulation parameters and outcome measures means that the studies are not readily comparable, and estimating real effectiveness or reproducibility is very difficult. It seems that careful experimental design is needed and it should consider patient selection aspects, rTMS parameters and clinical assessment tools. Consecutive sessions of rTMS, as well as the combination with conventional rehabilitation therapy, may increase the magnitude and duration of the beneficial effects. In an increasing number of studies, the patients have been enrolled early after stroke. The prolonged follow-up in these patients suggests that the effects of contralesional LF-rTMS can be long-lasting. However, physiological evidence indicating increased synaptic plasticity, and thus, a more favourable outcome, in the early enrolled patients, is still lacking. Carefully designed clinical trials designed are required to address this question. LF rTMS over unaffected hemisphere may have therapeutic utility, but the evidence is still preliminary and the findings need to be confirmed in further randomized controlled trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L. Sebastianelli
- Department of Neurorehabilitation; Hospital of Vipiteno; Vipiteno Italy
- Research Unit for Neurorehabilitation of South Tyrol; Bolzano Italy
| | - V. Versace
- Department of Neurorehabilitation; Hospital of Vipiteno; Vipiteno Italy
- Research Unit for Neurorehabilitation of South Tyrol; Bolzano Italy
| | - S. Martignago
- Department of Neurorehabilitation; Hospital of Vipiteno; Vipiteno Italy
- Research Unit for Neurorehabilitation of South Tyrol; Bolzano Italy
| | - F. Brigo
- Department of Neurology; Franz Tappeiner Hospital; Merano Italy
- Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences; University of Verona; Verona Italy
| | - E. Trinka
- Department of Neurology; Christian Doppler Klinik; Paracelsus Medical University; Salzburg Austria
| | - L. Saltuari
- Research Unit for Neurorehabilitation of South Tyrol; Bolzano Italy
- Department of Neurology; Hochzirl Hospital; Zirl Austria
| | - R. Nardone
- Department of Neurology; Franz Tappeiner Hospital; Merano Italy
- Department of Neurology; Christian Doppler Klinik; Paracelsus Medical University; Salzburg Austria
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Kim DY, Kim YH, Lee J, Chang WH, Kim MW, Pyun SB, Yoo WK, Ohn SH, Park KD, Oh BM, Lim SH, Jung KJ, Ryu BJ, Im S, Jee SJ, Seo HG, Rah UW, Park JH, Sohn MK, Chun MH, Shin HS, Lee SJ, Lee YS, Park SW, Park YG, Paik NJ, Lee SG, Lee JK, Koh SE, Kim DK, Park GY, Shin YI, Ko MH, Kim YW, Yoo SD, Kim EJ, Oh MK, Chang JH, Jung SH, Kim TW, Kim WS, Kim DH, Park TH, Lee KS, Hwang BY, Song YJ. Clinical Practice Guideline for Stroke Rehabilitation in Korea 2016. BRAIN & NEUROREHABILITATION 2017. [DOI: 10.12786/bn.2017.10.e11] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Deog Young Kim
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Korea
| | - Yun-Hee Kim
- Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Korea
| | - Jongmin Lee
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Korea
| | - Won Hyuk Chang
- Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Korea
| | - Min-Wook Kim
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Korea
| | - Sung-Bom Pyun
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Korea University College of Medicine, Korea
| | - Woo-Kyoung Yoo
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Hallym University College of Medicine, Korea
| | - Suk Hoon Ohn
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Hallym University College of Medicine, Korea
| | - Ki Deok Park
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Gachon University College of Medicine, Korea
| | - Byung-Mo Oh
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Korea
| | - Seong Hoon Lim
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Korea
| | - Kang Jae Jung
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Eulji University Hospital & Eulji University School of Medicine, Korea
| | - Byung-Ju Ryu
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Sahmyook Medical Center, Korea
| | - Sun Im
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Korea
| | - Sung Ju Jee
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Chungnam National University College of Medicine, Korea
| | - Han Gil Seo
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Korea
| | - Ueon Woo Rah
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Ajou University School of Medicine, Korea
| | - Joo Hyun Park
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Korea
| | - Min Kyun Sohn
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Chungnam National University College of Medicine, Korea
| | - Min Ho Chun
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Korea
| | - Hee Suk Shin
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine and Institute of Health Sciences, Gyeongsang National University College of Medicine, Korea
| | - Seong Jae Lee
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, College of Medicine Dankook University, Korea
| | - Yang-Soo Lee
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, Korea
| | - Si-Woon Park
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Catholic Kwandong University International St Mary's Hospital, Korea
| | - Yoon Ghil Park
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Korea
| | - Nam Jong Paik
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Korea
| | - Sam-Gyu Lee
- Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Chonnam National University Medical School, Korea
| | - Ju Kang Lee
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Gachon University College of Medicine, Korea
| | - Seong-Eun Koh
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Korea
| | - Don-Kyu Kim
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, College of Medicine, Chung-Ang University, Korea
| | - Geun-Young Park
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Korea
| | - Yong Il Shin
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Pusan National University Hospital, Korea
| | - Myoung-Hwan Ko
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Chonbuk National University Medical School, Korea
| | - Yong Wook Kim
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Korea
| | - Seung Don Yoo
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Korea
| | - Eun Joo Kim
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, National Rehabilitation Hospital, Korea
| | - Min-Kyun Oh
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine and Institute of Health Sciences, Gyeongsang National University College of Medicine, Korea
| | - Jae Hyeok Chang
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Pusan National University Hospital, Korea
| | - Se Hee Jung
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Korea
| | - Tae-Woo Kim
- TBI rehabilitation center, National Traffic Injury Rehabilitation Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Korea
| | - Won-Seok Kim
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Korea
| | - Dae Hyun Kim
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Veterans Health Service Medical Center, Korea
| | - Tai Hwan Park
- Department of Neurology, Seoul Medical Center, Korea
| | - Kwan-Sung Lee
- Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Korea
| | - Byong-Yong Hwang
- Department of Physical Therapy, Yong-In University College of Health & Welfare, Korea
| | - Young Jin Song
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Intermittent θ burst stimulation modulates resting-state functional connectivity in the attention network and promotes behavioral recovery in patients with visual spatial neglect. Neuroreport 2016; 27:1261-1265. [DOI: 10.1097/wnr.0000000000000689] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
19
|
Yang NYH, Fong KNK, Li-Tsang CWP, Zhou D. Effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with sensory cueing on unilateral neglect in subacute patients with right hemispheric stroke: a randomized controlled study. Clin Rehabil 2016; 31:1154-1163. [PMID: 27920261 DOI: 10.1177/0269215516679712] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
Objective: To compare the effects of rTMS combined with sensory cueing, rTMS alone, and conventional rehabilitation on unilateral neglect, hemiplegic arm functions and performance of activities of daily living. Design: A single-blinded randomized controlled trial. Setting: A convalescent hospital. Subjects: Sixty inpatients with left unilateral neglect after stroke. Interventions: Patients were randomly assigned to three groups: rTMS combined with sensory cueing, rTMS, and conventional rehabilitation alone. rTMS at 1 Hz was applied over P5 of the contralesional hemisphere while vibration cueing was emitted using a wristwatch device on the hemiplegic arm, five days per week for two weeks. The first two groups received the same dosage of conventional rehabilitation on top of their experimental interventions. Blinded assessments were administered at baseline, 2 weeks postintervention, and 6 weeks follow-up. Main measures: Neglect and arm motor performance. Results: Both rTMS combined with sensory cueing (99.6±33.0) and rTMS alone (88.2±28.7) significantly reduced unilateral neglect than conventional rehabilitation (72.7±33.1) when measured using the conventional subtests of the Behavioural Inattention Test, but the combination was better than rTMS alone. Hemiplegic arm functions and activities of daily living improved in all patients across the three groups but no significant differences were found between the groups. Conclusion: The combination of inhibitory P5-rTMS with sensory cueing was better than either rTMS or conventional rehabilitation alone in producing a stronger and long-lasting improvement in unilateral neglect, but the improvement was not associated with improved arm function or independence in activities of daily living.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole YH Yang
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong SAR
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, China
- Institute for Disaster Management and Reconstruction, Sichuan University, China
| | - Kenneth NK Fong
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong SAR
| | - Cecilia WP Li-Tsang
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong SAR
| | - D Zhou
- Department of Neurology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, China
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Tsagaris KZ, Labar DR, Edwards DJ. A Framework for Combining rTMS with Behavioral Therapy. Front Syst Neurosci 2016; 10:82. [PMID: 27895557 PMCID: PMC5108775 DOI: 10.3389/fnsys.2016.00082] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2016] [Accepted: 09/27/2016] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Upon its inception, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) was delivered at rest, without regard to the potential impact of activity occurring during or around the time of stimulation. rTMS was considered an experimental intervention imposed on the brain; therefore, the myriad features that might suppress or enhance its desired effects had not yet been explored. The field of rTMS has since grown substantially and therapeutic benefits have been reported, albeit with modest and inconsistent improvements. Work in this field accelerated following approval of a psychiatric application (depression), and it is now expanding to other applications and disciplines. In the last decade, experimental enquiry has sought new ways to improve the therapeutic benefits of rTMS, intended to enhance underlying brain reorganization and functional recovery by combining it with behavioral therapy. This concept is appealing, but poorly defined and requires clarity. We provide an overview of how combined rTMS and behavioral therapy has been delineated in the literature, highlighting the diversity of approaches. We outline a framework for study design and reporting such that the effects of this emerging method can be better understood.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Zoe Tsagaris
- Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation and Human Motor Control Laboratory, Burke Medical Research Institute, White Plains NY, USA
| | - Douglas R Labar
- Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation and Human Motor Control Laboratory, Burke Medical Research Institute, White PlainsNY, USA; Department of Neurology, New York Presbyterian, Weill Cornell Medicine, New YorkNY, USA
| | - Dylan J Edwards
- Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation and Human Motor Control Laboratory, Burke Medical Research Institute, White PlainsNY, USA; Department of Neurology, New York Presbyterian, Weill Cornell Medicine, New YorkNY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Làdavas E, Giulietti S, Avenanti A, Bertini C, Lorenzini E, Quinquinio C, Serino A. a-tDCS on the ipsilesional parietal cortex boosts the effects of prism adaptation treatment in neglect. Restor Neurol Neurosci 2016; 33:647-62. [PMID: 25855132 DOI: 10.3233/rnn-140464] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE The aim of the study is to compare the effects of multiple sessions of cathodal (c-tDCS) or anodal tDCS (a-tDCS) in modulating the beneficial effects of prism adaptation (PA) treatment in neglect patients. METHODS 30 neglect patients were submitted to 10 daily sessions of PA treatment. Patients were pseudo-randomly divided into 3 groups. In the c-tDCS-group, each PA session was coupled with 20 minutes of cathodal stimulation of the left, intact PPC; in the a-tDCS-group, anodal stimulation was applied to PPC of the damaged hemisphere; in the Sham group, sham stimulation was applied. Neglect was evaluated before and after treatment with the Behavioral Inattention Test. RESULTS Combined tDCS-PA treatment induced stronger neglect improvement in the a-tDCSgroup as compared to the Sham group. No improvement was found in the c-tDCS group, with respect to that normally induced by PA and found in the Sham group. CONCLUSIONS c-tDCS abolished neglect amelioration after PA, possibly because stimulation affected the sensorimotor network controlling prism adaptation. Instead, a-tDCS PPC boosted neglect amelioration after PA probably thanks to increased excitability of residual tissue in the lesioned hemisphere, which in turn might reduce dysfunctional over-excitability of the intact hemisphere.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elisabetta Làdavas
- Dipartimento di Psicologia, Università degli Studi di Bologna, Italy.,Centro studi e ricerche in Neuroscienze Cognitive, Campus di Cesena, Cesena, Italy
| | | | - Alessio Avenanti
- Dipartimento di Psicologia, Università degli Studi di Bologna, Italy.,Centro studi e ricerche in Neuroscienze Cognitive, Campus di Cesena, Cesena, Italy.,IRCCS Fondazione Santa Lucia, Roma, Italy
| | - Caterina Bertini
- Dipartimento di Psicologia, Università degli Studi di Bologna, Italy.,Centro studi e ricerche in Neuroscienze Cognitive, Campus di Cesena, Cesena, Italy
| | | | - Cristina Quinquinio
- Istituto di Riabilitazione Santo Stefano, Porto Potenza Picena, Macerata, Italy
| | - Andrea Serino
- Dipartimento di Psicologia, Università degli Studi di Bologna, Italy.,Centro studi e ricerche in Neuroscienze Cognitive, Campus di Cesena, Cesena, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Winstein CJ, Stein J, Arena R, Bates B, Cherney LR, Cramer SC, Deruyter F, Eng JJ, Fisher B, Harvey RL, Lang CE, MacKay-Lyons M, Ottenbacher KJ, Pugh S, Reeves MJ, Richards LG, Stiers W, Zorowitz RD. Guidelines for Adult Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 2016; 47:e98-e169. [PMID: 27145936 DOI: 10.1161/str.0000000000000098] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1504] [Impact Index Per Article: 188.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this guideline is to provide a synopsis of best clinical practices in the rehabilitative care of adults recovering from stroke. METHODS Writing group members were nominated by the committee chair on the basis of their previous work in relevant topic areas and were approved by the American Heart Association (AHA) Stroke Council's Scientific Statement Oversight Committee and the AHA's Manuscript Oversight Committee. The panel reviewed relevant articles on adults using computerized searches of the medical literature through 2014. The evidence is organized within the context of the AHA framework and is classified according to the joint AHA/American College of Cardiology and supplementary AHA methods of classifying the level of certainty and the class and level of evidence. The document underwent extensive AHA internal and external peer review, Stroke Council Leadership review, and Scientific Statements Oversight Committee review before consideration and approval by the AHA Science Advisory and Coordinating Committee. RESULTS Stroke rehabilitation requires a sustained and coordinated effort from a large team, including the patient and his or her goals, family and friends, other caregivers (eg, personal care attendants), physicians, nurses, physical and occupational therapists, speech-language pathologists, recreation therapists, psychologists, nutritionists, social workers, and others. Communication and coordination among these team members are paramount in maximizing the effectiveness and efficiency of rehabilitation and underlie this entire guideline. Without communication and coordination, isolated efforts to rehabilitate the stroke survivor are unlikely to achieve their full potential. CONCLUSIONS As systems of care evolve in response to healthcare reform efforts, postacute care and rehabilitation are often considered a costly area of care to be trimmed but without recognition of their clinical impact and ability to reduce the risk of downstream medical morbidity resulting from immobility, depression, loss of autonomy, and reduced functional independence. The provision of comprehensive rehabilitation programs with adequate resources, dose, and duration is an essential aspect of stroke care and should be a priority in these redesign efforts. (Stroke.2016;47:e98-e169. DOI: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000098.).
Collapse
|
23
|
Kim JH, Lee BH, Go SM, Seo SW, Heilman KM, Na DL. Improvement of hemispatial neglect by a see-through head-mounted display: a preliminary study. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2015; 12:114. [PMID: 26666223 PMCID: PMC4678567 DOI: 10.1186/s12984-015-0094-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2015] [Accepted: 11/01/2015] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Patients with right hemisphere damage are often unaware of, inattentive to and fail to interact with stimuli on their left side. This disorder, called hemispatial neglect, is a major source of disability. Inducing leftward ocular pursuit by optokinetic stimulation (OKS) relieves some of the signs of unilateral neglect. However, it is difficult to provide patients with a continuously moving background that is required for OKS. We studied whether OKS projected onto a see-through head-mounted display (HMD) would help treat neglect. Methods 14 patients with neglect after cerebral infarction performed line bisections on a computer screen, both with and without OKS that was either delivered by the HMD or on the same screen that was displaying the lines that were to be bisected. Results The line bisection performances were significantly different in the four conditions (P < 0.001). The post hoc analyses indicated that the rightward deviation observed in the control conditions on the line bisection tasks without OKS, improved significantly with the use OKS in both the HMD and screen conditions (α < 0.05). The results between the screen and HMD conditions were also different (α < 0.05). The OKS in the HMD condition corrected patients’ rightward deviation more toward the actual midline than did the OKS provided during the screen condition. Conclusions OKS projected onto the see-through HMD improved hemispatial neglect. The development of a portable device may aid in the treatment of neglect.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jong Hun Kim
- Department of Neurology, Dementia Center, Ilsan hospital, National Health Insurance Service, Goyang, South Korea.
| | - Byung Hwa Lee
- Department of Neurology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 50 Irwon-dong, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 135-710, South Korea. .,Neuroscience Center, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea.
| | - Seok Min Go
- Dr. Hwang's Neurology clinic, Suncheon, South Korea.
| | - Sang Won Seo
- Department of Neurology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 50 Irwon-dong, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 135-710, South Korea. .,Neuroscience Center, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea. .,Department of Clinical Research Design and Evaluation, SAIHST, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, South Korea.
| | - Kenneth M Heilman
- Department of Neurology, University of Florida and Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Gainesville, FL, USA.
| | - Duk L Na
- Department of Neurology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 50 Irwon-dong, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 135-710, South Korea. .,Neuroscience Center, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea. .,Department of Health Sciences and Technology, SAIHST, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, South Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
RETRACTED ARTICLE: Effects of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Cognitive Impairment in Stroke Patients: A Meta-Analysis. Mol Neurobiol 2015. [DOI: 10.1007/s12035-014-8895-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
|
25
|
Razumov AN, Melnikova EA. [The modern approaches to the prognostication of rehabilitation of the patients after stroke on an individual basis: a review of the literature and the results of original investigations]. VOPROSY KURORTOLOGII, FIZIOTERAPII, I LECHEBNOI FIZICHESKOI KULTURY 2015; 92:11-16. [PMID: 26841523 DOI: 10.17116/kurort2015611-16] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/05/2023]
Abstract
This article was designed to analyze the results of the investigations with the purpose of elucidation of the prognostic factors relevant to the rehabilitation of the patients who survived after stroke. Special attention is given to the role of demographic (age and sex) factors and the data of the clinical, neurological, psychological, cognitive, and instrumental examination of the patients. The results of the original studies based on the treatment of 203 stroke patients are discussed in the context of modern concepts of the significance of the factors contributing to the recovery of the patients in the course of the post-stroke rehabilitation. The prognostic value of the selected factors, such as leukoareosis (for the patients presenting with hemorrhagic stroke), has been demonstrated for the first time. The new data on the duration of the rehabilitation period are presented with reference to its dependence on the type of stroke and localization of the lesions. Specifically, it is estimated to be 2 years for the patients who suffered from ischemic stroke in the brain stem, 31 months for those with ischemic stroke of the hemispherical localization, and 38 months for the patients presenting with hemorrhagic stroke (hemispherical hematoma). In addition, the data on the magnitude of the post-ischemic atrophic changes of prognostic values are presented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A N Razumov
- State autonomous healthcare facility 'Moscow Research and Practical Centre for Medical Rehabilitation, Restorative and Sports Medicine', Moscow Health Department, Moscow, Russian Federation, 105120
| | - E A Melnikova
- State autonomous healthcare facility 'Moscow Research and Practical Centre for Medical Rehabilitation, Restorative and Sports Medicine', Moscow Health Department, Moscow, Russian Federation, 105120
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Cazzoli D, Rosenthal CR, Kennard C, Zito GA, Hopfner S, Müri RM, Nyffeler T. Theta burst stimulation improves overt visual search in spatial neglect independently of attentional load. Cortex 2015; 73:317-29. [PMID: 26547867 DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2015.09.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2015] [Revised: 08/17/2015] [Accepted: 09/28/2015] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Visual neglect is considerably exacerbated by increases in visual attentional load. These detrimental effects of attentional load are hypothesised to be dependent on an interplay between dysfunctional inter-hemispheric inhibitory dynamics and load-related modulation of activity in cortical areas such as the posterior parietal cortex (PPC). Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation (cTBS) over the contralesional PPC reduces neglect severity. It is unknown, however, whether such positive effects also operate in the presence of the detrimental effects of heightened attentional load. Here, we examined the effects of cTBS on neglect severity in overt visual search (i.e., with eye movements), as a function of high and low visual attentional load conditions. Performance was assessed on the basis of target detection rates and eye movements, in a computerised visual search task and in two paper-pencil tasks. cTBS significantly ameliorated target detection performance, independently of attentional load. These ameliorative effects were significantly larger in the high than the low load condition, thereby equating target detection across both conditions. Eye movement analyses revealed that the improvements were mediated by a redeployment of visual fixations to the contralesional visual field. These findings represent a substantive advance, because cTBS led to an unprecedented amelioration of overt search efficiency that was independent of visual attentional load.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dario Cazzoli
- Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom; University Hospital of Old Age Psychiatry, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland; ARTORG Center for Biomedical Engineering Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Clive R Rosenthal
- Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Christopher Kennard
- Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Giuseppe A Zito
- ARTORG Center for Biomedical Engineering Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Simone Hopfner
- Perception and Eye Movement Laboratory, Department of Neurology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland; Perception and Eye Movement Laboratory, Department of Clinical Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - René M Müri
- Perception and Eye Movement Laboratory, Department of Neurology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland; Perception and Eye Movement Laboratory, Department of Clinical Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland; Division of Cognitive and Restorative Neurology, Department of Neurology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland; Center for Cognition, Learning, and Memory, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Thomas Nyffeler
- Perception and Eye Movement Laboratory, Department of Neurology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland; Perception and Eye Movement Laboratory, Department of Clinical Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland; Center of Neurology and Neurorehabilitation, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Luzern, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Jacquin-Courtois S. Hemi-spatial neglect rehabilitation using non-invasive brain stimulation: Or how to modulate the disconnection syndrome? Ann Phys Rehabil Med 2015; 58:251-258. [DOI: 10.1016/j.rehab.2015.07.388] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2015] [Revised: 07/22/2015] [Accepted: 07/22/2015] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
28
|
Reti IM, Schwarz N, Bower A, Tibbs M, Rao V. Transcranial magnetic stimulation: A potential new treatment for depression associated with traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj 2015; 29:789-97. [PMID: 25950260 DOI: 10.3109/02699052.2015.1009168] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Each year, more than 1.7 million Americans suffer a traumatic brain injury (TBI) and the lifetime prevalence of major depressive disorder following TBI is between 25-50%. There are no validated established strategies to treat TBI depression. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a novel putative treatment option for post-TBI depression, which, compared with standard pharmacological agents, may provide a more targeted treatment with fewer side-effects. However, TBI is associated with an increased risk of both early and late spontaneous seizures, a significant consideration in evaluating rTMS as a potential treatment for TBI depression. Whilst the risk of seizure from rTMS is low, underlying neuropathology may somewhat increase that risk. REVIEW This review focuses on the safety aspects of rTMS in TBI patients. The authors review why low frequency rTMS might be less likely to trigger a seizure than high frequency rTMS and propose low frequency rTMS as a safer option in TBI patients. Because there is little data on the safety of rTMS in TBI, the authors also review the safety of rTMS in patients with other brain pathology. CONCLUSION It is concluded that pilot safety and tolerability studies should be first conducted in persons with TBI and neuropsychiatric comorbidities. These results could be used to help design larger randomized controlled trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irving M Reti
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, The Johns Hopkins University , Baltimore, MD , USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Chervyakov AV, Poydasheva AG, Korzhova JE, Suponeva NA, Chernikova LA, Piradov MA. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in neurology and psychiatry. Zh Nevrol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova 2015; 115:7-18. [DOI: 10.17116/jnevro20151151127-18] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
|
30
|
Spreij LA, Visser-Meily JMA, van Heugten CM, Nijboer TCW. Novel insights into the rehabilitation of memory post acquired brain injury: a systematic review. Front Hum Neurosci 2014; 8:993. [PMID: 25566021 PMCID: PMC4267268 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00993] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2014] [Accepted: 11/22/2014] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: Acquired Brain Injury (ABI) frequently results in memory impairment causing significant disabilities in daily life and is therefore a critical target for cognitive rehabilitation. Current understanding of brain plasticity has led to novel insights in remediation-oriented approaches for the rehabilitation of memory deficits. We will describe 3 of these approaches that have emerged in the last decade: Virtual Reality (VR) training, Computer-Based Cognitive Retraining (CBCR) and Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation (NBS) and evaluate its effectiveness. Methods: A systematic literature search was completed in regard to studies evaluating interventions aiming to improve the memory function after ABI. Information concerning study content and reported effectiveness were extracted. Quality of the studies and methods were evaluated. Results: A total of 786 studies were identified, 15 studies met the inclusion criteria. Three of those studies represent the VR technique, 7 studies represent CBCR and 5 studies NBS. All 3 studies found a significant improvement of the memory function after VR-based training, however these studies are considered preliminary. All 7 studies have shown that CBCR can be effective in improving memory function in patients suffering from ABI. Four studies of the 5 did not find significant improvement of the memory function after the use of NBS in ABI patients. Conclusion: On the basis of this review, CBCR is considered the most promising novel approach of the last decade because of the positive results in improving memory function post ABI. The number of studies representing VR were limited and the methodological quality low, therefore the results should be considered preliminary. The studies representing NBS did not detect evidence for the use of NBS in improving memory function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauriane A Spreij
- Department of Experimental Psychology, Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Johanna M A Visser-Meily
- Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, Center of Excellence for Rehabilitation Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, and De Hoogstraat Rehabilitation Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Caroline M van Heugten
- Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Tanja C W Nijboer
- Department of Experimental Psychology, Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University Utrecht, Netherlands ; Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, Center of Excellence for Rehabilitation Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, and De Hoogstraat Rehabilitation Utrecht, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Brem AK, Unterburger E, Speight I, Jäncke L. Treatment of visuospatial neglect with biparietal tDCS and cognitive training: a single-case study. Front Syst Neurosci 2014; 8:180. [PMID: 25324736 PMCID: PMC4179329 DOI: 10.3389/fnsys.2014.00180] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2014] [Accepted: 09/08/2014] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Symptoms of visuospatial neglect occur frequently after unilateral brain damage. Neglect hampers rehabilitation progress and is associated with reduced quality of life. However, existing treatment methods show limited efficacy. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a neuromodulatory technique, which can be used to increase or decrease brain excitability. Its combination with conventional neglect therapy may enhance treatment efficacy. A 72-year-old male with a subacute ischemic stroke of the right posterior cerebral artery suffering from visuospatial neglect, hemianopia, and hemiparesis was treated with biparietal tDCS and cognitive neglect therapy in a double-blind, sham-controlled single-case study. Four weeks of daily treatment sessions (5 days per week, 30 min) were started 26 days post-stroke. During week 1 and 4 the patient received conventional neglect therapy, during week 2, conventional neglect therapy was combined once with sham and once with real biparietal tDCS. Week 3 consisted of daily sessions of real biparietal tDCS (1 mA, 20 min) combined with neglect therapy. Outcome measures were assessed before, immediately after, as well as 1 week and 3 months after the end of treatment. They included subtests of the Test for Attentional Performance (TAP): covert attention (main outcome), alertness, visual field; the Neglect-Test (NET): line bisection, cancelation, copying; and activities of daily living (ADL). After real stimulation, covert attention allocation toward left-sided invalid stimuli was significantly improved, and line bisection and copying improved qualitatively as compared to sham stimulation. ADL were only improved at the 3-month follow-up. This single-case study demonstrates for the first time that combined application of tDCS and cognitive training may enhance training-induced improvements in measures of visuospatial neglect and is applicable in a clinical context.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna-Katharine Brem
- Berenson-Allen Center for Noninvasive Brain Stimulation, Division of Cognitive Neurology, Department of Neurology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School Boston, MA, USA
| | - Evelyn Unterburger
- Department of Neuropsychology, University Hospital Zurich Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Irving Speight
- Department of Neuropsychology, Zürcher Höhenklinik Wald ZHW, Rehabilitation Center Faltigberg-Wald, Switzerland
| | - Lutz Jäncke
- Division Neuropsychology, Institute of Psychology, University of Zurich Zurich, Switzerland ; Center for Integrative Human Physiology, University of Zurich Zurich, Switzerland ; International Normal Aging and Plasticity Imaging Center, University of Zurich Zurich, Switzerland ; University Research Priority Program "Dynamic of Healthy Aging," University of Zurich Zurich, Switzerland ; Department of Special Education, King Abdulaziz University Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Abstract
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) remains a significant public health problem and is a leading cause of death and disability in many countries. Durable treatments for neurological function deficits following TBI have been elusive, as there are currently no FDA-approved therapeutic modalities for mitigating the consequences of TBI. Neurostimulation strategies using various forms of electrical stimulation have recently been applied to treat functional deficits in animal models and clinical stroke trials. The results from these studies suggest that neurostimulation may augment improvements in both motor and cognitive deficits after brain injury. Several studies have taken this approach in animal models of TBI, showing both behavioral enhancement and biological evidence of recovery. There have been only a few studies using deep brain stimulation (DBS) in human TBI patients, and future studies are warranted to validate the feasibility of this technique in the clinical treatment of TBI. In this review, the authors summarize insights from studies employing neurostimulation techniques in the setting of brain injury. Moreover, they relate these findings to the future prospect of using DBS to ameliorate motor and cognitive deficits following TBI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel S Shin
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Lefaucheur JP, André-Obadia N, Antal A, Ayache SS, Baeken C, Benninger DH, Cantello RM, Cincotta M, de Carvalho M, De Ridder D, Devanne H, Di Lazzaro V, Filipović SR, Hummel FC, Jääskeläinen SK, Kimiskidis VK, Koch G, Langguth B, Nyffeler T, Oliviero A, Padberg F, Poulet E, Rossi S, Rossini PM, Rothwell JC, Schönfeldt-Lecuona C, Siebner HR, Slotema CW, Stagg CJ, Valls-Sole J, Ziemann U, Paulus W, Garcia-Larrea L. Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS). Clin Neurophysiol 2014; 125:2150-2206. [PMID: 25034472 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2014.05.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1249] [Impact Index Per Article: 124.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2014] [Revised: 05/09/2014] [Accepted: 05/13/2014] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
A group of European experts was commissioned to establish guidelines on the therapeutic use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) from evidence published up until March 2014, regarding pain, movement disorders, stroke, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, multiple sclerosis, epilepsy, consciousness disorders, tinnitus, depression, anxiety disorders, obsessive-compulsive disorder, schizophrenia, craving/addiction, and conversion. Despite unavoidable inhomogeneities, there is a sufficient body of evidence to accept with level A (definite efficacy) the analgesic effect of high-frequency (HF) rTMS of the primary motor cortex (M1) contralateral to the pain and the antidepressant effect of HF-rTMS of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). A Level B recommendation (probable efficacy) is proposed for the antidepressant effect of low-frequency (LF) rTMS of the right DLPFC, HF-rTMS of the left DLPFC for the negative symptoms of schizophrenia, and LF-rTMS of contralesional M1 in chronic motor stroke. The effects of rTMS in a number of indications reach level C (possible efficacy), including LF-rTMS of the left temporoparietal cortex in tinnitus and auditory hallucinations. It remains to determine how to optimize rTMS protocols and techniques to give them relevance in routine clinical practice. In addition, professionals carrying out rTMS protocols should undergo rigorous training to ensure the quality of the technical realization, guarantee the proper care of patients, and maximize the chances of success. Under these conditions, the therapeutic use of rTMS should be able to develop in the coming years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jean-Pascal Lefaucheur
- Department of Physiology, Henri Mondor Hospital, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Créteil, France; EA 4391, Nerve Excitability and Therapeutic Team, Faculty of Medicine, Paris Est Créteil University, Créteil, France.
| | - Nathalie André-Obadia
- Neurophysiology and Epilepsy Unit, Pierre Wertheimer Neurological Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Bron, France; Inserm U 1028, NeuroPain Team, Neuroscience Research Center of Lyon (CRNL), Lyon-1 University, Bron, France
| | - Andrea Antal
- Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Georg-August University, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Samar S Ayache
- Department of Physiology, Henri Mondor Hospital, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Créteil, France; EA 4391, Nerve Excitability and Therapeutic Team, Faculty of Medicine, Paris Est Créteil University, Créteil, France
| | - Chris Baeken
- Department of Psychiatry and Medical Psychology, Ghent Experimental Psychiatry (GHEP) Lab, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium; Department of Psychiatry, University Hospital (UZBrussel), Brussels, Belgium
| | - David H Benninger
- Neurology Service, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Roberto M Cantello
- Department of Translational Medicine, Section of Neurology, University of Piemonte Orientale "A. Avogadro", Novara, Italy
| | | | - Mamede de Carvalho
- Institute of Physiology, Institute of Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Dirk De Ridder
- Brai(2)n, Tinnitus Research Initiative Clinic Antwerp, Belgium; Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Hervé Devanne
- Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Lille University Hospital, Lille, France; ULCO, Lille-Nord de France University, Lille, France
| | - Vincenzo Di Lazzaro
- Department of Neurosciences, Institute of Neurology, Campus Bio-Medico University, Rome, Italy
| | - Saša R Filipović
- Department of Neurophysiology, Institute for Medical Research, University of Belgrade, Beograd, Serbia
| | - Friedhelm C Hummel
- Brain Imaging and Neurostimulation (BINS) Laboratory, Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Satu K Jääskeläinen
- Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Turku University Hospital, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - Vasilios K Kimiskidis
- Laboratory of Clinical Neurophysiology, AHEPA Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Giacomo Koch
- Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation Unit, Neurologia Clinica e Comportamentale, Fondazione Santa Lucia IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Berthold Langguth
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Thomas Nyffeler
- Perception and Eye Movement Laboratory, Department of Neurology, University Hospital, Inselspital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Antonio Oliviero
- FENNSI Group, Hospital Nacional de Parapléjicos, SESCAM, Toledo, Spain
| | - Frank Padberg
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Ludwig Maximilian University, Munich, Germany
| | - Emmanuel Poulet
- Department of Emergency Psychiatry, CHU Lyon, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France; EAM 4615, Lyon-1 University, Bron, France
| | - Simone Rossi
- Brain Investigation & Neuromodulation Lab, Unit of Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology, Department of Neuroscience, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
| | - Paolo Maria Rossini
- Brain Connectivity Laboratory, IRCCS San Raffaele Pisana, Rome, Italy; Institute of Neurology, Catholic University, Rome, Italy
| | - John C Rothwell
- Sobell Department of Motor Neuroscience and Movement Disorders, Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Hartwig R Siebner
- Department of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital Bispebjerg, Copenhagen, Denmark; Danish Research Centre for Magnetic Resonance, Centre for Functional and Diagnostic Imaging and Research, Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark
| | | | - Charlotte J Stagg
- Oxford Centre for Functional MRI of the Brain (FMRIB), Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Josep Valls-Sole
- EMG Unit, Neurology Service, Hospital Clinic, Department of Medicine, University of Barcelona, August Pi i Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ulf Ziemann
- Department of Neurology & Stroke, and Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Eberhard Karls University, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Walter Paulus
- Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Georg-August University, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Luis Garcia-Larrea
- Inserm U 1028, NeuroPain Team, Neuroscience Research Center of Lyon (CRNL), Lyon-1 University, Bron, France; Pain Unit, Pierre Wertheimer Neurological Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Bron, France
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Brem AK, Fried PJ, Horvath JC, Robertson EM, Pascual-Leone A. Is neuroenhancement by noninvasive brain stimulation a net zero-sum proposition? Neuroimage 2014; 85 Pt 3:1058-68. [PMID: 23880500 PMCID: PMC4392930 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.07.038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 79] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2013] [Revised: 07/09/2013] [Accepted: 07/13/2013] [Indexed: 10/26/2022] Open
Abstract
In the past several years, the number of studies investigating enhancement of cognitive functions through noninvasive brain stimulation (NBS) has increased considerably. NBS techniques, such as transcranial magnetic stimulation and transcranial current stimulation, seem capable of enhancing cognitive functions in patients and in healthy humans, particularly when combined with other interventions, including pharmacologic, behavioral and cognitive therapies. The "net zero-sum model", based on the assumption that brain resources are subjected to the physical principle of conservation of energy, is one of the theoretical frameworks proposed to account for such enhancement of function and its potential cost. We argue that to guide future neuroenhancement studies, the net-zero sum concept is helpful, but only if its limits are tightly defined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna-Katharine Brem
- Berenson-Allen Center for Noninvasive Brain Stimulation, Division of Cognitive Neurology, Department of Neurology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Peter J. Fried
- Berenson-Allen Center for Noninvasive Brain Stimulation, Division of Cognitive Neurology, Department of Neurology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Laboratory of Cerebral Dynamics, Plasticity and Rehabilitation, Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jared C. Horvath
- Psychological Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Edwin M. Robertson
- Berenson-Allen Center for Noninvasive Brain Stimulation, Division of Cognitive Neurology, Department of Neurology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Alvaro Pascual-Leone
- Berenson-Allen Center for Noninvasive Brain Stimulation, Division of Cognitive Neurology, Department of Neurology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Institut Guttman de Neurorehabilitació, Universitat Autonoma, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Salatino A, Berra E, Troni W, Sacco K, Cauda F, D'Agata F, Geminiani G, Duca S, Dimanico U, Ricci R. Behavioral and neuroplastic effects of low-frequency rTMS of the unaffected hemisphere in a chronic stroke patient: a concomitant TMS and fMRI study. Neurocase 2014; 20:615-26. [PMID: 23962174 DOI: 10.1080/13554794.2013.826691] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) ameliorates motor and neuropsychological deficits following stroke, but little is known about the underlying neuroplasticity. We investigated neuroplastic changes following 5 days of low-frequency rTMS on the intact motor cortex to promote motor recovery in a chronic patient with subcortical stroke. The feasibility of administering multiple treatments was also assessed 6 months later by applying the same protocol over the patient's parietal cortex to improve visuospatial disorders. Behavioral improvements and no adverse events were observed. Neuroimaging findings indicated that motor symptoms amelioration was associated with downregulation and cortical reorganization of hyperactive contralesional hemisphere.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adriana Salatino
- a Department of Psychology , University of Turin , Turin , Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Castel-Lacanal E, Tarri M, Loubinoux I, Gasq D, de Boissezon X, Marque P, Simonetta-Moreau M. Transcranial magnetic stimulation in brain injury. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2013; 33:83-7. [PMID: 24378049 DOI: 10.1016/j.annfar.2013.11.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Transcranial magnetic stimulations (TMS) have been used for many years as a diagnostic tool to explore changes in cortical excitability, and more recently as a tool for therapeutic neuromodulation. We are interested in their applications following brain injury: stroke, traumatic and anoxic brain injury. DATA SYNTHESIS Following brain injury, there is decreased cortical excitability and changes in interhemispheric interactions depending on the type, the severity, and the time-lapse between the injury and the treatment implemented. rTMS (repetitive TMS) is a therapeutic neuromodulation tool which restores the interhemispheric interactions following stroke by inhibiting the healthy cortex with frequencies ≤1Hz, or by exciting the lesioned cortex with frequencies between 3 and 50Hz. Results in motor recovery are promising and those in improving aphasia or visuospatial neglect are also encouraging. Finally, the use of TMS is mainly limited by the risk of seizure, and is therefore contraindicated for many patients. CONCLUSION TMS is a useful non-invasive brain stimulation tool to diagnose the effects of brain injury, to study the mechanisms of recovery and a non-invasive neuromodulation promising tool to influence the post-lesional recovery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Castel-Lacanal
- Service de médecine physique et réadaptation, CHU Rangueil, 1, avenue Jean-Poulhès, TSA 50032, 31059 Toulouse cedex 9, France; Inserm U 825, CHU Purpan, pavillon Baudot, place du Dr-Baylac, 31024 Toulouse cedex 3, France.
| | - M Tarri
- Inserm U 825, CHU Purpan, pavillon Baudot, place du Dr-Baylac, 31024 Toulouse cedex 3, France
| | - I Loubinoux
- Inserm U 825, CHU Purpan, pavillon Baudot, place du Dr-Baylac, 31024 Toulouse cedex 3, France
| | - D Gasq
- Service de médecine physique et réadaptation, CHU Rangueil, 1, avenue Jean-Poulhès, TSA 50032, 31059 Toulouse cedex 9, France; Inserm U 825, CHU Purpan, pavillon Baudot, place du Dr-Baylac, 31024 Toulouse cedex 3, France
| | - X de Boissezon
- Service de médecine physique et réadaptation, CHU Rangueil, 1, avenue Jean-Poulhès, TSA 50032, 31059 Toulouse cedex 9, France; Inserm U 825, CHU Purpan, pavillon Baudot, place du Dr-Baylac, 31024 Toulouse cedex 3, France
| | - P Marque
- Service de médecine physique et réadaptation, CHU Rangueil, 1, avenue Jean-Poulhès, TSA 50032, 31059 Toulouse cedex 9, France; Inserm U 825, CHU Purpan, pavillon Baudot, place du Dr-Baylac, 31024 Toulouse cedex 3, France
| | - M Simonetta-Moreau
- Inserm U 825, CHU Purpan, pavillon Baudot, place du Dr-Baylac, 31024 Toulouse cedex 3, France; Service de neurologie, CHU Purpan, pavillon Riser, place du Dr-Baylac, 31024 Toulouse cedex 3, France
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Fasotti L, van Kessel M. Novel insights in the rehabilitation of neglect. Front Hum Neurosci 2013; 7:780. [PMID: 24298249 PMCID: PMC3828556 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00780] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2013] [Accepted: 10/29/2013] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Visuospatial neglect due to right hemisphere damage, usually a stroke, is a major cause of disability, impairing the ability to perform a whole range of everyday life activities. Conventional and long-established methods for the rehabilitation of neglect like visual scanning training, optokinetic stimulation, or limb activation training have produced positive results, with varying degrees of generalization to (un)trained tasks, lasting from several minutes up to various months after training. Nevertheless, some promising novel approaches to the remediation of left visuospatial neglect have emerged in the last decade. These new therapy methods can be broadly classified into four categories. First, non-invasive brain stimulation techniques by means of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) or transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), after a period of mainly diagnostic utilization, are increasingly applied as neurorehabilitative tools. Second, two classes of drugs, dopaminergic and noradrenergic, have been investigated for their potential effectiveness in rehabilitating neglect. Third, prism adaptation treatment has been shown to improve several neglect symptoms consistently, sometimes during longer periods of time. Finally, virtual reality technologies hold new opportunities for the development of effective training techniques for neglect. They provide realistic, rich, and highly controllable training environments. In this paper the degree of effectiveness and the evidence gathered to support the therapeutic claims of these new approaches is reviewed and discussed. The conclusion is that for all these approaches there still is insufficient unbiased evidence to support their effectiveness. Further neglect rehabilitation research should focus on the maintenance of therapy results over time, on a more functional evaluation of treatment effects, on the design and execution of true replication studies and on the exploration of optimal combinations of treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luciano Fasotti
- Rehabilitation Medical Centre Groot Klimmendaal, SIZA Support and Rehabilitation , Arnhem , Netherlands ; Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Nijmegen , Nijmegen , Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Müri RM, Cazzoli D, Nef T, Mosimann UP, Hopfner S, Nyffeler T. Non-invasive brain stimulation in neglect rehabilitation: an update. Front Hum Neurosci 2013; 7:248. [PMID: 23772209 PMCID: PMC3677145 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00248] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2013] [Accepted: 05/19/2013] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Here, we review the effects of non-invasive brain stimulation such as transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) or transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in the rehabilitation of neglect. We found 12 studies including 172 patients (10 TMS studies and 2 tDCS studies) fulfilling our search criteria. Activity of daily living measures such as the Barthel Index or, more specifically for neglect, the Catherine Bergego Scale were the outcome measure in three studies. Five studies were randomized controlled trials with a follow-up time after intervention of up to 6 weeks. One TMS study fulfilled criteria for Class I and one for Class III evidence. The studies are heterogeneous concerning their methodology, outcome measures, and stimulation parameters making firm comparisons and conclusions difficult. Overall, there are however promising results for theta-burst stimulation, suggesting that TMS is a powerful add-on therapy in the rehabilitation of neglect patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- René Martin Müri
- Division of Cognitive and Restorative Neurology, Departments of Neurology and Clinical Research, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern , Bern , Switzerland ; Gerontechnology and Rehabilitation Research Group, ARTORG Center for Biomedical Engineering Research, University of Bern , Bern , Switzerland
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Yang NYH, Zhou D, Chung RCK, Li-Tsang CWP, Fong KNK. Rehabilitation Interventions for Unilateral Neglect after Stroke: A Systematic Review from 1997 through 2012. Front Hum Neurosci 2013; 7:187. [PMID: 23675339 PMCID: PMC3650319 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00187] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2013] [Accepted: 04/24/2013] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
A systematic review of the effectiveness of rehabilitation for persons with unilateral neglect (UN) after stroke was conducted by searching the computerized databases from 1997 through 2012. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of neglect treatment strategies for stroke patients which used the Behavioral Inattention Test (BIT) as the primary outcome measure were eligible for inclusion. Out of 201 studies initially identified, 12 RCTs covering 277 participants were selected for analysis. All had the same weakness of low power with smaller samples and limitation in the blinding of the design. Prism Adaptation (PA) was the most commonly used intervention while continuous Theta-burst stimulation (cTBS) appeared to be a new approach. Meta-analysis showed that for immediate effects, the BIT conventional subscore had a significant and large mean effect size (ES = 0.76; 95% CI 0.28-1.23; p = 0.002) whereas the BIT total score showed a modestly significant mean ES (ES = 0.55; 95% CI 0.16-0.94; p = 0.006). No significant mean ES in sensitivity analysis was found for long-lasting effects across all BIT outcomes. PA appeared to be the most effective intervention based on the results of pooled analysis. More rigorous studies should be done on repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) before it can be concluded that it is a promising treatment for UN.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole Y H Yang
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University Chengdu, China ; Institute for Disaster Management and Reconstruction, Sichuan University Chengdu, China ; Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University Hong Kong
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Effect of High- and Low-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Visuospatial Neglect in Patients With Acute Stroke: A Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled Trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2013; 94:803-7. [DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2012.12.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2012] [Revised: 12/04/2012] [Accepted: 12/28/2012] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
|
41
|
Mylius V, Ayache SS, Zouari HG, Aoun-Sebaïti M, Farhat WH, Lefaucheur JP. Stroke rehabilitation using noninvasive cortical stimulation: hemispatial neglect. Expert Rev Neurother 2013; 12:983-91. [PMID: 23002941 DOI: 10.1586/ern.12.78] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
The rehabilitation of neuropsychological sequels of cerebral stroke such as hemispatial neglect by noninvasive cortical stimulation (NICS) attracts increasing attention from the scientific community. The NICS techniques include primarily repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). They are based on the concept of either reactivating a hypoactive cortical region affected by the stroke (the right hemisphere in case of neglect) or reducing cortical hyperactivity of the corresponding cortical region in the contralateral hemisphere (the left hemisphere). In the studies published to date on the topic of neglect rehabilitation, rTMS was used to inhibit the left parietal cortex and tDCS to either activate the right or inhibit the left parietal cortex. Sham-controlled NICS studies assessed short-term effects, whereas long-term effects were only assessed in noncontrolled rTMS studies. Further controlled studies of large series of patients are necessary to determine the best parameters of stimulation (including the optimal cortical target location) according to each subtype of neglect presentation and to the time course of stroke recovery. To date, even if there are serious therapeutic perspectives based on imaging data and experimental studies, the evidence is not compelling enough to recommend any particular NICS protocol to treat this disabling condition in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Veit Mylius
- Université Paris-Est-Créteil, Faculté de Médecine, EA 4391, Créteil, France.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Kapur N, Cole J, Manly T, Viskontas I, Ninteman A, Hasher L, Pascual-Leone A. Positive Clinical Neuroscience. Neuroscientist 2013; 19:354-69. [DOI: 10.1177/1073858412470976] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Disorders of the brain and its sensory organs have traditionally been associated with deficits in movement, perception, cognition, emotion, and behavior. It is increasingly evident, however, that positive phenomena may also occur in such conditions, with implications for the individual, science, medicine, and for society. This article provides a selective review of such positive phenomena – enhanced function after brain lesions, better-than-normal performance in people with sensory loss, creativity associated with neurological disease, and enhanced performance associated with aging. We propose that, akin to the well-established field of positive psychology and the emerging field of positive clinical psychology, the nascent fields of positive neurology and positive neuropsychology offer new avenues to understand brain-behavior relationships, with both theoretical and therapeutic implications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Tom Manly
- MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, Cambridge, UK
| | - Indre Viskontas
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | - Lynn Hasher
- University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Alvaro Pascual-Leone
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Kim YH. Noninvasive brain stimulation: repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation. JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 2013. [DOI: 10.5124/jkma.2013.56.1.30] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Yun-Hee Kim
- Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Stroke and Cerebrovascular Center, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Cazzoli D, Muri RM, Schumacher R, von Arx S, Chaves S, Gutbrod K, Bohlhalter S, Bauer D, Vanbellingen T, Bertschi M, Kipfer S, Rosenthal CR, Kennard C, Bassetti CL, Nyffeler T. Theta burst stimulation reduces disability during the activities of daily living in spatial neglect. Brain 2012; 135:3426-39. [DOI: 10.1093/brain/aws182] [Citation(s) in RCA: 112] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
45
|
Schulz R, Gerloff C, Hummel FC. Non-invasive brain stimulation in neurological diseases. Neuropharmacology 2012; 64:579-87. [PMID: 22687520 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2012.05.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 115] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2012] [Revised: 05/11/2012] [Accepted: 05/13/2012] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Non-invasive brain stimulation has shown its potential to modulate brain plasticity in humans. Endeavour has been made to utilize brain stimulation in neurological diseases to enhance adaptive processes and prevent potential maladaptive ones. In stroke for instance both sensorimotor and higher cognitive impairment, such as aphasia and neglect, has been addressed to facilitate functional recovery. In Parkinson's disease, brain stimulation has been evaluated to improve motor and non-motor symptoms. In the present review we provide an update of the field of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) as non-invasive brain stimulation techniques to improve motor and higher cognitive functions in patients suffering from stroke and Parkinson's disease. Rather than attempting to be comprehensive in regard of the reviewed scientific field, this article may be considered as a present day's framework of the application of non-invasive brain stimulation on selected examples of common neurological diseases. At the end we will briefly discuss open controversies and future directions of the field which has to be addressed in upcoming studies. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled 'Cognitive Enhancers'.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert Schulz
- Brain Imaging and Neurostimulation (BINS) Laboratory, Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Rehabilitation for Cognitive-Communication Disorders in Right Hemisphere Brain Damage. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2012; 93:S61-9. [DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.10.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2011] [Revised: 09/18/2011] [Accepted: 10/25/2011] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
|
47
|
Lefaucheur JP, André-Obadia N, Poulet E, Devanne H, Haffen E, Londero A, Cretin B, Leroi AM, Radtchenko A, Saba G, Thai-Van H, Litré CF, Vercueil L, Bouhassira D, Ayache SS, Farhat WH, Zouari HG, Mylius V, Nicolier M, Garcia-Larrea L. [French guidelines on the use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS): safety and therapeutic indications]. Neurophysiol Clin 2011; 41:221-95. [PMID: 22153574 DOI: 10.1016/j.neucli.2011.10.062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 91] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2011] [Accepted: 10/18/2011] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
During the past decade, a large amount of work on transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has been performed, including the development of new paradigms of stimulation, the integration of imaging data, and the coupling of TMS techniques with electroencephalography or neuroimaging. These accumulating data being difficult to synthesize, several French scientific societies commissioned a group of experts to conduct a comprehensive review of the literature on TMS. This text contains all the consensual findings of the expert group on the mechanisms of action, safety rules and indications of TMS, including repetitive TMS (rTMS). TMS sessions have been conducted in thousands of healthy subjects or patients with various neurological or psychiatric diseases, allowing a better assessment of risks associated with this technique. The number of reported side effects is extremely low, the most serious complication being the occurrence of seizures. In most reported seizures, the stimulation parameters did not follow the previously published recommendations (Wassermann, 1998) [430] and rTMS was associated to medication that could lower the seizure threshold. Recommendations on the safe use of TMS / rTMS were recently updated (Rossi et al., 2009) [348], establishing new limits for stimulation parameters and fixing the contraindications. The recommendations we propose regarding safety are largely based on this previous report with some modifications. By contrast, the issue of therapeutic indications of rTMS has never been addressed before, the present work being the first attempt of a synthesis and expert consensus on this topic. The use of TMS/rTMS is discussed in the context of chronic pain, movement disorders, stroke, epilepsy, tinnitus and psychiatric disorders. There is already a sufficient level of evidence of published data to retain a therapeutic indication of rTMS in clinical practice (grade A) in chronic neuropathic pain, major depressive episodes, and auditory hallucinations. The number of therapeutic indications of rTMS is expected to increase in coming years, in parallel with the optimisation of stimulation parameters.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J-P Lefaucheur
- EA 4391, faculté de médecine, université Paris-Est-Créteil, 51, avenue du Maréchal-de-Lattre-de-Tassigny, 94010 Créteil, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Hesse MD, Sparing R, Fink GR. Ameliorating spatial neglect with non-invasive brain stimulation: From pathophysiological concepts to novel treatment strategies. Neuropsychol Rehabil 2011; 21:676-702. [DOI: 10.1080/09602011.2011.573931] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
|