1
|
English K, Daley B, Cahill L, Liu E, Lannin NA, Baker A. Characteristics and Outcomes of a Community Upper Limb Rehabilitation Group for Adult Stroke Survivors in Australia: A Pre-Post Cohort Study. Occup Ther Health Care 2021; 36:440-458. [PMID: 34878364 DOI: 10.1080/07380577.2021.2012734] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
This study investigated outcomes of a community-based upper limb rehabilitation group for adult stroke survivors in metropolitan Australia. Pre-post data were extracted from medical records. Participants (n = 27) were predominantly men (n = 22, 81%); mean age 61 years (SD 17) and median time 109 days post stroke. Participants improved on upper limb outcomes, with statistically significant changes on several of the items on the Motor Assessment Scale (item seven mean improvement 0.93 (95% CI 0.48-2.19), p = .016; item eight mean improvement 1.4 (95% CI 0.38-2.42), p = .016) and grip strength (mean improvement 4.5 kg/9 pounds, 14.73 ounces (95% CI 1.5-7.6), p = .006). These results guide occupational therapists implementing community-based upper limb rehabilitation groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kylie English
- Australian Catholic University, School of Allied Health, Melbourne, Australia; Eastern Health, Department of Occupational Therapy, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Bella Daley
- Alfred Health, Melbourne, Australia; St. Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Liana Cahill
- Australian Catholic University, School of Allied Health, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Enwu Liu
- Mary MacKillop Institute for Health Research, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Natasha A Lannin
- Department of Neuroscience, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.,Allied Health (Occupational Therapy), Alfred Health, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Anne Baker
- Federation University, School of Health, Gippsland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Grampurohit N, Bell A, Duff SV, Mulcahey MJ, Thielen CC, Kaplan G, Marino RJ. Highlighting gaps in spinal cord injury research in activity-based interventions for the upper extremity: A scoping review. NeuroRehabilitation 2021; 49:23-38. [PMID: 33967071 DOI: 10.3233/nre-210042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Upper extremity activity-based therapy for neurologic disorders employs high-intensity, high repetition functional training to exploit neuroplasticity and improve function. Research focused on high-intensity upper extremity activity-based therapy for persons with spinal cord injury (SCI) is limited. OBJECTIVE To summarize high-intensity activity-based interventions used in neurological disorders for their current or potential application to SCI. METHODS The scoping review included articles from MEDLINE, CINAHL, Cochrane CENTRAL, and OTSeeker with the criteria: non-invasive activity-based interventions delivered at least three times/week for two weeks, upper extremity functional outcomes, age 13 years or older, English language, and neurological disorders three months post onset/injury. RESULTS The search yielded 172 studies. There were seven studies with SCI, all in adults. Activity-based interventions in SCI included task-specific training and gaming, with and without electrical stimulation, and a robotic exoskeleton. The other populations found in the review included studies in stroke, cerebral palsy, and multiple sclerosis. Thirty-four different interventions were reported in other populations. In comparison to the extensive stroke research, work in SCI was not found for high-intensity interventions using virtual reality, brain stimulation, rehabilitation devices, and applications to the home and telerehab settings. CONCLUSION The results highlight critical gaps within upper extremity high-intensity activity-based research in SCI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Namrata Grampurohit
- Jefferson College of Rehabilitation Sciences, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Alison Bell
- Jefferson College of Rehabilitation Sciences, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Susan V Duff
- Crean College of Health and Behavioral Sciences, Chapman University, Irvine, CA, USA
| | - M J Mulcahey
- Jefferson College of Rehabilitation Sciences, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | - Gary Kaplan
- Scott Memorial Library, Academic Commons, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Ralph J Marino
- Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lu L, Tan Y, Klaic M, Galea MP, Khan F, Oliver A, Mareels I, Oetomo D, Zhao E. Evaluating Rehabilitation Progress Using Motion Features Identified by Machine Learning. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2020; 68:1417-1428. [PMID: 33156776 DOI: 10.1109/tbme.2020.3036095] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
Evaluating progress throughout a patient's rehabilitation episode is critical for determining the effectiveness of the selected treatments and is an essential ingredient in personalised and evidence-based rehabilitation practice. The evaluation process is complex due to the inherently large human variations in motor recovery and the limitations of commonly used clinical measurement tools. Information recorded during a robot-assisted rehabilitation process can provide an effective means to continuously quantitatively assess movement performance and rehabilitation progress. However, selecting appropriate motion features for rehabilitation evaluation has always been challenging. This paper exploits unsupervised feature learning techniques to reduce the complexity of building the evaluation model of patients' progress. A new feature learning technique is developed to select the most significant features from a large amount of kinematic features measured from robotics, providing clinically useful information to health practitioners with reduction of modeling complexity. A novel indicator that uses monotonicity and trendability is proposed to evaluate kinematic features. The data used to develop the feature selection technique consist of kinematic data from robot-aided rehabilitation for a population of stroke patients. The selected kinematic features allow for human variations across a population of patients as well as over the sequence of rehabilitation sessions. The study is based on data records pertaining to 41 stroke patients using three different robot assisted exercises for upper limb rehabilitation. Consistent with the literature, the results indicate that features based on movement smoothness are the best measures among 17 kinematic features suitable to evaluate rehabilitation progress.
Collapse
|
4
|
Flynn N, Kuys S, Froude E, Cooke D. Introducing robotic upper limb training into routine clinical practice for stroke survivors: Perceptions of occupational therapists and physiotherapists. Aust Occup Ther J 2019; 66:530-538. [PMID: 31292975 DOI: 10.1111/1440-1630.12594] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/22/2019] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Robot-assisted therapy for the upper limb (RT-UL) is an emerging form of intervention for stroke survivors with upper limb deficits. However, there is limited knowledge regarding therapists' perceptions of RT-UL and the factors influencing the implementation of RT-UL into the clinical setting. This is important when considering that therapists in Australia are primarily responsible for the prescription of RT-UL in daily practice. This study aimed to explore occupational therapists' and physiotherapists' perceptions of RT-UL and the perceived barriers and enablers influencing implementation. METHODS Two discipline-specific focus groups were conducted involving occupational therapists (n = 6) and physiotherapists (n = 6). Participants were members of the same multidisciplinary team working in an Australian public health rehabilitation facility where RT-UL (i.e. InMotion2) was being introduced for the first time. Focus groups explored therapist perceptions of the new RT-UL as well as perceived barriers and enablers to implementation. Focus groups were recorded, transcribed and deductively analysed using the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF). RESULTS Out of the 14 domains of the TDF, 7 were raised by participants during the focus groups: environmental context and resources, beliefs about consequences, optimism, knowledge, skills, social influences, and social and professional role and identity. Therapists' expressed their optimism towards the introduction of RT-UL but believed successful implementation would be primarily dependent on the availability of clinical leadership, training and a suitable client mix. CONCLUSION Therapists perceived that RT-UL would provide opportunity for increased upper limb practice particularly for patients with severe upper limb impairment. To facilitate implementation, support of RT-UL should come from both management and clinical leaders and training include RT-UL efficacy, device functionality and patient suitability. The availability of a single RT-UL device in a workplace may create unique interdisciplinary and logistical challenges.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas Flynn
- School of Allied Health, Australian Catholic University, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Suzanne Kuys
- School of Allied Health, Australian Catholic University, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Elspeth Froude
- School of Allied Health, Australian Catholic University, North Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Deirdre Cooke
- School of Allied Health, Australian Catholic University, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.,Mater Private Hospital Rehabilitation Unit, South Brisbane, Queens land, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Khan F, Amatya B, Galea MP, Gonzenbach R, Kesselring J. Neurorehabilitation: applied neuroplasticity. J Neurol 2016; 264:603-615. [PMID: 27778158 DOI: 10.1007/s00415-016-8307-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2016] [Revised: 10/06/2016] [Accepted: 10/07/2016] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
The prevalence of disability due to neurological conditions is escalating worldwide. Neurological disorders have significant disability-burden with long-term functional and psychosocial issues, requiring specialized rehabilitation services for comprehensive management, especially treatments tapping into brain recovery 'neuroplastic' processes. Neurorehabilitation is interdisciplinary and cross-sectorial, requiring coordinated effort of diverse sectors, professions, patients and community to manage complex condition-related disability. This review provides evidence for a range of neurorehabilitation interventions for four common neurological conditions: multiple sclerosis (MS), stroke, traumatic brain injury and Parkinson's disease using the Grade of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation tool for quality of evidence. Although, existing best-evidence for many interventions is still sparse, the overall findings suggest 'strong' evidence for physical therapy and psychological intervention for improved patient outcomes; and. 'moderate' evidence for multidisciplinary rehabilitation for longer term gains at the levels of activity (disability) and participation in MS and stroke population. The effect of other rehabilitation interventions is inconclusive, due to a paucity of methodologically robust studies. More research is needed to improve evidence-base for many promising rehabilitation interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fary Khan
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Royal Melbourne Hospital, 34-54 Poplar Road, Parkville, Victoria, 3052, Australia.
- Department of Medicine (Royal Melbourne Hospital), University of Melbourne, Grattan Street, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
| | - Bhasker Amatya
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Royal Melbourne Hospital, 34-54 Poplar Road, Parkville, Victoria, 3052, Australia
- Department of Medicine (Royal Melbourne Hospital), University of Melbourne, Grattan Street, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Mary P Galea
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Royal Melbourne Hospital, 34-54 Poplar Road, Parkville, Victoria, 3052, Australia
- Department of Medicine (Royal Melbourne Hospital), University of Melbourne, Grattan Street, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Roman Gonzenbach
- Department of Neurology and Neurorehabilitation, Rehabilitation Center, Valens, Switzerland
| | - Jürg Kesselring
- Department of Neurology and Neurorehabilitation, Rehabilitation Center, Valens, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|