Pain catastrophizing predicts dropout of patients from an interdisciplinary chronic pain management programme: A prospective cohort study

Attrition from Face-to-Face Pediatric Outpatient Chronic Pain Interventions: A Narrative Review and Theoretical Model

There is limited understanding of attrition (premature treatment withdrawal and non-completion) from pediatric chronic pain services. This narrative review aimed to summarize attrition prevalence from face-to-face pediatric outpatient chronic pain interventions, identify associated factors and develop a theoretical model to account for attrition in this setting. A comprehensive search of the published literature revealed massive variability (0-100%) in the reported attrition rates from pediatric chronic pain interventions that varied in type and format (individual vs. group, single discipline vs. interdisciplinary, psychological only vs. multiple combined interventions, of different durations). The factors associated with attrition from pediatric chronic pain programs varied between the studies: some have assessed patient sex, psychological and other comorbidities, avoidance strategies, missed schooling, family composition/tensions, caregiver catastrophizing, scheduling, caregiver leave and clinic access. A theoretical model is presented depicting youth, caregiver and service factors that may impact attrition from pediatric chronic pain interventions. Where available, literature is drawn from the pediatric chronic pain context, but also from adult chronic pain and pediatric weight management fields. The implications for research and clinical practice are discussed, including improved reporting, patient screening and targeted supports to promote intervention completion. This review contributes to a better understanding of attrition, which is crucial for optimizing pediatric chronic pain service outcomes.

Validation of the Danish version of the knowledge and attitudes survey regarding pain

OBJECTIVES

Pain management is critical for nurses; therefore, knowledge assessment is also critical. The Knowledge and Attitudes Survey Regarding Pain (KASRP), designed for testing pain management knowledge among nurses, finds widespread use internationally; yet, key validity evidence according to American Psychological Association standards is missing. Therefore, this study aimed to translate and test the psychometric traits of KASRP based on an item response theory model.

METHODS

Cronbach's α was included to assess internal consistency, and the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was included to assess the total score normal distribution goodness of fit. KASRP was tested using the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) test for sphericity to examine its suitability for factor analysis and exploratory factor analysis to examine construct evidence. The Kruskal-Wallis H test was used to assess discriminant evidence. The correlation between KASRP and the Brockopp-Warden Pain Knowledge Questionnaire (BWPKQ) was included as a measure of convergent validity evidence, and correlation with self-assessed knowledge was tested as a divergent validity measure.

RESULTS

The questionnaire was translated using back-forth and parallel translation. The KMO test for sphericity was 0.49 for all items and 0.53 for the adjusted scale without items 30, 33, and 36, with factor analysis explaining 70.42% of the variation suggesting unacceptable construct validity evidence. Cronbach's α was 0.75, suggesting acceptable reliability evidence; the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test revealed an insignificant skewness of -0.195 and a kurtosis of 0.001, while the Kruskal-Wallis H test revealed a significance of p < 0.001. The correlation between KASRP and the BWPKQ was 0.69 (p = 0.0001), suggesting acceptable convergent validity evidence. A correlation between KASRP and self-assessed knowledge of -0.59 was also found, which suggests acceptable divergent validity evidence.

CONCLUSIONS

The translated KASRP passed six out of seven tests based on the given sample.

Single-facility study of the effectiveness of rehabilitation therapy using wearable hybrid assistive limb for patients with bleeding disorders: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

Haemophilic arthropathy, a serious complication of haemophilia, results from recurrent joint bleeding, causing progressive joint damage and severely impacting patient quality of life. Rehabilitation therapy (RT) effectively addresses declining physical function due to joint degradation, but pain during RT can hinder its success. Therefore, an effective pain-alleviating treatment method is required. The single-joint hybrid assistive limb (HAL-SJ), a powered exoskeleton, measures bioelectric potential during muscle contraction and provides motorised support, potentially alleviating pain.

OBJECTIVE

This study outlines our protocol for a randomised, prospective, single-blind (evaluator) trial aimed to investigate the effects of HAL-SJ on pain reduction during RT, kinesiophobia and other physical functions in patients with haemophilia.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This two-group comparison intervention study will include 24 male patients aged 12-85 years diagnosed with a bleeding disorder necessitating RT for pain and physical function improvement. The primary outcome measures pain changes during the first and second RT session in patients receiving HAL-SJ-assisted RT compared with traditional RT without HAL-SJ. The secondary outcomes include kinesiophobia (Japanese version of the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia), standing position gait (zebris FDM-T treadmill), range of motion (manual goniometer) and body surface temperature (infrared thermography camera) during the study period of up to 3 months or until the end of 10 RTs. RT intensity remains below that required to move the affected joint against gravity, given HAL-SJ's muscular support. The follow-up period extends to 1 month after the last RT. Intergroup study variables are compared by an unpaired t-test or Mann-Whitney test. Intragroup comparisons of secondary outcomes are analysed by a paired t-test or Wilcoxon signed-rank test.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This study was approved by the accreditation committee of Nara Medical University Hospital. The study results will disseminate through publication in a peer-reviewed journal.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

jRCTs052220076.

Clinical profiling of specific diagnostic subgroups of women with chronic pelvic pain

Introduction

Chronic pelvic pain (CPP) is a common condition affecting up to 26.6% of women, with many suffering for several years before diagnosis and/or treatment. Its clinical presentation is varied and there are frequently comorbid conditions both within and outside the pelvis. We aim to explore whether specific subgroups of women with CPP report different clinical symptoms and differing impact of pain on their quality of life (QoL).

Methods

The study is part of the Translational Research in Pelvic Pain (TRiPP) project which is a cross-sectional observational cohort study. The study includes 769 female participants of reproductive age who completed an extensive set of questions derived from standardised WERF EPHect questionnaires. Within this population we defined a control group (reporting no pelvic pain, no bladder pain syndrome, and no endometriosis diagnosis, N = 230) and four pain groups: endometriosis-associated pain (EAP, N = 237), interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome (BPS, N = 72), comorbid endometriosis-associated pain and BPS (EABP, N = 120), and pelvic pain only (PP, N = 127).

Results

Clinical profiles of women with CPP (13-50 years old) show variability of clinical symptoms. The EAP and EABP groups scored higher than the PP group (p < 0.001) on the pain intensity scales for non-cyclical pelvic pain and higher than both the BPS and PP groups (p < 0.001) on the dysmenorrhoea scale. The EABP group also had significantly higher scores for dyspareunia (p < 0.001), even though more than 50% of sexually active participants in each pain group reported interrupting and/or avoiding sexual intercourse due to pain in the last 12 months. Scores for the QoL questionnaire (SF-36) reveal that CPP patients had significantly lower QoL across all SF-36 subscales (p < 0.001). Significant effects were also observed between the pain groups for pain interference with their work (p < 0.001) and daily lives (p < 0.001), with the EABP suffering more compared to the EAP and PP groups (p < 0.001).

Discussion

Our results demonstrate the negative impact that chronic pain has on CPP patients' QoL and reveal an increased negative impact of pain on the comorbid EABP group. Furthermore, it demonstrates the importance of dyspareunia in women with CPP. Overall, our results demonstrate the need for further exploration of interventions targeting QoL more broadly and suggest that novel approaches to classifying women with CPP are needed.

Characteristics of patients who dropped out after multidisciplinary pain management in Japan: A prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Because regular visits to distant hospitals may be a burden to patients, both in terms of time and cost, some patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain may discontinue multidisciplinary pain treatment, unable to maintain motivation to attend.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate and compare the pre-program characteristics of patients who dropped out and patients who continued treatment, thereby clarifying the characteristics of patients at risk of dropping out.

METHODS

A multidisciplinary pain management treatment program was implemented for patients at the Pain Management Center, Hoshi General Hospital. From April 2015 to March 2018, 23 patients participated in the program. Twelve of the 23 patients lived outside the prefecture where the hospital is located. Of these 12 patients, five completed the program, while seven did not. We compared the dropout and continuation groups in terms of patient characteristics, pain severity, pain-related psychosocial factors, and quality of life.

RESULTS

We found significant differences (p< 0.05) in median age, Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire walking ability dysfunction score, and Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire score.

CONCLUSIONS

The characteristics of patients who dropped out were older age, walking ability dysfunction, and low quality of life associated with low back pain.

Using quantitative sensory testing to predict attrition in an interdisciplinary pain management program: a pilot study

Aim: To determine the extent to which quantitative sensory testing (QST) predicted attrition in an interdisciplinary pain program (IPP). Patients & methods: Participants (n = 53) enrolled in an IPP completed pretreatment assessments of QST and the PROMIS-29 quality of life survey. Results & conclusion: Compared with completers, non-completers (24.5%) reported significantly higher pain intensity (7.1, 95% CI [5.8, 8.4] versus 5.4, 95% CI [4.8, 6.1]) and cold hyperalgesia (14.6°C, 95% CI [8.8, 20.4] versus 7.5°C, 95% CI [4.8, 6.1]), with both variables also predicting attrition. This finding highlights a potentially novel and clinically significant use of QST. Higher overall pain intensity and the presence of remote cold hyperalgesia may identify patients at risk for dropping out of an IPP.

Improvement in pain interference and function by an allied health pain management program: Results of a randomized trial

BACKGROUND

Chronic pain is a significant health problem worldwide and requires a biopsychosocial treatment approach. Access to traditional pain medicine specialist services is limited and innovative treatment models are required to support patients in tertiary care. The study evaluated the clinical effectiveness and safety of the Treatment Access Pathway (TAP), an allied health expanded scope model of care which included innovative group assessment and collaboration with patients to create individualized treatment plans.

METHODS

One hundred and eighty-one patients referred to a tertiary level chronic pain service were randomly allocated to either the TAP or the waitlist study groups. Primary (pain interference) and secondary outcome measures were collected at recruitment and again at 6 months. Per-protocol analyses were utilized due to high participant attrition (46% across groups).

RESULTS

The TAP group reported greater reductions in pain interference at 6 months than waitlist group (0.9, 95% CI: 0.2-1.6), with more than half of the TAP group (52%) reporting clinically significant improvement. In addition, statistically significant differences between the TAP and waitlist groups were observed for objective measurements of walking endurance (5.4 m, 95% CI: 1.7-9.1); and global impressions of change (1.4 unit decrease, 95% CI: 1-1.9). Nil adverse events were recorded.

CONCLUSIONS

The study suggests that an expanded scope allied health model of care prioritizing patient choice and group-based interventions provides modest benefits for tertiary-referral chronic pain patients. TAP warrants further investigation as a potentially viable alternative for tertiary healthcare where traditional pain services are unavailable or have long waiting lists.

SIGNIFICANCE

The study tests effectiveness and safety of an expanded scope allied health-led chronic pain program. Despite a high attrition rate, the study showed reduced pain interference and increased physical function in those who completed the protocol. The results are promising and support introduction of this model as an adjunct to existing traditional chronic pain models of care, with a particular focus on improving participant retention in the program. Additionally, the model of care can be used as a standalone chronic pain model of care where no other pain management resources are available. The study was registered on ANZCTR (Trial ID: ACTRN12617001284358).

Data Science Methods for Nursing-Relevant Patient Outcomes and Clinical Processes: The 2019 Literature Year in Review

Data science continues to be recognized and used within healthcare due to the increased availability of large data sets and advanced analytics. It can be challenging for nurse leaders to remain apprised of this rapidly changing landscape. In this article, we describe our findings from a scoping literature review of papers published in 2019 that use data science to explore, explain, and/or predict 15 phenomena of interest to nurses. Fourteen of the 15 phenomena were associated with at least one paper published in 2019. We identified the use of many contemporary data science methods (eg, natural language processing, neural networks) for many of the outcomes. We found many studies exploring Readmissions and Pressure Injuries. The topics of Artificial Intelligence/Machine Learning Acceptance, Burnout, Patient Safety, and Unit Culture were poorly represented. We hope that the studies described in this article help readers: (1) understand the breadth and depth of data science's ability to improve clinical processes and patient outcomes that are relevant to nurses and (2) identify gaps in the literature that are in need of exploration.

Interdisciplinary Laparoscopic Implantation of Neuromodulation Leads to the Sacral Plexus for Therapy of Chronic Pelvic Pain and Neurogenic Bladder Dysfunctions

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to report on the use of laparoscopic implantation of leads on the branches of the sacral plexus for neuromodulation in the treatment of chronic pelvic pain (CPP) in a multidisciplinary setting with the help of electrophysiological neuromonitoring.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between 2012 and 2019, six female patients complaining of chronic pain and bladder and bowel dysfunctions underwent laparoscopic exposure and nerve identification with the help of electrophysiological neuromonitoring. A lead was placed laparoscopically in direct contact with the affected nerve. Pain intensity (numerous ranking scale [NRS]), generic health status (EQ-5D-5L), Becks Depressions Inventory (BDI-V), Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), and Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8) were assessed pre-/postoperatively as well as three and six months after surgery. Statistical analysis was performed using Mann-Whitney U and Wilcoxon rank-sum test.

RESULTS

The median age was 36.5 years. NRS improved from a median of 9.5 preoperatively to 3.0 (p < 0.001) at six-month follow-up. Median EQ-5D-5L index value before treatment was 0.18, indicating a notably lowered quality of life and increased up to 0.83 after six months (p < 0.001). Preoperative median BDI-V scores indicated a major depressive mood and improved from a median of 46.0 to 12.0 after six months (p = 0.007). Preoperative PCS was elevated with a median score of 41.0 and decreased to 4.0 after six months (p < 0.001). CSQ showed that patients were satisfied with the treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

This unique method is an alternative and effective treatment option for CPP even years after primary endometriosis surgery.