Comparison of Vertical Marginal Discrepancy in High and Low Translucent Monolithic Zirconia Crowns in Repeated Firing Cycles

OBJECTIVE

 Increase in vertical marginal discrepancy (VMD) during repeated firing cycles and its clinical outcomes is a major concern for high and low translucent monolithic zirconia crowns. The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate and compare VMD in high and low translucent monolithic zirconia crowns in repeated firing cycles.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

 To perform this study, 10 monolithic zirconia crowns made by computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing method were used in two groups of five with high and low translucency, which were designed on Zimmer tissue-level implant abutment. The crowns in each group were randomly numbered from 1 to 5 and each underwent 1, 3, and 5 firing cycles. After completing each mentioned cycle, the VMD was measured at eight predetermined points on abutment by optical microscope and their average was recorded for each sample. Data analysis was done by SPSS 22 software through repeated-measure analysis of variance, paired t-test, and t-test with a 5% significance threshold.

RESULTS

 A total of 240 measurements were made for the VMD, which, due to the presence of five samples in each translucency group and eight examined points in each sample, was finally summed up to six averages for each translucency group in the mentioned three stages of firing cycles. The averages for the low-translucency group after 1, 3, and 5 firing cycles were 76.86, 85.02, and 90.55 μm, respectively, and for the high-translucency group after 1, 3, and 5 firing cycles were 80.38, 87.33, and 97.78 μm, respectively. The average VMD of the samples regardless of the translucency level after 1, 3 and 5 firing cycles was calculated as 78.62, 86.18, and 94.16 μm, respectively.

CONCLUSION

 This study found that VMD increased with repeated firing cycles, with no significant difference between high- and low-translucency zirconia crowns. Repeated firings significantly raised VMD, but all values remained within clinically acceptable limits, supporting the suitability of both translucency types for clinical use.

Biomechanical behavior of cantilevered 3-unit implant-supported prostheses made of PEKK and monolithic zirconia: A finite element study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the biomechanical performance of various designs of cantilevered three-unit implant-supported prostheses, using two distinct prosthetic materials and under different loading conditions.

METHOD

Three mandibular models were created with varying implant positions to support a 3-unit prosthesis using two materials (Zirconia and PEKK), resulting in three different designs: distal cantilever (M1), fixed-fixed (M2), and mesial cantilever (M3). The geometric model was created by segmenting a CBCT scan of an edentulous mandible using Mimics software, followed by refinement in 3-Matic to generate a trabecular bone core encased by a 2 mm-thick cortical shell and a 1 mm-thick mucosal layer. Implant CAD files were integrated, and the models were processed in SolidWorks to finalize solid geometries. These were then imported into ANSYS for mesh generation and finite element analysis, with materials assumed to be isotropic and elastic. Models underwent 3 different static loading protocols (Vertical 100 N, 30° Oblique 50 N, 45° Oblique 50 N). Von Mises stress and total deformation were calculated.

RESULTS

Model 2 demonstrated the best performance. Under vertical loading, PEKK prostheses showed lower stress than zirconia in the prosthetic body (10-45 %) and the cortical bone (3-40 %), but higher stresses in the implant (4-10 %). Compared to vertical loading, oblique loading generated higher stress but remained within a safe range without compromising function.

CONCLUSION

The fixed-fixed design showed optimal biomechanical performance. The mesial cantilever was more favorable than the distal for stress distribution. Zirconia provided superior stress dissipation, while PEKK showed reduced stress in the prosthetic body but increased stress I the implant and bone.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

The study provides prosthodontists with evidence recommending design and materials for 3-unit implant-supported prostheses. Zirconia is ideal for cantilevered designs, resisting high bending forces and minimizing implant stress, while PEKK is more suitable for fixed-fixed designs with lower stress levels.

Biomechanical behavior of implant retained prostheses in the posterior maxilla using different materials: a finite element study

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study is to evaluate the biomechanical behavior of the mesial and distal off-axial extensions of implant-retained prostheses in the posterior maxilla with different prosthetic materials using finite element analysis (FEA).

METHODS

Three dimensional (3D) finite element models with three implant configurations and prosthetic designs (fixed-fixed, mesial cantilever, and distal cantilever) were designed and modelled depending upon cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images of an intact maxilla of an anonymous patient. Implant prostheses with two materials; Monolithic zirconia (Zr) and polyetherketoneketone (PEKK) were also modeled .The 3D modeling software Mimics Innovation Suite (Mimics 14.0 / 3-matic 7.01; Materialise, Leuven, Belgium) was used. All the models were imported into the FE package Marc/Mentat (ver. 2015; MSC Software, Los Angeles, Calif). Then, individual models were subjected to separate axial loads of 300 N. Von mises stress values were computed for the prostheses, implants, and bone under axial loading.

RESULTS

The highest von Mises stresses in implant (111.6 MPa) and bone (100.0 MPa) were recorded in distal cantilever model with PEKK material, while the lowest values in implant (48.9 MPa) and bone (19.6 MPa) were displayed in fixed fixed model with zirconia material. The distal cantilever model with zirconia material yielded the most elevated levels of von Mises stresses within the prosthesis (105 MPa), while the least stresses in prosthesis (35.4 MPa) were recorded in fixed fixed models with PEKK material.

CONCLUSIONS

In the light of this study, the combination of fixed fixed implant prosthesis without cantilever using a rigid zirconia material exhibits better biomechanical behavior and stress distribution around bone and implants. As a prosthetic material, low elastic modulus PEKK transmitted more stress to implants and surrounding bone especially with distal cantilever.

Effect of sintering speed, aging processes, and different surface treatments on the optical and surface properties of monolithic zirconia restorations

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

Advances in dentistry have led to more esthetic and biocompatible restorative materials such as translucent zirconia and to faster and more accurate manufacturing methods. How changes in the surface and optical properties of translucent zirconia affect the esthetics and durability of these restorations under different conditions and manufacturing processes is unclear.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effect of the sintering speed, aging process, and different surface treatments on the translucency and surface structure of monolithic zirconia restorations.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Prepared typodont teeth were scanned, and 40 three-unit fixed partial dentures (FPDs) and 40 disk specimens were designed and prepared from monolithic zirconia blanks. The specimens were divided into traditional or speed sintering groups (20 FPDs and 20 disks each); half of each group (10 FPDs and 10 disks) was polished with a handpiece at 10 000 rpm, and the other half was glazed. Half of the specimens were thermocycled with 3500 cycles in 5 °C and 55 °C water baths, and the remaining half were not thermocycled. Translucency was measured with a spectrophotometer. Surface free energy was calculated in mNm with a contact angle device; surface roughness was measured in nm with an atomic force microscope. Translucency data were analyzed by the Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests, while surface free energy and surface roughness data were analyzed by 3-way ANOVA (α=.05).

RESULTS

The highest transmittance was in the speed sintered, polished, nonthermocycled group, and the lowest transmittance was in the speed sintered, polished, thermocycled group (P=.029). The transmittance of the traditionally sintered, polished, nonthermocycled group was significantly higher than that in all the speed sintered, glazed groups; the traditionally sintered, glazed groups; and the traditionally sintered, polished, thermocycled group (P=.029). The transmittance of the traditionally sintered, polished, thermocycled group was significantly higher than that of all traditionally sintered, glazed groups (P=.029). The mean surface free energy in the traditionally sintered groups was higher than that in the speed sintered groups (P=.002); also, it was higher in the glazed groups than in the polished groups (P<.001). The aging process decreased surface free energy (P=.023). The mean surface roughness in the speed sintered groups was significantly lower than that in the traditionally sintered groups (P=.004). No significant difference in surface roughness was found between the polished and glazed groups and between the 2 variables of the aging process (P>.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Speed sintering and polishing may decrease the surface free energy and increase the translucency of the monolithic zirconia restoration. Also, speed sintering creates a smoother surface. Aging had a more significant effect on decreasing the surface free energy of the specimens and could make the least translucent restorations.

Bond Strength of Zirconia Ceramics to Dentin Using Two Resin Cements: Influence of Dentin Conditioning.. [DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3067702/v1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0]

Background Dentin adhesion has difficult challenge compared to enamel adhesion. The purpose of the current study was to assess the impact of different dentin conditioning methods and two different resin cements on bond strength of zirconia ceramics to dentin. Methods A total of 64 zirconia discs were fabricated using CAD/CAM technology according to the desired dimensions (8mm diameter ×3mm thickness). A total of 64molars mounted in plastic rings with acrylic resin were prepared by exposing flat coronal dentin surfaces by removing the occlusal enamel and superficial dentin. The prepared molars were divided into 4 main groups (n = 16) according to dentin surface treatment; Dentin left as cutted, treated with EDTA, treated with Polyacrylic Acid (PAA), treated with self-etch adhesive. Each main group was subdivided into 2 subgroups (n = 8) according to luting cement used. One of the subgroups, zirconia discs were bonded to conditioned dentin surface using adhesive resin cement (VITA ADIVA® F-CEM). The other subgroup was bonded using self-adhesive resin cement (Calibra®Universal). After bonding, all specimens were stored in water bath at 37⁰C for 6 months followed by 10.000 thermal cycles. After artificial aging, all bonded specimens underwent shear bond strength testing using universal testing machine. The data was parametric and normally distributed. Two-way ANOVA was used to test significant difference in shear stress between cements and between surface treatments followed by post hoc Tukey test for correction of p value resulted from multiple comparisons. P is significant if < 0.05 at confidence interval 95%. Results There was a significant difference in shear bond strength between surface treatments. The highest shear bond strength was reported with Self-etch adhesive, followed by PAA, then EDTA surface treatments, and the lowest shear bond strength was reported with as cutted dentin. Also,There was a significant difference between each two surface treatments except between PAA and EDTA for adhesive resin cement group. Conclusion Define dentin surface treatment with self etch adhesive is recommended before bonding zirconia restoration overall the conditioning materials, followed by PAA and EDTA. Specially with self-adhesive resin cement (Calibra universal cement).

Effects of ceramic microbeads on bonding between a zirconia framework and layered resin composite

This study was conducted to evaluate the effects of ceramic microbeads on the bond strength between resin and zirconia. Microbeads made of zirconia (TZ) and zircon (ZS) were treated with and without hydrofluoric acid (HF). The microbeads were sintered to zirconia disks using intermediate feldspathic porcelains. Two control groups, NB (without microbeads) and AS (without porcelain and microbeads), were also prepared. All specimens were treated with a phosphate primer and veneered with a light-curing resin composite. The 24-h shear bond strengths were determined and analyzed by the Tukey-Kramer test (α=0.05, n=10). The TZ-HF specimen exhibited the highest bond strength, followed by TZ, ZS-HF, ZS, AS, and NB. Scanning electron microscopy observations revealed that the TZ-HF specimen had a complicated debonded surface, and it included microconcavities where the microbeads were detached. Sintering etched zirconia beads onto a zirconia framework with feldspathic porcelains is useful for bonding layered resin composite materials.

Effect of Different Decontamination Methods on Fracture Resistance, Microstructure, and Surface Roughness of Zirconia Restorations-In Vitro Study

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of seven different decontamination methods (water, ZirCleanTM, 37% phosphoric acid, 9.5% hydrofluoric acid, Al2O3 sandblasting, low-speed dental stone, and high-speed dental stone) on the fracture resistance, microstructure, and surface roughness of monolithic and multilayered zirconia. The as-received and sandblasted zirconia was used as a control. One-way ANOVA and t-test were performed. As-received monolithic zirconia was stronger (856 ± 94 MPa) than multilayered zirconia (348.4 ± 63 MPa). Only phosphoric acid (865 ± 141 MPa) and low-speed dental stone (959 ± 116 MPa) significantly increased the flexural strength of sandblasted monolithic zirconia (854 ± 99 MPa), but all tested decontamination methods except phosphoric acid (307 ± 57 MPa) and Al2O3 (322 ± 69 MPa) significantly increased the flexural strength of sandblasted multilayered zirconia (325 ± 74 MPa). Different decontamination methods did not significantly affect the flexural modulus, but introduced irregularities in the crystal as well as deep surface flaws in both types of zirconia. The surface of sandblasted monolithic zirconia is more resistant to change than multilayered zirconia. Among different decontamination methods, a low-speed dental stone could be beneficial as it significantly increased the surface roughness and fracture resistance of both types of zirconia.

Expression of Interleukin-1β and Histological Changes of the Three-Dimensional Oral Mucosal Model in Response to Yttria-Stabilized Nanozirconia

Over the years, advancement in ceramic-based dental restorative materials has led to the development of monolithic zirconia with increased translucency. The monolithic zirconia fabricated from nano-sized zirconia powders is shown to be superior in physical properties and more translucent for anterior dental restorations. Most in vitro studies on monolithic zirconia have focused mainly on the effect of surface treatment or the wear of the material, while the nanotoxicity of this material is yet to be explored. Hence, this research aimed to assess the biocompatibility of yttria-stabilized nanozirconia (3-YZP) on the three-dimensional oral mucosal models (3D-OMM). The 3D-OMMs were constructed using human gingival fibroblast (HGF) and immortalized human oral keratinocyte cell line (OKF6/TERT-2), co-cultured on an acellular dermal matrix. On day 12, the tissue models were exposed to 3-YZP (test) and inCoris TZI (IC) (reference material). The growth media were collected at 24 and 48 h of exposure to materials and assessed for IL-1β released. The 3D-OMMs were fixed with 10% formalin for the histopathological assessments. The concentration of the IL-1β was not statistically different between the two materials for 24 and 48 h of exposure (p = 0.892). Histologically, stratification of epithelial cells was formed without evidence of cytotoxic damage and the epithelial thickness measured was the same for all model tissues. The excellent biocompatibility of nanozirconia, as evidenced by the multiple endpoint analyses of the 3D-OMM, may indicate the potential of its clinical application as a restorative material.

Effect of surface treatments on biaxial flexural strength, fatigue resistance, and fracture toughness of high versus low translucency zirconia

BACKGROUND

Mechanical surface treatments can deteriorate the mechanical properties of zirconia. This study evaluated and compared the biaxial flexural strength, fracture toughness, and fatigue resistance of high translucency (HT) to low translucency (LT) zirconia after various mechanical surface treatments.

METHODS

Four hundred eighty zirconia discs were prepared by milling and sintering two HT (Katana and BruxZir) and LT (Cercon and Lava) zirconia blocks at targeted dimensions of 12 mm diameter × 1.2 mm thickness. Sintered zirconia discs received one of the following surface treatments: low-pressure airborne particle abrasion (APA) using 50 µm alumina particles, grinding using 400 grit silicon carbide paper, while as-sintered specimens served as control. Internal structure and surface roughness were evaluated by scanning electron microscope (SEM) and a non-contact laser profilometer, respectively. Half of the discs were tested for initial biaxial flexural strength, while the rest was subjected to 10⁶ cyclic fatigue loadings, followed by measuring the residual biaxial flexural strength. Fractured surfaces were examined for critical size defects (c) using SEM to calculate the fracture toughness (K_IC). The effect of surface treatments, zirconia type, and cyclic fatigue on the biaxial flexural strength was statistically analyzed using three-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey HSD post hoc tests (α = 0.05). Weibull analysis was done to evaluate the reliability of the flexural strength for different materials.

RESULTS

The initial biaxial flexural strength of LT zirconia was significantly higher (p < 0.001) than that of HT zirconia in all groups. While low APA significantly increased the biaxial flexural strength of LT zirconia, no significant change was observed for HT zirconia except for Katana. Surface grinding and cyclic fatigue significantly reduced the flexural strength of all groups. High translucency zirconia reported higher fracture toughness, yet with lower Weibull moduli, compared to LT zirconia.

CONCLUSION

LT zirconia has higher biaxial flexural strength, yet with lower fracture toughness and fatigue resistance, compared to HT zirconia. Low-pressure APA has significantly increased the biaxial flexural strength in all zirconia groups except BruxZir. Grinding was deteriorating to biaxial flexural strength and fracture toughness in all zirconia types. Cyclic fatigue has significantly decreased the biaxial flexural strength and reliability of HT and LT zirconia.

Biaxial Flexural Strength of Different Monolithic Zirconia upon Post-Sintering Processes

OBJECTIVE

 Different post-sintering processes are expected to be a reason for alteration in the strength of zirconia. This study evaluated the effect of post-sintering processes on the flexural strength of different types of monolithic zirconia.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

 A total of 120 classical- (Cz) and high-translucent (Hz) monolithic zirconia discs (1.2 mm thickness and 14 mm in Ø) were prepared, sintered, and randomly divided into four groups to be surface-treated with (1) as-glazed (AG); (2) finished and polished (FP); (3) finished, polished, and overglazed (FPOG); and (4) finished, polished, and heat-treated (FPHT) technique (n = 15). Biaxial flexural strength (σ) was determined on a piston-on-three ball in a universal testing machine at a speed of 0.5 mm/min.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

 Analysis of variance, and post hoc Bonferroni multiple comparisons were determined for significant differences (α = 0.05). Weibull analysis was applied for survival probability, Weibull modulus (m), and characteristic strength (σ₀). The microstructures were examined with a scanning electron microscope and X-ray diffraction.

RESULTS

 The mean ± standard deviation value of σ (MPa), m, and σ₀ were 1,626.43 ± 184.38, 9.51, and 1,709.79 for CzAG; 1,734.98 ± 136.15, 12.83, and 1,799.17 for CzFP; 1,636.92 ± 130.11, 14.66, and 1,697.63 for CzFPOG; and 1,590.78 ± 161.74, 10.13, and 1,663.82 for CzFPHT; 643.30 ± 118.59, 5.59, and 695.55 for HzAG; 671.52 ± 96.77, 3.28, and 782.61 for HzFP; 556.33 ± 122.85, 4.76, and 607.01 for HzFPOG; and 598.36 ± 57.96, 11.22, and 624.89 for HzFPHT. The σ was significantly affected by the post-sintering process and type of zirconia (p < 0.05), but not by their interactions (p > 0.05). The Cz indicated a significantly higher σ than Hz. The FP process significantly enhanced σ more than other treatment procedures.

CONCLUSION

 Post-sintering processes enabled an alteration in σ of zirconia. FP enhanced σ, while FPOG and FPHT resulted in a reduction of σ. Glazing tends to induce defects at the glazing interface, while heat treatment induces a phase change to tetragonal, both resulted in reducing σ. Finishing and polishing for both Cz and Hz monolithic zirconia is recommended, while overglazed or heat-treated is not suggested.

Fracture toughness of different monolithic zirconia upon post-sintering processes

Background

Surface treatments are expected to be a reason for alteration in fracture resistance of zirconia. This study evaluated the effect of post-sintering processes on the fracture toughness of different types of monolithic zirconia.

Material and Methods

Classical- (Cz) and high-translucent (Hz) monolithic zirconia discs (1.2 mm thickness, 14 mm in Ø) were prepared, and randomly divided for surface treatments with 1) as-glazed (AG); 2) finished and polished (FP); 3) finished, polished, and overglazed (FPOG); and 4) finished, polished, and heat-treated (FPHT) technique (n=15/group). Fracture toughness (KIC) was determined with indentation fracture toughness method at load 1 kg for AG, FPOG and 10 kg for FP, FPHT with 15 sec dwelling time. Weibull analysis was applied for survival probability, Weibull modulus (m), and characteristic toughness (K0). Microstructures were examined with SEM and XRD. ANOVA and multiple comparisons were determined for significant differences (α=0.05).

Results

The mean±sd value of KIC (MPa.m1/2), m, and K0 were 1.60±0.19, 7.27, 1.71 for CzAG; 9.57±0.89, 9.97, 10.96 for CzFP; 1.61±0.15, 10.56, 1.68 for CzFPOG; 6.45±0.31, 20.31, 6.60 for CzFPHT; 1.45±0.13, 10.91, 1.51 for HzAG; 6.58±0.24, 27.00, 6.70 for HzFP; 1.24±0.05, 23.90, 1.27 for HzFPOG; and 5.07±0.16, 30.51, 5.15 for HzFPHT. The KIC was significantly affected by the post-sintering process, type of zirconia (p<0.05). The Cz indicated a significantly higher KIC than Hz. The FP significantly enhanced KIC, while OG was unable to raise KIC. HT reduced KIC due to reverse phase transformation.

Conclusions

Post-sintering processes caused alteration in fracture resistance of zirconia. Fracture toughness was enhanced with FP, but not with either OG or HT process for both Cz and Hz. Surface treatment of zirconia through a finished-polished process is recommended, while glazing and heat-treated are not suggested.

Key words:Fracture toughness, glazing, heat treatment, polishing, post-sintering process, zirconia.

Clinical wear and quality assessment of monolithic and lithium disilicate layered zirconia restorations

BACKGROUND

Wear and quality assessments of translucent monolithic zirconia and CAD-on^® restorations were performed.

METHODS

Forty 3-unit posterior fixed partial denture (FPD) in 18 patients (age:18-50 years) were made from translucent monolithic zirconia (tm) (Zenostar T) and zirconia-frameworked, lithium disilicate layered (c) (CAD-on), materials in a split-mouth design. Restorations were digitally fabricated and their internal and marginal adaptations were measured before cementation followed by luting (Multilink Speed). Clinical evaluations were made by modified United States Public Health Service criteria at baseline, 6, 12, and 24-months. Wear of the restorations and the antagonists were digitally evaluated after optical scanning of stone casts at 1st week and 24 m through a software (Cerec 4.4). Statistical analysis was made (analysis of variance, Shapiro-Wilk, Friedman and Wilcoxon tests (SPSS 20)) at α = 0.05 significance level.

RESULTS

At 24 m, all restorations were clinically acceptable. Insignificant differences were found between tm and c restorations (P > 0.05). Mean internal and marginal adaptation of c restorations were significantly better (145 µm (premolar)-174 µm (molar)) than tm (190 µm (premolar)-207 µm (molar)) (P < 0.05). C restorations significantly caused more wear (0.3 ± 0.1 mm) than tm (0.1 ± 0.07 mm) on the antagonistic dentition (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Translucent monolithic zirconia restorations caused less wear and antagonist wear than CAD-on restorations. CAD-on restorations exhibited higher internal and marginal adaptation.

Effect of sintering process on microstructure, 4-point flexural strength, and grain size of yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia polycrystal for use in monolithic dental restorations

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

Modifications have been made in the microstructure and sintering parameters of monolithic zirconia to improve esthetics qualities and avoid chipping of 2-layer restorations. However, how these modifications affect the physical and mechanical properties of zirconia is unclear.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the influence of different sintering parameters on the microstructure, 4-point flexural strength, density, and grain size of 2 commercially available zirconia advocated for the fabrication of monolithic dental prostheses and 1 commercially available zirconia for use as a core material.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Three presintered blocks (Ceramill Zolid, Prettau, and IPS e.max ZirCAD) were used. Specimens were cut and sintered as per the manufacturer's recommendation or as per a modified heating protocol. Ceramill Zolid (Z1450) was sintered at 1450 °C, Prettau (P1600) was sintered at 1600 °C, and IPS e.max ZirCAD (I1530) was sintered at 1530 °C by following the manufacturer's heating protocol. Groups Ceramill Zolid Z1530 and Z1600 were sintered at temperatures higher than the manufacturer's recommendation. Specimens from each group (n=13) were analyzed with X-ray diffraction (XRD), density calculus, average grain size measurement, and 4-point flexural tests. Data were compared by using ANOVA (α=.05).

RESULTS

XRD analysis showed the presence of a tetragonal metastable phase in all groups before and after sintering. No significant differences were found in relative density values for the 3 Ceramill groups (5.98 g/cm³). Groups I1530 (6.03 g/cm³) and P1600 (6.03 g/cm³) had similar density results greater than 6.00 g/cm³. The average grain size of all groups remained lower than 1 μm. P1600 had the highest grain size (0.817 μm), and Z1450 presented the lowest grain size (0.465 μm). P1600 showed the most homogeneous flexural strength and the highest Weibull modulus (m=8.22). Z1530 presented the lowest Weibull modulus (m=4.58). IPS e.max ZirCAD (I1530) had the highest flexural strength (1057.41 ±150.54 MPa), and Ceramill Zolid Z1450 had the lowest (621.01 ±138.08 MPa).

CONCLUSIONS

The flexural strength, microstructure, crystal phase, and grain size of the analyzed zirconia varied as per the sintering processing. The IPS e.max ZirCAD had the highest flexural strength (1057.41 ±150.54 MPa), followed by Prettau zirconia (864.18 ±118.21), with a statistically significant difference (P<.05). The Ceramill Zolid zirconia presented the lowest flexural strength, as well as the lowest reliability for all sintering parameters used (Z1450: 621.01 ±138.08 MPa and m=5.42; Z1530: 713.10 ±175.44 MPa and m=4.58; Z1600: 630.15 ±112.08 MPa and m=6.87). At a lower heating rate (8 °C/min), the final density increased and excessive grain growth in group Z1530 was prevented.

Custom-Made Zirconium Dioxide Implants for Craniofacial Bone Reconstruction

Reconstruction of the facial skeleton is challenging for surgeons because of difficulties in proper shape restoration and maintenance of the proper long-term effect. ZrO₂ implant application can be a solution with many advantages (e.g., osseointegration, stability, and radio-opaqueness) and lacks the disadvantages of other biomaterials (e.g., metalosis, radiotransparency, and no osseointegration) or autologous bone (e.g., morbidity, resorption, and low accuracy). We aimed to evaluate the possibility of using ZrO₂ implants as a new application of this material for craniofacial bone defect reconstruction. First, osteoblast (skeleton-related cell) cytotoxicity and genotoxicity were determined in vitro by comparing ZrO₂ implants and alumina particle air-abraded ZrO₂ implants to the following: 1. a titanium alloy (standard material); 2. ultrahigh-molecular-weight polyethylene (a modern material used in orbital surgery); 3. a negative control (minimally cytotoxic or genotoxic agent action); 4. a positive control (maximally cytotoxic or genotoxic agent action). Next, 14 custom in vivo clinical ZrO₂ implants were manufactured for post-traumatologic periorbital region reconstruction. The soft tissue position improvement in photogrammetry was recorded, and clinical follow-up was conducted at least 6 years postoperatively. All the investigated materials revealed no cytotoxicity. Alumina particle air-abraded ZrO2 implants showed genotoxicity compared to those without subjection to air abrasion ZrO₂, which were not genotoxic. The 6-month and 6- to 8-year clinical results were aesthetic and stable. Skeleton reconstructions using osseointegrated, radio-opaque, personalized implants comprising ZrO₂ material are the next option for craniofacial surgery.

Does Diamond Stone Grinding Change the Surface Characteristics and Flexural Strength of Monolithic Zirconia?

PURPOSE

The present study evaluated the effect of grinding on the surface morphology, mean roughness, crystalline phase, flexural strength, and Weibull modulus of monolithic (MZ) and conventional (CZ) zirconias.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

CZ and MZ bars and square-shaped specimens were distributed into three subgroups, combining grinding (G) and irrigation (W) with distilled water: Ctrl (Control: no grinding, 20 × 4 × 1.2 mm and 12 × 1.2 mm), DG (dry grinding, 20 × 4 × 1.5 mm and 12 × 1.5 mm), and WG (grinding with irrigation, 20 × 4 × 1.5 mm and 12 × 1.5 mm). The grinding (0.3 mm) was performed on a standardized device using a low-rotation wheel-shaped diamond stone. The four-point flexural strength test was performed on the EMIC 2000 machine (5 KN, 0.5 mm/min). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was used to evaluate the surface morphology. An X-ray diffractometer (XRD) was used to obtain the crystalline structures that were analyzed by the Rietveld method. Flexural strength (FS) values were subjected to the Shapiro-Wilk test and two-way analysis of variance followed by the Tukey's test (for all tests, α=0.05).

RESULTS

Grinding, either with or without irrigation, did not change the FS of the MZ but increased the FS of the CZ. Both MZ and CZ showed similar morphologic patterns after grinding, and in the WG groups, the grinding was more aggressive. The MZ had greater monoclinic content in all groups; grinding without irrigation caused the smallest t→m transformation.

CONCLUSION

The grinding, when necessary, should be carried out without irrigation for conventional and monolithic zirconias.

Strength and aging resistance of monolithic zirconia: an update to current knowledge

New zirconia compositions with optimized esthetic properties have emerged due to the fast-growing technology in zirconia manufacturing. However, the large variety of commercial products and synthesis routes, make impossible to include all of them under the general term of “monolithic zirconia ceramics”. Ultra- or high translucent monolithic formulations contain 3–8 mol% yttria, which results in materials with completely different structure, optical and mechanical properties. The purpose of this study was to provide an update to the current knowledge concerning monolithic zirconia and to review factors related to strength and aging resistance. Factors such as composition, coloring procedures, sintering method and temperature, may affect both strength and aging resistance to a more or less extend. A significant reduction of mechanical properties has been correlated to high translucent zirconia formualtions while regarding aging resistance, the findings are contradictory, necessitating more and thorough investigation. Despite the obvious advantages of contemporary monolithic zirconia ceramics, further scientific evidence is required that will eventually lead to the appropriate laboratory and clinical guidelines for their use. Until then, a safe suggestion should be to utilize high-strength partially-stabilized zirconia for posterior or long span restorations and fully-stabilized ultra-translucent zirconia for anterior single crowns and short span fixed partial dentures.

Effect of extrinsic pigmentation and surface treatments on biaxial flexure strength after cyclic loading of a translucent ZrO2 ceramic

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the influence of extrinsic pigmentation on the biaxial flexural strength and surface topographic of translucent Y-TZP (InCoris TZI - Sirona - USA) subjected to several surface treatments.

METHODS

Sintered zirconia discs-shaped specimens (n=120) (ø:12mm; thickness:1.2mm; ISO 6872) were prepared and divided (n=15) according to various factors: "extrinsic pigmentation" (n: without; p: with) and "surface treatments" (C: control - as sintered; A: abraded with silica-coated alumina particles (30μm); G: glazed with a thin film of low-fusing porcelain glaze; GH: glazed and etched with 10% hydrofluoridric acid for 60s. Mechanical cycling (1.2×106 cycles, 200N, 3.8Hz) and flexural strength test (1mm/min - 1000kg cell) were performed. Two-way ANOVA and Tukey's were used for statistical test (α=0.05). Weibull analysis was used to evaluate the strength reliability. Samples were analyzed via (1) an optical profilometer to determine the surface roughness (Ra); (2) an X-ray diffraction (XRD) to evaluate phase transformations; and (3) a SEM equipped with an energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) to elucidate morphological properties and chemical compositions.

RESULTS

Regardless of the surface treatment (p=0.5459) (Cn: 560.16MPa; Gn: 573.36MPa; An: 643.51MPa; GHn: 542.94MPa; Cp: 628.04MPa; Gp: 641.90MPa; Ap: 554.47MPa; GHp :602.84MPa) and extrinsic pigmentation (p=0.1280) there was no difference in the flexural strength among the experimental groups. According to the XRD analysis, phase transformations occurred in the An group (t→m) and in Ap group (t→c). Surface roughness was affected by surface treatments (An - p=0.001) and extrinsic pigmentation (Gp - p=0.001).

SIGNIFICANCE

The biaxial flexural strength of the tested samples was not affected neither by surface treatments nor by pigmentation, although it can cause phase transformation and promote surface roughness.

Clinical evaluation of monolithic zirconia crowns for posterior teeth restorations

Although all-ceramic crowns have excellent biocompatibility and esthetic appearance, chipping may occur. The mechanical properties of monolithic zirconia restorative material are superior to those of all-ceramic restorative materials, and chipping caused by chewing hard foods could be avoided. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of monolithic zirconia crowns for posterior teeth restorations.A total of 46 patients requiring posterior teeth restorations involving 49 teeth were treated with monolithic zirconia crown procedure. The treatment results were evaluated according to the modified California Dental Association criteria immediately after the procedure, and at 2, 24, 48, and 96 weeks after the procedure. The plaque index, gingival index, probing depth, crown marginal integrity, and attrition of the abutment teeth, antagonist teeth, corresponding contralateral teeth, and antagonist of the corresponding contralateral teeth were assessed. The patients were followed for up to 96 weeks.The marginal adaptation results of all 46 patients were evaluated as excellent, resulting in an excellent rate of 100%. Regarding the crown color match, only 3 cases (6.1%) were evaluated as acceptable. Marginal adaptation, anatomic form, crown margin integrity, color match, and gross fracture did not show significant differences compared with the different time points (P = .999). Surface texture at different time did not change significantly (P = .807). During the 96-week follow-up, 1 crack in the antagonist teeth was found in 1 patient. There were no significant differences in wear of the antagonist teeth at different time points (P = .972). The rate of "excellent" evaluation for crown restorations was 93.9% to 100%.The monolithic zirconia crown had no detectable adverse effects on the periodontal tissues, and the antagonist teeth attrition was small. Therefore, it has good potential in the clinical application of posterior teeth restorations in the short term.