1
|
Magnetoencephalography: Clinical and Research Practices. Brain Sci 2018; 8:brainsci8080157. [PMID: 30126121 PMCID: PMC6120049 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci8080157] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2018] [Revised: 08/07/2018] [Accepted: 08/11/2018] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Magnetoencephalography (MEG) is a neurophysiological technique that detects the magnetic fields associated with brain activity. Synthetic aperture magnetometry (SAM), a MEG magnetic source imaging technique, can be used to construct both detailed maps of global brain activity as well as virtual electrode signals, which provide information that is similar to invasive electrode recordings. This innovative approach has demonstrated utility in both clinical and research settings. For individuals with epilepsy, MEG provides valuable, nonredundant information. MEG accurately localizes the irritative zone associated with interictal spikes, often detecting epileptiform activity other methods cannot, and may give localizing information when other methods fail. These capabilities potentially greatly increase the population eligible for epilepsy surgery and improve planning for those undergoing surgery. MEG methods can be readily adapted to research settings, allowing noninvasive assessment of whole brain neurophysiological activity, with a theoretical spatial range down to submillimeter voxels, and in both humans and nonhuman primates. The combination of clinical and research activities with MEG offers a unique opportunity to advance translational research from bench to bedside and back.
Collapse
|
2
|
Harmsen IE, Rowland NC, Wennberg RA, Lozano AM. Characterizing the effects of deep brain stimulation with magnetoencephalography: A review. Brain Stimul 2018; 11:481-491. [PMID: 29331287 DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2017.12.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2017] [Revised: 12/26/2017] [Accepted: 12/28/2017] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an important form of neuromodulation that is being applied to patients with motor, mood, or cognitive circuit disorders. Despite the efficacy and widespread use of DBS, the precise mechanisms by which it works remain unknown. Over the last decade, magnetoencephalography (MEG) has become an important functional neuroimaging technique used to study DBS. OBJECTIVE This review summarizes the literature related to the use of MEG to characterize the effects of DBS. METHODS Peer reviewed literature on DBS-MEG was obtained by searching the publicly accessible literature databases available on PubMed. The abstracts of all reports were scanned and publications which combined DBS-MEG in human subjects were selected for review. RESULTS A total of 32 publications met the selection criteria, and included studies which applied DBS for Parkinson's disease, dystonia, chronic pain, phantom limb pain, cluster headache, and epilepsy. DBS-MEG studies provided valuable insights into network connectivity, pathological coupling, and the modulatory effects of DBS. CONCLUSIONS As DBS-MEG research continues to develop, we can expect to gain a better understanding of diverse pathophysiological networks and their response to DBS. This knowledge will improve treatment efficacy, reduce side-effects, reveal optimal surgical targets, and advance the development of closed-loop neuromodulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irene E Harmsen
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Toronto Western Research Institute, Krembil Discovery Tower, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| | - Nathan C Rowland
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Richard A Wennberg
- Mitchell Goldhar Magnetoencephalography Unit, Krembil Neuroscience Centre, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Andres M Lozano
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Toronto Western Research Institute, Krembil Discovery Tower, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Long-Term Results of Deep Brain Stimulation of the Anterior Cingulate Cortex for Neuropathic Pain. World Neurosurg 2017; 106:625-637. [PMID: 28710048 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.06.173] [Citation(s) in RCA: 93] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2017] [Revised: 06/28/2017] [Accepted: 06/30/2017] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) is a recent technique that has shown some promising short-term results in patients with chronic refractory neuropathic pain. Three years after the first case series, we assessed its efficacy on a larger cohort, with longer follow-up. METHODS Twenty-four patients (19 males; average age, 49.1 years) with neuropathic pain underwent bilateral ACC DBS. Patient-reported outcome measures were collected before and after surgery, using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), Short-Form 36 quality of life (SF-36), McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), and EuroQol 5-domain quality of life (EQ-5D) questionnaire. RESULTS Twenty-two patients after a trial week were fully internalized and 12 had a mean follow-up of 38.9 months. Six months after surgery the mean NRS score decreased from 8.0 to 4.27 (P = 0.004). There was a significant improvement in the MPQ (mean, -36%; P = 0.021) and EQ-5D score significantly decreased (mean, -21%; P = 0.036). The physical functioning domain of SF-36 was significantly improved (mean, +54.2%; P = 0.01). Furthermore, in 83% of these patients, at 6 months, NRS score was improved by 60% (P < 0.001) and MPQ decreased by 47% (P < 0.01). After 1 year, NRS score decreased by 43% (P < 0.01), EQ-5D was significantly reduced (mean, -30.8; P = 0.05) and significant improvements were also observed for different domains of the SF-36. At longer follow-ups, efficacy was sustained up to 42 months in some patients, with an NRS score as low as 3. CONCLUSIONS Follow-up results confirm that ACC DBS alleviates chronic neuropathic pain refractory to pharmacotherapy and improves quality of life in many patients.
Collapse
|
4
|
Oswal A, Jha A, Neal S, Reid A, Bradbury D, Aston P, Limousin P, Foltynie T, Zrinzo L, Brown P, Litvak V. Analysis of simultaneous MEG and intracranial LFP recordings during Deep Brain Stimulation: a protocol and experimental validation. J Neurosci Methods 2015; 261:29-46. [PMID: 26698227 PMCID: PMC4758829 DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2015.11.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2015] [Accepted: 11/30/2015] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Setup for MEG and intracranial recordings during Deep Brain Stimulation is described. Phantom experiment showed correct recovery of oscillatory sources despite artefacts. The method is applied to real data from a patient with Parkinson's Disease. Cortico-subthalamic coherence profiles on and off stimulation were comparable.
Background Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) is an effective treatment for several neurological and psychiatric disorders. In order to gain insights into the therapeutic mechanisms of DBS and to advance future therapies a better understanding of the effects of DBS on large-scale brain networks is required. New method In this paper, we describe an experimental protocol and analysis pipeline for simultaneously performing DBS and intracranial local field potential (LFP) recordings at a target brain region during concurrent magnetoencephalography (MEG) measurement. Firstly we describe a phantom setup that allowed us to precisely characterise the MEG artefacts that occurred during DBS at clinical settings. Results Using the phantom recordings we demonstrate that with MEG beamforming it is possible to recover oscillatory activity synchronised to a reference channel, despite the presence of high amplitude artefacts evoked by DBS. Finally, we highlight the applicability of these methods by illustrating in a single patient with Parkinson's disease (PD), that changes in cortical-subthalamic nucleus coupling can be induced by DBS. Comparison with existing approaches To our knowledge this paper provides the first technical description of a recording and analysis pipeline for combining simultaneous cortical recordings using MEG, with intracranial LFP recordings of a target brain nucleus during DBS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashwini Oswal
- Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, 12 Queen Square, London, UK; Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | - Ashwani Jha
- Sobell Department of Motor Neuroscience and Movement Disorders, Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London, UK
| | - Spencer Neal
- Sobell Department of Motor Neuroscience and Movement Disorders, Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London, UK
| | - Alphonso Reid
- Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, 12 Queen Square, London, UK
| | - David Bradbury
- Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, 12 Queen Square, London, UK
| | - Peter Aston
- Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, 12 Queen Square, London, UK
| | - Patricia Limousin
- Sobell Department of Motor Neuroscience and Movement Disorders, Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London, UK
| | - Tom Foltynie
- Sobell Department of Motor Neuroscience and Movement Disorders, Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London, UK
| | - Ludvic Zrinzo
- Sobell Department of Motor Neuroscience and Movement Disorders, Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London, UK
| | - Peter Brown
- Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | - Vladimir Litvak
- Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Alhourani A, McDowell MM, Randazzo MJ, Wozny TA, Kondylis ED, Lipski WJ, Beck S, Karp JF, Ghuman AS, Richardson RM. Network effects of deep brain stimulation. J Neurophysiol 2015; 114:2105-17. [PMID: 26269552 DOI: 10.1152/jn.00275.2015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2015] [Accepted: 08/10/2015] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
The ability to differentially alter specific brain functions via deep brain stimulation (DBS) represents a monumental advance in clinical neuroscience, as well as within medicine as a whole. Despite the efficacy of DBS in the treatment of movement disorders, for which it is often the gold-standard therapy when medical management becomes inadequate, the mechanisms through which DBS in various brain targets produces therapeutic effects is still not well understood. This limited knowledge is a barrier to improving efficacy and reducing side effects in clinical brain stimulation. A field of study related to assessing the network effects of DBS is gradually emerging that promises to reveal aspects of the underlying pathophysiology of various brain disorders and their response to DBS that will be critical to advancing the field. This review summarizes the nascent literature related to network effects of DBS measured by cerebral blood flow and metabolic imaging, functional imaging, and electrophysiology (scalp and intracranial electroencephalography and magnetoencephalography) in order to establish a framework for future studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmad Alhourani
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Michael M McDowell
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Michael J Randazzo
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Thomas A Wozny
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | | | - Witold J Lipski
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Sarah Beck
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Jordan F Karp
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; and
| | - Avniel S Ghuman
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - R Mark Richardson
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Magnetoencephalography and neuromodulation. INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF NEUROBIOLOGY 2012. [PMID: 23206680 DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-404706-8.00007-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/05/2023]
Abstract
Magnetoencephalography (MEG) is a noninvasive method which allows recordings of human brain activity with excellent temporal and good spatial resolution. In this chapter, we review applications of MEG in neuromodulation. We provide an overview of studies which used MEG to optimize parameters for neuromodulation and to characterize the electrophysiological effects of brain stimulation. In particular, we discuss how MEG may be employed to study deep brain stimulation. In this context, we describe the problems arising from stimulation artifacts and present approaches to solve them.
Collapse
|
7
|
Mohseni HR, Smith PP, Parsons CE, Young KS, Hyam JA, Stein A, Stein JF, Green AL, Aziz TZ, Kringelbach ML. MEG can map short and long-term changes in brain activity following deep brain stimulation for chronic pain. PLoS One 2012; 7:e37993. [PMID: 22675503 PMCID: PMC3366994 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0037993] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2012] [Accepted: 05/01/2012] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has been shown to be clinically effective for some forms of treatment-resistant chronic pain, but the precise mechanisms of action are not well understood. Here, we present an analysis of magnetoencephalography (MEG) data from a patient with whole-body chronic pain, in order to investigate changes in neural activity induced by DBS for pain relief over both short- and long-term. This patient is one of the few cases treated using DBS of the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC). We demonstrate that a novel method, null-beamforming, can be used to localise accurately brain activity despite the artefacts caused by the presence of DBS electrodes and stimulus pulses. The accuracy of our source localisation was verified by correlating the predicted DBS electrode positions with their actual positions. Using this beamforming method, we examined changes in whole-brain activity comparing pain relief achieved with deep brain stimulation (DBS ON) and compared with pain experienced with no stimulation (DBS OFF). We found significant changes in activity in pain-related regions including the pre-supplementary motor area, brainstem (periaqueductal gray) and dissociable parts of caudal and rostral ACC. In particular, when the patient reported experiencing pain, there was increased activity in different regions of ACC compared to when he experienced pain relief. We were also able to demonstrate long-term functional brain changes as a result of continuous DBS over one year, leading to specific changes in the activity in dissociable regions of caudal and rostral ACC. These results broaden our understanding of the underlying mechanisms of DBS in the human brain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hamid R. Mohseni
- University Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, School of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
- Center of Functionally Integrative Neuroscience (CFIN), Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Neurosurgery, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom
- Department of Psychiatry, Oxford Centre for Human Brain Activity (OHBA), University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Penny P. Smith
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, School of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Christine E. Parsons
- University Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
- Center of Functionally Integrative Neuroscience (CFIN), Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Psychiatry, Oxford Centre for Human Brain Activity (OHBA), University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Katherine S. Young
- University Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
- Center of Functionally Integrative Neuroscience (CFIN), Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Psychiatry, Oxford Centre for Human Brain Activity (OHBA), University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Jonathan A. Hyam
- Center of Functionally Integrative Neuroscience (CFIN), Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Alan Stein
- University Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - John F. Stein
- Department of Neurosurgery, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Alexander L. Green
- Department of Neurosurgery, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Tipu Z. Aziz
- Department of Neurosurgery, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Morten L. Kringelbach
- University Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
- Center of Functionally Integrative Neuroscience (CFIN), Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Neurosurgery, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom
- Department of Psychiatry, Oxford Centre for Human Brain Activity (OHBA), University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Connolly AT, Bajwa JA, Johnson MD. Cortical magnetoencephalography of deep brain stimulation for the treatment of postural tremor. Brain Stimul 2012; 5:616-24. [PMID: 22425066 DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2011.11.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2011] [Revised: 11/22/2011] [Accepted: 11/23/2011] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
The effects of deep brain stimulation (DBS) on motor cortex circuitry in Essential tremor (ET) and Parkinson's disease (PD) patients are not well understood, in part, because most imaging modalities have difficulty capturing and localizing motor cortex dynamics on the same temporal scale as motor symptom expression. Here, we report on the use of magnetoencephalography (MEG) to characterize sources of postural tremor activity within the brain of an ET/PD patient and the effects of bilateral subthalamic nucleus DBS on these sources. Recordings were performed during unilateral and bilateral DBS at stimulation amplitudes of 0 V, 1 V, and 3 V corresponding to no therapy, subtherapeutic, and therapeutic configurations, respectively. Dipole source localization in reference to the postural tremor frequency recorded with electromyography (EMG) showed prominent sources in both right and left motor cortices when no therapy was provided. These sources dissipated as the amplitude of stimulation increased to a therapeutic level (P = 0.0062). Coherence peaks between the EMG and MEG recordings were seen at both 4 Hz, postural tremor frequency, and at 8 Hz, twice the tremor frequency, with no therapy. Both peaks were reduced with therapeutic DBS. These results demonstrate the capabilities of MEG to record cortical dynamics of tremor during deep brain stimulation and suggest that MEG could be used to examine DBS in the context of motor symptoms of PD and of ET.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Allison T Connolly
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Minnesota, 7-105 NHH, 312 Church Street SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Kringelbach ML, Green AL, Owen SLF, Schweder PM, Aziz TZ. Sing the mind electric - principles of deep brain stimulation. Eur J Neurosci 2011; 32:1070-9. [PMID: 21039946 DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2010.07419.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
The remarkable efficacy of deep brain stimulation (DBS) for a range of treatment-resistant disorders is still not matched by a comparable understanding of the underlying neural mechanisms. Some progress has been made using translational research with a range of neuroscientific techniques, and here we review the most promising emerging principles. On balance, DBS appears to work by restoring normal oscillatory activity between a network of key brain regions. Further research using this causal neuromodulatory tool may provide vital insights into fundamental brain function, as well as guide targets for future treatments. In particular, DBS could have an important role in restoring the balance of the brain's default network and thus repairing the malignant brain states associated with affective disorders, which give rise to serious disabling problems such as anhedonia, the lack of pleasure. At the same time, it is important to proceed with caution and not repeat the errors from the era of psychosurgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Morten L Kringelbach
- University of Oxford, Department of Psychiatry, Warneford Hospital, Oxford OX3 7JX, UK.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Mohseni HR, Kringelbach ML, Probert Smith P, Green AL, Parsons CE, Young KS, Brittain JS, Hyam JA, Schweder PM, Stein JF, Aziz TZ. Application of a null-beamformer to source localisation in MEG data of deep brain stimulation. ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY. IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY. ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE 2010; 2010:4120-4123. [PMID: 21096632 DOI: 10.1109/iembs.2010.5627325] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/30/2023]
Abstract
In this paper, we present an analysis of magnetoencephalography (MEG) signals from a patient with whole-body chronic pain in order to investigate changes in neural activity induced by DBS. The patient is one of the few cases treated using DBS of the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC). Using MEG to reconstruct the neural activity of interest is challenging because of interference to the signal from the DBS device. We demonstrate that a null-beamformer can be used to localise neural activity despite artefacts caused by the presence of DBS electrodes and stimulus pulses. We subsequently verified the accuracy of our source localisation by correlating the predicted DBS electrode positions with their actual positions, previously identified using anatomical imaging. We also demonstrated increased activity in pain-related regions including the pre-supplementary motor area, brainstem periaqueductal gray and medial prefrontal areas when the patient was in pain compared to when the patient experienced pain relief.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hamid R Mohseni
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, School of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Cortico-muscular coherence increases with tremor improvement after deep brain stimulation in Parkinson's disease. Neuroreport 2009; 20:1444-9. [DOI: 10.1097/wnr.0b013e328331a51a] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
12
|
Sillay KA, Sani S, Starr PA. Deep brain stimulation for medically intractable cluster headache. Neurobiol Dis 2009; 38:361-8. [PMID: 19501166 DOI: 10.1016/j.nbd.2009.05.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2009] [Revised: 04/27/2009] [Accepted: 05/25/2009] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Cluster headache is the most severe primary headache disorder known. Ten to 20% of cases are medically intractable. DBS of the posterior hypothalamic area has shown effectiveness for alleviation of cluster headache in many but not all of the 46 reported cases from European centers and the eight cases studied at the University of California, San Francisco. This surgical strategy was based on the finding of increased blood flow in the posterior hypothalamic area on H(2)(15)O PET scanning during spontaneous and nitroglycerin-induced cluster headache attacks. The target point used, 4-5 mm posterior to the mamillothalamic tract, is in the border zone between posterior hypothalamus, anterior periventricular gray matter, and inferior thalamus. Recently, occipital nerve stimulation has shown efficacy, calling in question the use of DBS as a first line surgical therapy. In this report, we review the indications, techniques, and outcomes of DBS for cluster headache.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karl A Sillay
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53792, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Abstract
Deep-brain stimulation (DBS) is a clinical intervention that has provided remarkable therapeutic benefits for otherwise treatment-resistant movement and affective disorders. The resulting direct causal manipulation of both local and distributed brain networks is not only clinically helpful but can also help to provide novel fundamental insights into brain function. In particular, DBS can be used in conjunction with methods such as local field potentials and magnetoencephalography to map the underlying mechanisms of normal and abnormal oscillatory synchronization in the brain. The precise mechanisms of action for DBS remain uncertain but here we present an overview of the clinical efficacy of DBS, its neural mechanisms and potential future applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Morten L Kringelbach
- University of Oxford, Department of Psychiatry, Warneford Hospital, Oxford OX3 7JX, UK and, University of Aarhus, Centre for Functionally Integrative Neuroscience (CFIN), Aarhus University Hospital, Århus Sygehus Nørrebrogade 44 Building 30, 8000 Århus C, Denmark
| | - Sarah LF Owen
- University of Oxford, Department of Physiology, Anatomy & Genetics, Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3PT, UK
| | - Tipu Z Aziz
- University of Oxford, Department of Physiology, Anatomy & Genetics, Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3PT, UK and, John Radcliffe Hospital, Nuffield Department of Surgery, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|