A single nucleotide variant in the FMR1 CGG repeat results in a "Pseudodeletion" and is not associated with the fragile X syndrome phenotype

Mechanisms of Genome Instability in the Fragile X-Related Disorders

The Fragile X-related disorders (FXDs), which include the intellectual disability fragile X syndrome (FXS), are disorders caused by expansion of a CGG-repeat tract in the 5′ UTR of the X-linked FMR1 gene. These disorders are named for FRAXA, the folate-sensitive fragile site that localizes with the CGG-repeat in individuals with FXS. Two pathological FMR1 allele size classes are distinguished. Premutation (PM) alleles have 54–200 repeats and confer the risk of fragile X-associated tremor/ataxia syndrome (FXTAS) and fragile X-associated primary ovarian insufficiency (FXPOI). PM alleles are prone to both somatic and germline expansion, with female PM carriers being at risk of having a child with >200+ repeats. Inheritance of such full mutation (FM) alleles causes FXS. Contractions of PM and FM alleles can also occur. As a result, many carriers are mosaic for different sized alleles, with the clinical presentation depending on the proportions of these alleles in affected tissues. Furthermore, it has become apparent that the chromosomal fragility of FXS individuals reflects an underlying problem that can lead to chromosomal numerical and structural abnormalities. Thus, large numbers of CGG-repeats in the FMR1 gene predisposes individuals to multiple forms of genome instability. This review will discuss our current understanding of these processes.

Recent advances in assays for the fragile X-related disorders

The fragile X-related disorders are a group of three clinical conditions resulting from the instability of a CGG-repeat tract at the 5' end of the FMR1 transcript. Fragile X-associated tremor/ataxia syndrome (FXTAS) and fragile X-associated primary ovarian insufficiency (FXPOI) are disorders seen in carriers of FMR1 alleles with 55-200 repeats. Female carriers of these premutation (PM) alleles are also at risk of having a child who has an FMR1 allele with >200 repeats. Most of these full mutation (FM) alleles are epigenetically silenced resulting in a deficit of the FMR1 gene product, FMRP. This results in fragile X Syndrome (FXS), the most common heritable cause of intellectual disability and autism. The diagnosis and study of these disorders is challenging, in part because the detection of alleles with large repeat numbers has, until recently, been either time-consuming or unreliable. This problem is compounded by the mosaicism for repeat length and/or DNA methylation that is frequently seen in PM and FM carriers. Furthermore, since AGG interruptions in the repeat tract affect the risk that a FM allele will be maternally transmitted, the ability to accurately detect these interruptions in female PM carriers is an additional challenge that must be met. This review will discuss some of the pros and cons of some recently described assays for these disorders, including those that detect FMRP levels directly, as well as emerging technologies that promise to improve the diagnosis of these conditions and to be useful in both basic and translational research settings.

The -413C > G substitution in the promoter of the FMR1 gene is not associated with the fragile X syndrome phenotype

Most common inherited form of intellectual disability, fragile X syndrome is associated to an expansion of greater than 200 CGG repeats in the 5' untranslated region of the FMR1 gene on the X chromosome which causes transcriptional silencing and deficiency of the encoded protein FMRP. Molecular diagnosis is performed through a combination of PCR to identify fewer than 100-150 repeats and of Southern blot analysis to identify longer alleles and the methylation status of the FMR1 promoter. We present a family with one patient with mild mental retardation who showed an atypical profile at Southern analysis due to the -413C > G transversion located in the FMR1 promoter which had been described as possibly associated with mental retardation. We demonstrated this variant in other four family members along three generations, including the maternal grandfather who did not manifest any pathological feature. Though the -413C > G substitution was not found in a large control series, these findings allowed to exclude its role in determining the disease phenotype.

Recommended principles and practices for validating clinical molecular pathology tests

CONTEXT

The use of DNA- and RNA-based tests continues to grow for applications as varied as inherited disease, infectious disease, cancer, identity testing, human leukocyte antigen typing, and pharmacogenetics. Progress is driven in part by the huge growth in knowledge about the molecular basis of disease coupled with advancements in technologic capabilities. In addition to requirements for clinical utility, every molecular test also may have limitations that must be carefully considered before clinical implementation. Analytic and clinical performance characteristics as well as test limitations are established and documented through the process of test validation.

OBJECTIVE

To describe the established principles of test validation, along with relevant regulations in the United States, in order to provide a rational approach to introducing molecular tests into the clinical laboratory.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed review of published literature, published guidelines, and online information from national and international professional organizations.

CONCLUSIONS

These resources and recommendations provide a framework for validating clinical tests.