Diagnostic Accuracy of Ultrasound Guided Percutaneous Pleural Needle Biopsy for Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma

Background/Objectives: Ultrasound (US) has been progressively spreading as the most useful technique for guiding biopsies and fine-needle aspirations that are performed percutaneously. Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) represents the most common malignant pleural tumour. Thoracoscopy represents the gold standard for diagnosis, although conditions hampering such diagnostic approach often coexist. The Objective was to determine whether ultrasound-guided percutaneous needle biopsy (US-PPNB) has a high diagnostic accuracy and represents a safe option for diagnosis of MPM. Methods: US-PPNB of pleural lesions suspected for MPM in patients admitted from January 2021 to June 2023 have been retrospectively analyzed. An 18-gauge semi-automatic spring-loaded biopsy system (Medax Velox 2®) was used by experienced pneumologists. The obtained specimens were histologically evaluated and defined as adequate or non-adequate for diagnosis according to whether the material was considered appropriate or not for immunohistochemistry (IHC) analysis. The primary objective of the study was the diagnostic yield for a tissue diagnosis. Results: US-PPNB was diagnostic of MPM in 15 out of 18 patients (sensitivity: 83.39%; specificity: 100%; PPV: 100%). Three patients with non-adequate US-PPNB underwent thoracoscopy for diagnosis. We found significant differences in terms of mean pleural lesion thickness between patients with adequate and not-adequate biopsy (15.4 mm (SD: 9.19 mm) and 3.77 mm (SD: 0.60 mm), p < 0.0010. In addition, a significant positive correlation has been observed between diagnostic accuracy and FDG-PET avidity value. Conclusions: US-PPNB performed by a pneumologist represents a valid procedure with a high diagnostic yield and accuracy for the diagnosis of MPM, and may be considered as an alternative option in patients who are not suitable for thoracoscopy.

Effectiveness of a new "focused pulse" high-frequency chest wall oscillation in patients with moderate to severe COPD

BACKGROUND

Chest physiotherapy plays a crucial role in the treatment of COPD, although the optimal techniques for airway clearance have not been definitively established. Among the different techniques, high-frequency chest wall oscillation (HFCWO) has gained attention for its potential to create a widespread lung percussion, facilitating the removal of secretions and potentially clearing the peripheral bronchial tree. This study aims to assess the effectiveness of a novel "focused pulse" HFCWO in patients with moderate to severe COPD.

METHODS

Sixty patients were randomized to three groups: a group treated with the PEP technique, a group with "focused pulse "HFCWO" and a group with pharmacological therapy alone (control group). The primary outcomes were changes in respiratory function parameters, changes in dyspnea and quality of life scores as well as daily life activity and health status assessment. The secondary outcomes were the number of exacerbations and the number of practitioner or emergency department (ED) visits after 1, 3, and 6 months.

RESULTS

Sixty patients concluded the study with 20 patients allocated to each group. The two devices improved respiratory function tests, quality of life and health scores and dyspnea compared to the control group. Maximal expiratory pressure and diffusing lung carbon oxide were significantly improved in the focused pulse HFCWO group compared to the PEP group. Only pulse-focused HFCWO showed a statistically significant lower number of exacerbations and visits to ED or practitioner compared to the control group.

CONCLUSIONS

The focused pulse HFCWO technique improves daily life activities and lung function in patients with stable COPD. The device demonstrated significantly greater effectiveness in lowering COPD exacerbations as well as visits to ED or practitioner.

Comorbidities in COPD: Current and Future Treatment Challenges

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a heterogeneous lung condition, primarily characterized by the presence of a limited airflow, due to abnormalities of the airways and/or alveoli, that often coexists with other chronic diseases such as lung cancer, cardiovascular diseases, and metabolic disorders. Comorbidities are known to pose a challenge in the assessment and effective management of COPD and are also acknowledged to have an important health and economic burden. Local and systemic inflammation have been proposed as having a potential role in explaining the association between COPD and these comorbidities. Considering that the number of patients with COPD is expected to rise, understanding the mechanisms linking COPD with its comorbidities may help to identify new targets for therapeutic purposes based on multi-dimensional assessments.

A Bibliometric Analysis of Comorbidity of COPD and Lung Cancer: Research Status and Future Directions

Objective

Although studies on the association between COPD and lung cancer are of great significance, no bibliometric analysis has been conducted in the field of their comorbidity. This bibliometric analysis explores the current situation and frontier trends in the field of COPD and lung cancer comorbidity, and to lay a new direction for subsequent research.

Methods

Articles in the field of COPD and cancer comorbidity were retrieved from Web of Science Core Collections (WoSCC) from 2004 to 2023, and analyzed by VOSviewer, CiteSpace, Biblimatrix and WPS Office.

Results

In total, 3330 publications were included. The USA was the leading country with the most publications and great influence. The University of Groningen was the most productive institution. Edwin Kepner Silverman was the most influential scholar in this field. PLOS One was found to be the most prolific journal. Mechanisms and risk factors were of vital importance in this research field. Environmental pollution and pulmonary fibrosis may be future research prospects.

Conclusion

This bibliometric analysis provided new guidance for the development of the field of COPD and lung cancer comorbidity by visualizing current research hotspots, and predicting possible hot research directions in the future.

Current challenges and perspectives in lung cancer care during COVID-19 waves

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In the era of the SARS-Cov2 pandemic, the multidisciplinary care of patients with lung cancer is the main challenge for clinicians. The depiction of complex networking between SARS-CoV2 and cancer cells is crucial to understanding the downstream signalling pathways leading to more severe clinical behaviour of COVID-19 among lung cancer patients.

RECENT FINDINGS

The immunosuppressive status caused by both blunted immune response and active anticancer treatments (e.g. radiotherapy, chemotherapy) affects also the response to vaccines. Furthermore, the COVID-19 pandemic has significantly influenced early detection, therapeutic management, and clinical research for patients with lung cancer.

SUMMARY

SARS-CoV-2 infection does undoubtedly represent a challenge for care of patients with lung cancer. Since symptoms of infection may overlap with underlying condition, diagnosis must be reached and treatment should start as soon as possible. Although any cancer treatment should be procrastinated as long as infection is not cured, every choice must be pondered on individual basis, according to clinical conditions. Underdiagnosis should be avoided, and both surgical and medical treatment must be tailored to each patient. Therapeutic scenario standardization represents a major challenge for clinicians and researchers.