Ultrasound-Guided Dorsal Penile Nerve Block in Children: An Anatomical-Based Observational Study of a New Anesthesia Technique

Dorsal penile nerve block stands out as one of the commonly employed regional anesthetic techniques in children. Despite the large body of experience, failure rates are still significant. We included 20 children (median (SD) age of 73 (31) months) scheduled for circumcision without general anesthesia and secondary airway manipulation in a consecutive case series. Under ultrasound guidance and utilizing an in-plane needle guidance technique, the dorsal penile nerve block was administered with slight sedation, and spontaneous respiration was maintained in all cases. To investigate the underlying anatomy for dorsal penile nerve blockade, we dissected three cadavers. The primary study endpoint was the success rate of surgical blockade, meaning that the surgical procedure could be performed without additional general anesthesia and invasive airway management. The secondary endpoint was the requirement of analgesics until discharge from the post-anesthesia care unit. The primary endpoint was successfully met in all patients according to our strict definition without additional general anesthesia or airway manipulation. In addition, no child received analgesics until discharge from the recovery room. The anatomical investigation clarified the specific anatomy as baseline knowledge for an ultrasound-guided dorsal penile nerve blockade and enabled successful performance in 20 consecutive children where penile surgery was possible in light sedation without additional airway manipulation.

ADV6209 for Premedication in Pediatric Anesthesia: A Double-Blinded, Randomized Controlled Trial

ADV6209, a new formulation of midazolam with the addition of γ-cyclodextrin for oral use, has recently been licensed as the first pediatric sedative in the European Union. We compared the clinical efficacy of ADV6209 to the standard formulation of midazolam in premedication to reduce anxiety in children before anesthesia induction in a randomized, double-blinded controlled trial. Eighty children (ASA I/II; age: 2–8 years) scheduled for elective surgery were randomized to receive 0.25 mg kg−1 of either conventional midazolam or ADV6209. Assessment tools included the modified Yale Preoperative Anxiety Scale-Short Form (mYPAS-SF) as well as scores for oral acceptance of the premedication and facemask acceptance during inhalational anesthesia induction. Mann–Whitney U and Pearson’s chi-square tests were used for comparisons of outcome parameters. The primary outcome parameter of the study (mYPAS-SF anxiety score 30 min after the drug administration) did not reveal any significant intergroup difference between the ADV6209 group and the conventional midazolam group. Both drugs revealed their efficacy in reducing anxiety and in providing adequate sedation. The premedication dose was accepted by all children in the ADV6209 but rejected by 15% in the conventional midazolam group (p = 0.037). Acceptance of facemask placement was not found to differ significantly. No adverse events related to the study medications were noted. ADV6209 was better orally accepted than the conventional midazolam preparation and proved its efficacy in reducing preoperative anxiety. This clinically interesting preparation may alleviate the premedication process of 2−8 year-old children and obviates off-label drug use.