Robot-assisted pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction: initial experience with the novel avatera system

PURPOSE

This pilot study was designed to interpret the technically specific features of the avatera robotic system and present our initial experience with this novel platform in robot-assisted pyeloplasty (RAP).

METHODS

A single-center prospective study was conducted including all patients who underwent RAP with the avatera robotic system from June 2022 to October 2022 in our Department. Transperitoneal robot-assisted dismembered pyeloplasty was performed in all cases. The trocar placement and the surgical technique were similar in all patients. The successful completion of the procedures, operation time (including draping, docking and console time), decrease in hemoglobin postoperatively, and presence of any complications were the study's primary endpoints.

RESULTS

In total, nine patients underwent RAP using the avatera system. All procedures were successfully completed. The draping of the robotic unit was completed in a median time of 10 min (range 7-15), while the median docking time was 17 min (range 10-24). The median console time was 88 min (range 78-116) and no complications were noticed. The median hemoglobin drop was calculated to 0.7 g/dL (range 0.4-1). During the mean follow-up of 9.33 ± 2.78 months, no late postoperative complications were noticed.

CONCLUSION

The early outcomes of the use of the novel avatera system in RAP are presented. All operations were successfully completed with safety and efficacy, without complications or significant blood loss.

Single-Port Mini-Pfannenstiel Robotic Pyeloplasty: Establishing a Non-Narcotic Pathway Along with A Same-Day Discharge Protocol

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the feasibility of a same day discharge protocol following SP robotic pyeloplasty.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From a single institution series, 23 patients (12 multi-port (MP), 11 single-port (SP)) who underwent primary robotic dismembered pyeloplasty between February 2018 and March 2021 were analyzed. The association between baseline and perioperative characteristics with functional outcome was analyzed using, chi-square, Fisher's exact, Mann Whitney U and t-tests.

RESULTS

All SP cases were completed using the mini Pfannenstiel incision without the need for conversion or additional ports. Baseline characteristics were comparable. No intraoperative complications were seen. Only one patient in the SP group had a Clavien II complication. All patients in the MP group had a drain placed, whereas drain was not placed in the SP group. Length of stay was shorter in the SP group (11.4 vs. 42.6 hours, p<0.001). Although visual analog pain score was comparable at discharge (p=0.633), the SP group had lower opioid usage (morphine milligram equivalent) in the hospital (p<0.001) and a lower rate of opioid prescription during discharge (18.2% vs. 91.7% p<0.001). At a median follow-up of 8 months, no patients had flank pain and all patients had good kidney drainage on follow-up images.

CONCLUSIONS

Single-port robotic dismembered pyeloplasty through a mini-Pfannenstiel access allows a same-day discharge protocol with minimal opiate use.

Functional outcomes after robot-assisted pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction: A bi-centre experience

BACKGROUND

Robot-assisted pyeloplasty (RALP) for patients with clinically symptomatic ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) is increasing and needs assessment.

METHODS

Patients who underwent RALP for UPJO in two academic centres were included. Demographic and perioperative data were collected retrospectively. UPJO was evaluated by imaging pre- and post-surgery. Patients had follow-up consultations 3,6 and 12 months post-surgery. Global success was defined as a clinical response plus radiographic evidence of no further obstruction 3-months post-surgery.

RESULTS

Overall 214 patients (median age: 40 years [interquartile range:30.3-54.0]) were included. Fourteen patients (6.5%) had undergone previous surgery for UPJO. Thirty patients (14%) suffered complication: urinoma (n = 13; 6.1%), pyelonephritis (n = 15; 7%) and retroperitoneal haematomas (n = 2; 0.9%). Repeated early surgery was necessary in eight patients (3.6%). Seven patients had a recurrence of UPJO and six (2.9%) underwent repeated surgery. Radiological success rate was 96.7% whereas global success rate was 91%.

CONCLUSIONS

RALP was a reliable, effective and safe treatment for UPJO with a high global and radiologic success rate.

Robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty as management for recurrent ureteropelvic junction obstruction: a comparison study with primary pyeloplasty

Background

To analyze the perioperative parameters and outcomes of robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (RALP) for recurrent ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) and compare them with our series of RALP for primary UPJO. Secondary pyeloplasty can be a challenging procedure because of ureteral devascularization, fibrosis and dense stricture formation. Robotic approach could be adjunct to these repairs.

Methods

Between August 2015 to March 2019, 96 patients in our hospital underwent RALP, with 32 patients as secondary intervention for recurrent UPJO. We compared the perioperative parameters of RALP for both primary UPJO and recurrent UPJO. Patient demographics, perioperative parameters, postoperative outcomes and complications from both groups were analyzed and compared.

Results

RALP was successfully performed for all cases in both groups. The median operating time was longer for secondary RALP than for primary RALP [125 (108.5–155) vs. 151 (120–190) minutes, P=0.004]. There were no conversions to open surgery or significant perioperative complications. No difference in blood loss, transfusion rate and perioperative complication rates was noted between the two groups. The success rates were 98.44% (63/64) and 96.88% (31/32) at a median follow up of 32 and 20 months (P=0.001) for the primary and secondary groups, respectively.

Conclusions

Secondary RALP is associated with significantly longer operative time as compared to primary RALP, especially during the exposure of the UPJO, however it is a safe surgical modality for recurrent UPJO with durable outcome. RALP should be an alternative treatment modality for recurrent UPJO whenever the facility and expert are available.

Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (RALP) in children with complex pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction (PUJO): results of a multicenter European report

PURPOSE

This study aimed to report a multi-institutional retrospective case series of outcomes after robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (RALP) in pediatric patients with complex pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction (PUJO).

METHODS

All patients undergoing complex RALP over the last 5 years were included. RALP was defined complex in the following cases of PUJO: anatomic variations including ectopic, malrotated, horseshoe, or duplex kidney and recurrent PUJO after failed open pyeloplasty.

RESULTS

Forty-eight patients underwent complex RALP in four European centers in the study period and included 18 girls and 30 boys with a median age of 8 years (range 5-12). The PUJO was associated with anatomic variations in 35/48 (72.9%), whereas a recurrent PUJO was present in 13/48 (27.1%). A dismembered Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty was performed in all patients. The median operative time including docking was 178.5 min (range 117-255) and the median anastomotic time was 64.8 min (range 50-76). All patients were discharged on 2nd postoperative day (POD). The median follow-up was 18.2 months (range 14-43). The overall success rate was 95.8% (46/48). Early postoperative complications (< 30th POD) included urinary tract infections (UTIs) and stent-related irritative symptoms in 4/48 (8.3%) [II Clavien], whereas late complications (> 30th POD) included recurrence of PUJO in 2/48 (4.2%), who needed re-operation [IIIb Clavien].

CONCLUSIONS

RALP was safe, feasible, and with good mid-term outcome in complex PUJO. An accurate pre-operative planning, a standardized technique, and an experienced surgical robotic team represented key points to manage successfully such complex cases.

Does the body weight influence the outcome in children treated with robotic pyeloplasty?

INTRODUCTION

To investigate the influence of the body weight on peri- and postoperative outcome in a series of pediatric patients with a diagnosis of uretero-pelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) treated with robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (RALP) at a single tertiary referral center.

OBJECTIVE

In this study, outcomes of RALP in children divided according to the weight are evaluated.

STUDY DESIGN

Sixty-one consecutive patients treated with RALP from January 2016 to May 2019 were recorded retrospectively and divided according to their weight: group A < 15 kg, group B ≥ 15 kg and were included in this study. Eligible criteria for surgery were symptomatic UPJO, worsening of hydronephrosis, or obstructive pattern at renogram. Success criteria were the reduction of the hydronephrosis at imaging and the absence of flank pain. All procedures were performed by one expert robotic surgeon.

RESULTS

18 patients were included in group A (median weight 12 kg) and 43 patients in group B (median weight 33 kg). The median (IQR) operative was 95 (90-120) for group A compared to 90 (85-110) of control group. No significant difference has been found (P = 0.93). We registered one (5.6%) Clavien 3b complication (omental hernia after removal of the drainage requiring surgical correction) and two (4.7%) Clavien 2 complication in group B (urinary infections). No difference has been found in the length of hospital stay, length of catheterization, and duration of procedure between the groups (P > 0.05). At a median follow-up of 23 months (IQR 9-27 vs 9-33), the success rate was comparable between the two groups (94.4% vs 97.7%; P = 0.51). Relapse was recorded in one child per group and both required nephrostomy placement.

DISCUSSION

Our study tried to fill the gaps in the evidence on the feasibility of RALP in low-weight children reporting favorable peri-operative and long-term outcomes; however, this study shows some intrinsic limitations. The relatively small numbers of patients in the <15 kg may have underpowered the comparison with heavier patients. Moreover, only two patients were <10 kg so that no definitive conclusions on the safety and feasibility of RALP in this cohort of patients can be drawn.

CONCLUSION

RALP in children <15 kg was feasible and effective to treat UPJO with superimposable results to heavier counterparts. In our experience, the need for a different trocar placement and limited space in patients <15 kg did not affect peri-operative and functional outcomes.

Robotic correction of iatrogenic ureteral stricture: preliminary experience from a tertiary referral centre

Objective: Iatrogenic stenosis is a relatively common complication and it could happen after urological procedures in the entire course of the ureter. The aim of this study is to report the surgical outcomes of 36 consecutive patients (period April 2013-November 2018) submitted to robot-assisted correction of benign stricture with previous urological surgery in a tertiary referral center.Methods: Elective criteria were to have had a benign ureteral stricture development after at least one urological procedure. Patients were classified as failures in the event of post-operative ultrasound demonstrating persistent hydronephrosis with or without symptoms or persistent symptoms with renal scan evidence of obstruction or redo procedures.Results: Eighteen patients (50%) were treated for calculosis, seven (19.4%) patients were submitted to double J ureteral stenting and previous pyeloplasty was performed in 11 (30.5%) patients. Overall median operative time was 160 min (IQR = 120-180). Five (13.8%) complications with three (8.3%) surgical post-operative complications occurred. Length of stay was 6 (IQR = 5-7) days. At last follow-up, ranging between 7-60 months, the overall success rate was 86.1% (31/36): three of them (8.3%) were submitted to retrograde holmium laser endopyelotomy, while two (5.5%) underwent a redo robot-assisted correction.Conclusions: Robot-assisted correction procedures can be done safely with good perioperative outcomes and a high post-operative success rate in a tertiary referral center. Further randomized clinical trials are mandatory to confirm the safety of this procedure.