Circulating tumor cells as prognostic biological marker in different stages prostate cancer and the effect of different therapeutic approaches on their expression

Molecular biomarkers in the context of focal therapy for prostate cancer: recommendations of a Delphi Consensus from the Focal Therapy Society

BACKGROUND

Focal therapy (FT) for prostate cancer (PCa) is promising. However, long-term oncological results are awaited and there is no consensus on follow-up strategies. Molecular biomarkers (MB) may be useful in selecting, treating and following up men undergoing FT, though there is limited evidence in this field to guide practice. We aimed to conduct a consensus meeting, endorsed by the Focal Therapy Society, amongst a large group of experts, to understand the potential utility of MB in FT for localized PCa.

METHODS

A 38-item questionnaire was built following a literature search. The authors then performed three rounds of a Delphi Consensus using DelphiManager, using the GRADE grid scoring system, followed by a face-to-face expert meeting. Three areas of interest were identified and covered concerning MB for FT, 1) the current/present role; 2) the potential/future role; 3) the recommended features for future studies. Consensus was defined using a 70% agreement threshold.

RESULTS

Of 95 invited experts, 42 (44.2%) completed the three Delphi rounds. Twenty-four items reached a consensus and they were then approved at the meeting involving (N.=15) experts. Fourteen items reached a consensus on uncertainty, or they did not reach a consensus. They were re-discussed, resulting in a consensus (N.=3), a consensus on a partial agreement (N.=1), and a consensus on uncertainty (N.=10). A final list of statements were derived from the approved and discussed items, with the addition of three generated statements, to provide guidance regarding MB in the context of FT for localized PCa. Research efforts in this field should be considered a priority.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study detailed an initial consensus on the use of MB in FT for PCa. This is until evidence becomes available on the subject.

miR-2392 functions as tumour suppressor and inhibits malignant progression of hepatocellular carcinoma via directly targeting JAG2

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Dysregulation of microRNA (miRNA) expression in various cancers and their vital roles in malignant progression of cancers are well investigated. Our previous studies have analysed miRNAs that promote malignant progression in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC); this study aims to systematically elucidate the mechanism of metastasis suppressor miRNAs in HCC.

METHODS

High-throughput RNA sequencing was used to identify anti-metastatic miRNAs. The relative expression levels of miRNAs were confirmed by qRT-PCR. The biological functions of miRNAs were detected in vitro and in vivo. Circulating tumour cells (CTCs) were enriched from blood samples of HCC patients and cultured by three-dimensional (3D) system. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression were used to analyse the value of potential target mRNAs on overall survival.

RESULTS

miR-2392 was significantly down-regulated in HCC. Overexpression of miR-2392 suppressed proliferation, clonogenicity, mobility, spheroid formation and maintenance of cancer stem cells (CSC)-like characteristics in HCC cells. CTCs from HCC patients with lower serum miR-2392 level had stronger cell spheroid formation ability. A negative correlation between the content of miR-2392 in serum and the number of CTC spheroids had been found. We identified Jagged2 (JAG2) as a direct target of miR-2392. miR-2392 inhibited the expression of JAG2 by targeting 3'-UTR of JAG2. Down-regulation of JAG2 inhibited the overexpression effects of miR-2392 in vitro and in vivo. JAG2 is highly expressed in HCC and is closely related to poor prognosis and survival of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

miR-2392 may play a role as a tumour suppressor to guide the individualized precise treatment of HCC.

Predictive Value of Circulating Tumor Cells Detected by ISET® in Patients with Non-Metastatic Prostate Cancer Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy

There is an unmet need for reliable biomarkers to predict prostate cancer recurrence after prostatectomy in order to better guide the choice of surgical treatment. We have evaluated the predictive value of the preoperative detection of Circulating Tumor Cells (CTC) for prostate cancer recurrence after surgery. A cohort of 108 patients with non-metastatic prostate adenocarcinoma undergoing radical prostatectomy was tested for the presence of CTC before prostatectomy using ISET®. Disease recurrence was assessed by the increase in serum PSA level after prostatectomy. The following factors were assessed for statistical association with prostate cancer recurrence: the presence of CTC, serum PSA, Gleason score, and pT stage using univariate and multivariate analyses, with a mean follow-up of 34.9 months. Prostate cancer recurrence was significantly associated with the presence of at least 1 CTC at the preoperative time point (p < 0.001; Predictive value = 0.83). Conversely, the absence of prostate cancer recurrence was significantly associated with the lack of CTC detection at diagnosis (Predictive value = 1). Our multivariate analysis shows that only CTC presence is an independent risk factor associated with prostate cancer recurrence after prostatectomy (p < 0.001). Our results suggest that CTC detection by ISET® before surgery is an interesting candidate predictive marker for cancer recurrence in patients with non-metastatic PCa.

Transperineal Parallel Biopsy of the Prostate: A New Approach of Tissue Sampling for Precision Medicine

Purpose

Through an observational study to present a new approach for obtaining high-quality samples for the targeted therapy of prostate cancer.

Patients and Methods

Parallel biopsy, which was defined as collecting the tissue from the same site by two biopsies, was performed on patients with elevated PSA. Each tissue was stained by ink to identify the pathological characteristics, including Gleason score and tumor tissue ratio. Kendall tau-b test and intraclass correlation coefficient test were used to compare the consistency between each paired sample. Then, based on the pathology of the biopsies, high-quality tissues would be selected for sequencing, and PyClone model was used to track the clonal evolution.

Results

In total, 252 pairs of biopsies were collected. The consistency of Gleason score between each paired biopsy is 0.777 (p<0.01), and the consistency of tumor tissue ratio is 0.853 (p<0.01). With the application of parallel biopsy, on average five nonsynonymous mutations could be identified in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer. Six out of eight had at least one biology-relevant alteration in patients, guiding further treatment. Meanwhile, clonal evolution was constructed to investigate the progress of tumor.

Conclusion

Parallel biopsy is a reliable approach to collect high-quality tissue and shows potential application in precision medicine.

Prognostic role of platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in patients with metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer treated with Abiraterone or Enzalutamide

BACKGROUND

Platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) are markers of systemic inflammation associated with poor outcome in several solid tumours. We retrospectively investigated the prognostic role of PLR and, secondly, NLR in mCRPC patients treated with Abiraterone Acetate (AA) or Enzalutamide (E), both in pre- and post-docetaxel setting.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

225 mCRPC patients treated with AA or E with basal blood count were divided in three groups according to PLR (PLR1 <128; PLR2 128-190; PLR >190) and in two groups according to NLR (<3 vs ≥3). Outcome measures were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall-survival (OS). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed.

RESULTS

110 patients were in PLR1, 58 in PLR2 and 57 in PLR3. Median OS was 22.0, 20.6 and 21.2 months in PLR1, PLR2 and PLR3 (PLR2 vs PLR1: HR 0.97, 95%CI 0.62-1.52, p=0.90; PLR3 vs PLR1: HR 1.37, 95%CI 0.90-2.08, p=0.14). Median PFS was 9.2, 12.7 and 8.5 months in PLR1, PLR2 and PLR3 (PLR2 vs PLR1: HR 0.87, 95%CI 0.59-1.27, p=0.47; PLR3 vs PLR1: HR 1.15, 95%CI 0.80-1.66, p=0.45). 142 patients were in NLR<3 and 83 in NLR≥3. Median OS was 26.5 months in NLR<3 and 17.0 months in NLR≥3 (HR 1.75, 95%CI 1.22-2.51, p=0.02). Median PFS was 10.1 months in NLR<3 and 7.6 months in NLR≥3 (HR 1.37, 95%CI 1.00-1.88, p=0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

In this retrospective analysis of mCRPC patients treated with AA or E we did not identify a prognostic role of baseline PLR, while we found a significant prognostic role of baseline NLR.