Detrusor overactivity and underactivity: implication for lower urinary tract symptoms related to benign prostate hyperplasia diagnosis and treatment

Green Light laser enucleation of the prostate with early apical release is safe and effective: single center experience and revision of the literature

BACKGROUND

Green Light laser enucleation of the prostate (GreenLEP) is an endoscopic treatment to treat bladder outlet obstruction in men with large prostate (>100 cc). Herein, we describe our GreenLEP series and describe its safety and efficacy.

METHODS

Between February 2014 and April 2019, 120 patients from a single center underwent en-bloc GreenLEP with early apical release. All procedures were performed with the AMS XPS laser generator (set: 120 W for vaporization and 20 W for coagulation). Morcellation was carried out with the Wolf Piranha morcellator. Data concerning the pre-, intra- and postoperative outcomes were prospectively collected. The follow-up data at 6, 12 months and at the last control were collected.

RESULTS

The median age was 66.0 (IQR: 61.0-71.0) years; 37.5% of the patients were under antiplatelet/anticoagulant therapy, 15.0% had indwelling catheter history. The median prostate volume and the baseline PSA value were 98.5ml (IQR 83.0-130.0) and 4.2ng/ml (IQR: 3.2-6.8), respectively. The median operative and lasing time were 65.0 (IQR: 51.0-83.5) and 6.0 (IQR: 6.0-10.0) minutes, respectively. In the post-operative period 1 patient was transfused. The median follow-up was 18.0 (IQR: 12.0-39.5) months. All patients had significant improvement in terms of improvement of uroflowmetry [median from 9ml/sec (IQR 7.8, 11.0) to 20.0 (IQR 18.0, 22.0), p <0.001] and symptoms control [IPSS median score from 26.0ml/sec (IQR 22.0, 28.0) to 7.0 (IQR 6.0, 8.0), p <0.001]) over time. After 12 months 1 patient complained of stress incontinence (1 pad/day) and 1 of "de novo" wet urgency.

CONCLUSIONS

En-bloc GreenLEP with early apical release is a safe and effective procedure even for large volume prostates. It allows us to limit the use of laser energy and shorten the operating times with stable and satisfactory long-term outcomes.

En-Bloc Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate with Early Apical Release: Are We Ready for a New Paradigm?

Background: Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) is considered a safe and effective treatment in case of bladder outlet obstruction (BOO). Despite technical execution has evolved over time, from the standard three-lobes to the more recent en-bloc approaches, data comparing these two techniques are missing. The aim of the present study was to describe our en-bloc HoLEP with early apical release technique and compare peri- and postoperative results with the classical three-lobe approach in a single referral center. Materials and Methods: We prospectively analyzed all consecutive cases between 2017 and 2019 divided according to the type of approach. Patients were preoperatively studied through instrumental assessment and clinical evaluation, using validated questionnaires and then postoperatively at specific time frames. Linear regression analysis was performed to evaluate possible predictor of continuous variables. All the procedures were carried out by one single expert surgeon. Results: Overall, 168 patients were included, of which 81 were treated with classical three-lobes and 87 with en-bloc with early apical release technique. The two cohorts were comparable related to preoperative features and postoperative complication rate. Mean enucleation time (ET), lasing time, amount of energy delivered, and overall operative time were significantly lower in en-bloc procedures (p < 0.05). Stepwise multivariable linear regression showed that en-bloc strategy can significantly predict shorter ET and lower energy delivered. Stress incontinence rate at 1-month follow-up was found to be significantly reduced in the en-bloc group, compared with the counterpart. Conclusions: Both techniques are effective and safe treatment options for BOO, since peri- and postoperative surgical and functional outcomes were favorable. En-bloc strategy may significantly decrease ET and the amount of energy delivered leading to a reduced early stress incontinence rate compared with the standard approach.

The urothelium, the urinary microbioma and men LUTS: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

The pathophysiology and management of male patients with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) is still a matter of debate. In the past few years, the urothelium and the urinary microbiota represented important areas of research to improve the understanding and management of these patients. Aim of the present review was to summarize the available data on the urothelium and the microbiota related to male LUTS.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) PubMed search for relevant articles published between January 2000 and December 2019 was performed using the medical subjects heading "urothelium," "microbioma," "microbiota," "urobioma," "urobiota," "benign prostatic hyperplasia," "benign prostatic enlargement," "lower urinary tract symptoms," "lower urinary tract dysfunction," "men," "male," "overactive bladder," "receptors." Exclusion criteria included: animal studies and studies on muscarinic and adrenergic pathways.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

The urothelium has been recently evaluated in humans to evaluate new possible markers and pathways. New possible targets for the treatment of male LUTS include the neural growth factor, the cannabinoid, the vanilloid and the ATP pathways. However, studies in humans are still needed to elucidate the exact role of these pathways in the management of male patients with LUTS. The available evidence on the urinary microbioma in male is poor. Standing to the available, urinary microbioma is evident in healthy urine in males. Moreover, the urinary microbioma varies depending on the method of collection, sexually transmitted disease status, inflammation and urinary symptoms. A possible role of probiotics in the management of LUTS in women has been proposed and may have a role in male patients as well.

CONCLUSIONS

The urothelium and the urinary microbiota are still poorly studied in men with LUTS. Most of the evidence and the hypothesis on the relationship between urothelium/urinary microbiota and LUTS comes from animal/in-vitro evidence while clinical trials are lacking. These pathways seem interesting even in LUTS pathogenesis in men but their possible role as a new therapeutic target is still an open debate.