Bowel suture technique for bladder neck reconstruction during RALP and its impact on early continence recovery

Precise Prediction of Long-Term Urinary Incontinence after Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy by Readily Accessible "Everyday" Diagnostics during Post-Surgical Hospitalization

Aim and Objectives: We aimed to test the predictive value of readily accessible and easily performed post-surgical "bedside tests" on their validity of long-term urinary incontinence (UI) (≥12 months) in patients following robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP). Material and Methods: Patients undergoing RALP between July 2020 and March 2021 were prospectively included and subdivided into two groups based on their pad usage after 12 months (0 vs. ≥1 pad). After catheter removal, patients performed a 1 h pad test, documented the need for pad change in a micturition protocol and received post-voiding residual urine volume ultrasound. Univariate and multivariable analyses were used to demonstrate the predictive value of easily accessible tests applied after catheter removal for UI following RALP. Results: Of 109 patients, 47 (43%) had to use at least one pad (vs. 62 (57%) zero pads) after 12 months. Univariate testing showed a significant difference in urine loss between both groups evaluated by the 1 h pad test performed within 24 h after catheter removal (70% < 10 mL, vs. 30% ≥ 10 mL, p = 0.004) and in the need for pad change within the first 24 h after catheter removal (14% dry pads vs. 86% wet pads, p = 0.003). In multivariable analyses, the combination of both tests (synoptical incontinence score) could be confirmed as an independent predictor for UI after 12 months (p = 0.011). Conclusions: Readily accessible "everyday" diagnostics (pad test/change of pads after catheter removal) following RALP seem to be associated with a higher rate of long-term UI. This finding is crucial since patients with a potentially higher need for patient education and counselling can be identified using these readily accessible tests. This could lead to a higher patient satisfaction and improved outcomes.

Correlation of Urine Loss after Catheter Removal and Early Continence in Men Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy

BACKGROUND

To determine the correlation between urine loss in PAD-test after catheter removal, and early urinary continence (UC) in RP treated patients.

METHODS

Urine loss was measured by using a standardized, validated PAD-test within 24 h after removal of the transurethral catheter, and was grouped as a loss of <1, 1-10, 11-50, and >50 g of urine, respectively. Early UC (median: 3 months) was defined as the usage of no or one safety-pad. Uni- and multivariable logistic regression models tested the correlation between PAD-test results and early UC. Covariates consisted of age, BMI, nerve-sparing approach, prostate volume, and extraprostatic extension of tumor.

RESULTS

From 01/2018 to 03/2021, 100 patients undergoing RP with data available for a PAD-test and early UC were retrospectively identified. Ultimately, 24%, 47%, 15%, and 14% of patients had a loss of urine <1 g, 1-10 g, 11-50 g, and >50 g in PAD-test, respectively. Additionally, 59% of patients reported to be continent. In multivariable logistic regression models, urine loss in PAD-test predicted early UC (OR: 0.21 vs. 0.09 vs. 0.03; for urine loss 1-10 g vs. 11-50 g vs. >50 g, Ref: <1 g; all p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Urine loss after catheter removal strongly correlated with early continence as well as a severity in urinary incontinence.

Systematic review comparing Anterior vs Retzius-sparing robotic assisted radical prostatectomy: can the approach really make a difference?

INTRODUCTION

Retzius-Sparing Robotic Assisted Radical Prostatectomy (RS-RARP) is a novel surgical approach to radical prostatectomy. Its pioneers have suggested an improved recovery of urinary continence, while maintaining adequate cancer control. Aim of this systematic review is to explore available data on RS-RALP and compare functional, oncologic and perioperative results of RS-RARP compared to anterior RARP.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A search following PRISMA guidelines was performed including the combination of the following words: retzius AND sparing AND radical AND prostatectomy. 93 articles were identified and 13 were included in the systematic review, including 3 randomized controlled trials (RCT), 4 prospective studies and 6 retrospective studies.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

All available randomized trials confirmed an improved immediate continence for RS-RARP, with rates ranging 51-71%, compared to 21-48% for anterior RARP. However, this advantage was progressively lost with no significant difference found after 6 months. Moreover, a prospective study found no discrepancy in terms of quality of life across the two techniques. Erectile function was difficult to compare, as patients had different baseline erectile function across studies and rate of neurovascular preservation was not comparable. Surgical approach remains controversial regarding positive margin rate, although related to the surgeon's experience and clinical stage. Biochemical recurrence-free survival appears similar between the two approaches.

CONCLUSIONS

RS-RARP improves early urinary continence recovery compared to anterior RARP, with this advantage being lost after 3 to 6 months. Erectile function and quality of life were however comparable between the two techniques. The results concerning the rate of positive margins remained controversial. Future studies with longer follow-up are needed to better assess oncologic outcomes.

Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy versus standard laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: an evidence-based analysis of comparative outcomes

PURPOSE

To provide a systematic analysis of the comparative outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) versus laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) in the treatment of prostate cancer based on the best currently available evidence.

METHODS

An independent systematic review of the literature was performed up to February 2021, using MEDLINE^®, EMBASE^®, and Web of Science^® databases. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis (PRISMA) recommendations were followed to design search strategies, selection criteria, and evidence reports. The quality of the included studies was determined using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for non-randomized controlled trials. Demographics and clinical characteristics, surgical, pathological, and functional outcomes were collected.

RESULTS

Twenty-six studies were identified. Only 16 "high-quality" (RCTs and Newcastle-Ottawa scale 8-9) studies were included in the meta-analysis. Among the 13,752 patients included, 6135 (44.6%) and 7617 (55.4%) were RARP and LRP, respectively. There was no difference between groups in terms of demographics and clinical characteristics. Overall and major complication (Clavien-Dindo ≥ III) rates were similar in LRP than RARP group. The biochemical recurrence (BCR) rate at 12months was significantly lower for RARP (OR: 0.52; 95% CI 0.43-0.63; p < 0.00001). RARP reported lower urinary incontinence rate at 12months (OR: 0.38; 95% CI 0.18-0.8; p = 0.01). The erectile function recovery rate at 12months was higher for RARP (OR: 2.16; 95% CI 1.23-3.78; p = 0.007).

CONCLUSION

Current evidence shows that RARP offers favorable outcomes compared with LRP, including higher potency and continence rates, and less likelihood of BCR. An assessment of longer-term outcomes is lacking, and higher cost remains a concern of robotic versus laparoscopic prostate cancer surgery.