1
|
Tokas T, Mavridis C, Bouchalakis A, Nakou CM, Mamoulakis C. Learning Curves in Robotic Urological Oncological Surgery: Has Anything Changed During the Last Five Years? Cancers (Basel) 2025; 17:1334. [PMID: 40282510 PMCID: PMC12026137 DOI: 10.3390/cancers17081334] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2025] [Revised: 04/06/2025] [Accepted: 04/10/2025] [Indexed: 04/29/2025] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite numerous studies assessing LCs in urological surgical oncology, high-quality evidence and a fully structured curriculum are missing. We aimed to systematically search and review the available literature on the LCs of robot-assisted surgery in urological cancers. METHODS Medline was systematically searched up to December 2024 to retrieve studies following the Preferred Reporting Items reporting on LC in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP), robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC), robot-assisted radical and partial nephrectomy (RARN, RAPN), and robot-assisted radical nephroureterectomy (RANU). The results of the last five years were then compared to those of the previous years. RESULTS In total, 82 studies were identified, 47 of which were for prostatectomy, 9 of which were for the last 5 years. Eighteen studies referred to partial-nephrectomy, seven over the previous 5 years. Finally, 16 studies referred to radical cystectomy, 7 over the previous five years. For radical prostatectomy, LC was based on operative time (OT), estimated blood loss (EBL), length of hospital stays, complication rate, positive surgical margin (PSM), biochemical recurrence (BCR), continence, and potency with ranges of 100-400, 90-290, 200, 15-250, 50-300, 30-250, 200-500 and 200-300 cases, respectively. For partial nephrectomy, the LC was based on OT, EBL, length of hospital stay, complication rate, warm ischemia time (WIT), and trifecta, with unclear ranges for the first three categories and 20-50, 26-140, and 50-77 cases, respectively, for the rest. Finally, for radical cystectomy, the LC was based on OT, EBL, length of hospital stay, complication rate, PSM, and lymph node yield, with ranges 20-75, 88, 40-198, 16-100, no difference, and 30-50 cases, respectively. We could not identify any study assessing the LCs in RARN and RANU. CONCLUSIONS Robot-assisted surgery does not have a standard definition of LC regardless of the type of operation, which causes heterogeneity between the studies. Nevertheless, LCs appear to be steep and continuous. Training curriculums are essential to optimize outcomes and prepare new surgeons.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Theodoros Tokas
- Department of Urology, University General Hospital of Heraklion, University of Crete, Medical School, 71500 Heraklion, Greece; (C.M.); (A.B.); (C.M.N.); (C.M.)
- Training and Research in Urological Surgery and Technology (T.R.U.S.T.)-Group, 6060 Hall in Tirol, Austria
| | - Charalampos Mavridis
- Department of Urology, University General Hospital of Heraklion, University of Crete, Medical School, 71500 Heraklion, Greece; (C.M.); (A.B.); (C.M.N.); (C.M.)
| | - Athanasios Bouchalakis
- Department of Urology, University General Hospital of Heraklion, University of Crete, Medical School, 71500 Heraklion, Greece; (C.M.); (A.B.); (C.M.N.); (C.M.)
| | - Chrisoula Maria Nakou
- Department of Urology, University General Hospital of Heraklion, University of Crete, Medical School, 71500 Heraklion, Greece; (C.M.); (A.B.); (C.M.N.); (C.M.)
| | - Charalampos Mamoulakis
- Department of Urology, University General Hospital of Heraklion, University of Crete, Medical School, 71500 Heraklion, Greece; (C.M.); (A.B.); (C.M.N.); (C.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Papalia R, Prata F, Tedesco F, Ragusa A, Pira M, Iannuzzi A, Fantozzi M, Civitella A, McGUIRE B, Simone G, Scarpa RM. "Δ" Delta neobladder: a novel stentless simplified totally intracorporeal robotic technique. Minerva Urol Nephrol 2024; 76:773-781. [PMID: 39831857 DOI: 10.23736/s2724-6051.24.06146-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2025]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To report the first case series of RARC using a simplified technique for intracorporeal stentless neobladder formation. METHODS From October 2022 to February 2023, 10 patients with high-risk bladder cancer underwent RARC at our Institution. RARC with extended pelvic lymph node dissection and totally intracorporeal neobladder using Hugo RAS system. Surgical steps of this novel reservoir are shown in the complementary video. Continuous data were presented as median and interquartile ranges (IQR) while frequencies and proportions were used to report categorical variables and compared by means of Mann-Whitney U test and Chi-square test, respectively. One-year outcomes were recorded. RESULTS All procedures were successfully performed. Median console time for neobladder configuration was 192 min (IQR, 170-219). A decrease in median operative time was observed in the second half of the series (305 vs. 322 minutes; P=0.12). Two patients (20%) experienced a minor complication (ileus and UTI, Clavien-Dindo II). At 12-months follow-up, renal function was preserved in all patients. Overall, 12-months daytime and night-time continence rates were 80% and 60%, respectively. The limited number of cases represents the main limitation of the current study. CONCLUSIONS This simplified robotic assisted intracorporeal neobladder technique demonstrates a good safety profile in this series of patients. Simplifying robotic intracorporeal surgical techniques could potentially contribute to its reproducibility and popularization in the urologic community.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rocco Papalia
- Department of Urology, Campus Bio-Medico University Polyclinic Foundation, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Prata
- Department of Urology, Campus Bio-Medico University Polyclinic Foundation, Rome, Italy -
| | - Francesco Tedesco
- Department of Urology, Campus Bio-Medico University Polyclinic Foundation, Rome, Italy
| | - Alberto Ragusa
- Department of Urology, Campus Bio-Medico University Polyclinic Foundation, Rome, Italy
| | - Matteo Pira
- Department of Urology, Campus Bio-Medico University Polyclinic Foundation, Rome, Italy
| | - Andrea Iannuzzi
- Department of Urology, Campus Bio-Medico University Polyclinic Foundation, Rome, Italy
| | - Marco Fantozzi
- Department of Urology, Campus Bio-Medico University Polyclinic Foundation, Rome, Italy
| | - Angelo Civitella
- Department of Urology, Campus Bio-Medico University Polyclinic Foundation, Rome, Italy
| | - Barry McGUIRE
- Department of Urology, St. Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Giuseppe Simone
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Roberto M Scarpa
- Department of Urology, Campus Bio-Medico University Polyclinic Foundation, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Tuderti G, Chiacchio G, Mastroianni R, Anceschi U, Bove AM, Brassetti A, D'Annunzio S, Ferriero M, Misuraca L, Proietti F, Flammia RS, Guaglianone S, Lombardo R, Anselmi M, Zampa A, Nunzio C, Pastore AL, Galosi AB, Leonardo C, Gallucci M, Simone G. Impact of diabetes mellitus on oncologic outcomes in patients receiving robot-assisted radical cystectomy for bladder cancer. World J Urol 2024; 42:479. [PMID: 39133312 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-024-05178-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2024] [Accepted: 07/15/2024] [Indexed: 08/13/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Aim of this study is to investigate the association between DM and oncological outcomes among patients with muscle-invasive (MI) or high-risk non-muscle invasive (NMI) bladder cancer (BC) who underwent robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion (RARC). METHODS An IRB approved multi-institutional BC database was queried, including patients underwent RARC between January 2013 and June 2023. Patients were divided into two groups according to DM status. Baseline, clinical, perioperative, pathologic data were compared. Chi-square and Student t tests were performed to compare categorical and continuous variables, respectively. Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression analyses were performed to assess the association between DM and oncologic outcomes. RESULTS Out of 547 consecutive patients, 97 (17.7%) had DM. The two cohorts showed similar preoperative features, except for ASA score (p = 0.01) and Hypertension rates (p < 0.001). No differences were detected for perioperative complications, pT stage, pN stages and surgical margins status (all p > 0.12). DM patients displayed significantly lower 5-yr disease-free survival (DFS) (44.6% vs. 63.3%, p = 0.007), 5-yr cancer-specific survival (CSS) (45.1% vs. 70.1%, p = 0.001) and 5-yr Overall survival (OS) (39.9% vs. 63.8%, p = 0.001). At Multivariable Cox-regression analyses DM status was identified as independent predictor of worse cancer-specific survival (CSS) (HR 2.1; p = 0.001) and overall survival (OS) (HR 2.05; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION Among BC patients who underwent RARC, DM patients showed worse oncologic outcomes than the non-DM patients, with DM status playing an independent negative predicting role in CSS and OS. Future prospective studies are awaited, stimulating basic and translational research to identify possible mechanisms of interaction between DM and BC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriele Tuderti
- Department of Urology, IRCCS "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Via Elio, Chianesi 53, Rome, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Chiacchio
- Department of Urology, IRCCS "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Via Elio, Chianesi 53, Rome, Italy.
| | - Riccardo Mastroianni
- Department of Urology, IRCCS "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Via Elio, Chianesi 53, Rome, Italy
| | - Umberto Anceschi
- Department of Urology, IRCCS "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Via Elio, Chianesi 53, Rome, Italy
| | - Alfredo Maria Bove
- Department of Urology, IRCCS "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Via Elio, Chianesi 53, Rome, Italy
| | - Aldo Brassetti
- Department of Urology, IRCCS "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Via Elio, Chianesi 53, Rome, Italy
| | - Simone D'Annunzio
- Department of Urology, IRCCS "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Via Elio, Chianesi 53, Rome, Italy
| | - Mariaconsiglia Ferriero
- Department of Urology, IRCCS "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Via Elio, Chianesi 53, Rome, Italy
| | - Leonardo Misuraca
- Department of Urology, IRCCS "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Via Elio, Chianesi 53, Rome, Italy
| | - Flavia Proietti
- Department of Urology, IRCCS "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Via Elio, Chianesi 53, Rome, Italy
| | - Rocco Simone Flammia
- Department of Urology, IRCCS "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Via Elio, Chianesi 53, Rome, Italy
| | - Salvatore Guaglianone
- Department of Urology, IRCCS "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Via Elio, Chianesi 53, Rome, Italy
| | - Riccardo Lombardo
- Department of Urology, "Sapienza" University of Rome-Ospedale Sant'Andrea, Rome, Italy
| | - Marianna Anselmi
- Department of Urology, IRCCS "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Via Elio, Chianesi 53, Rome, Italy
| | - Ashanti Zampa
- Department of Urology, IRCCS "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Via Elio, Chianesi 53, Rome, Italy
| | - CosimoDe Nunzio
- Department of Urology, "Sapienza" University of Rome-Ospedale Sant'Andrea, Rome, Italy
| | - Antonio Luigi Pastore
- Department of Urology, "Sapienza" University of Rome -ICOT Latina Polo Pontino, Latina, Italy
| | - Andrea Benedetto Galosi
- Urology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria delle Marche, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Costantino Leonardo
- Department of Urology, IRCCS "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Via Elio, Chianesi 53, Rome, Italy
| | - Michele Gallucci
- Department of Urology, IRCCS "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Via Elio, Chianesi 53, Rome, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Simone
- Department of Urology, IRCCS "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Via Elio, Chianesi 53, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Song W, Yu J, Chung JH, Kang M, Sung HH, Jeon HG, Seo SI, Jeon SS, Jeong BC. A Proposal for Standardization of Early Outcomes Following Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy (RARC): RARC Tetrafecta. Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31:4752-4761. [PMID: 38538821 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-15138-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2023] [Accepted: 02/17/2024] [Indexed: 06/14/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Currently, there is no dedicated tool to record the early outcomes of robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC), and existing criteria for longer-term outcomes require a minimum of 3 months for assessment. However, early evaluation is essential to prevent future morbidity and mortality, especially in surgeries with a high risk of complications in the short term. We propose a comprehensive approach to report early RARC outcomes and investigate the influence of surgeon experience on these results. PATIENTS AND METHODS We retrospectively analyzed the outcomes of patients who underwent RARC for bladder cancer between April 2009 and April 2020. The cohort was divided chronologically into three groups: patients 1-60 in group 1, 61-120 in group 2, and 121-192 in group 3. Patients with yields of ≥ 16 lymph nodes (LN), negative soft tissue surgical margins, absence of transfusion, and absence of major complications at 30 days were regarded as attaining the RARC tetrafecta. RESULTS Of the 192 included patients, 93 (48.4%) achieved RARC tetrafecta, with the proportion increasing with surgical experience from 41.7% in group 1 to 55.6% in group 3. Age [odds ratio (OR) 0.947; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.924-0.970; P = 0.021], LN yield (OR 1.432; 95% CI 1.139-1.867; P = 0.001), and greater surgical experience with RARC (> 120 patients; OR 2.740; 95% CI 1.231-6.100; P = 0.014) were significantly associated with the achievement of RARC tetrafecta. CONCLUSIONS RARC tetrafecta could be a comprehensive method for reporting early outcomes in patients undergoing RARC, with improvements aligned with the surgeon's experience.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wan Song
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jiwoong Yu
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jae Hoon Chung
- Department of Urology, Hallym University College of Medicine, Anyang, Korea
| | - Minyong Kang
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hyun Hwan Sung
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hwang Gyun Jeon
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seong Il Seo
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seong Soo Jeon
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Byong Chang Jeong
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Piramide F, Turri F, Amparore D, Fallara G, De Groote R, Knipper S, Wuernschimmel C, Bravi CA, Lambert E, Di Maida F, Liakos N, Pellegrino F, Andras I, Mastrorosa A, Tillu N, Mastroianni R, Paciotti M, Wenzel M, Bianchi R, di Trapani E, Moschovas MC, Gandaglia G, Moschini M, D'Hondt F, Rocco B, Fiori C, Galfano A, Minervini A, Simone G, Briganti A, De Cobelli O, Gaston R, Montorsi F, Breda A, Wiklund P, Porpiglia F, Mottrie A, Larcher A, Dell'Oglio P. Atlas of Intracorporeal Orthotopic Neobladder Techniques After Robot-assisted Radical Cystectomy and Systematic Review of Clinical Outcomes. Eur Urol 2024; 85:348-360. [PMID: 38044179 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.11.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2023] [Revised: 10/24/2023] [Accepted: 11/20/2023] [Indexed: 12/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Multiple and heterogeneous techniques have been described for orthotopic neobladder (ONB) reconstruction after robot-assisted radical cystectomy. Nonetheless, a systematic assessment of all the available options is lacking. OBJECTIVE To provide the first comprehensive step-by-step description of all the available techniques for robotic intracorporeal ONB together with individual intraoperative, perioperative and functional outcomes based on a systematic review of the literature. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS We performed a systematic review of the literature, and MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were searched to identify original articles describing different robotic intracorporeal ONB techniques and reporting intra- and perioperative outcomes. Studies were categorized according to ONB type, providing a synthesis of the current evidence. Video material was provided by experts in the field to illustrate the surgical technique of each intracorporeal ONB. SURGICAL PROCEDURE Nine different ONB types were identified: Studer, Hautmann, Y shape, U shape, Bordeaux, Pyramid, Shell, Florence Robotic Intracorporeal Neobladder, and Padua Ileal Neobladder. MEASUREMENTS Continuous and categorical variables are presented as mean ± standard deviation and as frequencies and proportions, respectively. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Of 2587 studies identified, 19 met our inclusion criteria. No cohort studies or randomized control trials comparing different neobladder types are available. Available techniques for intracorporeal robotic ONB reconstruction have similar operative time, estimated blood loss, intraoperative complications, and length of stay. Major variability exists concerning postoperative complications and functional outcomes, likely related to reporting bias. CONCLUSIONS Several techniques are described for intracorporeal ONB during robot-assisted radical cystectomy with comparable perioperative outcomes. We provide the first step-by-step surgical atlas for robot-assisted ONB reconstruction. Further comparative studies are needed to assess any advantage of one technique over others. PATIENT SUMMARY Patients elected for radical cystectomy should be aware that multiple techniques for robotic orthotopic neobladder are available, but that current evidence does not favor one type over the others.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Federico Piramide
- Department of Oncology, Division of Urology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy; Department of Urology, OLV Hospital, Aalst, Belgium; ORSI Academy, Melle, Belgium.
| | - Filippo Turri
- Department of Urology, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Daniele Amparore
- Department of Oncology, Division of Urology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Fallara
- Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Ruben De Groote
- Department of Urology, OLV Hospital, Aalst, Belgium; ORSI Academy, Melle, Belgium
| | - Sophie Knipper
- Department of Urology, Vivantes Klinikum am Urban, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Carlo Andrea Bravi
- Department of Urology, OLV Hospital, Aalst, Belgium; ORSI Academy, Melle, Belgium; Department of Urology, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Edward Lambert
- Department of Urology, OLV Hospital, Aalst, Belgium; ORSI Academy, Melle, Belgium
| | - Fabrizio Di Maida
- Department of Urology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Nikolaos Liakos
- Department of Urology, Medical Faculty and Medical Centre of the University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Francesco Pellegrino
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Iulia Andras
- Department of Urology, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Alessandro Mastrorosa
- Unit of Urology, Clinique Saint-Augustin, Bordeaux, France; Urology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Tumori "Giovanni Paolo II", Bari, Italy
| | - Neeraja Tillu
- Department of Urology, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Riccardo Mastroianni
- Department of Urology, IRCCS "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Marco Paciotti
- Department of Urology, OLV Hospital, Aalst, Belgium; ORSI Academy, Melle, Belgium
| | - Mike Wenzel
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Roberto Bianchi
- Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Ettore di Trapani
- Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Giorgio Gandaglia
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Moschini
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Bernando Rocco
- Department of Urology, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Cristian Fiori
- Department of Oncology, Division of Urology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Antonio Galfano
- Department of Urology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Minervini
- Department of Urology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Simone
- Department of Urology, IRCCS "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Ottavio De Cobelli
- Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Richard Gaston
- Unit of Urology, Clinique Saint-Augustin, Bordeaux, France
| | - Francesco Montorsi
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Breda
- Department of Urology, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Fundaciò Puigvert, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Peter Wiklund
- Department of Urology, Karolinska University Hospital, Solna, Sweden
| | - Francesco Porpiglia
- Department of Oncology, Division of Urology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Alexandre Mottrie
- Department of Urology, OLV Hospital, Aalst, Belgium; ORSI Academy, Melle, Belgium
| | - Alessandro Larcher
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Paolo Dell'Oglio
- Department of Urology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Tuderti G, Mastroianni R, Chiacchio G, Anceschi U, Bove AM, Brassetti A, Ferriero M, Misuraca L, Flammia RS, Proietti F, D'Annunzio S, Leonardo C, Guaglianone S, Anselmi M, Zampa A, Galosi AB, Torregiani G, Gallucci M, Simone G. Long-term oncologic and functional outcomes following robot-assisted radical cystectomy and intracorporeal Padua ileal bladder: results from a single high-volume center. World J Urol 2023; 41:2359-2366. [PMID: 37518504 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-023-04523-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2023] [Accepted: 07/04/2023] [Indexed: 08/01/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To report long-term oncologic and functional outcomes of a large consecutive single center series of Robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC)- intracorporeal (IC) Urinary Diversion (UD), identifying their predicting factors. METHODS A single center Bladder cancer (BC) database was queried for "RARC" and "ICUD", including patients treated between January 2012 and September 2020. Kaplan-Meier curves were assessed disease-free (DFS), cancer-specific (CSS) and overall survival (OS) probability. Univariable (UV) and multivariable (MV) analysis were adopted to identify predictors of DFS, CSS and OS. Kaplan-Meier method evaluated day- and night-time continence recovery probabilities; UV and MV analysis were adopted to identify predictors of Day-time continence. RESULTS Overall, 251 patients were included. Among them, 192 patients underwent intracorporeal ileal orthotopic neobladder (ION) (76.5%). Five-year DFS, CSS and OS rates were 66.5%, 65.4% and 61.5%; pT stage ≥ 3 and pathologic nodal involvement were identified as negative independent predictors of DFS (HR 2.39, p = 0.001, HR 4.64, p ≤ 0.001), CSS (HR 2.20, p = 0.01, HR 3.97, p < 0.001) and OS (HR 2.25, p = 0.005, HR 3.95, p < 0.001). In RARC-ION patients, Trifecta rate was 64.1%. One-year day- and night-time continence rates were 78.6% and 48.3%. Age (HR 0.98, p = 0.03), female gender (HR 0.57, p = 0.008) and complications Clavien grade ≥ 3 (HR 0.55, p = 0.03) were identified as independent predictors of day-time incontinence. CONCLUSIONS Long-term oncologic outcomes and their predicting factors seem aligned to the largest historical open series and multi-institutional robotic series data. According to the identified predicting factors undermining a proper achievement of day-time continence, this represents an objective support, in order to properly advice specific sub-group of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriele Tuderti
- Department of Urology, IRCCS "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Via Elio, Chianesi 53, Rome, Italy.
| | - Riccardo Mastroianni
- Department of Urology, IRCCS "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Via Elio, Chianesi 53, Rome, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Chiacchio
- Department of Urology, IRCCS "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Via Elio, Chianesi 53, Rome, Italy
- Urology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Ospedali Riuniti di Ancona, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Umberto Anceschi
- Department of Urology, IRCCS "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Via Elio, Chianesi 53, Rome, Italy
| | - Alfredo Maria Bove
- Department of Urology, IRCCS "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Via Elio, Chianesi 53, Rome, Italy
| | - Aldo Brassetti
- Department of Urology, IRCCS "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Via Elio, Chianesi 53, Rome, Italy
| | - Mariaconsiglia Ferriero
- Department of Urology, IRCCS "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Via Elio, Chianesi 53, Rome, Italy
| | - Leonardo Misuraca
- Department of Urology, IRCCS "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Via Elio, Chianesi 53, Rome, Italy
| | - Rocco Simone Flammia
- Department of Urology, IRCCS "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Via Elio, Chianesi 53, Rome, Italy
- Department of Urology, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Flavia Proietti
- Department of Urology, IRCCS "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Via Elio, Chianesi 53, Rome, Italy
| | - Simone D'Annunzio
- Department of Urology, IRCCS "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Via Elio, Chianesi 53, Rome, Italy
| | - Costantino Leonardo
- Department of Urology, IRCCS "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Via Elio, Chianesi 53, Rome, Italy
| | - Salvatore Guaglianone
- Department of Urology, IRCCS "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Via Elio, Chianesi 53, Rome, Italy
| | - Marianna Anselmi
- Department of Urology, IRCCS "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Via Elio, Chianesi 53, Rome, Italy
| | - Ashanti Zampa
- Department of Urology, IRCCS "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Via Elio, Chianesi 53, Rome, Italy
| | - Andrea Benedetto Galosi
- Urology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Ospedali Riuniti di Ancona, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Giulia Torregiani
- Department of Urology, IRCCS "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Via Elio, Chianesi 53, Rome, Italy
| | - Michele Gallucci
- Department of Urology, IRCCS "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Via Elio, Chianesi 53, Rome, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Simone
- Department of Urology, IRCCS "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Via Elio, Chianesi 53, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Cochetti G, Paladini A, Del Zingaro M, Ciarletti S, Pastore F, Massa G, De Angelis L, Mearini E. Robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal reconstruction of urinary diversion by mechanical stapler: prospective evaluation of early and late complications. Front Surg 2023; 10:1157684. [PMID: 37383384 PMCID: PMC10293791 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1157684] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2023] [Accepted: 05/22/2023] [Indexed: 06/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Radical cystectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection is the gold standard treatment for non-metastatic muscle-invasive bladder cancer and high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer. For years, the traditional open surgery approach was the only viable option. The widespread of robotic surgery led to its employment also in radical cystectomy to reduce complication rates and improve functional outcomes. Regardless of the type of approach, radical cystectomy is a procedure with high morbidity and not negligible mortality. Data available in the literature show how the use of staplers can offer valid functional outcomes, with an acceptable rate of complications shortening the operative time. The aim of our study was to describe the perioperative outcomes and complications associated with robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) with intracorporeal urinary diversion (ICUD) using a mechanical stapler. Material and methods From January 2015 to May 2021, we enrolled patients who underwent RARC with pelvic node dissection and stapled ICUD (ileal conduit or ileal Y-shaped neobladder according to the Perugia ileal neobladder) in our high-volume center. Demographic features, perioperative outcomes and early (≤30 days) and late (>90 days) post-operative complications according to the Clavien-Dindo classification, were recorded for each patient. We also analyzed the potential linear correlation between demographic, pre-operative as well as operative features and the risk of post-operative complications. Results Overall, 112 patients who underwent RARC with ICUD were included with a minimum follow-up of 12 months. Intracorporeal Perugia ileal neobladder was performed in 74.1% of cases while ileal conduit was performed in 25.9%. The mean operative time, estimated intraoperative blood loss, and LOS were 289.1 ± 59.7 min, 390.6 ± 186.2 ml, and 17.5 ± 9.8 days, respectively. Early minor and major complications accounted for 26.7% and 10.8%, respectively. Overall late complications were 40.2%. The late most common complications were hydronephrosis (11.6%) and urinary tract infections (20.5%). Stone reservoir formation occurred in 2.7% of patients. Major complications occurred in 5.4%. In the sub-analysis, the mean operative time and the estimated blood loss improved significantly from the first 56 procedures to the last ones. Conclusion RARC with ICUD performed by mechanical stapler is a safe and effective technique. Stapled Y-shaped neobladder did not increase the complication rate.
Collapse
|
8
|
Geretto P, DE Cillis S, Karsenty G, Candela L, Phé V. Totally intracorporeal robot-assisted supratrigonal cystectomy and ileal augmentation cystoplasty with periprostatic artificial urinary sphincter implantation for male neurogenic mixed urinary incontinence. Minerva Urol Nephrol 2023; 75:272-274. [PMID: 37221825 DOI: 10.23736/s2724-6051.23.05314-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/25/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Paolo Geretto
- Department of Urology, Tenon Academic Hospital, Assistance-Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Sorbonne University, Paris, France -
- Division of Neuro-Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, Città della Salute e della Scienza, University of Turin, Turin, Italy -
| | - Sabrina DE Cillis
- Department of Urology, Tenon Academic Hospital, Assistance-Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | - Gilles Karsenty
- Department of Urology and Kidney Transplantation, La Conception Hospital, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Marseille, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France
| | - Luigi Candela
- Department of Urology, Tenon Academic Hospital, Assistance-Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
- Division of Experimental Oncology, Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Véronique Phé
- Department of Urology, Tenon Academic Hospital, Assistance-Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Sarkis J, Diamand R, Aoun F, Assenmacher G, Assenmacher C, Verhoest G, Holz S, Naudin M, Ploussard G, Mari A, Minervini A, Tay A, Issa R, Roumiguié M, Bajeot AS, Simone G, Anceschi U, Umari P, Sridhar A, Kelly J, Hendricksen K, Einerhand S, Mertens LS, Sanchez-Salas R, Colomer A, Quackels T, Peltier A, Montorsi F, Briganti A, Pradere B, Moschini M, Roumeguère T, Albisinni S. Do perioperative blood transfusions impact oncological outcomes of robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion? Results from a large multi-institutional registry. Minerva Urol Nephrol 2023; 75:50-58. [PMID: 36800680 DOI: 10.23736/s2724-6051.22.05109-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Blood transfusions (BT) have been associated with adverse oncologic outcomes in multiple malignancies including open radical cystectomy (ORC) for urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (UCB). Robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) with intracorporeal urinary diversion (ICUD) delivers similar oncologic outcomes compared to ORC, yet with lower blood loss and reduced transfusions. However, the impact of BT after robotic cystectomy is still unknown. METHODS This is a multicenter study including patients treated for UCB with RARC and ICUD in 15 academic institutions, between January 2015 and January 2022. BT were administered during surgery (intraoperative blood transfusions, iBT) or during the first 30 days after surgery (post-operative blood transfusions, pBT). The association of iBT and pBT with recurrence-free survival (RFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated by univariate and multivariate regression analysis. RESULTS A total of 635 patients were included in the study. Overall, 35/635 patients (5.51%) received iBT while 70/635 (11.0%) received pBT. After a mean follow-up of 23±18 months, 116 patients (18.3%) had died, including 96 (15.1%) from bladder cancer. Recurrence occurred in 146 patients (23%). iBT were associated with decreased RFS, CSS and OS (P<0.001) on univariate Cox analysis. After adjusting for clinicopathologic covariates, iBT were associated only with the risk of recurrence (HR: 1.7; 95% CI, 1.0-2.8, P=0.04). pBT were not significantly associated to RFS, CSS or OS on univariate and multivariate Cox regression models (P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS In the present study, patients treated by RARC with ICUD for UCB have a higher risk of recurrence after iBT, yet no significant association with CSS and OS was found. pBT are not associated with worse oncological prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julien Sarkis
- Department of Urology, Erasme Hospital, University Clinics of Brussels, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium -
| | - Romain Diamand
- Department of Urology, Jules Bordet Institute, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Fouad Aoun
- Department of Urology, Hotel Dieu de France, Beirut, Lebanon
| | | | | | | | - Serge Holz
- Department of Urology, CHU Ambroise Paré, Mons, Belgium
| | - Michel Naudin
- Department of Urology, CHU Ambroise Paré, Mons, Belgium
| | - Guillaume Ploussard
- Department of Urology, La Croix du Sud Hospital, Quint-Fonsegrives, France.,Institut Universitaire du Cancer Toulouse - Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | - Andrea Mari
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Unit of Oncologic Minimally-Invasive Urology and Andrology, Careggi University Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Andrea Minervini
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Unit of Oncologic Minimally-Invasive Urology and Andrology, Careggi University Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Andrea Tay
- Department of Urology, Saint Georges Hospital, London, UK
| | - Rami Issa
- Department of Urology, Saint Georges Hospital, London, UK
| | - Mathieu Roumiguié
- Department of Urology, Andrology and Renal Transplantation, CHU Rangueil, Paul-Sabatier University, Toulouse Cedex, France
| | - Anne S Bajeot
- Department of Urology, Andrology and Renal Transplantation, CHU Rangueil, Paul-Sabatier University, Toulouse Cedex, France
| | - Giuseppe Simone
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Umberto Anceschi
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Paolo Umari
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Sciences, University College of London, London, UK
| | - Ashwin Sridhar
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Sciences, University College of London, London, UK
| | - John Kelly
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Sciences, University College of London, London, UK
| | - Kees Hendricksen
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Sarah Einerhand
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Laura S Mertens
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Anna Colomer
- Department of Urology, Montsouris Mutualiste Institute, Paris, France
| | - Thierry Quackels
- Department of Urology, Erasme Hospital, University Clinics of Brussels, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Alexandre Peltier
- Department of Urology, Jules Bordet Institute, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Francesco Montorsi
- Division of Oncology, Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Division of Oncology, Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology UROSUD, Croix Du Sud Hospital, Quint-Fonsegrives, France
| | - Marco Moschini
- Division of Oncology, Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Thierry Roumeguère
- Department of Urology, Erasme Hospital, University Clinics of Brussels, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.,Department of Urology, Jules Bordet Institute, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Simone Albisinni
- Department of Urology, Erasme Hospital, University Clinics of Brussels, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.,Unit of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, Tor Vergata University Hospital, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Treatment trends for muscle-invasive bladder cancer in Germany from 2006 to 2019. World J Urol 2022; 40:1715-1721. [PMID: 35486177 PMCID: PMC9237006 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-022-04017-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2022] [Accepted: 04/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To examine national treatment trends of muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) in Germany with a special focus on radical cystectomy (RC). Patients and methods Population-based data were derived from the nationwide hospital billing database of the German Federal Statistical Office and institution-related information from the reimbursement.INFO tool based on hospitals’ quality reports from 2006 to 2019. Additionally, we used the German National Center for Cancer Registry data to analyze all cases of bladder cancer with stage ≥ T2 who received RC, chemotherapy, radiation therapy or a combination from 2006 to 2017. Results The annual number of RC cases in Germany increased by 28% from 5627 cases in 2006 to 7292 cases in 2019 (p = 0.001). The proportion of patients undergoing RC remained constant at about 75% in all age groups between 2006 and 2017 (p = 0.3). Relative to all performed RC, the proportion of patients > 75 years increased from 25% in 2006 to 38% in 2019 (p = 0.03). The proportion of patients receiving a combination of RC and chemotherapy increased from 9% in 2006 to 13% in 2017 (p = 0.005). In 2006, 8 of 299 urology departments (2.7%) performed more than 50 RCs per year, which increased to 17 of 360 (4.7%) in 2019. In 2019, 107 departments (29%) performed 25–49 RCs and 236 (66%) departments performed < 25 RCs. Conclusion In Germany, three out of four patients with MIBC receive RC and the proportion of patients > 75 years is increasing. The combination of surgery and chemotherapy is increasingly used. With overall increasing case numbers, there is a slight tendency towards centralization. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00345-022-04017-z.
Collapse
|
11
|
Amparore D, Pecoraro A, Checcucci E, DE Cillis S, Piramide F, Volpi G, Piana A, Verri P, Granato S, Sica M, Manfredi M, Fiori C, Autorino R, Porpiglia F. 3D imaging technologies in minimally-invasive kidney and prostate cancer surgery: which is the urologists' perception? Minerva Urol Nephrol 2021; 74:178-185. [PMID: 33769019 DOI: 10.23736/s2724-6051.21.04131-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Many specific 3D imaging technologies are currently available for the practising urologists. Aim of the study was to assess their perception about different 3D imaging tools in the field of prostate and kidney cancer surgery. METHODS All the attendees of the 8th Techno-Urology-Meeting were asked to fill a questionnaire regarding the role of 3D virtual reconstruction PDFs, 3D printing models, Augmented-Reality (AR) and mixed reality technology in the setting of surgical planning, patient counselling, intraoperative guidance and training for kidney and prostate cancer surgery; Moreover the different materials used for 3D printing were compared to assess the most suitable in reproducing the organ and tumor features, as well as their estimated cost and production time. RESULTS The population consisted of 180 attendees. Overall, AR was the preferred option for intraoperative guidance and training, in both prostate (55% and 38.3%) and kidney cancer surgery (58.3% and 40%). HoloLens was perceived as the best imaging technology for the surgical planning (50% for prostate and 60% for kidney), whereas printed models for patients counselling (66.7% for prostate and 61.7% for kidney). Fused deposition models were deemed as the best printing technology in representing kidney anatomy and renal tumor location (40%), while silicon (46.7%) and Polyjet (36.7%) models for prostate anatomy and cancer location. Finally, attendees demonstrated poor knowledge of 3D printing costs and production times. CONCLUSIONS Our study shows the perceptions of a heterogeneous surrogate of practising urologists about the role and potential applications of 3D imaging technologies in daily surgical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniele Amparore
- Division of Urology, Departmet of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Turin, San Luigi Hospital, Orbassano, Turin, Italy -
| | - Angela Pecoraro
- Division of Urology, Departmet of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Turin, San Luigi Hospital, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | - Enrico Checcucci
- Division of Urology, Departmet of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Turin, San Luigi Hospital, Orbassano, Turin, Italy.,Uro-technology and SoMe Working Group of the Young Academic Urologists (YAU) Working Party of the European Association of Urology (EAU), Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Sabrina DE Cillis
- Division of Urology, Departmet of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Turin, San Luigi Hospital, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | - Federico Piramide
- Division of Urology, Departmet of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Turin, San Luigi Hospital, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | - Gabriele Volpi
- Division of Urology, Departmet of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Turin, San Luigi Hospital, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | - Alberto Piana
- Division of Urology, Departmet of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Turin, San Luigi Hospital, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | - Paolo Verri
- Division of Urology, Departmet of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Turin, San Luigi Hospital, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | - Stefano Granato
- Division of Urology, Departmet of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Turin, San Luigi Hospital, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | - Michele Sica
- Division of Urology, Departmet of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Turin, San Luigi Hospital, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | - Matteo Manfredi
- Division of Urology, Departmet of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Turin, San Luigi Hospital, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | - Cristian Fiori
- Division of Urology, Departmet of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Turin, San Luigi Hospital, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | | | - Francesco Porpiglia
- Division of Urology, Departmet of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Turin, San Luigi Hospital, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| |
Collapse
|