1
|
Goujon A, Kaulanjan K, Taha F, Gasmi A, Badet L, Bessede T, Boissier R, Boutin JM, Branchereau J, Culty T, Defortescu G, Drouin S, Kleinclauss F, Matillon X, Millet C, Prudhomme T, Sallusto F, Seizilles de Mazancourt E, Verhoest G, Timsit MO. Young urologists and kidney transplantation training: A survey designed by the French Transplantation Committee of the French Association of Urology (CTAFU) and the French Association of Urologists in training (AFUF). THE FRENCH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY 2024; 34:102611. [PMID: 38460937 DOI: 10.1016/j.fjurol.2024.102611] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2023] [Revised: 01/12/2024] [Accepted: 03/04/2024] [Indexed: 03/11/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE In France, kidney transplantations (KT) are mainly performed by urologist. Young urologists and residents are involved in this activity mostly performed in emergency. How do they feel about KT training? Is KT an attractive part of the urologist activity? METHODS This survey has been designed in the form of a questionnaire by the French Committee of Kidney Transplantation (CTAFU) and the French Association of Urologists in training (AFUF). It has been sent by e-mail to all the AFUF members. Interest in KT and performance of the training were evaluated. RESULTS In total, 126 members filed the form. Among the residents, 51.5% feel secure to perform KT at the end of their residency. KT is considered as an interesting surgery for 92.1% of the participants: 76.5% are willing to get involved in KT during their residency/fellowship. Among the participants, 44% are willing to continue a long-term involvement. Among the residents, 65.9% consider their practical training insufficient: 56.8% have been supervised for a KT performance during their residency and 86% declare a lack of practical training and had a patient-based learning. Among the residents, 92.1% declare an insufficient theorical training. Among the residents, 33.3% say the schedules of transplantation limit their interest in KT. Among the participants, 34.4% receive a transplant bonus in addition to the usual on-call salary. CONCLUSION Young urologists wish to continue their involvement in KT activity, but improved theoretical and practical training are essential. In addition, the conditions under which this activity is performed and remunerated are a matter of concern. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Goujon
- Department of Urology, Rennes University Hospital, Rennes, France; Department of Nephrology, Rennes University Hospital, Rennes, France.
| | | | - Fayek Taha
- Department of Urology Reims University Hospital, Reims, France
| | - Anis Gasmi
- Department of Urology, Rennes University Hospital, Rennes, France
| | - Lionel Badet
- Department of Urology Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Thomas Bessede
- Department of Urology Kremlin-Bicêtre Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Romain Boissier
- Department of Urology La Conception Hospital, Marseille, France
| | - Jean-Michel Boutin
- Department of Urology, Trousseau-Chambray University Hospital, Tours, France
| | | | - Thibaut Culty
- Department of Urology, Angers University Hospital, Angers, France
| | | | - Sarah Drouin
- Department of Urology La Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France
| | | | | | - Clementine Millet
- Department of Urology, Clermont-Ferrand University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Thomas Prudhomme
- Department of Urology, Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse, France
| | - Federico Sallusto
- Department of Urology, Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse, France
| | | | - Gegory Verhoest
- Department of Urology, Rennes University Hospital, Rennes, France
| | | |
Collapse
|