Annular ligament repair using allograft for the treatment of chronic radial head dislocation: a case report

Floating Elbow in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

We aimed to systematically review all papers examining floating elbow injuries in adults.

Material and Methods

MEDLINE, Cochrane Bone, Joint and Muscle Trauma, PROSPERO, and Scopus databases were searched up to August 31, 2020. Included studies had as a primary or secondary outcome the functional outcomes after a floating elbow injury on patients aged 17 or older. Methodological quality of the included studies was assessed.

Results

Thirty-two studies met the inclusion criteria. Patients were male at 73,1%. Median age of the patients was 33,0 years and median time of follow-up was 19,5 months. Articular surfaces were affected at 24,4%, whereas 51,2% of the fractures was open. Approximately, 34,9% of the patients suffered neural injury. Ipsilateral and multiple-system injuries were present in 34,8% and 76,3 % of the cases, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that intra-articular and nerve damage, open fractures and multi-system injuries affected range of motion, union and complications. Sex, age, vascular damage and ipsilateral injuries of the patient did not adversely impact the outcome. All of the included studies were classified as very-low quality of evidence.

Conclusions

The current knowledge regarding the characteristics of floating elbow in adults is limited, albeit we were able to provide possible pre-operative predictor outcomes.

Stabilization of the radial head with the palmaris longus or the gracilis tendon: an anatomical feasibility study

PURPOSE

The proximal radioulnar joint (PRUJ) and the radiocapitellar joint may be destabilized after trauma. Different techniques for stabilization of PRUJ have been proposed, but none of them can stabilize the radiocapitellar joint at the same time. We propose a ligamentoplasty to stabilize the radial head at these two joints by reconstructing the radial head annular ligament and the lateral collateral ulnar ligament (LCUL) with a single graft (palmaris longus or gracilis tendon of the knee).

METHODS

Fifteen cadaveric upper limbs were used to compare the stabilization obtained by performing our ligamentoplasty with the palmaris longus or the gracilis tendon. For each technique, the stabilization obtained was evaluated by measuring the displacement of the radial head in the anterior, lateral and posterior directions when a force of 1 N was applied in maximum supination, neutral rotation and maximum pronation. We also evaluated whether this technique could damage the ulnar nerve or the posterior interosseous nerve by dissecting them and whether it could limit the range of rotation of the forearm.

RESULTS

Our ligamentoplasty enables to restore PRUJ stability equivalent to the intact ligament condition. The palmaris longus was inconstant (13/15) and too short to allow concomitant reconstruction of the LCUL (except in one case). No nerve damage was found during the dissection, and the range of rotation of the forearm was not limited by the ligamentoplasty. We also report a clinical case with an excellent result and without complications.

CONCLUSION

This ligamentoplasty we have described makes it possible to stabilize the radial head with respect to the radial notch of the ulna and with respect to the capitellum of the humerus. The gracilis tendon is more suitable than the palmaris longus because of its constant presence and length. A clinical series is now necessary to better evaluate this technique.