Clinical and functional evaluation of bone marrow aspirate concentrate vs autologous conditioned serum in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis

Bone Marrow Aspiration Concentrate in the Treatment of Osteoarthritis: A Review of its Current Clinical Application

BACKGROUND

Bone marrow aspiration concentrate (BMAC) has gained acceptance as a safe orthobiologic for treating osteoarthritis (OA), despite lacking robust supporting evidence. Although several publications have documented the use of BMAC in OA, evidence confirming its unequivocal efficacy remains limited.

METHODS

This review aims to summarize the current clinical evidence regarding BMAC as a therapeutic for OA, while also presenting the author's perspective. Sixteen studies were reviewed, including ten randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and six cohort studies.

RESULTS

From the review of existing literature, BMAC injections do not appear to significantly improve pain and function compared to conventional therapies such as hyaluronic acid and corticosteroids, although some studies report a longer duration of effectiveness. Furthermore, the evidence for structural improvement, which was the original rationale for cell therapy, is seldom reported.

CONCLUSION

In light of these findings, it is suggested that high-quality data from a large patient cohort is needed to determine the role of BMAC injections in OA treatment and address reimbursement issues. From the author's perspective, the introduction of a national registry system that provides valuable information on the cost-effectiveness of various orthopedic procedures may offer a solution.

Innovative Approaches in Knee Osteoarthritis Treatment: A Comprehensive Review of Bone Marrow-Derived Products

Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a chronic articular disease characterized by the progressive degeneration of cartilage and bone tissue, leading to the appearance of subchondral cysts, osteophyte formation, and synovial inflammation. Conventional treatments consist of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), analgesics, and glucocorticoids. However, the prolonged use of these drugs causes adverse effects. NSAIDs, for instance, are known to be nephrotoxic, increasing the damage to articular cartilage. New therapies capable of accelerating the process of tissue regeneration and repair are being discussed, such as the use of orthobiologics that are naturally found in the body and obtained through minimally invasive collection and/or laboratory manipulations. Bone marrow aspirate (BMA) and bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) are both rich in hematopoietic stem cells, mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), and growth factors (GFs) that can be used in the healing process due to their anabolic and anti-inflammatory effects. The aim of this literature review is to assess the efficacy of BMA and BMAC in the treatment of knee OA based on the favorable results that researchers have obtained with the use of both orthobiologics envisaging an accelerated healing process and the prevention of OA progression.

Autologous Conditioned Serum in Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review of Current Clinical Evidence

Knee osteoarthritis (OA) significantly impacts global health, causing pain, disability, and socioeconomic burden. Traditional treatments often provide only temporary relief and can have adverse effects. Autologous conditioned serum (ACS) therapy, which enriches a patient's own blood with growth factors and anti-inflammatory cytokines, has emerged as a promising approach to manage knee OA, potentially offering pain reduction, improved function, and tissue regeneration. Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we searched databases such as PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane using terms like "Autologous Conditioned Serum" and "knee osteoarthritis." Clinical studies were selected based on their focus on ACS's efficacy in knee OA, assessing outcomes like pain relief, functional improvement, and adverse events. Eighteen studies met the inclusion criteria, including randomized controlled trials, observational studies, and comparative analyses. The review included a wide range of study designs and outcomes, highlighting ACS's efficacy in reducing pain and enhancing knee function as evidenced by various patient-reported outcome measures Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Knee Society Clinical Rating Score (KSCRS) with a follow-up of up to 11 years (range: 2-11 years). Comparative studies showed ACS to be as effective or superior to conventional treatments such as platelet-rich plasma, steroids, and hyaluronic acid, especially in cases of moderate synovitis. Minimal adverse effects such as peri-injection pain, rigidity, synovitis, transient sensation of redness/heat, and numbness in the knee/leg/toes were reported, underscoring ACS's safety. Some studies suggested ACS might also have disease-modifying effects, contributing to tissue repair and integrity. ACS therapy offers a promising alternative for knee OA management, demonstrating potential benefits in symptom alleviation, functional improvement, and safety. Indications of disease-modifying properties further highlight its therapeutic value. However, the need for standardized formulations and treatment protocols, long-term studies, and mechanistic understanding remain. Future research should focus on addressing these gaps to fully elucidate ACS's role in the treatment landscape of knee OA.

Intra-articular injection of bone marrow aspirate concentrate (mesenchymal stem cells) in KL grade III and IV knee osteoarthritis: 4 year results of 37 knees

Cell based therapies are increasingly used and results of bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) show encouraging short- to middle term results, superior to hyaluronic acid and platelet rich plasma (PRP). Most studies describe patients with mild to moderate arthritis and results of patients with KL III and IV osteoarthritis of the knee are limited to short term evaluations. Hence, the aim of this prospective study was to investigate the mid-term outcome of BMAC injections in patients with severe osteoarthritis of the knee. The BMAC was retrieved from the iliac crest as previously published with the "reorientation technique" from the iliac crest in supine position in analgosedation and injected into the patients' osteoarthritic knees. Patients were followed-up for 4 years. WOMAC, IKDC, SF 36 and walking distance were measured in a total of 37 participants. There was an improvement of IKDC and WOMAC from the first year onwards and a significant improvement beginning from year 2 up to the mid-term follow-up: IKDC increased significantly from 56 ± 12 (range 34-81) to 73 ± 13 (range 45-100), p < 0.001. WOMAC decreased significantly from 40 ± 23 (range 6-96) to 18 ± 18 (range 0-67), p < 0.001. 35 of 37 knees improved regarding IKDC and WOMAC score from the first to the last follow-up. Not a single protheses had to be implanted. Elaborate statistical analysis was done to exclude covariates and confounders (age, time, BMI,…). In summary, this is the first study on BMAC injections into 37 osteoarthritic knees with a 4-year follow up showing significant improvements in IKDC and WOMAC scores, and with a 95% success rate and significant improvement in walking distance.Clinical relevance Describes the 4-year outcome of BMAC injections for knees with severe osteoarthritis.