1
|
Chernyshov PV, Finlay AY, Tomas-Aragones L, Zuberbier T, Kocatürk E, Manolache L, Pustisek N, Svensson A, Marron SE, Sampogna F, Bewley A, Salavastru C, Koumaki D, Augustin M, Linder D, Abeni D, Salek SS, Szepietowski J, Jemec GB. Quality of life measurement in urticaria: Position statement of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology Task Forces on Quality of Life and Patient-Oriented Outcomes and Urticaria and Angioedema. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2024. [PMID: 38855825 DOI: 10.1111/jdv.20157] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2024] [Accepted: 05/03/2024] [Indexed: 06/11/2024]
Abstract
The European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (EADV) Task Forces on quality of life (QoL) and patient-oriented outcomes and on urticaria and angioedema recommendations for the assessment of Health-related (HR) QoL in all patients with urticaria in research and practice are as follows: to use the DLQI for adults and the CDLQI for children as dermatology-specific and the CU-Q2oL as a disease-specific HRQoL instruments in urticaria; to use generic instruments to provide comparison of data on urticaria with non-dermatologic diseases, or to compare with healthy volunteers or the general population; to select validated HRQoL instruments with appropriate age limits; to present exact numeric data for HRQoL results; correct title of any HRQoL instrument should be used, along with its correct abbreviation and the reference to its original publication, where possible. The EADV TFs discourage the use of non-validated HRQoL instruments and modified HRQoL instruments that have not undergone standard validation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P V Chernyshov
- Department of Dermatology and Venereology, National Medical University, Kiev, Ukraine
| | - A Y Finlay
- Division of Infection and Immunity, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - L Tomas-Aragones
- Department of Psychology, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - T Zuberbier
- Institute of Allergology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Fraunhofer Institute for Translational Medicine and Pharmacology ITMP, Allergology and Immunology, Berlin, Germany
| | - E Kocatürk
- Institute of Allergology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Fraunhofer Institute for Translational Medicine and Pharmacology ITMP, Allergology and Immunology, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Dermatology, Koç University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - L Manolache
- Department of Dermatology, Dali Medical, Bucharest, Romania
| | - N Pustisek
- Children's Hospital Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - A Svensson
- Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Skane University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - S E Marron
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Miguel Servet, Aragon Psychodermatology Research Group (GAI+PD), Zaragoza, Spain
| | - F Sampogna
- Clinical Epidemiology Unit, IDI-IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - A Bewley
- Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
- Queen Mary University, London, UK
| | - C Salavastru
- Department of Paediatric Dermatology, Colentina Clinical Hospital, "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania
| | - D Koumaki
- Department of Dermatology and Venereology, University Hospital of Heraklion, Heraklion, Crete, Greece
| | - M Augustin
- Institute for Health Services Research in Dermatology and Nursing (IVDP), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - D Linder
- University Clinic for Medical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - D Abeni
- Clinical Epidemiology Unit, IDI-IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - S S Salek
- School of Life & Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK
| | - J Szepietowski
- Department of Dermatology, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland
| | - G B Jemec
- Department of Dermatology, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ayse Ornek S, Orcen C, Church MK, Kocaturk E. An evaluation of remission rates with first and second line treatments and indicators of antihistamine refractoriness in chronic urticaria. Int Immunopharmacol 2022; 112:109198. [PMID: 36115277 DOI: 10.1016/j.intimp.2022.109198] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2022] [Revised: 08/22/2022] [Accepted: 08/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Guidelines recommend standard doses of antihistamines as first-line, and updosing of antihistamines as second-line treatment for the management of chronic urticaria (CU). However, remission rates with different types of first- and second-line treatments and indicators of antihistamine response are largely lacking in the literature. OBJECTIVES To examine response rates to first- and second-line treatments in CU, and to identify patient characteristics that can predict antihistamine treatment outcomes. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed treatment outcomes of 657 CU (556 chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU), 101 chronic inducible urticaria (CIndU)) patients who had at least 3-months of follow-up data. RESULTS A standard dose of second generation antihistamines (sgAH) was effective in 43.1 % of the patients. An additional 28.8 % of patients were in remission with second-line treatments. Among patients whose disease was in remission with a standard dose of sgAHs, 14.8 % benefited from switching from their current sgAH to another sgAH. Updosing sgAHs, combination of two different sgAHs, sgAH and first generation H1-antihistamine combination, and sgAH and leukotriene receptor antagonist combination provided remission in 38.3 %, 35.8 %, 37.5 % and 25 % of patients who were given these treatments, respectively. Baseline UCT score ≤ 4, emergency referral and family history of CSU were found to be risk factors for antihistamine refractoriness in patients with CSU. CONCLUSIONS A step-wise approach to the management of CU is practical as more patients respond to treatment at each step. The presence of baseline UCT score ≤ 4, emergency referral and family history of CSU might be helpful to determine patients who require third-line treatments in advance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sinem Ayse Ornek
- Department of Dermatology, Health Sciences University Diskapi Yildirim Beyazit Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Cihan Orcen
- Department of Allergy Immunology, Health Science University Derince Training and Research Hospital, Kocaeli, Turkey
| | - Martin K Church
- Institute for Allergology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Emek Kocaturk
- Institute for Allergology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Department of Dermatology, Koc University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey; Fraunhofer Institute for Translational Medicine and Pharmacology ITMP, Allergology and Immunology, Berlin, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Alen Coutinho I, Regateiro FS, Fernandes RA, Pita JS, Gomes R, Coelho C, Todo Bom A. Refractory chronic urticaria in adults: clinical characterization and predictors of severity. Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol 2020; 16:97. [PMID: 33292453 PMCID: PMC7661155 DOI: 10.1186/s13223-020-00496-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2020] [Accepted: 10/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Chronic urticaria (CU) is defined as recurrent urticaria lasting for more than 6 weeks. Objectives We aimed to characterize the phenotypes of patients with CU refractory to standard dose anti-H1 antihistamine treatment and search for clinical predictors of poor disease control. Methods Retrospective collection of data regarding clinical characteristics, comorbidities, treatment, and disease control of all adult refractory CU patients presenting to the Allergy and Immunology Department during 1 year. Results Sixty-one adult patients were included, 74% females, average age 44.5 years (18 to 84 years old). Most patients (78.7%) had initiated CU less than 1 year before enrolment. Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) accounted for 55.7% of the patients, CSU associated with chronic inducible urticaria (CIndU) as a comorbidity for 44.3%, and angioedema was present in 55.7%. Medically-confirmed psychiatric disorders were present in 78.7%. Complementary diagnostic tests were performed in cases with more severe presentation (UAS7 ≥ 28 and/or UCT < 12) or with longer evolution (> 1 year), corresponding to 42 tested patient. Evidence for autoimmunity (positive anti-thyroid peroxidase antibodies, anti-nuclear antibodies or autologous serum test) was found in 45.2% (n = 19/42), and high C-reactive protein was present in 14.3% (n = 6/42), half of these also had positive antinuclear antibodies. Forty-six patients (75.4%) had at least one significant exacerbation, requiring medical appointment, emergency room, hospitalization or job absenteeism. The number of exacerbations correlated with the presence of angioedema (p = 0.022), with a recent diagnosis (< 1 year), and with higher UAS7 severity (p = 0.006). Although ClndU was associated with poor symptom control (p = 0.022), it was also associated with less exacerbations requiring medical observation or hospitalization (p = 0.015). All patients were using antihistamines and 21.3% (n = 13) of them were also under treatment with omalizumab, ciclosporine or montelukast for disease control. Conclusions Autoimmunity can affect about half of the patients with severe or long-term CU. UAS7 and angioedema are associated with disease exacerbations. UAS7 and UCT presented unequal accuracy, with UAS7 better associating with the occurrence of exacerbations and treatment doses. Patients with refractory CU frequently present psychiatric disorders. Accurate diagnostic tests, namely autoimmune parameters and inflammatory markers, should be recommended in some individual cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iolanda Alen Coutinho
- Allergy and Clinical Immunology Departement, Centro Hospitalar E Universitário de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
| | - Frederico Soares Regateiro
- Allergy and Clinical Immunology Departement, Centro Hospitalar E Universitário de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.,Institute of Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.,ICBR - Coimbra Institute for Clinical and Biomedical Research, CIBB, Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Rosa Anita Fernandes
- Allergy and Clinical Immunology Departement, Centro Hospitalar E Universitário de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Joana Sofia Pita
- Allergy and Clinical Immunology Departement, Centro Hospitalar E Universitário de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Raquel Gomes
- Allergy and Clinical Immunology Departement, Centro Hospitalar E Universitário de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
| | | | - Ana Todo Bom
- Allergy and Clinical Immunology Departement, Centro Hospitalar E Universitário de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.,ICBR - Coimbra Institute for Clinical and Biomedical Research, CIBB, Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.,Institute of Pathophysiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|