The incidence of immunofluorescence patterns and specific autoantibodies observed in autoimmune patients in a tertiary care centre

Clinical usefulness of anti-nuclear antibody in childhood: real-world experience at a tertiary care center : Usefulness of ANA in pediatric autoimmune diseases

We evaluated the reasons for requesting anti-nuclear antibody (ANA) analysis in clinical practice at a tertiary center and the performance of ANA in pediatric autoimmune diseases. Patients under 18 years of age who underwent ANA testing for various symptoms between 2013 and 2017 were included. We retrieved data from medical records, including demographic and clinical characteristics, diagnoses, ANA results, titers, and staining patterns. The performance assessment tools were calculated according to the ANA titer for autoimmune diseases. Risk factors for autoimmune diseases in ANA-positive patients were evaluated using logistic regression analysis. Changes in ANA titer and seroconversion were evaluated using repeated ANA analyses. A total of 3812 patients underwent ANA. Medical records of 3320 patients were obtained. The rate of ANA positivity was 27.4%. ANA was requested most frequently because of musculoskeletal findings in 1355 patients (40.8%). Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (n = 174, 20.2%) was the most common diagnosis in ANA-positive patients, followed by systemic lupus erythematosus (n = 52, 6%). For autoimmune diseases, a titer of ≥ 1:100, a sensitivity of 40.1%, and a specificity of 77.1% were observed. At a titer ≥ 1:1000, the sensitivity and specificity were 24.1% and 89%, respectively. Homogeneous staining was an additional risk factor for autoimmune diseases in ANA-positive patients by multivariate logistic regression analysis (OR [95% CI]: 4.562 [3.076-6.766], p < 0.001).    Conclusion: Our results revealed that the performance of the ANA test in diagnosing autoimmune diseases in pediatric clinical practice was poor. Therefore, clinical findings should be carefully evaluated before ANA testing is performed. What is Known: • ANA can be detected in systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases. • The diagnostic role of ANA is controversial, especially in childhood. What is New: • One in four patients who requested the ANA test had an autoimmune disease. • Less than half of patients with an autoimmune disease had ANA positivity.

Development of a Novel Multiplex Bead-based Assay for Measuring Autoantibodies on Flow Cytometric Platform

Background: Autoantibodies (AAbs) are important biomarkers for the diagnosis of Autoimmune Diseases (ADs). The detection of AAbs performed by current methods (indirect immunofluorescence test (IIFT)/Immunoblot (dot/line)/enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay ELISA) which have limitations in terms of performing multiple assays to arrive at laboratory diagnosis. We validated a novel multiplex bead-based assay (NMBA) that could quantify five common antibodies, simultaneously, on a flow-cytometry platform.Methods: A total of five recombinant antigens (SS-A Ro60, CENP B, RNP 70, Scl 70 and Histones) were covalently coupled onto beads and tested using known positive sera (positive for AAbs) and analyzed using flow cytometer.Results: The sensitivity, specificity, Positive Predictive Value (PPV) and Negative Predictive Value (NPV) were obtained for each antigen, analyzed by both assays (NMBA and IIFT). It showed comparable or higher values for the NMBA. The Spearman's rank correlation coefficient (Rho) were ≥ 0.97, (P < .05), indicating that multiplexing of the five autoantigens did not alter the results obtained when antigens were tested individually. The mean intra-assay precision measured by coefficient of variation (CV) was7.56 ± 1.6% and the mean inter-assay CV was 10.03 ± 1.34%. The time taken from sample receipt to reporting of results was 90 minutes in NMBA as compared to 150 minutes of IIFTConclusion: The NMBA could quantitatively measure antibodies against five autoantigens, simultaneously in patient's sera. The assay is faster, objective, reproducible, requires low sample volume, and stable. Moreover, the flow cytometer in diagnostic laboratory settings for hematological and transplant immunology tests, can also be used for testing AAbs.

The association between antinuclear antibody and response to rituximab treatment in adult patients with primary immune thrombocytopenia

Background: Antinuclear antibodies (ANAs) can be detected in about 30% of patients with primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP), yet their relationship with treatment response to rituximab remains elusive.Methods: we retrospectively reviewed the clinical records of hospitalized adult ITP patients who were treated with rituximab from three medical centers across China. Rituximab was given intravenously at 100 mg weekly for 4 weeks, or at a single dose of 375 mg/m². All included patients had their ANAs tested before rituximab treatment.Results: A total of 287 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were eligible for analysis. ANAs were positive in 98 (34.1%) of the included patients. The incidence of overall response and complete response (CR) in ANA-positive patients was significantly higher than that in ANA-negative patients (overall response: 76.5% vs. 55.0%, P < 0.001; CR: 46.9% vs. 29.1%, P = 0.003). However, sustained response (SR) rates in ANA-positive patients at 6, 12 and 24 months were all lower compared with ANA-negative patients (all P < 0.05). The overall duration of response (DOR) estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis in ANA-negative patients was greater than that in ANA-positive patients (P < 0.001).Conclusion: ITP patients with positive ANA test were likely to achieve a better initial response to rituximab treatment, while their long-term outcome was unfavorable. Therefore, ANA test could be useful for predicting rituximab response in ITP.