Outcomes of open heart surgery in patients with end-stage renal disease

A systematic review of right atrial bypass grafting in the management of central venous occlusive disease in patients undergoing hemodialysis

INTRODUCTION

Central venous occlusive disease (CVOD) is a complication that can occur in patients with end-stage renal disease who are receiving hemodialysis. When CVOD develops, patients often require multiple re-interventions to maintain their dialysis access. CVOD can be treated by various strategies such as balloon angioplasty, stenting, lower limb or extra-anatomical grafts, hybrid grafts or surgical bypasses such as right atrial (RA). In this systematic review, we aim to evaluate the indications, technical aspects, and outcomes after RA bypass grafting for the treatment of CVOD in hemodialysis patients.

METHODS

A systematic and comprehensive literature search was conducted using various electronic databases. We included articles that reported described and reported outcomes of RA bypass grafting for the treatment of CVOD in hemodialysis patients. A narrative review of the indications and technical aspects of RA bypass grafting was performed. We also pooled and reported the primary patency, secondary patency, postoperative complications, and 30-day mortality of RA bypass grafting.

RESULTS

A total of 21 studies with 55 patients who underwent RA bypass grafting were included in our systematic review. Follow-up period ranged from 0.5 to 84 months. The mean pooled primary patency and secondary patency of RA bypass grafting were 8.1 ± 4.9 and 21.7 ± 20.1 months, respectively. The incidence of early postoperative complications such as surgical site infection, bleeding, and access thrombosis was 0%, 4%, and 4%, respectively. The overall 30-day mortality was 4%.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review summarizes the patient characteristics, technical features and outcomes of RA bypass grafting in the treatment of hemodialysis-related CVOD. RA bypass grafting may be a viable last-resort option when less invasive or conventional treatment options have been exhausted.

Clinical outcomes in end stage renal disease on dialysis and severe coronary artery disease: A real-world study

BACKGROUND

The optimal management of patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) on dialysis with severe coronary artery disease (CAD) has not been determined.

METHODS

Between 2013 and 2017, all patients with ESRD on dialysis who had left main (LM) disease, triple vessel disease (TVD) and/or severe CAD for consideration of coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) were included. Patients were divided into 3 groups based on final treatment modality: CABG, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), optimal medical therapy (OMT). Outcome measures include in-hospital, 180-day, 1-year and overall mortality and major adverse cardiac events (MACE).

RESULTS

In total, 418 patients were included (CABG 11.0%, PCI 65.6%, OMT 23.4%). Overall, 1-year mortality and MACE rates were 27.5% and 55.0% respectively. Patients who underwent CABG were significantly younger, more likely to have LM disease and have no prior heart failure. In this non-randomized setting, treatment modality did not impact on 1-year mortality, although the CABG group had significantly lower 1-year MACE rates (CABG 32.6%, PCI 57.3%, OMT 59.2%; CABG vs. OMT p < 0.01, CABG vs. PCI p < 0.001). Independent predictors of overall mortality include STEMI presentation (HR 2.31, 95% CI 1.38-3.86), prior heart failure (HR 1.84, 95% CI 1.22-2.75), LM disease (HR 1.71, 95% CI 1.26-2.31), NSTE-ACS presentation (HR 1.40, 95% CI 1.03-1.91) and increased age (HR 1.02, 95% CI 1.01-1.04).

CONCLUSION

Treatment decisions for patients with severe CAD with ESRD on dialysis are complex. Understanding independent predictors of mortality and MACE in specific treatment subgroups may provide valuable insights into the selection of optimal treatment options.

Outcomes of cardiac surgery in patients with end-stage renal disease: Insights from the Israel national registries

BACKGROUND

End-stage renal disease (ESRD) has been shown to be associated with increased mortality in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. We aimed to compare the short- and mid-term mortality after cardiac surgery of patients with dialysis-dependent ESRD (DD-ESRD) to patients with normal renal function (NRF), using national registries: the ESRD registry, the adult cardiac surgery registry (ACSR), and the National Mortality Registry.

METHODS

The study population comprised 8207 adult patients who underwent either isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), isolated aortic valve replacement (AVR), isolated mitral valve replacement (MVR), or CABG + valve-related procedure, between January 2017 and April 2019. Data were retrospectively extracted and reported to the ACSR by the department of medical records of each medical center.

RESULTS

One hundred and four DD-ESRD patients (mean age 63.2 ± 8.8 years, 83.7% males) were compared with 8103 NRF patients (mean age 64.9 ± 9.8 years, 77.6% males). Median follow-up for the total cohort was of 32.0 months (IQR; 25.0, 40.0). In DD-ESRD compared to NRF patients, 30-day mortality was higher (14.4% vs. 2.3%, respectively, p = 0.0001) and 4-year survival was significantly lower (44% ± 0.06 vs. 91% ± 0.04, respectively, p = 0.0001). Fifty-three percent of DD-ESRD 30-day mortality was caused by sepsis. Risk factors associated with reduced midterm survival included: DD-ESRD patients (HR = 4.7, 95% CI; 1.2-18.2), MVR procedure (HR = 1.5, 95% CI; 1.04-2.1) and combined CABG + valve-related procedure (HR = 1.6, 95% CI; 1.2-2.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative DD-ESRD was associated with a significant increase in 30-day and mid-term mortality after cardiac surgery. The highest mortality rate was observed in valvular and combined procedures.

Comparison of coronary artery bypass graft versus drug-eluting stents in dialysis patients: an updated systemic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

As percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) technologies have been far improved, we hence conducted an updated systemic review and meta-analysis to determine the comparability between coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) and PCI with drug-eluting stent (DES) in ESRD patients.

METHODS

We comprehensively searched the databases of MEDLINE, EMBASE, PUBMED and the Cochrane from inception to January 2020. Included studies were published observational studies that compared the risk of cardiovascular outcomes among dialysis patients with CABG and DES. Data from each study were combined using the random-effects, generic inverse variance method of DerSimonian and Laird to calculate risk ratios and 95% confidence intervals. Subgroup analyses and meta-regression were performed to explore heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Thirteen studies were included in this analysis, involving total 56 422 (CABG 21 740 and PCI 34 682). Compared with DES, our study demonstrated CABG had higher 30-day mortality [odds ratio (OR) 3.85, P = 0.009] but lower cardiac mortality (OR 0.78, P < 0.001), myocardial infarction (OR 0.5, P < 0.001) and repeat revascularization (OR 0.35, P < 0.001). No statistical differences were found between CABG and DES for long-term mortality (OR 0.92, P = 0.055), composite outcomes (OR 0.88, P = 0.112) and stroke (OR 1.49, P = 0.457). Meta-regression suggested diabetes and the presence of left main coronary artery disease as an effect modifier of long-term mortality.

CONCLUSION

PCI with DES shared similar long-term mortality, composite outcomes and stroke outcomes to CABG among dialysis patients but still was associated with an improved 30-day survival. However, CABG had better rates of myocardial infarction, repeat revascularization and cardiac mortality.