Detection of increased left ventricular filling pressure by pulsed tissue Doppler in cardiac amyloidosis

Myocardial phenotypes and dysfunction in HFpEF and HFrEF assessed by echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance

Heart failure (HF) with either reduced or preserved ejection fraction is an increasingly prevalent condition. Cardiac imaging plays a central role in trying to identify the underlying cause of the underlying systolic and diastolic dysfunction, as the imaging findings have implications for patient's management and individualised treatment. The imaging modalities used more frequently in patients with heart failure in clinical routine are echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance. Both techniques keep some strengths and weakness due to their spatial and temporal resolution. Notably, several features in the diagnostic algorithm of heart failure with preserved systolic function (HFpEF) may be improved by an integrated approach. This review focuses on the role of each modality in characterising cardiac anatomy, systolic and diastolic function as well as myocardial tissue characterisation in the most common phenotypes of dilated and hypertrophied hearts.

Multimodality Imaging in Restrictive Cardiomyopathies: An EACVI expert consensus document In collaboration with the "Working Group on myocardial and pericardial diseases" of the European Society of Cardiology Endorsed by The Indian Academy of Echocardiography

Restrictive cardiomyopathies (RCMs) are a diverse group of myocardial diseases with a wide range of aetiologies, including familial, genetic and acquired diseases and ranging from very rare to relatively frequent cardiac disorders. In all these diseases, imaging techniques play a central role. Advanced imaging techniques provide important novel data on the diagnostic and prognostic assessment of RCMs. This EACVI consensus document provides comprehensive information for the appropriateness of all non-invasive imaging techniques for the diagnosis, prognostic evaluation, and management of patients with RCM.

Reentrant Ventricular Tachycardia Originating From the Periaortic Region in the Absence of Overt Structural Heart Disease

Background—

In the absence of overt structural heart disease, most left ventricular outflow tract ventricular tachycardias (VTs) have a focal origin and are benign. We hypothesized that multiple morphologies (MMs) of inducible left ventricular outflow tract VT may indicate a scar-related VT that can mimic idiopathic VT.

Methods and Results—

Of 54 consecutive patients referred for ablation of sustained outflow tract VT without overt structural heart disease, 24 had left ventricular outflow tract VT, 10 had MM VT, and 14 had a single VT (SM). The MM group were older (70.3±4.3 versus 53.9±15.9 years; P =0.004), had more hypertension (100% versus 29%; P =0.0006), and had longer PR intervals and QRS durations compared with the SM group. In contrast to the SM group, the MM group VTs had features consistent with reentry, including induction by programmed stimulation without isoproterenol, entrainment in some, and abnormal electrograms in the periaortic area. Periaortic region voltages suggested scar in the MM group, but not in the SM group. MRI in 2 MM patients was consistent with scar, but not in 10 SM patients. Longer radiofrequency applications were required in the MM group than in the SM group. At a median follow-up of 9.7 (3.0–32.0) months, recurrences tended to be more frequent in the MM group than in the SM group (70% versus 22%; P =0.07).

Conclusions—

VTs from small regions of periaortic scar can mimic idiopathic VT but are suggested by multiple VT morphologies and are more difficult to ablate. Whether these patients are at greater risk, as feared for other scar-related VTs, warrants further study.

Echocardiographic features of an atypical presentation of rapidly progressive cardiac amyloidosis

We present the case of a 66 year old male who presented with dyspnea and reduced exercise tolerance. Echocardiography demonstrated impaired left ventricular (LV) function and restrictive diastolic function with pronounced concentric left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) without a history of hypertension and no aortic valve stenosis. Differential diagnostics of concentric LVH are discussed in detail. In the current case, cardiac amyloidosis (AL) amyloidosis was diagnosed and confirmed by serum amyloid P (SAP) scintigraphy and abdominal fat aspiration biopsy. This case shows the rapid decline in clinical condition with progression of cardiac involvement of AL. As discussed in detail, cardiac involvement in AL-amyloidosis generally denotes a poor prognosis, regardless of the method of treatment.

Prognostic role of clinical presentation in symptomatic patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

AIMS

To evaluate the long-term prognostic impact of baseline symptoms in a cohort of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) patients.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We considered 84 HCM patients symptomatic at diagnosis: 26 (31%) with heart failure (group 1), 34 (40%) with syncope/palpitations (group 2) and 24 (29%) with chest pain (group 3). During a median follow-up of 102 (53-187) months, 25 (30%) patients died/underwent heart transplant (HTx), 14 of 26 (54%) in group 1, 10 of 34 (29%) in group 2 and one of 24 (4%) in group 3. At 12, 60 and 120 months, HTx-free survival rates were 100, 79 and 52% in group 1, vs. 100, 97 and 69% in group 2, vs. 96, 96 and 96% in group 3, respectively (P = 0.008). At multivariate analysis, heart failure [hazard ratio (HR) 2.59, confidence interval (CI) 95% 1.09-6.17, P = 0.032] and left atrium diameter (HR 1.83, CI 95% 1.16-2.89, P = 0.009) emerged as independent predictors of death/HTx, with incremental prognostic power with respect to echo Doppler variables of left ventricular systolic and diastolic dysfunction [area under the curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves at 5 years: 0.90 vs. 0.78, respectively, P = 0.03].

CONCLUSION

Clinical presentation emerged as a relevant prognostic tool in HCM patients symptomatic at onset, as heart failure was associated with a particularly poor outcome. Heart failure and left atrium diameter at diagnosis showed incremental prognostic power compared with echo Doppler assessment of left ventricular systolic and diastolic dysfunction.