Sex differences in the management of acute coronary syndromes in Italy: data from the MANTRA registry

A Global Overview of Acute Coronary Syndrome Registries: A Systematic Review

The present study was conducted with the aim of identifying, and summarizing the characteristics of ACS registries at national, multinational and international levels. Literature was searched using keywords in the title and/or abstract without any time limit ending in March, 2021. After excluding duplicates, 2 reviewers independently reviewed the titles and/or abstracts and full text for inclusion. Each reviewer independently extracted the characteristics of the registries from included papers. Finally, the extracted characteristics were confirmed by a second reviewer. Out of the 1309 papers included, 71 ACS registries were identified (including 60 national and 11 multinational and international registries). Most national registries were being used in Europe. Most registries focused on measuring quality. In more than half of the registries, all types of ACS patients were enrolled. The diagnostic and drug classification systems were mentioned in eight and five registries, respectively. The design of 55 registries was hospital-based. The ability of computerized audit checks was made for 34 registries. More than half of the registries had patient consent and had a web-based design. In all the ACS registries, patient characteristics, clinical characteristics and treatment characteristics were recorded and post-discharge follow-up information was recorded in 45 registries. In the current situation and given that a limited number of countries in the world have national ACS registries, reviewing the results of this study and modeling the registries implemented in the leading countries can help countries without a registry to design it.

Pharmacological treatment after acute coronary syndrome: Baseline clinical characteristics and gender differences in a population-based cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To describe baseline socio-demographic and clinical characteristics and drugs prescribed for secondary prevention after a first episode of ACS and to assess differences between men and women.

SETTING

PHC in Catalonia.

DATA SOURCE

SIDIAP (Information System for Research in Primary Care).

PARTICIPANTS

Patients who suffered an ACS during 2009-2016 and followed-up in PHC centres of the Catalan Health Institute in Catalonia.

INTERVENTIONS

Not applicable.

MAIN MEASURES

Socio-demographic and clinical characteristics at baseline: sex, age, socioeconomic index, toxic habits, comorbidities, study drugs (prescribed for cardiovascular secondary prevention: antiplatelets, betablockers, statins, drugs acting on the renin-angiotensin system) and comedications.

RESULTS

8071 patients included, 71.3% of them were men and 80.2% had an acute myocardial infarction. Their mean age was 65.3 and women were older than men. The most frequent comorbidities were hypertension, dyslipidaemia and diabetes and they were more common in women. Antiplatelets (91.3%) and statins (85.7%) were the study drugs most prescribed. The uses of all comedications were significantly higher in women, except for nitrates. The combination of four study groups was initially prescribed in 47.7% of patients and combination of beta-blockers, statins and antiplatelets was prescribed in 18.4%. More men than women received all recommended pharmacological groups.

CONCLUSION

Women were older, had more comorbidities and received more comedications. Most patients were treated with a combination of four or three study drugs for secondary prevention. Men initiated more drug treatments for secondary prevention and dual antiplatelet therapy than women.

EUPAS REGISTER

EUPAS19017.

Contemporary differences between men and women with acute coronary syndromes: CIAM multicenter registry

AIM

Differences exist in the diagnosis and treatment of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) between men and women. However, recent advancements in the management of ACSs might have attenuated this sex gap. We evaluated the status of ACS management in a multicenter registry in 10 tertiary Spanish hospitals.

METHODS

We enrolled 1056 patients in our study, including only those with type 1 myocardial infarctions or unstable angina presumably not related to a secondary cause in an 'all-comers' design.

RESULTS

The women enrolled (29%) were older than men (71.0 ± 12.8 vs. 64.0 ± 12.3, P = 0.001), with a higher prevalence of hypertension (71.0 vs. 56.5%, P < 0.001), insulin-treated diabetes (13.7 vs. 7.9%, P = 0.003), dyslipidemia (62.2 vs. 55.3%, P = 0.038), and chronic kidney disease (16.9 vs. 9.1%, P = 0.001). Women presented more frequently with back or arm pain radiation (57.3 vs. 49.7%, P = 0.025), palpitations (5.9 vs. 2.0%, P = 0.001), or dyspnea (33.0 vs. 19.4%, P = 0.001). ACS without significant coronary stenosis was more prevalent in women (16.8 vs. 8.1%, P = 0.001). There were no differences in percutaneous revascularization rates, but drug-eluting stents were less frequently employed in women (75.4 vs. 67.8%, P = 0.024); women were less often referred to a cardiac rehabilitation program (19.9 vs. 33.9%, P = 0.001). There were no significant differences in in-hospital complications such as thrombosis or bleeding.

CONCLUSION

ACS presenting with atypical symptoms and without significant coronary artery stenosis is more frequent in women. Selection of either an invasive procedure or conservative management is not influenced by sex. Cardiac rehabilitation referral on discharge is underused, especially in women.

Contemporary Determinants of Delayed Benchmark Timelines in Acute Myocardial Infarction in Men and Women

Treatment delays in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) are related to increased morbidity and mortality. Hence, identifying determinants of delay may help reduce time to treatment. Importantly, limited data suggest that there may be sex-related disparities in benchmark timelines. Although guidelines advocate the use of the first medical contact (FMC) rather than hospital admission as the moment from which delays to treatment should be monitored, the latter is still often used for quality purposes. We aimed to identify factors associated with treatment delays, with an emphasis on sex-related disparities. We reviewed data on 3,658 patients with AMI from 2 contemporary, consecutive multicenter surveys. Measured delays were FMC-to-electrocardiogram >10 minutes in ST-elevation MI (STEMI) and non-STEMI, FMC-to-primary percutaneous coronary intervention >90 minutes in STEMI, and invasive angiography >72 hours after admission in non-STEMI patients. Timely electrocardiogram was performed in 48% of patients with STEMI and in 39.8% of non-STEMI patients without significant sex-related differences. Independent determinants of delay included atypical chest pain (CP) and presentation during daytime. In patients with STEMI, 37.5% had primary percutaneous coronary intervention in less than 90 minutes without significant sex-related disparities. Independent determinants of delay included atypical CP, night presentation, and diabetes. In non-STEMI patients, independent determinants of delayed invasive approach were female sex, age >75 years, atypical CP, and renal failure. In conclusion, significant treatment delays in patients with AMI are still frequent in contemporary practice, highlighting the need for improvement and guidelines implementation. Predictors of delay identified in our study may facilitate targeting of interventions to improve adherence to guidelines.

Is female gender associated with worse outcome after ST elevation myocardial infarction?

Objectives

To investigate the impact of gender in outcomes of patients with ST segment myocardial infarction in a setting with limited access to primary percutaneous coronary intervention

Methods

In 1017 consecutive patients hospitalized with ST segment myocardial infarction during years 2008–2013, distribution of risk factors, therapeutic methods, heart failure and in-hospital mortality were compared between males and females. Association of gender and primary outcomes was determined after adjustment for confounding factors.

Results

Females were significantly older (66 ± 12.1 years vs. 59.5 ± 12.7 years, p < 0.001). Prevalence of hypertension, hyperlipidemia and diabetes was significantly higher in females (72.2% vs. 39%, p < 0.001, 36.1% vs. 20.3%, p < 0.001, 46.5% vs. 32.1%, p < 0.001, respectively). Presentation delay was similar in males and females. Females received reperfusion therapy more than males (63.2%vs. 55.8%, p = 0.032). Development of heart failure and in-hospital mortality were significantly higher in females (36.5% vs. 27.2%, p = 0.003 and 19.4% vs. 12.1%, p = 0.002, respectively).

However in multivariate analysis, female gender was not independently associated with increased rate of heart failure and in-hospital mortality

Conclusion

In a center with low rate of primary percutaneous coronary intervention, crude rates of heart failure and in-hospital mortality are higher in females; however, the association is lost after adjustment for baseline characteristics