Refractory idiopathic recurrent pericarditis

Recurrent pericarditis and interleukin (IL)-1 inhibitors

Recurrent pericarditis (RP) is defined by the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) as an instance of acute pericarditis (AP) that occurs at least 4-6 weeks after the resolution of a previous episode of the same ailment. To mitigate the risk of RP, it is advised to administer accurate and prolonged pharmacological treatment for both the initial AP and subsequent RP. ESC guidelines recommend commencing treatment for any single episode of AP, including those that contribute to RP, with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in conjunction with colchicine for several months, often followed by gradual tapering. If there is an inadequate response, corticosteroids (CS) may be introduced cautiously. However, in a minority of cases, even when NSAIDs, colchicine, and CS are administered together at the highest recommended dosages, they may prove ineffective. In such instances, treatment with immunosuppressive drugs or biologics is advised. Among biologics, interleukin (IL)-1 inhibitors have been extensively studied, although certain gaps remain. This narrative review delves into the rationale for employing IL-1 inhibitors and presents findings from existing studies regarding their efficacy, tolerability, and safety. Analysis of the literature indicates that there is currently insufficient data to ascertain the true therapeutic role of IL-1 inhibitors in managing and preventing RP. However, theoretically, drugs targeting both IL-1α and IL-1β may offer superior efficacy compared to those solely targeting IL-1β due to the significant involvement of both cytokines in inflammation. Further research is warranted to determine the comparative effectiveness of IL-1α and IL-1β inhibitors.

Anakinra-Dependent Recurrent Pericarditis: The Role of the R202Q Variant of the MEFV Gene

Background: the role of the R202Q (c.605G>A, p.Arg202Gln) missense variant of the MEFV gene has been debated as either a benign polymorphism or a potentially pathogenic mutation. We report and discuss here the case of a young female with corticosteroid-dependent recurrent pericarditis carrying the homozygous R202Q variant, exhibiting distinctive clinical features possibly influenced by this genetic variant. Methods: a 30-year-old woman with a previous diagnosis of cancer and recent respiratory infection presented with severe pleuritic chest pain, hypotension, tachycardia, and fever. Initial diagnostic evaluation indicated cardiac tamponade, and emergent pericardiocentesis was performed. Despite initial treatment with NSAIDs, colchicine, and corticosteroids, the patient experienced multiple recurrences. Genetic testing identified homozygous R202Q variant in the MEFV gene. Given the corticosteroid dependency and recurrent nature of her condition, IL-1 inhibitor anakinra was introduced, leading to significant improvement, although tapering below 150 mg per week failed to prevent recurrences. Results: the introduction of anakinra resulted in rapid symptom relief and resolution of pericardial effusion. However, attempts to taper or discontinue anakinra led to pericarditis recurrences. Ultimately, a maintenance dose of 50 mg every three days was established, which maintained remission for 18 months without recurrence. Despite multiple tapering attempts, further reduction in anakinra dosage was unsuccessful without triggering relapses. Conclusions: the R202Q variant, although typically considered benign, may contribute to an autoinflammatory phenotype resembling familial Mediterranean fever. This case underscores the potential pathogenicity of the homozygous R202Q variant in recurrent pericarditis and its responsiveness to IL-1 inhibition. In patients with corticosteroid-dependent recurrent pericarditis, genetic testing for the R202Q variant should be considered when anti-IL-1 drugs cannot be withdrawn. Further studies are warranted to elucidate the variant's role in pericardial inflammation and guide personalized treatment strategies.

Anakinra in Recurrent Pericarditis: Current Evidence on Clinical Use, Effectiveness, and Safety

Anakinra is a recombinant human interleukin 1 receptor antagonist that competes and blocks the biologic effects of interleukin 1, reducing systemic inflammatory responses. In the 2015 guidelines for the diagnosis and management of pericardial diseases of the European Society of Cardiology, anakinra was established as a third-line therapy option for refractory recurrent pericarditis (RP). Recently, important studies that investigates the effect and safety of anakinra in RP were published, such as the AIRTRIP trial and the International Registry of Anakinra for Pericarditis. This article presents the current evidence about the effectiveness and safety of anakinra in RP and discusses its clinical application and mechanisms.

Anakinra for corticosteroid-dependent and colchicine-resistant pericarditis: The IRAP (International Registry of Anakinra for Pericarditis) study

AIMS

Novel therapies are needed for recurrent pericarditis, particularly when corticosteroid dependent and colchicine resistant. Based on limited data, interleukin-1 blockade with anakinra may be beneficial. The aim of this multicentre registry was to evaluate the broader effectiveness and safety of anakinra in a 'real world' population.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This registry enrolled consecutive patients with recurrent pericarditis who were corticosteroid dependent and colchicine resistant and treated with anakinra. The primary outcome was the pericarditis recurrence rate after treatment. Secondary outcomes included emergency department visits, hospitalisations, corticosteroid use and adverse events. Among 224 patients (46 ± 14 years old, 63% women, 75% idiopathic), the median duration of disease was 17 months (interquartile range 9-33). Most patients had elevated C-reactive protein (91%) and pericardial effusion (88%). After a median treatment of 6 months (3-12), pericarditis recurrences were reduced six-fold (2.33-0.39 per patient per year), emergency department admissions were reduced 11-fold (1.08-0.10 per patient per year), hospitalisations were reduced seven-fold (0.99-0.13 per patient per year). Corticosteroid use was decreased by anakinra (respectively from 80% to 27%; P < 0.001). No serious adverse events occurred; adverse events consisted mostly of transient skin reactions (38%) at the injection site. Adverse events led to discontinuation in 3%. A full-dose treatment duration of over 3 months followed by a tapering period of over 3 months were the therapeutic schemes associated with a lower risk of recurrence.

CONCLUSION

In patients with recurrent pericarditis, anakinra appears efficacious and safe in reducing recurrences, emergency department admissions and hospitalisations.