The paradox of transient worsening renal function in patients with acute heart failure

Frequency and progression of azotemia during acute and chronic treatment of congestive heart failure in cats

BACKGROUND

Azotemia is common in cats with congestive heart failure (CHF) and might be exacerbated by diuretic therapy.

HYPOTHESIS/OBJECTIVES

Determine frequency, risk factors, and survival impact of progressive azotemia in cats treated for CHF.

ANIMALS

One hundred and sixteen client-owned cats with kidney function testing performed at least twice during acute or chronic CHF treatment.

METHODS

Serum creatinine (sCr) and electrolyte concentrations were determined at multiple clinical timepoints to detect azotemia and kidney injury (KI; sCr increase ≥0.3 mg/dL). Furosemide dosage between timepoints was calculated. Multivariable modeling was performed to identify predictors of KI, change in serum biochemistry results, and survival.

RESULTS

Azotemia was common at all timepoints, including initial CHF diagnosis (44%). Kidney injury was documented in 66% of cats. Use of a furosemide continuous rate infusion was associated with increased risk of KI during hospitalization (odds ratio, 141.6; 95% confidence interval [CI], 12.1-6233; P = .01). Higher furosemide dosage was associated with increase in sCr during hospitalization (P = .03) and at first reevaluation (P = .01). Treatment with an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor was associated with fewer lifetime KI events (P = .02). Age in years was the only variable associated with shorter survival (hazard ratio, 1.1; 95% CI, 1.0-1.1; P = .03). Neither sCr nor KI were associated with long-term outcome.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE

Azotemia and KI were common in cats during CHF treatment but did not impact survival.

Tolvaptan's Association with Low Risk of Acute Kidney Injury in Patients with Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease and Acute Decompensated Heart Failure

INTRODUCTION

Furosemide, a loop diuretic, is often empirically used to treat acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) initially. Conversely, decongestion using tolvaptan, an aquaretic, is thought to maintain renal function compared to furosemide. However, it has not been investigated in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) at high risk of developing acute kidney injury (AKI). This study aimed to investigate AKI incidence using tolvaptan add-on treatment, compared to increased furosemide treatment for patients with ADHF complicated by advanced CKD.

METHODS

We retrospectively studied patients with advanced CKD (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] <45 mL/min/1.73 m2) who developed ADHF under outpatient furosemide treatment. The exposure was set to tolvaptan add-on treatment, and the control was set to increased furosemide treatment.

RESULTS

Of the 163 patients enrolled, 79 were in the tolvaptan group and 84 in the furosemide group. The mean age was 71.6 years, the percentage of males was 63.8%, the mean eGFR was 15.7 mL/min/1.73 m2, and patients with CKD stage G5 were 61.9%. AKI incidence was 17.7% in the tolvaptan group and 42.9% in the furosemide group (odds ratio [95% confidence interval]: 0.34 [0.13-0.86], p = 0.023 in multivariate logistic regression analysis). Persistent AKI incidence was 11.8% in the tolvaptan group and 32.9% in the furosemide group (odds ratio [95% confidence interval]: 0.34 [0.10-1.06], p = 0.066 in the multinomial logit analysis).

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that tolvaptan may be better than furosemide in patients with ADHF experiencing complicated advanced CKD.

Retrospective evaluation of risk factors for development of kidney injury after parenteral furosemide treatment of left-sided congestive heart failure in dogs

BACKGROUND

Kidney injury (KI) has been documented in dogs treated with furosemide for left-sided congestive heart failure (CHF).

HYPOTHESIS/OBJECTIVES

Determine risk factors for development of KI in furosemide-treated dogs and determine the effect of KI on survival.

ANIMALS

Seventy-nine client-owned dogs receiving parenteral furosemide for CHF.

METHODS

Serum creatinine (sCr) and electrolyte concentrations were determined during hospitalization and at first outpatient reevaluation to detect and stage KI (increase in sCr ≥0.3 mg/dL). Furosemide dosage administered between timepoints was calculated. Multivariable modeling was performed to identify predictors of KI and percent change in serum biochemistry results over time.

RESULTS

Kidney injury was identified in 38/79 (48%) dogs and mostly occurred during hospitalization. Kidney injury was Grade I in 25 dogs, Grade II in 9 dogs, and Grade III in 4 dogs. Higher blood pressure was associated with acute KI during hospitalization (odds ratio, 1.03; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.01-1.07; P = .03) whereas PO furosemide dosage was associated with KI after hospital discharge (odds ratio, 7.77; 95% CI, 2.05-68.6; P = .02). Baseline sCr and use of a furosemide continuous rate infusion were not associated with increased risk of KI. Kidney injury was not associated with long-term outcome. Of 13 dogs with Grade II-III KI, azotemia was reversible in 9 dogs, and 6 dogs survived >1 year after KI.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE

In this cohort of dogs receiving parenteral furosemide for CHF, KI was common, mostly nonazotemic (Grade I), and did not impact survival.

Prognostic and Therapeutic Implications of Renal Insufficiency in Heart Failure

The heart and kidneys are closely related vital organs that significantly affect each other. Cardiorenal syndrome is the term depicting the various spectra of cardiorenal interaction mediated by the hemodynamic, neurohormonal, and biochemical cross-talk between these two organs. In patients with heart failure (HF), both the baseline and worsening renal function are closely related to prognosis. However, for both investigational and clinical purposes, the unified definition and classification of renal injury are still necessary. Renal insufficiency is caused by multiple factors, and categorizing them into monogenous subgroups of phenotype is difficult. Various clinical scenarios related to the chronicity of HF, progression of renal dysfunction, and issues related to pharmacologic therapies associated with the prognosis of patients with HF have been reviewed in this study.

Impact of Preoperative Lymphopenia on Survival Following Left Ventricular Assist Device Placement

Lymphopenia has been implicated in poor outcomes in the heart failure population. However, the prognostic implication of lymphopenia in left ventricular assist device (LVAD) patients is unknown. We examine the impact of lymphopenia on all-cause mortality in this population over a 24-month period post-implantation. A total of 170 patients between June 2011 and July 2018 receiving permanent durable LVAD at a single center formed the study population. Criteria for lymphopenia on admission, defined as an absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) <1500 cells/μl, was met in 99 patients. A total of 11 patients were excluded: two with ALC >4800/μl and nine with incomplete data. Survival across groups was compared with a Kaplan-Meier plot and log-rank statistics. The Cox proportional hazard model was used to examine the association between lymphopenia and 24-month all-cause mortality. In the lymphopenia group, mean ALC was 909.6 ± 331.9 versus 2073.6 ± 501.1 in the non-lymphopenic group. Twenty-four-month all-cause mortality was significantly higher in the lymphopenia group (p = 0.009). The lymphopenic patients had worse unadjusted (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.14, confidence interval [CI] = 1.19-3.82; p = 0.01) and adjusted survival (HR = 2.07, CI = 1.13-3.79; p = 0.02). Further clinical investigations are required to assess the utility of continued clinical monitoring of ALC levels beyond LVAD placement.

Home care for heart failure: can caregiver education prevent hospital admissions? A randomized trial in primary care

AIM

To assess the feasibility and effectiveness of a low-complexity, low-cost model of caregiver education in primary care, targeted to reduce hospitalizations of heart failure patients.

METHODS

A cluster-randomized, controlled, open trial was proposed to general practitioners, who were invited to identify patients with heart failure, exclusively managed at home and continuously attended by a caregiver. Participating general practitioners were then randomized to: usual treatment; caregiver education (educational session for recognizing early symptoms/signs of heart failure, with recording in a diary of a series of patient parameters, including body weight, blood pressure, heart rate). The patients were observed at baseline and during a 12-month follow-up.

RESULTS

Three hundred and thirteen patients were enrolled (163 in the intervention, 150 in the usual care group), 63% women, mean age 85.3 ± 7.7 years. At the end of the 12-month follow-up, a trend towards a lower incidence of hospitalizations was observed in the intervention group (hazard ratio 0.73; 95% CI 0.53-1.01 P = 0.061). Subgroup analysis showed that for patients with persistent/permanent atrial fibrillation, age less than 90 years or Barthel score equal to or greater than 50 a significant lower hospital admission rate occurred in the intervention group (hazard ratio 0.63; 95% CI 0.39-0.99; P = 0.048, hazard ratio 0.66; 95% CI 0.45-0.97; P = 0.036 and hazard ratio 0.61; 95% CI 0.41-0.89; P = 0.011, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Caregivers training for early recognition of symptoms/signs of worsening heart failure may be effective in reducing hospitalizations, although the benefit was evident only in specific patient subgroups (with persistent/permanent atrial fibrillation, age <90 years or Barthel score ≥ 50), with only a positive trend in the whole cohort.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03389841.

Worsening renal function during decongestion among patients hospitalized for heart failure: Findings from the Evaluation Study of Congestive Heart Failure and Pulmonary Artery Catheterization Effectiveness (ESCAPE) trial

INTRODUCTION

Worsening renal function (WRF) can occur throughout a hospitalization for acute heart failure (HF). However, decongestion can be measured in different ways and the prognostic implications of WRF in the setting of different measures of decongestion are unclear.

METHODS

Patients (N = 433) from the ESCAPE were classified by measures of decongestion during hospitalization: hemodynamic (right atrial pressure ≤8 mmHg and/or wedge pressure ≤15 mmHg at discharge), clinical (≤1 sign of congestion at discharge), hemoconcentration (any increase in hemoglobin) and estimated plasma volume using the Hakim formula (5% reduction in plasma volume). WRF was defined as creatinine increase ≥0.3 mg/dl during hospitalization. The association between WRF and 180-day all-cause death was assessed.

RESULTS

Successful decongestion was observed in 124 (60%) patients by hemodynamics, 204 (49%) by clinical exam, 173 (47%) by hemoconcentration, and 165 (45%) by plasma volume. There was no agreement between the hemodynamic assessment and other decongestion measures in up to 43% of cases. Persistent congestion with concomitant WRF at discharge was associated with worse outcomes compared to patients without congestion and WRF. Among patients decongested at discharge, in-hospital WRF was not significantly associated with 180-day all-cause death, when using hemodynamic, clinical or estimated plasma volume as measures of decongestion (P > .05 for all markers).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients hospitalized for HF, although there was disagreement across common measures of decongestion, in-hospital WRF was not associated with increased hazard of all-cause mortality among patients successfully decongested at discharge.