New drugs for the treatment of chronic heart failure with a reduced ejection fraction

Vericiguat: A Novel Soluble Guanylate Cyclase Stimulator for Use in Patients With Heart Failure

Heart failure (HF) affects 6.2 million Americans and is increasing annually in its frequency. Treatment of HF has been at the forefront of medical advancements due to the financial burden on our health care system. As such, changes to the guidelines regarding standard of care have been evolving over the last decade with the recent additions of sacubitril-valsartan and sodium glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors to standard of care in the treatment of HF. Despite the aforementioned expansions in treatment options, HF continues to have a significant impact on the American health care system. Most recently, a novel drug vericiguat that targets an unprecedented pathway for the treatment of HF was Food and Drug Administration approved for the management of patients with HF with a reduced ejection fraction with a recent hospitalization or need for outpatient intravenous diuretics. In clinical trials, vericiguat was associated with a reduction in death from cardiovascular causes and first hospitalization in comparison to placebo. The aim of this review is to provide a comprehensive literature analysis of the various trials surrounding the approval of vericiguat and to both inform and synthesize the data surrounding the clinical use of vericiguat. The introduction of Vericiguat should be considered as a treatment option in patients to decrease the mortality/morbidity of HF with reduced ejection fraction and to increase the quality of life.

Effects of renal denervation therapy on cardiac function and malignant arrhythmia in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction and narrow QRS complexes treated with implantable cardioverter defibrillator

Objective : The purpose of this study was to explore the effects of renal denervation (RDN) on cardiac function and malignant arrhythmia in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (HFrEF) and narrow QRS treated with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). Methods: A total of 20 eligible HFrEF patients [left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <40%] and narrow QRS complexes (QRS duration <120 ms) were randomized into either the ICD plus RDN group or the ICD only group during 17 April 2014 to 22 November 2016. Clinical data, including clinical characteristics, blood biochemistry, B-type natriuretic peptide, echocardiographic indexes, 6-min walk distance (6MWD), New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification, and count of ICD discharge events before and after the operation were analyzed. Patients were followed up for up to 3 years post ICD or ICD plus RDN. Results: Baseline clinical data were comparable between the two groups. Higher LVEF (%) (mixed model repeated measure, p = 0.0306) (39.50% ± 9.63% vs. 31.20% ± 4.52% at 1 year; 41.57% ± 9.62% vs. 31.40% ± 8.14% at 3 years), systolic blood pressure (p = 0.0356), and longer 6MWD (p < 0.0001) as well as reduction of NYHA classification (p < 0.0001) were evidenced in the ICD plus RDN group compared to ICD only group during follow-up. Patients in the ICD plus RDN group experienced fewer ICD discharge events (2 vs. 40) and decreased diuretic use; rehospitalization rate (30% vs. 100%, p = 0.0031) and cardiogenic mortality rate (0% vs. 50%, p = 0.0325) were also significantly lower in the ICD plus RDN group than in the ICD only group during follow-up. Conclusion: ICD implantation plus RDN could significantly improve cardiac function and cardiac outcome as well as increase exercise capacity compared to ICD only for HFrEF patients with narrow QRS complexes.

Clinical characteristics, management, and one-year risk of complications among patients with heart failure with and without type 2 diabetes in Spain

OBJECTIVE

This work aims to describe the clinical characteristics and therapeutic management and to determine cardiovascular outcomes after one year of follow-up in a contemporaneous population with heart failure (HF) with and without type 2 diabetes in Spain. These factors were also analyzed in the DAPA-HF-like population (patients who met most inclusion criteria of the DAPA-HF trial) and in patients treated with SGLT2 inhibitors at baseline.

METHODS

This work is an observational, retrospective, population-based study using the BIG-PAC database. The index date was January 1, 2019. People aged ≥ 18 years who received care for HF in 2019 were selected. Events that occurred in 2019 were analyzed.

RESULTS

We identified 21,851 patients with HF (age 78.0 ± 11.3 years, 53.0% men, 50.9% with HF with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction, 44.5% in NYHA functional class II). HF prevalence was 1.88% and incidence was 2.83 per 1,000 person-years. Regarding HF treatments, 66.1% were taking renin-angiotensin system inhibitors, 69.4% beta blockers, 31.2% aldosterone antagonists, and 7.5% sacubitril/valsartan. During the year of follow-up, 29.8% had HF decompensation which led to hospitalization (mean time to first event of 120.9 ± 72.5 days), 12.3% died, and 8.1% died during hospitalization. Events were more common among patients with type 2 diabetes. Hospitalizations for HF were more common in the DAPA-HF-like population.

CONCLUSIONS

In Spain, the population with HF is elderly and has many comorbidities. Approximately half of patients have HF with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction. There is room for improvement in HF management, particularly through the use of drugs that reduce both HF hospitalization and mortality, in order to reduce the burden of HF.

Novelties in Therapy of Chronic Heart Failure

In recent decades, considerable advances have been made in the treatment of heart failure. The main target of heart failure therapy is the inhibition of the sympathetic nervous system and renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system. The angiotensin receptor blockers represent a breakthrough in the treatment of heart failure with a demonstrated effect on reduction of cardiovascular events. However, new perspectives derive from latest drugs developed for diabetes, iron deficiency, and hyperkalemia. New frontiers are also opened to the development of neurohormonal therapies, antagonists of inflammatory mediators, inotropic agents, and cell-based treatments.

Epidemiology and treatment of heart failure in Spain: the HF-PATHWAYS study

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

To describe the epidemiology and treatment of a large contemporary cohort of patients with heart failure (HF).

METHODS

Observational, retrospective, population-based study using the BIG-PAC database, which includes people aged ≥ 18 years seeking care for HF between 2017 and 2019. The main variables were the prevalence/annual incidence rate, comorbidities, clinical variables, and medication administered.

RESULTS

We identified 19 762 patients with HF from a total of 1 189 003 persons seeking medical attention from 2017 to 2019 (2019: mean age, 78.3 years; 53.0% men). Distribution by type of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was as follows: 51.7% reduced, 40.2% preserved, and 8.1% mid-range. In 2019, the prevalence was 1.89% (95%CI, 1.70-2.08), with an incidence rate of 2.78 new cases per 1000 persons/y. No statistically significant differences were observed in prevalence and/or incidence from 2017 to 2019. Among patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), 64% received beta-blockers, 80.5% angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blockers or sacubitril-valsartan, and 29.8% an aldosterone antagonist. In addition, from the diagnosis (baseline) to 24 months of follow-up, there was discreet treatment optimization, which was notable in the first 3 to 6 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Epidemiological data on HF remained stable during the study period, with a lower prevalence than that reported in non-population-based studies. There is wide room for improvement in the optimization of medical treatment of HFrEF.