Outcomes of the tacrolimus drug-eluting Janus stent: a prospective two-centre registry in high-risk patients

Polymers for Cardiovascular Stent Coatings

Polymers have found widespread applications in cardiology, in particular in coronary vascular intervention as stent platforms (scaffolds) and coating matrices for drug-eluting stents. Apart from permanent polymers, current research is focussing on biodegradable polymers. Since they degrade once their function is fulfilled, their use might contribute to the reduction of adverse events like in-stent restenosis, late stent-thrombosis, and hypersensitivity reactions. After reviewing current literature concerning polymers used for cardiovascular applications, this review deals with parameters of tissue and blood cell functions which should be considered to evaluate biocompatibility of stent polymers in order to enhance physiological appropriate properties. The properties of the substrate on which vascular cells are placed can have a large impact on cell morphology, differentiation, motility, and fate. Finally, methods to assess these parameters under physiological conditions will be summarized.

Biodegradable versus durable polymer drug eluting stents in coronary artery disease: insights from a meta-analysis of 5,834 patients

BACKGROUND

Biodegradable polymer drug eluting stents (BP-DES) have been developed to overcome the limitations of first generation durable polymer DES (DP-DES) but the clinical results of different BP-DES are not consistent. We performed a meta-analysis to compare the outcomes of BP-DES and DP-DES in the treatment of coronary artery disease (CAD).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Online databases including MEDLINE were searched for studies comparing BP-DES and DP-DES for obstructive CAD that reported rates for overall mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), late stent thrombosis (LST), target lesion revascularization (TLR) and late lumen loss (LLL) with a follow-up of ≥ 6 months. Ten studies (5834 patients) with a 1-year median follow-up were included in the meta-analysis. When comparing patients treated with DP-DES and BP-DES those treated with BP-DES had lower LLL (in-stent: weighted mean difference (WMD) -0.10 mm, 95% CI = -0.17 to -0.03 mm, p = 0.004; in-segment: WMD -0.06 mm, 95% CI = -0.10 to -0.01 mm, p = 0.01) with lower TLR rates (OR 0.67, 95% CI = 0.47 to 0.98, p = 0.04). However, BP-DES did not improve mortality (OR 0.97, 95% CI = 0.73 to 1.29, p = 0.83), MI (OR 1.13, 95% CI = 0.87 to 1.46, p = 0.36) or LST rates (OR 0.64, 95% CI = 0.36 to 1.16, p = 0.14). A pre-specified subgroup analysis of Biolimus BP-DES confirmed significant LLL reduction without differences in other clinical endpoints. Meta-regression analysis demonstrated a strong significant inverse correlation between LLL and reference coronary diameter (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our present meta-analysis showed that BP-DES when compared with DP-DES significantly reduced LLL and TVR but without clear benefits on mortality, MI and LST rates. (Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT01466634).

Tacrolimus-eluting carbon-coated stents versus sirolimus-eluting stents for prevention of symptom-driven clinical end points

BACKGROUND

Coating of stents has been shown to minimize the interactions between platelets, stent surface and vascular response following stent implantation. The aim of our study was to compare the tacrolimus-eluting carbon-coated JANUS(®) stent with sirolimus-eluting CYPHER(®) stent for the prevention of symptom-driven clinical end points in a real world clinical setting.

METHODS

This prospective registry with a follow-up period of 24 months was conducted in 90 consecutive patients undergoing coronary artery stenting receiving CYPHER(®) (n = 48) or JANUS(®) (n = 42) stents. The primary end point was a composite of death from cardiovascular causes, nonfatal myocardial infarction and target vessel revascularisation, and the secondary end point was clinically driven in-stent restenosis.

RESULTS

The primary combined endpoint occurred in 38% of patients (n = 16) in the JANUS(®) group compared to 10% (n = 5) in the CYPHER(®) group. The relative risk increase of the composite end point was therefore 63% higher in patients receiving JANUS(®) stents compared to the CYPHER(®) stents (crude HR = 1.63, 95% CI = 1.17-2.28, p = 0.004; adjusted HR = 1.79, CI = 1.26-2.55, p = 0.001). Interestingly, 75% of events in the JANUS(®) group occurred during the first 6 months after stent implantation. Similarly, the rate of clinically driven in-stent restenosis was higher in patients receiving JANUS(®) stent (n = 10, 2%) compared to the CYPHER(®) stent (n = 2, 4%). Concordantly, the relative risk for clinically driven in-stent restenosis was 81% higher in the JANUS(®) group compared to the CYPHER(®) group (crude HR = 1.81, 95% CI = 1.08-3.02, p = 0.02; adjusted HR = 2.24, CI = 1.26-3.96, p = 0.006).

CONCLUSION

The use of tacrolimus-eluting carbon coated JANUS(®) stent was associated with worse clinical outcome compared to the sirolimus-eluting CYPHER(®) stent in clinical routine use.