Investigation of associations between preoperative acepromazine or dexmedetomidine administration and development of arterial hypotension or bradycardia in dogs undergoing ovariohysterectomy

Two doses of subcutaneous methadone for postoperative analgesia in dogs undergoing tibial plateau levelling osteotomies

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate analgesia, sedation and adverse effects of two doses of subcutaneous methadone in dogs undergoing tibial plateau levelling osteotomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Seventeen client-owned dogs undergoing unilateral tibial plateau levelling osteotomy were randomly allocated to receive either 0.25 mg/kg methadone (eight dogs) or 0.5 mg/kg methadone (nine dogs). All dogs were premedicated with methadone and 2 to 6 mcg/kg dexmedetomidine subcutaneously. They were induced and maintained on a standard protocol. All animals received a second dose of methadone subcutaneously 4 hours after premedication and a 4.4 mg/kg dose of carprofen subcutaneously at 8 hours after premedication. During surgery, blood pressure, heart rate and temperature were assessed every 5 minutes. Postoperatively, sedation scores, temperature, heart rate and Glasgow composite modified pain score - short form were assessed for 12 hours postoperatively.

RESULTS

One of 17 (5.9%) dogs had intraoperative hypotension, nine of 17 dogs had intra-operative bradyarrhythmias and 17 of 17 dogs had intra-operative hypothermia. No dogs required intra-operative rescue. Composite modified pain score - short form scores were below the threshold for intervention in 16 of 17 (94.1%) animals. Only one of 17 (5.9%) dogs required rescue analgesia. Median sedation score was 0 by the T8 time point. Adverse events were rare in both groups with only vocalisation and hypothermia reported commonly postoperatively.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Two doses of methadone at either 0.25 or 0.5 mg/kg administered via subcutaneous injections pre-operatively and 4 hours later, along with 4.4 mg/kg carprofen subcutaneously 8 hours after the first methadone dose appear to provide sufficient pain control for up to 12 hours in dogs undergoing tibial plateau levelling osteotomy.

What is the best treatment for hypotension in healthy dogs during anaesthesia maintained with isoflurane?

Hypotension is a common and potentially life-threatening complication of general anaesthesia in dogs. Due to the combination of cardiovascular side effects of many anaesthetic, sedative and analgesic drugs used peri-operatively hypotension is frequently reported even in healthy dogs undergoing elective procedures. Several treatment options for hypotension have been advocated. Potential treatments include rapid administration of either crystalloid or colloid fluids; pharmacological treatments to increase cardiac output and/or systemic vascular resistance; or reduction in the delivery of the volatile anaesthetic agents. This critical appraisal considers the current evidence for which treatment is the best option for treating hypotension in healthy euvolemic dogs undergoing general anaesthesia maintained with isoflurane. Fourteen relevant studies were appraised, including 12 laboratory studies and two small clinical trials. One study demonstrated that reduction in the delivery of isoflurane may correct hypotension, but this treatment may not always be feasible. In general, rapid administration of fluids did not increase blood pressure and failed to correct hypotension. Synthetic colloids demonstrated some efficacy, but results were inconsistent between studies and large volumes may be required. Infusion of dopamine appears to be the most reliable pharmacological option consistently increasing blood pressure, cardiac output and correcting hypotension.

Association between body mass and hypotension in dogs under general anaesthesia

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the association between body mass and hypotension during general anaesthesia in dogs undergoing surgical and diagnostic procedures within a referral hospital.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective evaluation of the anaesthetic records of 1789 dogs was performed. Data on signalment, anaesthetic protocol and physiological variables, including mean arterial pressure, were collected. A multivariable generalised linear model was used to identify associations between explanatory variables, including body mass, and hypotension.

RESULTS

In the population studied, increasing body mass (per 10 kg) was significantly associated with decreasing odds of hypotension (odds ratio 0.68; 95% confidence interval: 0.60 to 0.77). Additional variables associated with a decreased odds of hypotension were pre-anaesthetic medication with alpha-2 agonists (odds ratio 0.63; 95% confidence interval 0.48 to 0.82) and increased body temperature (per 1°C) during general anaesthesia (odds ratio 0.77; 95% confidence interval 0.67 to 0.88). Brachycephaly (odds ratio 1.72; 95% confidence interval 1.25 to 2.38), ASA physical status classification >3 (odds ratio 2.03; 95% confidence interval 1.16 to 3.56), undergoing a surgical procedure (versus diagnostic) (odds ratio 1.57; 95% confidence interval 1.10 to 2.23) and bradycardia (odds ratio 1.37; 95% confidence interval 1.05 to 1.80) were independently associated with increased odds of hypotension.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Dogs of lower body mass and brachycephalic breeds may be at higher risk of hypotension during general anaesthesia or alternatively represent subpopulations in which accurate blood pressure measurement presents a greater challenge. Monitoring blood pressure accurately in these groups requires particular attention and provisions for treating hypotension should be readily accessible.

Evaluation of urine specific gravity as a predictor of hypotension during anaesthesia in healthy dogs premedicated with dexmedetomidine

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the relationship between urine specific gravity (USG) and the risk of arterial hypotension during general anaesthesia (GA) in healthy dogs premedicated with dexmedetomidine and methadone.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective clinical cohort study.

ANIMALS

A total of 75 healthy client-owned dogs undergoing GA for elective tibial plateau levelling osteotomy.

METHODS

After placing an intravenous catheter, dogs were premedicated with dexmedetomidine (5 μg kg^-1) and methadone (0.3 mg kg^-1) intravenously. After induction of GA with alfaxalone to effect, the bladder was expressed and USG measured. An arterial catheter was placed, and residual blood was used to measure packed cell volume (PCV) and total protein (TP). GA was maintained with isoflurane vaporised in oxygen and a femoral and sciatic nerve block were performed. Arterial blood pressure < 60 mmHg was defined as hypotension and recorded by the anaesthetist. Treatment for hypotension was performed in a stepwise manner following a flow chart. Frequency of hypotension, treatment and response to treatment were recorded. Logistic regression modelling was used to assess the association between USG, TP and PCV and incidence of perioperative hypotension; p < 0.05.

RESULTS

Data from 14 dogs were excluded. Of the 61 dogs, 16 (26%) were hypotensive during GA, 15 dogs needed treatment of which 12 were responsive to a decrease in inhalant vaporiser setting. The logistic regression model was not statistically significant (p = 0.8). There was no significant association between USG (p = 0.6), TP (p = 0.4), PCV (p = 0.8) and arterial hypotension during GA.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

In healthy dogs premedicated with dexmedetomidine and methadone and maintained under GA with isoflurane and a femoral and sciatic nerve block, there was no relationship between the specific gravity of urine collected after premedication and intraoperative arterial hypotension.

Development and comparison of an esophageal Doppler monitoring-based treatment algorithm with a heart rate and blood pressure-based treatment algorithm for goal-directed fluid therapy in anesthetized dogs: A pilot study

The objective of this pilot study was to determine the feasibility of a study comparing the efficacy of an esophageal Doppler monitor (EDM)-based fluid therapy algorithm with a heart rate (HR)- and mean arterial blood pressure (MAP)-based algorithm in reducing hypotension and fluid load in anesthetized dogs. Client-owned dogs undergoing general anesthesia for surgical procedures were randomized to two groups. An EDM probe for monitoring blood flow in the descending aorta was placed in each dog before receiving a crystalloid bolus (5 mL/kg) over 5 min. Fluids were repeated in case of fluid responsiveness defined by increasing Velocity Time Integral (VTI) ≥ 10% in group EDM and by decreasing HR ≥ 5 beats/min and/or increasing MAP ≥ 3 mmHg in group standard. The feasibility outcomes included the proportion of dogs completing the study and the clinical applicability of the algorithms. The clinical outcomes were the total administered fluid volume and the duration of hypotension defined as MAP < 60 mmHg. Data was compared between groups with Mann-Whitney U-test. p < 0.05 were deemed significant. Of 25 dogs screened, 14 completed the study (56%). There were no differences in the proportion of recorded time spent in hypotension in group standard [2 (0–39)% (median (range))] and EDM [0 (0–63) %, p = 1], or the total volume of fluids [standard 8 (5–14) mL/kg/h, EDM 11 (4–20) mL/kg/h, p = 0.3]. This study declined the feasibility of a study comparing the impact of two newly developed fluid therapy algorithms on hypotension and fluid load in their current form. Clinical outcome analyses were underpowered and no differences in treatment efficacy between the groups could be determined. The conclusions drawn from this pilot study provide important information for future study designs.

Efficacy and Safety of Intranasal Dexmedetomidine vs. Oral Chloral Hydrate for Sedation in Children Undergoing Computed Tomography/Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the sedative efficacy and safety of intranasal administration of dexmedetomidine (DEX) compared with oral chloral hydrate for Computed tomography (CT) or Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) examination in Children.

METHODS

Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and China WanFang Databases were searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating intranasal DEX (test group) vs. oral chloral hydrate (control group) in pediatric CT/MRI examinations up to December 30, 2021. The data were analyzed using Stata 15.0 software.

RESULTS

Seven RCTs with 1,846 children were identified. The meta-analysis results showed that the success rate of sedation (RR = 1.14, 95% CI: 1.03-1.26, P = 0.011), sedation onset time [weighted mean difference (WMD) = -0.87, 95% CI: -1.42 to -0.31, P = 0.002], sedation duration (WMD = -9.05, 95% CI:-14.69 to -3.42, P = 0.002), time to awakening (WMD = -9.75, 95% CI:-17.57 to -1.94, P = 0.014), and incidence of nausea and vomiting [relative risk (RR) = 0.09, 95% CI:0.04-0.23, P < 0.001) of the test group were significantly better than those of the control group. However, no significant differences were identified in incidence of hypotension (RR = 1.18, 95% CI: 0.51-2.74) and bradycardia (RR = 1.17, 95% CI: 0.13-22.11) between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Intranasal administration of DEX is superior to oral chloral hydrate for sedation during pediatric CT/MRI examinations and has a better safety profile.

Clinical evaluation of the effects of a single oral dose of gabapentin on fear-based aggressive behaviors in cats during veterinary examinations

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effects of a single oral dose of gabapentin on fear-based aggressive behaviors (FABs) in cats during veterinary examinations.

ANIMALS

55 healthy pet cats (26 with and 29 without a history of FAB during veterinary visits [FAB and untreated control groups, respectively]).

PROCEDURES

A standardized 9-step clinical examination protocol (with patient compliance scored from 0 to 9 according to the highest completed step) was tested on untreated control group cats. The protocol was then used in a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover-design trial in which FAB-group cats received owner-administered gabapentin (100 or 200 mg/cat) or placebo capsules 2 hours before the first of 2 veterinary visits and received the alternate treatment before the second visit ≥ 1 day later. Ease of administration (scored from 1 [very difficult] to 4 [very easy]) and adverse effects were recorded. Compliance scores were compared between treatments for the FAB group and between FAB and untreated control groups. Changes in scores between treatments for the FAB group were used to investigate associations between selected variables and the outcome of interest.

RESULTS

FAB group compliance scores after gabapentin administration (median, 9; range, 0 to 9) were significantly higher than scores after placebo administration (median 0.5; range, 0 to 7) and did not differ from scores for the untreated control group. Owner scores indicated capsule administration was easy. Adverse effects (most commonly drowsiness, myorelaxation, and ataxia) resolved ≤ 10 hours after detection.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Results suggested oral administration of gabapentin to cats 2 hours before a veterinary visit can reduce FAB during physical examination, enabling more complete evaluation.

Comparison between dexmedetomidine and acepromazine in combination with methadone for premedication in brachycephalic dogs undergoing surgery for brachycephalic obstructive airway syndrome

OBJECTIVE

To compare dexmedetomidine with acepromazine for premedication combined with methadone in dogs undergoing brachycephalic obstructive airway syndrome (BOAS) surgery.

STUDY DESIGN

Randomized, blinded clinical study.

ANIMALS

A group of 40 dogs weighing mean (± standard deviation) 10.5 ± 6 kg, aged 2.6 ± 1.9 years.

METHODS

Dogs received either acepromazine 20 μg kg^-1 (group A) or dexmedetomidine 2 μg kg^-1 (group D) intramuscularly with methadone 0.3 mg kg^-1. Anaesthesia was induced with propofol and maintained with sevoflurane. Sedation (0-18), induction (0-6) and recovery (0-5) qualities were scored. Propofol dose, hypotension incidence, mechanical ventilation requirement, extubation time, additional sedation, oxygen supplementation, regurgitation and emergency intubation following premedication or during recovery were recorded. Data were analysed using t tests, Mann-Whitney U or Chi-square tests.

RESULTS

Group A dogs were less sedated [median (range): 1.5 (0-12)] than group D [5 (1-18)] (p = 0.021) and required more propofol [3.5 (1-7) versus 2.4 (1-8) mg kg^-1; p = 0.018]. Induction scores [group A: 5 (4-5); group D 5 (3-5)] (p = 0.989), recovery scores [group A 5 (4-5); group D 5(3-5)](p = 0.738) and anaesthesia duration [group A:93 (50-170); group D 96 (54-263) minutes] (p = 0.758) were similar between groups. Time to extubation was longer in group A 12.5 (3-35) versus group D 5.5 (0-15) minutes; (p = 0.005). During recovery, two dogs required emergency intubation (p > 0.99) and five dogs required additional sedation (p > 0.99). Oxygen supplementation was required in 16 and 12 dogs in group A and D, respectively (p = 0.167); no dogs in group A and one dog in group D regurgitated (p = 0.311).

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Dexmedetomidine 2 μg kg^-1 produces more sedation but similar recovery quality to acepromazine 20 μg kg^-1 combined with methadone in dogs undergoing BOAS surgery.

Evaluation of an oscillometric blood pressure monitor in anesthetized dogs: Agreement with direct measurements and ability to detect hypotension

We evaluated the agreement between oscillometric and direct blood pressure monitors in anesthetized dogs and evaluated the ability of the oscillometric method to detect MAP <60 mmHg. Forty client-owned dogs, three months to 14 years old, 4.6-50.2 kg, under general anesthesia were studied. Systolic (SAP), mean (MAP) and diastolic (DAP) arterial pressures were measured directly via an arterial catheter and with an oscillometric cuff (Cardell Touch monitor). Paired values were compared with mixed effect models. Bias and limits of agreement (LOA) were calculated. The sensitivity and false negative rate to detect hypotension (invasive MAP <60 mmHg) using an oscillometric MAP <60 and < 70 mmHg were calculated. A receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve was constructed and the area under the curve calculated. SAP and DAP differed between methods (both P < 0.001), but MAP did not (P = 0.5). Bland-Altman plots showed small biases but wide LOA for all variables. The sensitivity to detect hypotension was 40% with a false negative rate of 60% when using an oscillometric MAP <60 mmHg, and 68% and 32%, respectively, with a MAP <70 mmHg. The area under the ROC curve for MAP was 0.82. While the oscillometric MAP did not differ from invasive values, the device failed to recognize hypotensive events when 60 mmHg was used as the threshold to detect hypotension. Higher MAP values increased the ability to correctly recognize hypotension, but at the expense of a higher incidence of false positives.