1
|
Yan M, Yang C. Reply to the Letter to the Editor From Professor Yu Du. ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE & BIOLOGY 2025; 51:1028-1029. [PMID: 39952825 DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2025.02.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2025] [Revised: 01/19/2025] [Accepted: 02/02/2025] [Indexed: 02/17/2025]
Affiliation(s)
- Meiying Yan
- Department of Ultrasound, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou Institute of Medicine (HIM), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Chen Yang
- Department of Ultrasound, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou Institute of Medicine (HIM), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mori N, Li L, Matsuda M, Mori Y, Mugikura S. Prospects of perfusion contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CE-US) in diagnosing axillary lymph node metastases in breast cancer: a comparison with lymphatic CE-US. J Med Ultrason (2001) 2024; 51:587-597. [PMID: 38642268 PMCID: PMC11499517 DOI: 10.1007/s10396-024-01444-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2023] [Accepted: 02/18/2024] [Indexed: 04/22/2024]
Abstract
Accurate diagnosis of lymph node (LN) metastasis is vital for prognosis and treatment in patients with breast cancer. Imaging 1modalities such as ultrasound (US), MRI, CT, and 18F-FDG PET/CT are used for preoperative assessment. While conventional US is commonly recommended due to its resolution and sensitivity, it has limitations such as operator subjectivity and difficulty detecting small metastases. This review shows the microanatomy of axillary LNs to enhance accurate diagnosis and the characteristics of contrast-enhanced US (CE-US), which utilizes intravascular microbubble contrast agents, making it ideal for vascular imaging. A significant focus of this review is on distinguishing between two types of CE-US techniques for axillary LN evaluation: perfusion CE-US and lymphatic CE-US. Perfusion CE-US is used to assess LN metastasis via transvenous contrast agent administration, while lymphatic CE-US is used to identify sentinel LNs and diagnose LN metastasis through percutaneous contrast agent administration. This review also highlights the need for future research to clarify the distinction between studies involving "apparently enlarged LNs" and "clinical node-negative" cases in perfusion CE-US research. Such research standardization is essential to ensure accurate diagnostic performance in various clinical studies. Future studies should aim to standardize CE-US methods for improved LN metastasis diagnosis, not only in breast cancer but also across various malignancies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naoko Mori
- Department of Radiology, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1-1 Hondo, Akita, Akita, 010-8543, Japan.
| | - Li Li
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1 Seiryo-Machi, Aoba-Ku, Sendai, 980-8574, Japan
| | - Masazumi Matsuda
- Department of Radiology, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1-1 Hondo, Akita, Akita, 010-8543, Japan
| | - Yu Mori
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1 Seiryo-Machi, Aoba-Ku, Sendai, 980-8575, Japan
| | - Shunji Mugikura
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1 Seiryo-Machi, Aoba-Ku, Sendai, 980-8574, Japan
- Division of Image Statistics, Tohoku Medical Megabank Organization, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Yamada A, Kamagata K, Hirata K, Ito R, Nakaura T, Ueda D, Fujita S, Fushimi Y, Fujima N, Matsui Y, Tatsugami F, Nozaki T, Fujioka T, Yanagawa M, Tsuboyama T, Kawamura M, Naganawa S. Clinical applications of artificial intelligence in liver imaging. LA RADIOLOGIA MEDICA 2023:10.1007/s11547-023-01638-1. [PMID: 37165151 DOI: 10.1007/s11547-023-01638-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2023] [Accepted: 04/21/2023] [Indexed: 05/12/2023]
Abstract
This review outlines the current status and challenges of the clinical applications of artificial intelligence in liver imaging using computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging based on a topic analysis of PubMed search results using latent Dirichlet allocation. LDA revealed that "segmentation," "hepatocellular carcinoma and radiomics," "metastasis," "fibrosis," and "reconstruction" were current main topic keywords. Automatic liver segmentation technology using deep learning is beginning to assume new clinical significance as part of whole-body composition analysis. It has also been applied to the screening of large populations and the acquisition of training data for machine learning models and has resulted in the development of imaging biomarkers that have a significant impact on important clinical issues, such as the estimation of liver fibrosis, recurrence, and prognosis of malignant tumors. Deep learning reconstruction is expanding as a new technological clinical application of artificial intelligence and has shown results in reducing contrast and radiation doses. However, there is much missing evidence, such as external validation of machine learning models and the evaluation of the diagnostic performance of specific diseases using deep learning reconstruction, suggesting that the clinical application of these technologies is still in development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akira Yamada
- Department of Radiology, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Nagano, Japan.
| | - Koji Kamagata
- Department of Radiology, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kenji Hirata
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Rintaro Ito
- Department of Radiology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
| | - Takeshi Nakaura
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Kumamoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Chuo-Ku, Kumamoto, Japan
| | - Daiju Ueda
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka Metropolitan University, Abeno-Ku, Osaka, Japan
| | - Shohei Fujita
- Department of Radiology, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yasutaka Fushimi
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Sakyoku, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Noriyuki Fujima
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Yusuke Matsui
- Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University, Kita-Ku, Okayama, Japan
| | - Fuminari Tatsugami
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Hiroshima University, Minami-Ku, Hiroshima City, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Taiki Nozaki
- Department of Radiology, St. Luke's International Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tomoyuki Fujioka
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masahiro Yanagawa
- Department of Radiology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita-City, Osaka, Japan
| | - Takahiro Tsuboyama
- Department of Radiology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita-City, Osaka, Japan
| | - Mariko Kawamura
- Department of Radiology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
| | - Shinji Naganawa
- Department of Radiology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
| |
Collapse
|