Effects of functional electrical stimulation on gait recovery post-neurological injury during inpatient rehabilitation

Implications of neuromuscular electrical stimulation on gait ability, balance and kinematic parameters after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTIN

Improper gait patterns, impaired balance and foot drop consistently plague stroke survivors, preventing them from walking independently and safely. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) technology can help patients reactivate their muscles and regain motor coordination. This study aims to systematically review and summarize the evidence for the potential benefits of NMES on the improvement of gait patterns after stroke.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Science Direct and Web of Science were systematically searched until April 2024, to identify randomized controlled trials with the following criteria: stroke survivors as participants; NMES as intervention; conventional rehabilitation as a comparator; and gait assessment, through scales or quantitative parameters, as outcome measures.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

29 publications involving 1711 patients met the inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis showed no significant differences in Ten-meter walk test, Fugl-Meyer assessment lower extremity, Modified Ashworth Assessment and asymmetry between the NMES group and the control group. Besides, NMES was associated with changes in outcome indicators such as quantitative gait analysis speed [SMD = 0.53, 95% CI (0.20, 0.85), P = 0.001], cadence [SMD = 0.76, 95% CI (0.32, 1.20), P = 0.0008], affected side step length [SMD = 0.73, 95% CI (0.16, 1.31), P = 0.01], angle of ankle dorsiflexion [WMD = 1.57, 95% CI (0.80, 2.33), P < 0.0001], Six-Minute Walk Test [WMD = 14.83, 95% CI (13.55, 16.11), P<0.00001]. According to the PEDro scale, 21 (72.4%) studies were of high quality and 8 were of moderate quality (27.6%).

CONCLUSIONS

Taken together, the review synthesis indicated that NMES might play a potential role in stroke-induced walking dysfunction. And NMES may be superior for survivors in the chronic phase than the acute and subacute phases, and the efficacy of short sessions received by patients was greater than that of those who participated in a longer session. Additionally, further comparisons of the effects of NMES with different types or stimulation frequencies may provide unexpected benefits.

Clinical applications of electrical stimulation for peripheral nerve injury: a systematic review

Introduction

Peripheral nerve injuries are common neurologic injuries that are challenging to treat with current therapies. Electrical stimulation has been shown to accelerate reinnervation and enhance functional recovery. This study aims to review the literature on clinical application of electrical stimulation for peripheral nerve injury.

Methods

PubMed and Embase were sourced from 1995 to August 2022. Selection was based on predetermined inclusion/exclusion criteria. Eight hundred and thirty-five articles were screened with seven being included in this review.

Results

Two hundred and twenty-nine patients with peripheral nerve injuries were represented. Six of the studies were randomized controlled trials. A variety of nerve injuries were represented with all being in the upper extremity and supraclavicular region. Electrical stimulation protocols and evaluation varied. Electrodes were implanted in four studies with one also implanting the stimulator. Length of stimulation per session was either 20 mins or 1 h. Median stimulation frequency was 20 Hz. Stimulation intensity varied from 3 to 30V; pulse width ranged from 0.1 to 1.007 ms. Three protocols were conducted immediately after surgery. Patients were followed for an average of 13.5 months and were evaluated using electrophysiology and combinations of motor, sensory, and functional criteria.

Discussion

Patients who received electrical stimulation consistently demonstrated better recovery compared to their respective controls. Electrical stimulation for peripheral nerve injury is a novel treatment that has not been well-studied in humans. Our review illustrates the potential benefit in implementing this approach into everyday practice. Future research should aim to optimize protocol for clinical use.

Muscle Electrical Impedance Properties and Activation Alteration After Functional Electrical Stimulation-Assisted Cycling Training for Chronic Stroke Survivors: A Longitudinal Pilot Study

Electrical impedance myography (EIM) is a sensitive assessment for neuromuscular diseases to detect muscle inherent properties, whereas surface electromyography (sEMG) is a common technique for monitoring muscle activation. However, the application of EIM in detecting training effects on stroke survivors is relatively few. This study aimed to evaluate the muscle inherent properties and muscle activation alteration after functional electrical stimulation (FES)-assisted cycling training to chronic stroke survivors. Fifteen people with chronic stroke were recruited for 20 sessions of FES-assisted cycling training (40 min/session, 3–5 sessions/week). The periodically stimulated and assessed muscle groups were quadriceps (QC), tibialis anterior (TA), hamstrings (HS), and medial head of gastrocnemius (MG) on the paretic lower extremity. EIM parameters [resistance (R), reactance (X), phase angle (θ), and anisotropy ratio (AR)], clinical scales (Fugl-Meyer Lower Extremity (FMA-LE), Berg Balance Scale (BBS), and 6-min walking test (6MWT)] and sEMG parameters [including root-mean square (RMS) and co-contraction index (CI) value] were collected and computed before and after the training. Linear correlation analysis was conducted between EIM and clinical scales as well as between sEMG and clinical scales. The results showed that motor function of the lower extremity, balance, and walking performance of subjects improved after the training. After training, θ value of TA (P = 0.014) and MG (P = 0.017) significantly increased, and AR of X (P = 0.004) value and AR of θ value (P = 0.041) significantly increased on TA. The RMS value of TA decreased (P = 0.022) and a significant reduction of CI was revealed on TA/MG muscle pair (P < 0.001). Significant correlation was found between EIM and clinical assessments (AR of X value of TA and FMA-LE: r = 0.54, P = 0.046; X value of TA and BBS score: 0.628, P = 0.016), and between sEMG and clinical scores (RMS of TA and BBS score: r = −0.582, P = 0.029). This study demonstrated that FES-assisted cycling training improved lower limb function by developing coordinated muscle activation and facilitating an orderly myofiber arrangement. The current study also indicated that EIM can jointly evaluate lower extremity function alteration with sEMG after rehabilitation training.

Clinical Trail Registration: The study was registered on the Clinical Trial Registry (trial registration number: NCT 03208439, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03208439).

The Effects of Combining Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Gait Training with Functional Electrical Stimulation on Trunk Acceleration During Walking in Patients with Subacute Stroke

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to investigate whether the combination of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and gait training with FES affected walking speed and trunk accelerometry-based gait characteristics in patients with subacute stroke, compared with FES or tDCS gait training only.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Stroke patients (n = 34; female 15; mean age, 72.5 ± 11.2 years; mean days poststroke, 38.7) with resultant paresis in the lower extremity (mean Fugl-Meyer score, 25.5) were enrolled. Patients were randomly assigned to one of three groups: combined anodal tDCS and gait training with FES (tDCS+FES, n = 11), anodal tDCS with gait training (tDCS, n = 11), or combined sham tDCS and gait training with FES (FES, n = 12). Participants received the intervention for 20 minutes and a 40-minute conventional rehabilitative intervention daily for a week. Patients' walking ability was evaluated using walking speed, harmonic ratio (HR), autocorrelation coefficient (AC), and root mean square (RMS) along each axis using a wearable trunk accelerometer.

RESULTS

The tDCS+FES group had a significantly greater change in AC in the anteroposterior axis and mediolateral axis than the FES and tDCS groups and FES group, respectively. There were no significant effects on walking speed or other parameters (HR and RMS) among the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of anodal tDCS and gait training with FES improved the post-stroke patients' gait regularity than FES gait training intervention only. Thus, combined tDCS and FES gait training, as a novel intervention, could be an important therapeutic tool in improving walking performance.

Functional electrical stimulation compared with ankle-foot orthosis in subacute post stroke patients with foot drop: A pilot study

Background: The conventional treatment for foot drop includes an ankle-foot orthosis (AFO) or functional electrical stimulation (FES). Goal: To compare gait parameters in patients following a subacute post stroke with foot drop treated with AFO or FES. Method: Twenty one subacute patients with stroke with foot drop were fitted with FES (N = 10) or AFO (N = 11). Evaluations were performed at baseline, following 4 weeks and 12 weeks. Spatiotemporal gait parameters and symmetry, dynamic electromyography, 10-m walk test, 6-min walk test, timed up and go, functional ambulation classification, and perception of improvement in walking were measured. The gait analysis measures were collected without the assistive devices while the functional measures were collected with them. Results: Both groups showed improvement in all of the outcome measures, with no between-groups differences. The swing duration's and step length's symmetry indicated better gait symmetry in the FES group after 12 weeks (p = 0.037, effect size = -0.538 and p = 0.028 effect size = -0.568, respectively). The FES group perceived significant improvement in gait after 4 weeks, while subjects in the AFO group reported to perceive improvement only after 12 weeks. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that FES is at least as effective as traditional AFO and may be more so.