MMPI-2 negative treatment indicators scale and irregular discharge

Individuals at Risk for Suicide

BACKGROUND

Individuals experiencing suicidal ideation and/or behaviors are often difficult to engage in treatment. Up to 50% of individuals presenting to an ER for treatment of a suicidal crisis refuse outpatient treatment referrals. This study examined outpatient mental health clinicians' perceptions of the barriers to and facilitators of mental health treatment engagement of individuals at risk for suicide.

METHOD

Thirty-six mental health clinicians working with clients with past and/or current suicidality (ideation, behaviors) in outpatient mental health centers participated in four focus groups. Data were collected using semistructured interview. A process of content analysis was utilized in which data were analyzed thematically.

RESULTS

Five main domains of barriers and facilitators emerged including (a) client-level, (b) clinician-level, (c) service-level, (d) agency-level, and (e) intervention-level variables. In all, 38 barriers and 31 facilitators were identified. The most frequently identified facilitator was the clinician's own sense of engagement with the client, identified by 31% of the clinicians. The most frequently identified barrier was housing instability, identified by 34% of the clinicians.

CONCLUSION

Knowledge of clinicians' perspective on treatment engagement of clients at risk for suicide may inform the development and implementation of interventions and guide training/supervision programs for those working with this vulnerable population.

Predicting Methadone Maintenance Treatment Outcomes Using the Addiction Severity Index and the MMPI‐2 Content Scales (Negative Treatment Indicators and Cynism Scales)

We studied the ability of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 Content Scales (Negative Treatment Indicators [TRT] and Cynicism [CYN]) and the domain scales of the Addiction Severity Index (ASI) in predicting outcome from a methadone maintenance program. Participants were 108 African American males treated in a VA health care outpatient methadone maintenance treatment program and followed for up to 1 year after admission. Dependent variables were 1) length of stay and the percentage of 2) missed medication days, 3) toxicology urine samples free from illicit drugs, 4) full-time employment, 5) attendance at scheduled counseling sessions, and 6) counselor ratings of patient progress. A stepwise linear regression equation indicated that low drug severity scores on the ASI and low scores on percentage of missed medication predicted patients who were clean 1 year later; low scores on the psychological domain of the ASI predicted attendance at counseling sessions; a discriminant function analysis (consisting of percent of missed medication, percentage of clean urines, and ratings of patient progress) successfully predicted patient status (i.e., dropouts vs. "active patients") with 85% accuracy. Although the TRT and CYN were related to some ASI domains, they were not associated with any outcome variable. Results suggest that some ASI scores serve as important indicators of patient progress in methadone maintenance treatment.

Predicting the outcome of methadone maintenance treatment with the Negative Treatment Indicators content scale from the MMPI-2

Scores on the Negative Treatment Indicators content scale from the MMPI-2 were not significantly correlated with 5 measures of treatment outcome among 108 male patients on methadone maintenance. These results and those from other studies using this content scale as an independent variable with substance abusers suggest that the scale has yet to demonstrate consistent predictive validity with this population.

Adherence to substance abuse treatment: clinical utility of two MMPI-2 scales

In this study, we examined the ability of the MMPI-2 (Butcher, Dahlstrom, Graham, Tellegen, & Kaemmer, 1989) Addiction Acknowledgment scale (AAS; Weed, Butcher, McKenna, & Ben-Porath, 1992) and Negative Treatment Indicators scale (TRT; Butcher, Graham, Williams, & Ben-Porath, 1990) to predict adherence to and outcomes from substance abuse treatment. There was no evidence that the AAS was related to treatment adherence or outcome in our sample. However, results did reveal a significant positive relation between scores on the TRT scale and readmission to the hospital. Further analyses identified an optimal score for use in similar clinical populations and settings, and characteristics of high and low scorers. Compared to low scorers, high TRT scorers were more likely to not return for treatment after an initial screening interview. If they did return for treatment, high TRT scorers were more likely to experience fewer treatment days and to be rated as having lower motivation, poorer participation, and poorer comprehension of program materials. These findings provide promising initial evidence of the utility of the TRT scale for identifying patients who may be at a high risk for unsuccessful substance abuse treatment.

Predictors of outcome in a short-term psychiatric day hospital program

This study assessed selected chronicity, social support, and personality variables as predictors of outcome in a 3-week psychiatric day hospital program. Measured outcome included pre- and post-treatment scores on the BDI, STAI, and SCL-90-R from 224 patients. A single outcome variable based on the average standardized residual changes scores for these measures was derived to assess whether symptom severity at discharge was greater or less than predicted. Predictor variables were analysed using multiple regression. Chronicity variables predicted outcome, with patients hospitalized more than once and those with personality disorders more symptomatic than expected after treatment. Social support and personality variables failed to predict outcome; however, patients who scored higher on the MMPI Si scale were more symptomatic than expected at discharge. Although these results possess marginal clinical utility in terms of accounting for symptom change variation, this study overcame some methodological difficulties seen in prior day hospital literature. Future research should consider a prospective approach, including random treatment assignment, comprehensive and diverse outcome measures, and exploration of specific diagnostic groups.