Optic nerve ultrasound for fluid status assessment in patients with severe preeclampsia

Usefulness of optic nerve sheath diameter measurement in hypertensive patients during pregnancy and the puerperium

Pre-eclampsia/eclampsia during pregnancy and the puerperium are major risk factors for maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality worldwide. Early diagnosis followed by appropriate treatment can prevent neurological disorders, considered one of the most serious sequelae of the disease. The detection of increased intracerebral pressure through the use of ocular ultrasonography could be considered an effective method for its diagnosis, since it has the advantage of being a noninvasive technique, easy to perform at the patient's bedside and with a high sensitivity and specificity for the detection of intracranial hypertension.

Ultrasound measurement of the optic nerve sheath diameter in traumatic brain injury: a narrative review

Background : Raised intracranial pressure (ICP) needs to be investigated in various situations, especially in traumatic brain injury (TBI). Ultra-sonographic (US) measurement of the optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) is a promising noninvasive tool for assessing elevated ICP. Objectives : This narrative review aimed to explain the history of and indications forUS measurement of ONSD. We focused on the detection of elevated ICP after TBI and discussed the possible improvements in detection methods. Conclusions : US measurement of ONSD in TBI cases provides a qualitative but no quantitative assessment of ICP. Current studies usually calculate their own optimum cutoff value for detecting raised ICP based on the balance between sensitivity and specificity of the method when compared with invasive methods. There is no universally accepted threshold. We did not find any paper focusing on the prognosis of patients benefiting from it when compared with usual care. Another limitation is the lack of standardization. US measurement of ONSD cannot be used as the sole technique to detect elevated ICP and monitor its evolution, but it can be a useful tool in a multimodal protocol and it might help to determine the prognosis of patients in various situations.

Point-of-Care Ultrasound (POCUS) for the assessment of volume status and fluid management in patients with severe pre-eclampsia: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Appropriate volume assessment and fluid management can prevent maternal deaths in the severely pre-eclamptic (SPE) parturients. We planned a systematic review and meta-analysis (MA) to evaluate the role and ability of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) in the assessment of volume status and early detection of lung oedema in an SPE parturient.

METHODS

An e-literature search was done from several databases. Data were extracted under five domains including POCUS-derived parameters like echo comet score (ECS), lung ultrasound (LUS) scores, B-patterns, optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD), E/e' ratio, presence of pleural effusion, pulmonary interstitial syndrome and pulmonary congestion. The risk of bias was assessed. Extracted data were analysed using MetaXL and Revman 5.3. Heterogeneity in the studies was evaluated using the Cochrane Q test and I2 statistics. Funnel plots were used for the assessment of publication bias.

RESULTS

Seven prospective studies including 574 parturients (including 396 pre-eclamptics) were selected. POCUS included lung, optic nerve, cardiac and thoracic US. In two studies, the ECS and LUS scores pre-delivery were higher in pre-eclamptics. Two studies found a mean ONSD of 5-5.84 mm before delivery. MA revealed a significantly lower mean ECS score at post-delivery than pre-delivery, and the summary prevalence of B-pattern and pleural effusion among SPE parturients was found to be 0.28 (0.03-0.84) and 0.1 (0-0.2), respectively. A good correlation was observed between B-line patterns and diastolic dysfunction (increased E/e' ratio), LUS score and thoracic fluid content, ONSD and ECS in individual studies.

CONCLUSION

POCUS parameters can be useful as early markers of fluid status and serve as useful tools in the precise clinical management of pre-eclampsia.

[Special pathologies of pregnant patients in intensive care medicine]

Da die Inzidenz intensivtherapiepflichtiger Erkrankungen in Schwangerschaft oder Puerperium sehr niedrig ist, werden Intensivmediziner bei der Behandlung dieser Patientinnen vor eine Vielzahl von ungewohnten Herausforderungen gestellt. Die physiologischen und pathophysiologischen Veränderungen während einer Schwangerschaft bedingen einige Besonderheiten bezüglich der intensivmedizinischen Behandlung schwangerer oder kürzlich entbundener Patientinnen. Nachdem im ersten Beitrag dieser CME-Reihe die wichtigsten Prinzipien und aktuellen Empfehlungen zur Versorgung intensivtherapiebedürftiger schwangerer oder frisch entbundener Patientinnen behandelt wurden, fokussiert der zweite Beitrag auf Diagnostik und Therapie spezieller, ausgewählter Krankheitsbilder.

Methodological Errors in Clinical Studies Published by Medical Journals of Ex-Yugoslav Countries

INTRODUCTION

Certain methodological principles should be inexcusably followed when designing clinical or observational research to avoid bias and presentation of results that do not reflect the truth about the phenomenon that is the object of the study.

AIM

The aim of this study was to compare the methodological quality of clinical trials and observational studies published in medical journals from ex-Yugoslav countries indexed in Pubmed/MEDLINE.

METHODS

Clinical studies published in medical journals of ex-Yugoslav countries were retrieved from the Pubmed/MEDLINE database, and the sample for analysis was randomly chosen from the retrieved publications. The rate of the most common errors in the design of clinical/observational studies was established by a careful reading of the sampled publications and their checking against predefined criteria.

RESULTS

The studies published in two countries that are now member states of the European Union (Slovenia and Croatia) have significantly higher citation rates, impact factor, and methodological quality scores than studies from other ex-Yugoslav countries. While publications from Croatia show clear improvement trend throughout the last two decades, which is visible also in the last 10 years in Slovenia and Bosnia and Herzegovina, quality of clinical research published in journals from Serbia was stagnating in the same period.

CONCLUSIONS

There are significant differences in methodological quality and scientometric characteristics of clinical research published in medical journals of ex-Yugoslav countries that could be mitigated by more intensive training of clinical researchers in statistics and research design, as well as by more rigorous editorial practices.